The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2505.21286 · v1 · pith:UJHJY5W4 · submitted 2025-05-27 · cs.GT

PACT: A Contract-Theoretic Framework for Pricing Agentic AI Services Powered by Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pithpith:UJHJY5W4open to challenge →

classification cs.GT
keywords agenticpactpricingservicesmodelsserviceapproachcontract-theoretic
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Agentic AI, often powered by large language models (LLMs), is becoming increasingly popular and adopted to support autonomous reasoning, decision-making, and task execution across various domains. While agentic AI holds great promise, its deployment as services for easy access raises critical challenges in pricing, due to high infrastructure and computation costs, multi-dimensional and task-dependent Quality of Service (QoS), and growing concerns around liability in high-stakes applications. In this work, we propose PACT, a Pricing framework for cloud-based Agentic AI services through a Contract-Theoretic approach, which models QoS along both objective (e.g., response time) and subjective (e.g., user satisfaction) dimensions. PACT accounts for computational, infrastructure, and potential liability costs for the service provider, while ensuring incentive compatibility and individual rationality for the user under information asymmetry. Through contract-based selection, users receive tailored service offerings aligned with their needs. Numerical evaluations demonstrate that PACT improves QoS alignment between users and providers and offers a scalable, liable approach to pricing agentic AI services in the future.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Understanding Censorship in Large Language Models: From Mechanisms to Governance

    cs.CY 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Synthesizes mechanisms of LLM censorship across the model lifecycle and argues that the key issue is making moderation proportionate, accountable, pluralistic, and auditable rather than debating whether moderation sho...