pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.23982 · v1 · pith:433GHL2Wnew · submitted 2025-05-29 · 💻 cs.AI

MSQA: Benchmarking LLMs on Graduate-Level Materials Science Reasoning and Knowledge

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords llmsmaterialssciencemsqareasoningknowledgebenchmarkdomain-specific
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Despite recent advances in large language models (LLMs) for materials science, there is a lack of benchmarks for evaluating their domain-specific knowledge and complex reasoning abilities. To bridge this gap, we introduce MSQA, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark of 1,757 graduate-level materials science questions in two formats: detailed explanatory responses and binary True/False assessments. MSQA distinctively challenges LLMs by requiring both precise factual knowledge and multi-step reasoning across seven materials science sub-fields, such as structure-property relationships, synthesis processes, and computational modeling. Through experiments with 10 state-of-the-art LLMs, we identify significant gaps in current LLM performance. While API-based proprietary LLMs achieve up to 84.5% accuracy, open-source (OSS) LLMs peak around 60.5%, and domain-specific LLMs often underperform significantly due to overfitting and distributional shifts. MSQA represents the first benchmark to jointly evaluate the factual and reasoning capabilities of LLMs crucial for LLMs in advanced materials science.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. OmniMatBench: A Human-Calibrated Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark Across 19 Materials Science Subfields

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    OmniMatBench is a new human-calibrated benchmark for multimodal materials-science reasoning that reveals the best evaluated MLLM scores only 0.372 overall.

  2. PolyReal: A Benchmark for Real-World Polymer Science Workflows

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PolyReal benchmark shows leading MLLMs perform well on polymer knowledge reasoning but drop sharply on practical tasks like lab safety analysis and raw data extraction.

  3. INCARBench: A Benchmark for Scientific Configuration in VASP INCAR by Large Language Models

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    INCARBench evaluates 19 LLMs on VASP INCAR configuration generation and repair, showing high semantic accuracy but lower scientific correctness especially for DFT+U, magnetism, and correlated materials.