The Relationship between No-Regret Learning and Online Conformal Prediction
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:EZI6J33Wrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Existing algorithms for online conformal prediction -- guaranteeing marginal coverage in adversarial settings -- are variants of online gradient descent (OGD), but their analyses of worst-case coverage do not follow from the regret guarantee of OGD. What is the relationship between no-regret learning and online conformal prediction? We observe that although standard regret guarantees imply marginal coverage in i.i.d. settings, this connection fails as soon as we either move to adversarial environments or ask for group conditional coverage. On the other hand, we show a tight connection between threshold calibrated coverage and swap-regret in adversarial settings, which extends to group-conditional (multi-valid) coverage. We also show that algorithms in the follow the perturbed leader family of no regret learning algorithms (which includes online gradient descent) can be used to give group-conditional coverage guarantees in adversarial settings for arbitrary grouping functions. Via this connection we analyze and conduct experiments using a multi-group generalization of the ACI algorithm of Gibbs & Candes [2021] (arXiv:2106.00170).
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Parameter-Free and Group Conditional Online Conformal Prediction
A parameter-free algorithm for group-conditional online conformal prediction that achieves optimal coverage guarantees without learning-rate tuning.
-
Strategic Decision Support for AI Agents
The paper introduces an optimization framework for AI agents to strategically seek support, proving a threshold policy on support value and providing an online algorithm to control missed-support error without distrib...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.