pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.19855 · v1 · pith:OQWXBEGXnew · submitted 2025-03-25 · 💻 cs.CL

Think Twice: Enhancing LLM Reasoning by Scaling Multi-round Test-time Thinking

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords answerscalingtest-timedeepseek-r1modelmodelsmulti-roundperformance
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs), such as OpenAI-o1 and DeepSeek-R1, have demonstrated the effectiveness of test-time scaling, where extended reasoning processes substantially enhance model performance. Despite this, current models are constrained by limitations in handling long texts and reinforcement learning (RL) training efficiency. To address these issues, we propose a simple yet effective test-time scaling approach Multi-round Thinking. This method iteratively refines model reasoning by leveraging previous answers as prompts for subsequent rounds. Extensive experiments across multiple models, including QwQ-32B and DeepSeek-R1, consistently show performance improvements on various benchmarks such as AIME 2024, MATH-500, GPQA-diamond, and LiveCodeBench. For instance, the accuracy of QwQ-32B improved from 80.3% (Round 1) to 82.1% (Round 2) on the AIME 2024 dataset, while DeepSeek-R1 showed a similar increase from 79.7% to 82.0%. These results confirm that Multi-round Thinking is a broadly applicable, straightforward approach to achieving stable enhancements in model performance, underscoring its potential for future developments in test-time scaling techniques. The key prompt: {Original question prompt} The assistant's previous answer is: <answer> {last round answer} </answer>, and please re-answer.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncovering the Representation Geometry of Minimal Cores in Overcomplete Reasoning Traces

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Language models produce overcomplete reasoning traces where on average 46% of steps can be removed while preserving the answer in 86% of cases, with necessity concentrated in the top three steps.

  2. SPATIOROUTE: Dynamic Prompt Routing for Zero-Shot Spatial Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SpatioRoute introduces dynamic prompt routing that improves zero-shot spatial VQA accuracy by up to 5% on the SQA3D benchmark across VLMs without 3D inputs or fine-tuning.

  3. Understanding Performance Gap Between Parallel and Sequential Sampling in Large Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Lack of exploration from conditioning on prior answers is the primary reason parallel sampling outperforms sequential sampling in large reasoning models.

  4. The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A literature survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM reasoning paradigms, analyzes methodological trends, and synthesizes failure modes from over 300 papers.