pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.11489 · v1 · submitted 2025-05-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · hep-th· math-ph· math.MP· nlin.CD· quant-ph

Exactly solvable many-body dynamics from space-time duality

Bruno Bertini , Pieter W. Claeys , Toma\v{z} Prosen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 13:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech hep-thmath-phmath.MPnlin.CDquant-ph
keywords dual-unitary circuitsspace-time dualityquantum many-body dynamicsquantum chaosthermalizationentanglementscramblingexactly solvable models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dual-unitary circuits treat space and time symmetrically to yield exact results for chaotic quantum many-body dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews dual-unitary circuits as minimal models that place space and time on equal footing. This symmetry allows for exact analytical solutions to the evolution even when the dynamics are chaotic. A sympathetic reader would care because these models provide the first cases where notions of quantum chaos, thermalization, scrambling, and entanglement can be fully characterized analytically. The work shows how space-time duality can be used to access dynamical properties that are otherwise hard to compute in many-body systems. This offers concrete solvable examples in a field dominated by complexity.

Core claim

Dual-unitary circuits constitute minimal models in which space and time are treated on an equal footing, yielding exactly solvable yet possibly chaotic evolution. They were the first in which current notions of quantum chaos could be analytically quantified and allow a full characterisation of the dynamics of thermalisation, scrambling, and entanglement. Dual-unitarity is a specific fruitful implementation of the more general idea of space-time duality in which the roles of space and time are exchanged to access relevant dynamical properties of quantum many-body systems.

What carries the argument

Dual-unitarity, a property that ensures the circuit evolution remains unitary when the roles of space and time are exchanged, enabling exact computations of correlations, entanglement, and other dynamical quantities.

Load-bearing premise

The special properties of dual-unitary circuits yield broadly representative insights into generic quantum many-body systems rather than being limited to this narrow solvable subclass.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation in a generic interacting system that exhibits thermalization or entanglement growth qualitatively different from the exact predictions derived for dual-unitary circuits under comparable local rules.

read the original abstract

Recent years have seen significant advances, both theoretical and experimental, in our understanding of quantum many-body dynamics. Given this problem's high complexity, it is surprising that a substantial amount of this progress can be ascribed to exact analytical results. Here we review dual-unitary circuits as a particular setting leading to exact results in quantum many-body dynamics. Dual-unitary circuits constitute minimal models in which space and time are treated on an equal footings, yielding exactly solvable yet possibly chaotic evolution. They were the first in which current notions of quantum chaos could be analytically quantified, allow for a full characterisation of the dynamics of thermalisation, scrambling, and entanglement (among others), and can be experimentally realised in current quantum simulators. Dual-unitarity is a specific fruitful implementation of the more general idea of space-time duality in which the roles of space and time are exchanged to access relevant dynamical properties of quantum many-body systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews dual-unitary circuits as minimal models in which space and time are treated on equal footing, yielding exactly solvable yet possibly chaotic quantum many-body evolution. It positions these circuits as the first setting in which notions of quantum chaos could be analytically quantified and as enabling a full characterisation of thermalisation, scrambling, and entanglement dynamics, while noting their experimental realizability in quantum simulators. Dual-unitarity is presented as a concrete implementation of the broader space-time duality idea.

Significance. If the aggregated results are accurately represented, the review consolidates recent progress on exactly solvable models that capture chaotic features, providing a reference point for the field. The explicit connection to experimental platforms in current quantum simulators adds practical value, and the framing of dual-unitary circuits as minimal yet representative models for generic dynamics is a useful organizing principle.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that dual-unitary circuits 'were the first' to analytically quantify quantum chaos; a minor comment would be to add a brief footnote or sentence in the introduction clarifying the precise sense in which this priority is claimed relative to earlier integrable or Bethe-ansatz solvable models.
  2. The manuscript aggregates results from multiple independent groups; ensure that the reference list includes the most recent updates to the cited works on entanglement growth and operator spreading in dual-unitary circuits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of its scope, and recommendation for minor revision. The review correctly positions dual-unitary circuits as minimal models enabling exact results for chaotic many-body dynamics through space-time duality, with connections to thermalisation, scrambling, entanglement, and experimental platforms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review aggregates independent literature results

full rationale

This manuscript is explicitly a review paper that summarizes established results on dual-unitary circuits and space-time duality from the broader literature, including contributions from multiple independent research groups. No new derivations, equations, or predictions are introduced within the text that could reduce to self-referential fitting, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citations. Central claims about exact solvability, quantification of quantum chaos, and characterization of thermalisation are framed as prior results rather than original constructions derived here. The paper therefore contains no load-bearing steps that collapse to their own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the text relies entirely on previously published constructions of dual-unitary gates and their properties.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5701 in / 1011 out tokens · 46840 ms · 2026-05-22T13:56:49.843016+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exact Entanglement Dynamics Beyond Nearest-Neighbor Dual-Unitary Floquet Systems

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Constructs staggered finite-range dual-unitary Floquet models whose entanglement entropies are exactly the sum of independent sublattice contributions for all times and all Rényi indices.

  2. Graph restricted tensors: building blocks for holographic networks

    quant-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Graph-restricted tensors generalize 1-uniform states, dual-unitary operators and AME states, with exact analytic solutions for new examples motivated by holographic lattice models.

  3. Exact large deviations and emergent long-range correlations in sequential quantum East circuits

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Conditioning on rare boundary measurement outcomes in a quantum East circuit generates states with finite two-point correlations at arbitrary distances and an underlying Sierpiński-triangle fractal structure.

  4. Quantum many-body operator cascade as a route to chaos

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Local operators in quantum chaotic systems cascade toward non-local fractal structures whose dimension is tied by unitarity to the decay rate of local correlations, demonstrated exactly in dual-unitary circuits and nu...

  5. Mesoscopic Regimes of Temporal Entanglement in Ergodic Quantum Systems

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Generic ergodic Hamiltonian dynamics in quantum Ising chains exhibits a long mesoscopic regime in temporal entanglement that deviates from random-circuit universality, suggesting slow spectral reorganization of the in...

  6. Entanglement structure for finite system under dual-unitary dynamics

    quant-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dual-unitary circuits with specific two-body operators and pair-product initial states produce states approaching the multipartite entanglement bounds of absolutely maximally entangled states.

  7. Absolutely maximally entangled pure states of multipartite quantum systems

    quant-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    An updated survey of methods to generate absolutely maximally entangled states, with new analyses of reduced-state entanglement, GHZ superpositions, orthogonal frequency square representations, and local unitary equiv...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dual-Unitary Classical Shadow To- mography,

    Akhtar, Ahmed A, Namit Anand, Jeffrey Marshall, and Yi- Zhuang You (2024), “Dual-Unitary Classical Shadow To- mography,” arXiv:2404.01068. Akila, Maram, Daniel Waltner, Boris Gutkin, and Thomas Guhr (2016), “Particle-time duality in the kicked Ising spin chain,” J. Phys. Math. Theor.49(37), 375101. Alba, Vincenzo, and Pasquale Calabrese (2017), “Entangle-...

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Quantum ergodicity in the SYK model,

    Altland, Alexander, and Dmitry Bagrets (2018), “Quantum ergodicity in the SYK model,” Nucl. Phys. B930, 45–68. Alves, Gabriel O, Felix Fritzsch, and Pieter W. Claeys (2025), “Probes of Full Eigenstate Thermalization in Ergodicity- Breaking Quantum Circuits,” arXiv:2504.08517. Ambainis, Andris, and Joseph Emerson (2007), “Quantum t-designs: t-wise Independ...

    work page arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Matrix Product States for Dynamical Simulation of Infinite Chains,

    Bañuls, M C, M. B. Hastings, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac (2009), “Matrix Product States for Dynamical Simulation of Infinite Chains,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 240603. Barenco, Adriano (1995), “Elementary gates for quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A52(5), 3457–3467. Bastidas, V M, and K. J. Joven (2024), “Complexifica- tion of Quantum Signal Processing and ...

    work page arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    Ran- dom matrix spectral form factor of dual-unitary quantum circuits,

    Bertini, Bruno, Pavel Kos, and Tomaž Prosen (2021), “Ran- dom matrix spectral form factor of dual-unitary quantum circuits,” Comm. Math. Phys.387(1), 597–620. Bertini, Bruno, Pavel Kos, and Tomaž Prosen (2024c), “Lo- calized Dynamics in the Floquet Quantum East Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132(8), 080401. Bertini, Bruno, andLorenzoPiroli(2020),“Scramblinginran...

    work page arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Preparing random states and benchmarking with many-body quantum chaos,

    Choi, Joonhee, Adam L. Shaw, Ivaylo S. Madjarov, Xin Xie, Ran Finkelstein, Jacob P. Covey, Jordan S. Cotler, Daniel K. Mark, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Anant Kale, Hannes Pichler, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Soonwon Choi, and Manuel Endres (2023), “Preparing random states and benchmarking with many-body quantum chaos,” Nat 613(7944), 468–473. Choi, Soonwon, Yimu Bao...

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Matrix product states and pro- jected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theo- rems,

    Cirac, J Ignacio, David Pérez-García, Norbert Schuch, and Frank Verstraete (2021), “Matrix product states and pro- jected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theo- rems,” Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 045003. Claeys, Pieter W, and Giuseppe De Tomasi (2025), “Fock- Space Delocalization and the Emergence of the Porter- Thomas Distribution from Dual-Unitary Dy...

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Maximum velocity quantum circuits,

    Claeys, Pieter W, and Austen Lamacraft (2020), “Maximum velocity quantum circuits,” Phys. Rev. Res.2(3), 033032. Claeys, Pieter W, and Austen Lamacraft (2021), “Ergodic and Nonergodic Dual-Unitary Quantum Circuits with Ar- bitrary Local Hilbert Space Dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(10), 100603. Claeys, Pieter W, and Austen Lamacraft (2022), “Emergent qua...

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Operator dynamics and entanglement in space-time dual Hadamard lattices,

    Claeys, Pieter W, and Austen Lamacraft (2024), “Operator dynamics and entanglement in space-time dual Hadamard lattices,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57(40), 405301. Claeys, Pieter W, Austen Lamacraft, and Jamie Vicary (2024), “From dual-unitary to biunitary: a 2-categorical model for exactly-solvable many-body quantum dynamics,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57(33...

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Dowling, P

    Cotler, Jordan S, Daniel K. Mark, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Felipe Hernández, Joonhee Choi, Adam L. Shaw, Manuel Endres, and Soonwon Choi (2023), “Emergent Quantum State De- signs from Individual Many-Body Wave Functions,” PRX Quantum4(1), 010311. Cvitanović, Predrag, Roberto Artuso, Ronnie Mainieri, Gre- gor Tanner, and Gabor Vattay (2016),Chaos: Classical and Qu...

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Filippov, M

    Feynman, RP, and F.L. Vernon (1963), “The theory of a gen- eral quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,” Ann. Phys.24, 118–173. Filippov, Sergei, Matea Leahy, Matteo A. C. Rossi, and Guillermo García-Pérez (2023), “Scalable tensor-network error mitigation for near-term quantum computing,” arXiv:2307.11740. Filippov, Sergey N, Sabrina ...

    work page arXiv 1963

  11. [11]

    Nonequilibrium Dynamics of Charged Dual- Unitary Circuits,

    Foligno, Alessandro, Pasquale Calabrese, and Bruno Bertini (2025), “Nonequilibrium Dynamics of Charged Dual- Unitary Circuits,” PRX Quantum6, 010324. Foligno, Alessandro, Pavel Kos, and Bruno Bertini (2024), “Quantum Information Spreading in Generalized Dual- Unitary Circuits,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132(25), 250402. Foligno, Alessandro, Tianci Zhou, and Bruno B...

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Eigenstate Correlations in Dual-Unitary Quantum Circuits: Partial Spectral Form Factor,

    Fritzsch, Felix, Maximilian F. I. Kieler, and Arnd Bäcker (2025), “Eigenstate Correlations in Dual-Unitary Quantum Circuits: Partial Spectral Form Factor,” Quantum9,

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Eigenstate ther- malization in dual-unitary quantum circuits: Asymptotics of spectral functions,

    Fritzsch, Felix, and Tomaž Prosen (2021), “Eigenstate ther- malization in dual-unitary quantum circuits: Asymptotics of spectral functions,” Phys. Rev. E103(6), 062133. Fritzsch, Felix, and Tomaž Prosen (2022), “Boundary chaos,” Phys. Rev. E106(1), 014210. Fritzsch, Felix, and Tomaž Prosen (2024), “Boundary chaos: Spectral form factor,” SciPost Phys.17(5),

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Local Pairing of Feyn- man Histories in Many-Body Floquet Models,

    Fulton, W, and J. Harris (1991),Representation Theory: A First Course, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer New York). Garratt, SJ, and J.T. Chalker (2021), “Local Pairing of Feyn- man Histories in Many-Body Floquet Models,” Phys. Rev. X11(2), 021051. Ghoshal, Subir, and Alexander Zamolodchikov (1994), “Boundary S matrix and boundary state in two- dime...

    work page 1991

  15. [15]

    Integrable de- formations of superintegrable quantum circuits,

    Gombor, Tamás, and Balázs Pozsgay (2024), “Integrable de- formations of superintegrable quantum circuits,” SciPost Phys.16(4),

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    The Heisenberg Representation of Quantum Computers

    Gong, Zongping, Christoph Sünderhauf, Norbert Schuch, and J. Ignacio Cirac (2020), “Classification of Matrix-Product Unitaries with Symmetries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124(10), 100402. Gopalakrishnan, Sarang, and Austen Lamacraft (2019), “Uni- tary circuits of finite depth and infinite width from quan- tum channels,” Phys. Rev. B100(6), 064309. Gottesman, Daniel...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Classical foun- dations of many-particle quantum chaos,

    Gutkin, Boris, and Vladimir Osipov (2016), “Classical foun- dations of many-particle quantum chaos,” Nonlinearity 29(2), 325–356. Gütschow, Johannes, Vincent Nesme, and Reinhard F. Werner (2010a), “The fractal structure of cellular automata on abelian groups,” inDMTCS Proceedings vol. AL, Au- tomata 2010 - 16 th Intl. Workshop on CA and DCS. Gütschow, Joh...

    work page arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Absence of localization in weakly interacting Floquet circuits,

    Hahn, Dominik, and Luis Colmenarez (2024), “Absence of localization in weakly interacting Floquet circuits,” Phys. Rev. B109(9), 094207. Hamazaki, Ryusuke (2021), “Exceptional dynamical quan- tum phase transitions in periodically driven systems,” Nat. Commun.12(1),

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Computational advantage of quantum random sampling,

    Hangleiter, Dominik, and Jens Eisert (2023), “Computational advantage of quantum random sampling,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 95(3), 035001. Harris, Robert J, Nathan A. McMahon, Gavin K. Brennen, and Thomas M. Stace (2018), “Calderbank-Shor-Steane holographic quantum error-correcting codes,” Phys. Rev. A98, 052301. Hastings, M B (2009), “Light-cone matrix product,” ...

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Absolutely Maximally Entangled Qudit Graph States

    Hearth, Sumner N, Michael O. Flynn, Anushya Chandran, and Chris R. Laumann (2025), “Unitaryk-Designs from Random Number-Conserving Quantum Circuits,” Phys. Rev. X15(2), 021022. Helwig, Wolfram (2013), “Absolutely maximally entangled qudit graph states,” arXiv:1306.2879 [quant-ph]. Helwig, Wolfram, Wei Cui, José Ignacio Latorre, Arnau Ri- era, and Hoi-Kwon...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Chaos in quantum channels,

    Hosur, Pavan, Xiao-Liang Qi, Daniel A Roberts, and Beni Yoshida (2016), “Chaos in quantum channels,” J. High En- ergy Phys.2016(2), 1–49. Hu, Xi-Dan, and Dan-Bo Zhang (2025), “Exact correlation functions for dual-unitary quantum circuits with excep- tional points,” Phys. Rev. B111(2), 024301. Huang, Ke, Xiao Li, David A. Huse, and Amos Chan (2023), “Out-o...

    work page arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    Coarse-grained dynamics of operator and state entanglement

    Ippoliti, Matteo, and Wen Wei Ho (2023), “Dynamical Purifi- cation and the Emergence of Quantum State Designs from the Projected Ensemble,” PRX Quantum4(3), 030322. Ippoliti, Matteo, and Vedika Khemani (2021), “Postselection- free entanglement dynamics via spacetime duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 060501. Ippoliti, Matteo, Tibor Rakovszky, and Vedika Khema...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Ex- act thermalization dynamics in the “rule 54

    Klobas, Katja, Bruno Bertini, and Lorenzo Piroli (2021), “Ex- act thermalization dynamics in the “rule 54” quantum cel- lular automaton,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 160602. Klobas, Katja, Cecilia De Fazio, and Juan P. Garrahan (2024), “Exact pretransition effects in kinetically con- strained circuits: Dynamical fluctuations in the Floquet- East model,” Phys. Re...

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    LaRacuente and F

    Krajnik, Žiga, and Tomaž Prosen (2020), “Kardar–Parisi– Zhang Physics in Integrable Rotationally Symmetric Dy- namics on Discrete Space–Time Lattice,” J. Stat. Phys. 179(1), 110–130. Kraus, B, and J. I. Cirac (2001), “Optimal creation of entan- glement using a two-qubit gate,” Phys. Rev. A63, 062309. Krishnan, Uma, and Viakalathur Shankar Sunder (1996), “...

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Spreading of correlations and entanglement after a quench in the one- dimensional bose–hubbard model,

    Läuchli, Andreas M, and Corinna Kollath (2008), “Spreading of correlations and entanglement after a quench in the one- dimensional bose–hubbard model,” J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp.2008(05), P05018. Lerose, Alessio, Michael Sonner, and Dmitry A Abanin (2021a), “Influence matrix approach to many-body Floquet dynamics,” Phys. Rev. X11(2), 021040. Lerose, Aless...

    work page arXiv 2008

  26. [26]

    Information scrambling in quantum circuits,

    Mi, Xiao, Pedram Roushan, Chris Quintana, Salvatore Man- drà, Jeffrey Marshall, Charles Neill, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Juan Atalaya, Ryan Babbush, Joseph C. Bardin, et al.(2021), “Information scrambling in quantum circuits,” Sci374(6574), 1479–1483. Miao, Yuan, and Eric Vernier (2023), “Integrable Quantum Circuits from the Star-Triangle Relation,” Quantum7,

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Ternary Unitary Quantum Lattice Models and Circuits in 2 + 1 Dimensions,

    Milbradt, Richard M, Lisa Scheller, Christopher Aßmus, and Christian B. Mendl (2023), “Ternary Unitary Quantum Lattice Models and Circuits in 2 + 1 Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130(9), 090601. Montambaux, Gilles, Didier Poilblanc, Jean Bellissard, and Clément Sire (1993), “Quantum chaos in spin-fermion mod- els,” Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 497–500. Montañà López...

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Conservation laws in cellular au- tomata,

    Pivato, Marcus (2002), “Conservation laws in cellular au- tomata,” Nonlinearity15(6),

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    Operator space en- tanglement entropy inXYspin chains,

    Pižorn, Iztok, and Tomaž Prosen (2009), “Operator space en- tanglement entropy inXYspin chains,” Phys. Rev. B79, 184416. Plenio, M B (2005), “Logarithmic negativity: A full entangle- ment monotone that is not convex,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 090503. 63 Porter, C E, and R. G. Thomas (1956), “Fluctuations of Nu- clear Reaction Widths,” Phys. Rev.104(2), 483–491...

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    The spectral form factor is not self- averaging,

    Prange, R E (1997), “The spectral form factor is not self- averaging,” Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2280–2283. Prosen, Tomaž (1999), “Ergodic properties of a generic non- integrable quantum many-body system in the thermody- namic limit,” Phys. Rev. E60, 3949–3968. Prosen, Tomaž (2000), “Exact Time-Correlation Functions of Quantum Ising Chain in a Kicking Transvers...

    work page 1997

  31. [31]

    General relation between quantum ergodicity and fidelity of quantum dynamics,

    Prosen, Tomaž (2002), “General relation between quantum ergodicity and fidelity of quantum dynamics,” Phys. Rev. E65, 036208. Prosen, Tomaž (2007), “Chaos and complexity of quantum motion,” J. Phys. Math. Theor.40(28),

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    Many-body quantum chaos and dual- unitarity round-a-face,

    Prosen, Tomaž (2021), “Many-body quantum chaos and dual- unitarity round-a-face,” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Jour- nal of Nonlinear Science31(9), 093101. Prosen, Tomaž, and Iztok Pižorn (2007), “Operator space en- tanglement entropy in a transverse Ising chain,” Phys. Rev. A76(3), 032316. Prosen, Tomaž, and Marko Žnidarič (2007), “Is the efficiency of cl...

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    From Dual Unitarity to Generic Quantum Opera- tor Spreading,

    Rampp, Michael A, Roderich Moessner, and Pieter W. Claeys (2023), “From Dual Unitarity to Generic Quantum Opera- tor Spreading,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130(13), 130402. Rampp, Michael A, Suhail A. Rather, and Pieter W. Claeys (2024a), “Entanglement membrane in exactly solvable lat- tice models,” Phys. Rev. Res.6(3), 033271. Rampp, Michael A, Suhail A. Rather, an...

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Creating Ensembles of Dual Unitary and Maximally Entangling Quantum Evolutions,

    Rather, Suhail Ahmad, S. Aravinda, and Arul Lakshmi- narayan (2020), “Creating Ensembles of Dual Unitary and Maximally Entangling Quantum Evolutions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125(7), 070501. Rather, Suhail Ahmad, S. Aravinda, and Arul Lakshmi- narayan (2022a), “Construction and Local Equivalence of Dual-Unitary Operators: From Dynamical Maps to Quan- tum Combinat...

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Structural Stability of Vector Fields,

    Robinson, Clark (1974), “Structural Stability of Vector Fields,” Ann. Math.99(1), 154–175. Roy, Dibyendu, Divij Mishra, and Tomaž Prosen (2022), “Spectral form factor in a minimal bosonic model of many- body quantum chaos,” Phys. Rev. E106, 024208. Roy, Dibyendu, and Tomaž Prosen (2020), “Random matrix spectral form factor in kicked interacting fermionic ...

    work page arXiv 1974

  36. [36]

    Black holes and the butterfly effect,

    Shenker, Stephen H, and Douglas Stanford (2014a), “Black holes and the butterfly effect,” J. High Energy Phys. 2014(3), 1–25. Shenker, Stephen H, and Douglas Stanford (2014b), “Multiple shocks,” J. High Energy Phys.2014(12), 1–20. Shivam, Saumya, Andrea De Luca, David A. Huse, and Amos 64 Chan (2023), “Many-body quantum chaos and emergence of ginibre ense...

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Er- godic theory of diagonal orthogonal covariant quantum channels,

    Singh, Satvik, Nilanjana Datta, and Ion Nechita (2024), “Er- godic theory of diagonal orthogonal covariant quantum channels,” Lett. Math. Phys.114(5),

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Diagonal unitary and orthogonal symmetries in quantum theory: II. Evolution operators,

    Singh, Satvik, and Ion Nechita (2022), “Diagonal unitary and orthogonal symmetries in quantum theory: II. Evolution operators,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55(25), 255302. Smith, Kevin C, Abid Khan, Bryan K. Clark, S.M. Girvin, and Tzu-Chieh Wei (2024), “Constant-Depth Preparation of Matrix Product States with Adaptive Quantum Cir- cuits,” PRX Quantum5(3), 03...

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Influence functional of many-body systems: Tem- poral entanglement and matrix-product state representa- tion,

    Sonner, Michael, Alessio Lerose, and Dmitry A. Abanin (2021), “Influence functional of many-body systems: Tem- poral entanglement and matrix-product state representa- tion,” Ann. Phys.435, 168677. Sonner, Michael, Alessio Lerose, and Dmitry A. Abanin (2022), “Characterizing many-body localization via ex- act disorder-averaged quantum noise,” Phys. Rev. B1...

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Unscrambling the physics of out-of- time-order correlators,

    Swingle, Brian (2018), “Unscrambling the physics of out-of- time-order correlators,” Nat. Phys.14(10), 988–990. Swingle, Brian, Gregory Bentsen, Monika Schleier-Smith, and Patrick Hayden (2016), “Measuring the scrambling of quan- tum information,” Phys. Rev. A94(4), 040302. Tadej, Wojciech, and Karol Życzkowski (2006), “A concise guidetocomplexhadamardmat...

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Higher Quantum Theory

    Vanicat, Matthieu, Lenart Zadnik, and Tomaž Prosen (2018), “Integrable Trotterization: Local Conservation Laws and Boundary Driving,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121(3), 030606. Vatan, Farrokh, and Colin Williams (2004), “Optimal quan- tum circuits for general two-qubit gates,” Phys. Rev. A69, 032315. Vernier, Eric, Bruno Bertini, Giuliano Giudici, and Lorenzo Piroli...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Operator Scaling Dimensions and Multifractal- ity at Measurement-Induced Transitions,

    Zabalo, A, M.J. Gullans, J.H. Wilson, R. Vasseur, A. W. W. Ludwig, S. Gopalakrishnan, David A. Huse, and J. H. Pix- ley (2022), “Operator Scaling Dimensions and Multifractal- ity at Measurement-Induced Transitions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(5), 050602. Zaletel, Michael P, and Frank Pollmann (2020), “Isometric Tensor Network States in Two Dimensions,” Phys. Re...

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    9×4 = 6×6: Understanding the Quantum Solution to Euler’s Problem of 36 Officers,

    Życzkowski, K, W Bruzda, G Rajchel-Mieldzioć, A Bur- chardt, S Ahmad Rather, and A Lakshminarayan (2023), “9×4 = 6×6: Understanding the Quantum Solution to Euler’s Problem of 36 Officers,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2448(1), 012003

    work page 2023