The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2503.04783 · v1 · pith:BNYBSFE4 · submitted 2025-02-25 · cs.CL · cs.CR

Comparative Analysis Based on DeepSeek, ChatGPT, and Google Gemini: Features, Techniques, Performance, Future Prospects

Reviewed by Pithpith:BNYBSFE4open to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.CR
keywords chatgptdeepseekgeminigoogleperformanceresearchtechniquesanalysis
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Nowadays, DeepSeek, ChatGPT, and Google Gemini are the most trending and exciting Large Language Model (LLM) technologies for reasoning, multimodal capabilities, and general linguistic performance worldwide. DeepSeek employs a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) approach, activating only the parameters most relevant to the task at hand, which makes it especially effective for domain-specific work. On the other hand, ChatGPT relies on a dense transformer model enhanced through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), and then Google Gemini actually uses a multimodal transformer architecture that integrates text, code, and images into a single framework. However, by using those technologies, people can be able to mine their desired text, code, images, etc, in a cost-effective and domain-specific inference. People may choose those techniques based on the best performance. In this regard, we offer a comparative study based on the DeepSeek, ChatGPT, and Gemini techniques in this research. Initially, we focus on their methods and materials, appropriately including the data selection criteria. Then, we present state-of-the-art features of DeepSeek, ChatGPT, and Gemini based on their applications. Most importantly, we show the technological comparison among them and also cover the dataset analysis for various applications. Finally, we address extensive research areas and future potential guidance regarding LLM-based AI research for the community.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. No Universal Courtesy: A Cross-Linguistic, Multi-Model Study of Politeness Effects on LLMs Using the PLUM Corpus

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Politeness in prompts boosts average LLM response quality by up to 11% but the benefit is language- and model-dependent, with English favoring courteous tones, Hindi deferential ones, and Spanish assertive ones.

  2. Syntax Is Easy, Semantics Is Hard: Evaluating LLMs for LTL Translation

    cs.LO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LLMs handle LTL syntax better than semantics, improve with detailed prompts, and perform substantially better when the task is reframed as Python code completion.