pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.04388 · v3 · pith:RGOFOLNQnew · submitted 2025-02-05 · 💻 cs.MA · cs.AI

Position: Emergent Machina Sapiens Urge Rethinking Multi-Agent Paradigms

classification 💻 cs.MA cs.AI
keywords systemsmulti-agentagentscriticalemergentinfrastructureobjectivesrethinking
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents capable of autonomous learning and independent decision-making hold great promise for addressing complex challenges across various critical infrastructure domains, including transportation, energy systems, and manufacturing. However, the surge in the design and deployment of AI systems, driven by various stakeholders with distinct and unaligned objectives, introduces a crucial challenge: How can uncoordinated AI systems coexist and evolve harmoniously in shared environments without creating chaos or compromising safety? To address this, we advocate for a fundamental rethinking of existing multi-agent frameworks, such as multi-agent systems and game theory, which are largely limited to predefined rules and static objective structures. We posit that AI agents should be empowered to adjust their objectives dynamically, make compromises, form coalitions, and safely compete or cooperate through evolving relationships and social feedback. Through two case studies in critical infrastructure applications, we call for a shift toward the emergent, self-organizing, and context-aware nature of these multi-agentic AI systems.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Survey of 112 agentic AI for social good papers reveals moral-geographic asymmetry with 73% lacking geographic context (lowest for SDG 16) and only 25% reporting deployments.