Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 5 cited by

A Survey on Imitation Learning for Contact-Rich Tasks in Robotics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This survey maps imitation learning for contact-rich robot tasks, arguing that force and touch, not just vision, carry the skill and that no prior survey has covered this intersection.

desk verdict A useful, readable survey of imitation learning for contact-rich tasks, but its central 'first survey' claim is contradicted by its own reference list. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13498 v1 pith:7PFD32EW submitted 2025-06-16 cs.RO cs.HCcs.LGcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.ROcs.HCcs.LGcs.SYeess.SY
keywords imitationlearningcontact-richmanipulationfromdemonstrationtactilesensingdynamicmovementprimitivesbehaviorcloningfoundationmodelsrobotsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims to be the first survey devoted specifically to imitation learning for contact-rich robotic tasks, and it organizes the field into a map of demonstration collection, learning algorithms, datasets, and applications. A sympathetic reader would care because contact-rich skills—assembly, polishing, surgery, household chores—are where robots still fail, and human demonstrations encode tacit force and compliance knowledge that is hard to specify by hand. The survey's organizing insight is that these tasks are nonlinear, sensitive to tiny positional deviations, and only partially visible through cameras, so force and tactile feedback are not optional extras but necessary complements to vision. If the map is accurate, it gives researchers and practitioners a common vocabulary for choosing teaching methods and learning algorithms, and it clarifies where the field's real bottlenecks lie.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing organizing object is the taxonomy of teaching and learning. Online versus offline teaching describes where demonstration trajectories come from—directly operating the robot, remote control, virtual reality, or sensor observation of human movement—while online versus offline learning describes when the policy updates, either during execution with feedback or from a stored dataset. Crossing these two dichotomies produces the four method families that structure the entire survey, and this frame carries the argument that imitation learning for contact-rich tasks is not a single technique but a design space. The companion mechanism is the modality argument: because contact-rich tasks are partially observable under vision and the contact point is often occluded, force and tactile sensing must be added to position and vision, and the dataset and application sections show how those modalities enter different learning algorithms.

What would settle it

A reproducible literature search with explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria for surveys covering both imitation learning and contact-rich manipulation published before June 2025 would settle the first-survey claim: if it returns a prior survey with the same scope, the central claim fails, and if it returns none, the claim stands. A second check would take the survey's own corpus and test whether its trend statements—for example, that behavior cloning and foundation models dominate recent contact-rich work—survive a quantitative tally over the full set of cited papers.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The survey's central claim is that no prior survey has investigated imitation learning for contact-rich tasks, and that this paper fills that gap by systematically organizing current research along two axes: how demonstrations are collected (online teaching, such as kinesthetic teaching, teleoperation, and VR-based teaching, versus offline observation of human movement) and when policies are learned (online during execution or offline from stored data). Crossing these axes yields four named categories—interactive imitation, demo-augmented reinforcement learning, direct imitation, and observational learning—which the paper uses to classify methods throughout. It further argues that contact-rich imitation learning is fundamentally multimodal: position, force, vision, and tactile signals each contribute different information, and fusion of several modalities is needed because interaction forces cannot be inferred from images alone. The survey also reviews datasets and benchmarks, showing that large general manipulation datasets exist but that touch-specific data remain smaller and mostly research-grade, and it identifies three future directions: dual-process hierarchical architectures, multimodal sensing, and improved simulation-to-reality transfer.

Load-bearing premise

The survey assumes that the papers it selected in Sections 3 through 5 are representative enough of the broader field to support its trend claims and its status as the first survey, yet it does not describe any reproducible search strategy, inclusion criteria, or quality filter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The four-way teaching/learning taxonomy gives a practitioner a direct way to select a method: use interactive imitation when real-time corrections are available, direct or observational learning when working from stored data, and adversarial or demo-augmented reinforcement learning when reward design is the obstacle.
  • The modality analysis implies that adding force or tactile sensing to a vision-only demonstration pipeline is a necessity rather than an enhancement for tasks where contact forces determine success, such as assembly or surgery, because occlusion hides the contact interface.
  • The dataset review anchors expectations about scale: large trajectories exist for general manipulation, but contact-specific tactile datasets are smaller and mostly research-based, meaning data availability, not algorithm choice, may be the practical ceiling for contact-rich imitation learning.
  • The survey's stated future directions—dual-process hierarchical architectures, multimodal sensing, and sim-to-real transfer—identify where the next advances are likely to come from if the current trend claims are correct.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: if the first-survey claim is correct, then the field's most pressing missing artifact is a shared evaluation benchmark for contact-rich imitation learning, and the datasets and applications collected here could serve as a seed for building one.
  • My inference: the taxonomy suggests a testable scaling relationship—methods that combine force observation during teaching with online correction during learning should outperform vision-only behavior cloning on precision tasks such as peg-in-hole with micrometer clearance.
  • My inference: continued progress in foundation models is likely to shift the bottleneck from policy learning to demonstration capture, making cheap force and tactile teleoperation hardware at least as important as the learning algorithms themselves.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper surveys imitation learning (IL) for contact-rich robotic tasks. It organizes the area into data collection (teaching methods and sensory modalities), learning algorithms (behavior cloning, dynamic movement primitives, generative methods, inverse RL, offline RL, and other approaches), available datasets, and application domains (industrial, household/service, and healthcare robots). The paper proposes a 2x2 taxonomy that crosses online/offline teaching with online/offline learning, and it claims to be the first survey specifically devoted to IL for contact-rich tasks.

Significance. If its scope and organization are made precise, the survey would be a useful entry point for researchers entering this subfield. Its strengths include a broad collection of recent work, a sensible separation of teaching and learning concepts, a useful review of DMP variants for contact-rich manipulation, a concrete list of public datasets, and attention to force and tactile modalities that are often underrepresented in general IL surveys. Several sections, particularly the DMP and multi-modal IL discussions, are informative and well grounded in the literature. However, the central novelty claim of being the first IL survey for contact-rich tasks is not adequately delimited or supported, and the absence of a reported search strategy weakens the reproducibility of the survey's coverage.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 1] The claim that 'No survey exists that investigates imitation learning research in contact-rich tasks' is contradicted by the authors' own reference list: Sec. 5.2 cites An et al. (2025), a survey of imitation learning for dexterous manipulation (arXiv:2504.03515). Under the paper's own Sec. 2.1 definition of contact-rich manipulation as involving continuous and complex physical interactions and sophisticated force control, dexterous manipulation is a canonical contact-rich domain. The authors must either delimit 'contact-rich tasks' explicitly to exclude dexterous manipulation or explain how the present survey differs from An et al. (2025); otherwise the paper's central contribution is not the first survey but an overlapping taxonomy.
  2. [Secs. 3-5] No search strategy, database list, inclusion or exclusion criteria, or quality filter is described anywhere in the paper. The contributions list in Sec. 1 promises a 'systematic organization' of existing research, but the reader cannot verify that the selection of papers in Secs. 3-5 is representative or comprehensive. The claim to be the first survey is a negative claim that is especially sensitive to this omission: without a defined search window and inclusion criteria, the paper cannot support either its first-survey status or its trend statements. I recommend adding a methodology subsection or explicitly characterizing the coverage as a selective overview rather than a systematic survey.
  3. [Secs. 4.4.1 and 4.4.2] Sections 4.4.1 (Adversarial Imitation Learning) and 4.4.2 (Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning) are near-verbatim duplicates. Both describe the same GAN-based discriminator/generator framework, both cite Ho and Ermon (2016), and both claim effectiveness on pick-and-place and assembly tasks with the same citation (Li and Zou, 2023). Additionally, Sec. 3.2 classifies GAIL as an example of 'demo-augmented reinforcement learning' with online learning, while Sec. 4.4.2 treats GAIL as an IRL variant. This duplication and inconsistent classification directly weaken the survey's organizational contribution and must be corrected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.1 and reference list] The citation 'Neville, 1985' appears to be Neville Hogan's impedance control paper, but the author name is given as 'Neville H' rather than the standard 'Hogan, N.'; this should be corrected in both the text and the reference list.
  2. [Sec. 4.4] The reference 'PJ and BDO, 1971' is not a usable bibliographic entry; it should be replaced with the actual authors and title of the inverse optimal control paper being cited.
  3. [Secs. 4.3.1-4.3.2] The headings contain stray spacing: 'V ariational AutoEncoder' and 'F oundation models' should be 'Variational AutoEncoder' and 'Foundation models'.
  4. [Sec. 4.6] The offline reinforcement learning section is not, by itself, imitation learning; a few sentences explaining why demo-initialized or demo-augmented offline RL methods are included in an IL survey would clarify the scope, especially since Sec. 3.2 already distinguishes demo-augmented RL from direct imitation.
  5. [Throughout] Several in-text citations lack page numbers or venue details (e.g., 'Englert and Toussaint, 2017' has a DOI but no venue; 'PJ and BDO, 1971' is incomplete). A final pass to standardize the reference format would improve usability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the survey makes no fitted predictions and its organizational claims do not reduce to their inputs.

full rationale

This is a survey paper, not a derivation. It contains no fitted parameters, no quantitative predictions, and no theorem whose conclusion is assumed in its premises. The claimed contribution is an organized mapping of imitation-learning methods for contact-rich tasks, and the body of the paper supports it with a broad literature selection across BC, DMPs, generative methods, IRL, multi-modal IL, and offline RL. Author self-citations (Tsuji, Petrič, Solak, Ajoudani, Kato, etc.) appear as illustrative examples of research in the area, not as load-bearing justifications for the survey's organizational framework; removing them would not collapse any argument. The closest thing to a load-bearing assertion is the negative novelty claim in Sec. 1: 'No survey exists that investigates imitation learning research in contact-rich tasks.' That claim is contestable because the paper itself cites An et al. (2025), a survey of imitation learning for dexterous manipulation, which is a contact-rich domain under the paper's own Sec. 2.1 definition; however, a false or under-scoped novelty claim is a correctness/scope issue, not a circular reduction of a derived result to its inputs. Since no equation is shown to equal another by construction and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no circularity step can be exhibited under the stated hard rules, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities appear because the paper is a survey. Its central claims rest on two domain-level judgments: that contact-rich tasks justify an imitation-learning focus, and that the presented selection of papers is representative. Both are asserted rather than demonstrated, and no reproducibility artifacts are provided.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Contact-rich tasks are insufficiently solved by model-based control alone and justify a learning-from-demonstration focus.
    Section 2.1 and 2.3 motivate imitation learning through nonlinearity, safety limits on reinforcement learning exploration, and limited data; this framing selects the survey's scope.
  • ad hoc to paper The selected literature is representative and comprehensive enough to support trend claims and the claimed first-survey status.
    No search protocol, inclusion criteria, or quality filter is provided; the paper declares comprehensiveness in Section 1 and proceeds.
  • ad hoc to paper The 2x2 online/offline teaching and learning taxonomy is a valid organizing scheme that does not misrepresent the surveyed methods.
    Figure 1 in Section 3.2 defines the four categories; the survey assumes this grouping is natural and complete, but it is not derived from the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Survey on Imitation Learning for Contact-Rich Tasks in Robotics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7PFD32EW

@misc{pith2026250613498,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Survey on Imitation Learning for Contact-Rich Tasks in Robotics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7PFD32EW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13498}
}
read the original abstract

This paper comprehensively surveys research trends in imitation learning for contact-rich robotic tasks. Contact-rich tasks, which require complex physical interactions with the environment, represent a central challenge in robotics due to their nonlinear dynamics and sensitivity to small positional deviations. The paper examines demonstration collection methodologies, including teaching methods and sensory modalities crucial for capturing subtle interaction dynamics. We then analyze imitation learning approaches, highlighting their applications to contact-rich manipulation. Recent advances in multimodal learning and foundation models have significantly enhanced performance in complex contact tasks across industrial, household, and healthcare domains. Through systematic organization of current research and identification of challenges, this survey provides a foundation for future advancements in contact-rich robotic manipulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13498 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows that IL can be categorized into the following four categories based on the combinations of online/offline teaching and online/offline learning: • Interactive Imitation • Demo-Augmented Reinforcement Learning • Direct Imitation • Observational Learning First, the combination of online teaching and on￾line learning is called interactive imitation. The most prominent example is DAgger (Hoque et al., 2022, 2021), … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CaLiSym: Learning Symplectic Dynamics of Real-World Systems through Structured Canonical Lifts

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Lifting non-conservative, actuated, and contact-constrained robot dynamics into an exactly symplectic phase-space map yields state-of-the-art out-of-distribution autoregressive rollout error at low parameter and FLOP cost.

  2. A Hierarchical Approach to Imitation Learning for Manipulation Tasks Requiring Time Varying Forces

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DPA-FTG couples a 5 Hz diffusion-based task selector with a 60 Hz force-reactive GRU decoder, improving safe task success over diffusion baselines on bimanual compliant sheet separation.

  3. Input-gated Bilateral Teleoperation: An Easy-to-implement Force Feedback Teleoperation Method for Low-cost Hardware

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simple bilateral teleoperation law that clamps the leader's control input to the follower's input achieves both easy free motion and stable contact on low-cost hardware.

  4. Spatiotemporal Context-dependent Personalized Movement Compensation in Delayed Telemanipulation

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Personalized, context-dependent motion scaling improves delayed telemanipulation performance in simulation and transfers to a real surgical robot with reduced benefit.

  5. CONTACT: CONtact-aware TACTile Learning for Robotic Disassembly

    cs.RO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In contact-rich robotic disassembly, compact force-field tactile representations (TacFF) outperform vision-only and high-resolution tactile-image policies, especially in tight-tolerance and deformable tasks; naive fus...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

286 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize ":" * " " *...

  3. [3]

    Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 22: S60--S64

    Abbruzzese G, Marchese R, Avanzino L and Pelosin E (2016) Rehabilitation for parkinson's disease: current outlook and future challenges. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 22: S60--S64

  4. [4]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics

    Ablett T, Limoyo O, Sigal A, Jilani A, Kelly J, Siddiqi K, Hogan F and Dudek G (2024) Multimodal and force-matched imitation learning with a see-through visuotactile sensor. IEEE Transactions on Robotics

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Abolghasemi P, Mazaheri A, Shah M and Boloni L (2019) Pay attention!-robustifying a deep visuomotor policy through task-focused visual attention. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 4254--4262

  6. [6]

    In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Abu-Dakka FJ and Kyrki V (2020) Geometry-aware dynamic movement primitives. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 4421--4426

  7. [7]

    Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7: 590681

    Abu-Dakka FJ and Saveriano M (2020) Variable impedance control and learning—a review. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7: 590681

  8. [8]

    Neurocomputing 598: 128056

    Abu-Dakka FJ, Saveriano M and Kyrki V (2024) A unified formulation of geometry-aware discrete dynamic movement primitives. Neurocomputing 598: 128056

Show all 286 references
  1. [9]

    In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Adachi T, Fujimoto K, Sakaino S and Tsuji T (2018) Imitation learning for object manipulation based on position/force information using bilateral control. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 3648--3653

  2. [10]

    Cham: Springer International Publishing

    Aggarwal K, Singh SK, Chopra M, Kumar S and Colace F (2022) Deep Learning in Robotics for Strengthening Industry 4.0.: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions. Cham: Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-030-96737-6, pp. 1--19. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96737-6_1. ...

  3. [11]

    In: The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003

    Aleotti J, Caselli S and Reggiani M (2003) Toward programming of assembly tasks by demonstration in virtual environments. In: The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. pp. 309--314. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2003.1251863

  4. [12]

    (2025) Dexterous manipulation through imitation learning: A survey

    An S, Meng Z, Tang C, Zhou Y, Liu T, Ding F, Zhang S, Mu Y, Song R, Zhang W et al. (2025) Dexterous manipulation through imitation learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.03515

  5. [13]

    In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Ankile L, Simeonov A, Shenfeld I and Agrawal P (2024 a ) Juicer: Data-efficient imitation learning for robotic assembly. In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 5096--5103

  6. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16677

    Ankile L, Simeonov A, Shenfeld I, Torne M and Agrawal P (2024 b ) From imitation to refinement--residual rl for precise visual assembly. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16677

  7. [15]

    Robotics and Autonomous Systems 57(5): 469--483

    Argall BD, Chernova S, Veloso M and Browning B (2009) A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 57(5): 469--483

  8. [16]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 18(11): 1056--1063

    Arimoto S (1999) Robotics research toward explication of everyday physics. The International Journal of Robotics Research 18(11): 1056--1063

  9. [17]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: 5058--5069

    Bahl S, Mukadam M, Gupta A and Pathak D (2020) Neural dynamic policies for end-to-end sensorimotor learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: 5058--5069

  10. [18]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    Barcellona L, Zadaianchuk A, Allegro D, Papa S, Ghidoni S and Gavves E (2025) Dream to manipulate: Compositional world models empowering robot imitation learning with imagination. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?...

  11. [19]

    In: 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)

    Batson JP, Kato Y, Shuster K, Patton JL, Reed KB, Tsuji T and Novak D (2020) Haptic coupling in dyads improves motor learning in a simple force field. In: 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, pp. 4795--4798

  12. [20]

    Applied Sciences 10(19): 6923

    Beltran-Hernandez CC, Petit D, Ramirez-Alpizar IG and Harada K (2020) Variable compliance control for robotic peg-in-hole assembly: A deep-reinforcement-learning approach. Applied Sciences 10(19): 6923

  13. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02011

    Bharadhwaj H, Gupta A, Tulsiani S and Kumar V (2023) Zero-shot robot manipulation from passive human videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02011

  14. [22]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Bhateja C, Guo D, Ghosh D, Singh A, Tomar M, Vuong Q, Chebotar Y, Levine S and Kumar A (2024) Robotic offline rl from internet videos via value-function learning. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 16977--16984

  15. [23]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 12(2): 122--137

    Bicchi A and Siciliano B (1993) Closure properties of robotic manipulation. The International Journal of Robotics Research 12(2): 122--137

  16. [24]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(2): 3533--3539

    Bonardi A, James S and Davison AJ (2020) Learning one-shot imitation from humans without humans. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(2): 3533--3539

  17. [25]

    Transactions on Machine Learning Research ://openreview.net/forum?id=vsCpILiWHu

    Bousmalis K, Vezzani G, Rao D, Devin CM, Lee AX, Villalonga MB, Davchev T, Zhou Y, Gupta A, Raju A, Laurens A, Fantacci C, Dalibard V, Zambelli M, Martins MF, Pevceviciute R, Blokzijl M, Denil M, Batchelor N, Lampe T, Parisotto E, Zolna K, Reed S, Colmenarejo SG, Scholz J, Abd...

  18. [26]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    Brohan A, Brown N, Carbajal J, Chebotar Y, Dabis J, Finn C, Gopalakrishnan K, Hausman K, Herzog A, Hsu J, Ibarz J, Ichter B, Irpan A, Jackson T, Jesmonth S, Joshi N, Julian R, Kalashnikov D, Kuang Y, Leal I, Lee KH, Levine S, Lu Y, Malla U, Manjunath D, Mordatch I, Nachum O, P...

  19. [27]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM)

    Buamanee T, Kobayashi M, Uranishi Y and Takemura H (2024) Bi-act: Bilateral control-based imitation learning via action chunking with transformer. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). pp. 410--415. doi:10.1109/AIM55361.2024.10637173

  20. [28]

    u scher G, Koiva R, Sch \

    B \"u scher G, Koiva R, Sch \"u rmann C, Haschke R and Ritter HJ (2012) Tactile dataglove with fabric-based sensors. In: 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012). IEEE, pp. 204--209

  21. [29]

    IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 17(2): 44--54

    Calinon S, D'halluin F, Sauser EL, Caldwell DG and Billard AG (2010) Learning and reproduction of gestures by imitation. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 17(2): 44--54

  22. [30]

    Robotics: Science and Systems XV

    Campbell J, Stepputtis S and Ben Amor H (2019) Probabilistic multimodal modeling for human-robot interaction tasks. Robotics: Science and Systems XV

  23. [31]

    Foundations and Trends in Robotics 10(1-2): 1--197

    Celemin C, P \'e rez-Dattari R, Chisari E, Franzese G, de Souza Rosa L, Prakash R, Ajanovi \'c Z, Ferraz M, Valada A and Kober J (2022) Interactive imitation learning in robotics: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Robotics 10(1-2): 1--197

  24. [32]

    In: 2022 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM)

    Chang C, Haninger K, Shi Y, Yuan C, Chen Z and Zhang J (2022) Impedance adaptation by reinforcement learning with contact dynamic movement primitives. In: 2022 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). IEEE, pp. 1185--1191

  25. [33]

    2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) : 8973--8979

    Chebotar Y, Handa A, Makoviychuk V, Macklin M, Issac J, Fox D and Molchanov A (2019) Closing the sim-to-real loop: Adapting simulation randomization with real world experience. 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) : 8973--8979

  26. [34]

    In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229

    Chebotar Y, Vuong Q, Hausman K, Xia F, Lu Y, Irpan A, Kumar A, Yu T, Herzog A, Pertsch K, Gopalakrishnan K, Ibarz J, Nachum O, Sontakke SA, Salazar G, Tran HT, Peralta J, Tan C, Manjunath D, Singh J, Zitkovich B, Jackson T, Rao K, Finn C and Levine S (2023) Q-transformer: Scal...

  27. [35]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    Chen J, Yu C, Zhou X, Xu T, Mu Y, Hu M, Shao W, Wang Y, Li G and Shao L (2025) EMOS : Embodiment-aware heterogeneous multi-robot operating system with LLM agents. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?id=Ey8KcabBpB

  28. [36]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18825

    Chen L and Gombolay M (2024) Elemental: Interactive learning from demonstrations and vision-language models for reward design in robotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18825

  29. [37]

    ://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03813

    Cheng N, Guan C, Gao J, Wang W, Li Y, Meng F, Zhou J, Fang B, Xu J and Han W (2024) Touch100k: A large-scale touch-language-vision dataset for touch-centric multimodal representation. ://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03813

  30. [38]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research : 02783649241273668

    Chi C, Xu Z, Feng S, Cousineau E, Du Y, Burchfiel B, Tedrake R and Song S (2023) Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion. The International Journal of Robotics Research : 02783649241273668

  31. [39]

    Applied Sciences 10(8): 2719

    Cho NJ, Lee SH, Kim JB and Suh IH (2020) Learning, improving, and generalizing motor skills for the peg-in-hole tasks based on imitation learning and self-learning. Applied Sciences 10(8): 2719

  32. [40]

    Frontiers in Neurorobotics 16: 829437

    Cong L, Liang H, Ruppel P, Shi Y, G \"o rner M, Hendrich N and Zhang J (2022) Reinforcement learning with vision-proprioception model for robot planar pushing. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 16: 829437

  33. [41]

    https://pybullet.org

    Coumans E and Bai Y (2016) Pybullet, a python module for physics simulation for games, robotics and machine learning. https://pybullet.org

  34. [42]

    Science robotics 6(54): eabd9461

    Cui J and Trinkle J (2021) Toward next-generation learned robot manipulation. Science robotics 6(54): eabd9461

  35. [43]

    IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine

    Cui Z, Cartucho J, Giannarou S and y Baena FR (2023) Caveats on the first-generation da vinci research kit: Latent technical constraints and essential calibrations. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine

  36. [44]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 5(2): 151--165

    Cutkosky MR and Kao I (1989) Computing and controlling compliance of a robotic hand. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 5(2): 151--165

  37. [45]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(2): 4488--4495

    Davchev T, Luck KS, Burke M, Meier F, Schaal S and Ramamoorthy S (2022) Residual learning from demonstration: Adapting dmps for contact-rich manipulation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(2): 4488--4495

  38. [46]

    Frontiers in Neurorobotics 13: 6

    Degrave J, Hermans M, Dambre J and Wyffels F (2019) A differentiable physics engine for deep learning in robotics. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 13: 6

  39. [47]

    IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 21(5): 2581--2594

    Deni s a M, Gams A, Ude A and Petri c T (2015) Learning compliant movement primitives through demonstration and statistical generalization. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 21(5): 2581--2594

  40. [48]

    In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Deshpande A, Ke L, Pfeifer Q, Gupta A and Srinivasa SS (2024) Data efficient behavior cloning for fine manipulation via continuity-based corrective labels. In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). pp. 8531--8538

  41. [49]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: 10088--10115

    Dettmers T, Pagnoni A, Holtzman A and Zettlemoyer L (2023) Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: 10088--10115

  42. [50]

    Robotics and Autonomous Systems 47(2-3): 109--116

    Dillmann R (2004) Teaching and learning of robot tasks via observation of human performance. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 47(2-3): 109--116

  43. [51]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Dong Q, Kaneko T and Sugiyama M (2024) An offline learning of behavior correction policy for vision-based robotic manipulation. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 5448--5454

  44. [52]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Driess D, Xia F, Sajjadi MS, Lynch C, Chowdhery A, Ichter B, Wahid A, Tompson J, Vuong Q, Yu T, Huang W, Chebotar Y, Sermanet D Pierre ackworth, Levine S, Vanhoucke V, Hausman K, Toussaint M, Greff K, Zeng A, Mordatch I and Florence P (2023) Palm-e: An embodied multimodal lang...

  45. [53]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    Duan J, Pumacay W, Kumar N, Wang YR, Tian S, Yuan W, Krishna R, Fox D, Mandlekar A and Guo Y (2025) AHA : A vision-language-model for detecting and reasoning over failures in robotic manipulation. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. ://open...

  46. [54]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30

    Duan Y, Andrychowicz M, Stadie B, Jonathan Ho O, Schneider J, Sutskever I, Abbeel P and Zaremba W (2017) One-shot imitation learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30

  47. [55]

    In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Edmonds M, Gao F, Xie X, Liu H, Qi S, Zhu Y, Rothrock B and Zhu SC (2017) Feeling the force: Integrating force and pose for fluent discovery through imitation learning to open medicine bottles. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)...

  48. [56]

    Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 81: 102517

    Elguea-Aguinaco \'I , Serrano-Mu \ n oz A, Chrysostomou D, Inziarte-Hidalgo I, B gh S and Arana-Arexolaleiba N (2023) A review on reinforcement learning for contact-rich robotic manipulation tasks. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 81: 102517

  49. [57]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 37: 027836491774379

    Englert P and Toussaint M (2017) Learning manipulation skills from a single demonstration. The International Journal of Robotics Research 37: 027836491774379. doi:10.1177/0278364917743795

  50. [58]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 36: 027836491774598

    Englert P, Vien N and Toussaint M (2017) Inverse kkt: Learning cost functions of manipulation tasks from demonstrations. The International Journal of Robotics Research 36: 027836491774598. doi:10.1177/0278364917745980

  51. [59]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(7): 4283--4290

    Escarabajal RJ, Pulloquinga JL, Zamora-Ortiz P, Valera \'A , Mata V and Vall \'e s M (2023) Imitation learning-based system for the execution of self-paced robotic-assisted passive rehabilitation exercises. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(7): 4283--4290

  52. [60]

    In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Fan Y, Luo J and Tomizuka M (2019) A learning framework for high precision industrial assembly. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 811--817

  53. [61]

    International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications 3: 362--369

    Fang B, Jia S, Guo D, Xu M, Wen S and Sun F (2019) Survey of imitation learning for robotic manipulation. International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications 3: 362--369

  54. [62]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Fang HS, Fang H, Tang Z, Liu J, Wang C, Wang J, Zhu H and Lu C (2024) Rh20t: A comprehensive robotic dataset for learning diverse skills in one-shot. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 653--660

  55. [63]

    In: Proceedings of The 6th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 205

    Fang K, Yin P, Nair A, Walke HR, Yan G and Levine S (2023) Generalization with lossy affordances: Leveraging broad offline data for learning visuomotor tasks. In: Proceedings of The 6th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 205. pp. 106--117

  56. [64]

    In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229

    Feng Y, Hansen N, Xiong Z, Rajagopalan C and Wang X (2023) Finetuning offline world models in the real world. In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229. pp. 425--445

  57. [65]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL)

    Ferguson S, Liu S, Mandikal V, Liu K, Goldberg K and Thananjeyan B (2020) Leveraging demonstrations for reinforcement learning with hybrid representations. In: Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL)

  58. [66]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Finn C, Yu T, Zhang T, Abbeel P and Levine S (2017) One-shot visual imitation learning via meta-learning. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 357--368

  59. [67]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research : 02783649241281508

    Firoozi R, Tucker J, Tian S, Majumdar A, Sun J, Liu W, Zhu Y, Song S, Kapoor A, Hausman K, Ichter B, Driess D, Wu J, Lu C and Schwager M (2023) Foundation models in robotics: Applications, challenges, and the future. The International Journal of Robotics Research : 02783649241281508

  60. [68]

    In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 164

    Florence P, Lynch C, Zeng A, Ramirez OA, Wahid A, Downs L, Wong A, Lee J, Mordatch I and Tompson J (2022) Implicit behavioral cloning. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 164. pp. 158--168

  61. [69]

    Neuron 72(3): 425--42

    Franklin DW and Wolpert DM (2011) Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron 72(3): 425--42. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.006

  62. [70]

    Freeman D, Ha D, Lester T, Wente A, Tunyasuvunakool K, Tassa Y, Erez T, Davidson J, Heess N and Tassa Y (2021) Brax: A differentiable physics engine for large scale rigid body simulation

  63. [71]

    In: Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning

    Fu L, Datta G, Huang H, Panitch WCH, Drake J, Ortiz J, Mukadam M, Lambeta M, Calandra R and Goldberg K (2024 a ) A touch, vision, and language dataset for multimodal alignment. In: Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning. ://openreview.net/forum?id=tFEOOH9eH0

  64. [72]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Fu Z, Zhao TZ and Finn C (2024 b ) Mobile aloha: Learning bimanual mobile manipulation with low-cost whole-body teleoperation. In: Conference on Robot Learning

  65. [73]

    In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Funabashi S, Ogasa S, Isobe T, Ogata T, Schmitz A, Tomo TP and Sugano S (2020) Variable in-hand manipulations for tactile-driven robot hand via cnn-lstm. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 9472--9479

  66. [74]

    IEEE Access 8: 73142--73150

    Furuta D, Kutsuzawa K, Sakaino S and Tsuji T (2020) Motion planning with success judgement model based on learning from demonstration. IEEE Access 8: 73142--73150

  67. [75]

    Current Robotics Reports 3(3): 97--109

    Gams A, Petri c T, Nemec B and Ude A (2022) Manipulation Learning on Humanoid Robots . Current Robotics Reports 3(3): 97--109. doi:10.1007/s43154-022-00082-9. ://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43154-022-00082-9

  68. [76]

    arXiv e-prints : arXiv--2403

    George A, Gano S, Katragadda P and Barati Farimani A (2024) Visuo-tactile pretraining for cable plugging. arXiv e-prints : arXiv--2403

  69. [77]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    Ghosh D, Walke HR, Pertsch K, Black K, Mees O, Dasari S, Hejna J, Kreiman T, Xu C, Luo J, Tan YL, Chen LY, Vuong Q, Xiao T, Sanketi PR, Sadigh D, Finn C and Levine S (2024) Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy . In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

  70. [78]

    Applied Sciences 11(22): 10702

    Gonzalez-Aguirre JA, Osorio-Oliveros R, Rodr \' guez-Hern \'a ndez KL, Liz \'a rraga-Iturralde J, Morales Menendez R, Ramirez-Mendoza RA, Ramirez-Moreno MA and Lozoya-Santos JdJ (2021) Service robots: Trends and technology. Applied Sciences 11(22): 10702

  71. [79]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27

    Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A and Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27

  72. [80]

    In: 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Grauman K, Westbury A, Byrne E, Chavis Z, Furnari A, Girdhar R, Hamburger J, Jiang H, Liu M, Liu X, Martin M, Nagarajan T, Radosavovic I, Ramakrishnan SK, Ryan F, Sharma J, Wray M, Xu M, Xu EZ, Zhao C, Bansal S, Batra D, Cartillier V, Crane S, Do T, Doulaty M, Erapalli A, Feic...

  73. [81]

    In: 2020 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR)

    Gubbi S, Kolathaya S and Amrutur B (2020) Imitation learning for high precision peg-in-hole tasks. In: 2020 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR). IEEE, pp. 368--372

  74. [82]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    Guo Y, Tang B, Akinola I, Fox D, Gupta A and Narang Y (2025) SRSA : Skill retrieval and adaptation for robotic assembly tasks. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?id=RInisw1yin

  75. [83]

    Human Technology 18(2): 191--208

    Halicka K and Surel D (2022) Smart living technologies in the context of improving the quality of life for older people: The case of the humanoid rudy robot. Human Technology 18(2): 191--208

  76. [84]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08548

    Hao P, Zhang C, Li D, Cao X, Hao X, Cui S and Wang S (2025) Tla: Tactile-language-action model for contact-rich manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08548

  77. [85]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(10): 6083--6090

    Hejrati M and Mattila J (2023) Nonlinear subsystem-based adaptive impedance control of physical human-robot-environment interaction in contact-rich tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(10): 6083--6090

  78. [86]

    8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning ://openreview.net/forum?id=xYJn2e1uu8

    Higuera C, Sharma A, Bodduluri CK, Fan T, Lancaster P, Kalakrishnan M, Kaess M, Boots B, Lambeta M, Wu T and Mukadam M (2024) Sparsh: Self-supervised touch representations for vision-based tactile sensing. 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning ://openreview.net/forum?id=xYJn2e1uu8

  79. [87]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 29

    Ho J and Ermon S (2016) Generative adversarial imitation learning. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 29

  80. [88]

    In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 164

    Hoque R, Balakrishna A, Novoseller E, Wilcox A, Brown DS and Goldberg K (2022) Thriftydagger: Budget-aware novelty and risk gating for interactive imitation learning. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 164. pp. 598--608

  81. [89]

    In: 2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)

    Hoque R, Balakrishna A, Putterman C, Luo M, Brown DS, Seita D, Thananjeyan B, Novoseller E and Goldberg K (2021) Lazydagger: Reducing context switching in interactive imitation learning. In: 2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). ...

  82. [90]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations

    Hu EJ, Shen Y, Wallis P, Allen-Zhu Z, Li Y, Wang S, Wang L and Chen W (2022) Lo RA : Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In: International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?id=nZeVKeeFYf9

  83. [91]

    Sensors 21(4): 1278

    Hua J, Zeng L, Li G and Ju Z (2021) Learning for a robot: Deep reinforcement learning, imitation learning, transfer learning. Sensors 21(4): 1278

  84. [92]

    In: 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning

    Huang B, Wang Y, Yang X, Luo Y and Li Y (2024) 3d-vitac: Learning fine-grained manipulation with visuo-tactile sensing. In: 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning

  85. [93]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 38(7): 833--852

    Huang Y, Rozo L, Silv \'e rio J and Caldwell DG (2019) Kernelized movement primitives. The International Journal of Robotics Research 38(7): 833--852

  86. [94]

    In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Ichiwara H, Ito H, Yamamoto K, Mori H and Ogata T (2022) Contact-rich manipulation of a flexible object based on deep predictive learning using vision and tactility. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 5375--5381

  87. [95]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(12): 8271--8278

    Ichiwara H, Ito H, Yamamoto K, Mori H and Ogata T (2023) Modality attention for prediction-based robot motion generation: Improving interpretability and robustness of using multi-modality. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(12): 8271--8278

  88. [96]

    Mechatronics 85: 102807

    Iodice F, Wu Y, Kim W, Zhao F, De Momi E and Ajoudani A (2022) Learning cooperative dynamic manipulation skills from human demonstration videos. Mechatronics 85: 102807

  89. [97]

    Science Robotics 7(65): eaax8177

    Ito H, Yamamoto K, Mori H and Ogata T (2022) Efficient multitask learning with an embodied predictive model for door opening and entry with whole-body control. Science Robotics 7(65): eaax8177

  90. [98]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    James S, Davison AJ and Johns E (2019) Sim-to-real via sim-to-sim: Data-efficient robotic grasping via randomized-to-canonical adaptation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 12627--12637

  91. [99]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(2): 3019--3026

    James S, Ma Z, Arrojo DR and Davison AJ (2020) Rlbench: The robot learning benchmark & learning environment. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(2): 3019--3026

  92. [100]

    In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 164

    Jang E, Irpan A, Khansari M, Kappler D, Ebert F, Lynch C, Levine S and Finn C (2022) Bc-z: Zero-shot task generalization with robotic imitation learning. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 164. pp. 991--1002

  93. [101]

    In: 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning

    Jia X, Wang Q, Donat A, Xing B, Li G, Zhou H, Celik O, Blessing D, Lioutikov R and Neumann G (2024) Ma IL : Improving imitation learning with selective state space models. In: 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning

  94. [102]

    Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 78: 102366

    Jiang Y, Huang Z, Yang B and Yang W (2022) A review of robotic assembly strategies for the full operation procedure: planning, execution and evaluation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 78: 102366

  95. [103]

    In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Johns E (2021) Coarse-to-fine imitation learning: Robot manipulation from a single demonstration. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 4613--4619

  96. [104]

    IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology 5: 173--179

    Kato Y, Tsuji T and Cikajlo I (2024) Feedback type may change the emg pattern and kinematics during robot supported upper limb reaching task. IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology 5: 173--179

  97. [105]

    Advanced Robotics 38(18): 1232--1254

    Kawaharazuka K, Matsushima T, Gambardella A, Guo J, Paxton C and Zeng A (2024) Real-world robot applications of foundation models: A review. Advanced Robotics 38(18): 1232--1254

  98. [106]

    In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Kelly M, Sidrane C, Driggs-Campbell K and Kochenderfer MJ (2019) Hg-dagger: Interactive imitation learning with human experts. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 8077--8083. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793698

  99. [107]

    Nonlinear Dynamics 111(1): 113--127

    Khandelwal A, Kant N and Mukherjee R (2023) Nonprehensile manipulation of a stick using impulsive forces. Nonlinear Dynamics 111(1): 113--127

  100. [108]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics 27(5): 943--957

    Khansari-Zadeh SM and Billard A (2011) Learning stable nonlinear dynamical systems with gaussian mixture models. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 27(5): 943--957

  101. [109]

    IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation 3(1): 43--53

    Khatib O (1987) A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation 3(1): 43--53

  102. [110]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    Khazatsky A, Pertsch K, Nair S, Balakrishna A, Dasari S, Karamcheti S, Nasiriany S, Srirama MK, Chen LY, Ellis K, Fagan PD, Hejna J, Itkina M, Lepert M, Ma YJ, Miller PT, Wu J, Belkhale S, Dass S, Ha H, Jain A, Lee A, Lee Y, Memmel M, Park S, Radosavovic I, Wang K, Zhan A, Bla...

  103. [111]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations

    Kim GH, Seo S, Lee J, Jeon W, Hwang H, Yang H and Kim KE (2021) Demodice: Offline imitation learning with supplementary imperfect demonstrations. In: International Conference on Learning Representations

  104. [112]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Kim JW, Zhao TZ, Schmidgall S, Deguet A, Kobilarov M, Finn C and Krieger A (2024 a ) Surgical robot transformer (srt): Imitation learning for surgical tasks. In: Conference on Robot Learning

  105. [113]

    In: 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning

    Kim MJ, Pertsch K, Karamcheti S, Xiao T, Balakrishna A, Nair S, Rafailov R, Foster EP, Sanketi PR, Vuong Q, Kollar T, Burchfiel B, Tedrake R, Sadigh D, Levine S, Liang P and Finn C (2024 b ) Open VLA : An open-source vision-language-action model. In: 8th Annual Conference on R...

  106. [114]

    o hlich T, Sch \

    Kittmann R, Fr \"o hlich T, Sch \"a fer J, Reiser U, Wei hardt F and Haug A (2015) Let me introduce myself: I am care-o-bot 4, a gentleman robot. In: Mensch und computer 2015--proceedings. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, pp. 223--232

  107. [115]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 32(11): 1238--1274

    Kober J, Bagnell JA and Peters J (2013) Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey. The International Journal of Robotics Research 32(11): 1238--1274

  108. [116]

    In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Kober J, Gienger M and Steil JJ (2015) Learning movement primitives for force interaction tasks. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 3192--3199

  109. [117]

    IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 17(2): 55--62

    Kober J and Peters J (2010) Imitation and reinforcement learning. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 17(2): 55--62

  110. [118]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13519

    Korkmaz Y and B y k E (2025) Mile: Model-based intervention learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13519

  111. [119]

    Advanced Robotics 25(5): 581--603

    Kormushev P, Calinon S and Caldwell DG (2011) Imitation learning of positional and force skills demonstrated via kinesthetic teaching and haptic input. Advanced Robotics 25(5): 581--603

  112. [120]

    IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 6(1): 75--87

    Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML and Volpe BT (1998) Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 6(1): 75--87

  113. [121]

    Journal of Machine Learning Research 22(30): 1--82

    Kroemer O, Niekum S and Konidaris G (2021) A review of robot learning for manipulation: Challenges, representations, and algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research 22(30): 1--82

  114. [122]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    Kumar A, Singh A, Ebert FD, Nakamoto M, Yang Y, Finn C and Levine S (2023) Pre-Training for Robots: Offline RL Enables Learning New Tasks in a Handful of Trials . In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

  115. [123]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3(4): 3606--3613

    Kutsuzawa K, Sakaino S and Tsuji T (2018) Sequence-to-sequence model for trajectory planning of nonprehensile manipulation including contact model. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3(4): 3606--3613

  116. [124]

    ://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02479

    Lambeta M, Wu T, Sengul A, Most VR, Black N, Sawyer K, Mercado R, Qi H, Sohn A, Taylor B, Tydingco N, Kammerer G, Stroud D, Khatha J, Jenkins K, Most K, Stein N, Chavira R, Craven-Bartle T, Sanchez E, Ding Y, Malik J and Calandra R (2024) Digitizing touch with an artificial mu...

  117. [125]

    The Lancet 377(9778): 1693--1702

    Langhorne P, Bernhardt J and Kwakkel G (2011) Stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet 377(9778): 1693--1702

  118. [126]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 9(5): 624--637

    Lawrence DA (2002) Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 9(5): 624--637

  119. [127]

    Science Robotics 4(26): eaav3150

    L \'a zaro-Gredilla M, Lin D, Guntupalli JS and George D (2019) Beyond imitation: Zero-shot task transfer on robots by learning concepts as cognitive programs. Science Robotics 4(26): eaav3150

  120. [128]

    Robotics and Autonomous Systems 61(12): 1323--1334

    Lee K, Su Y, Kim TK and Demiris Y (2013) A syntactic approach to robot imitation learning using probabilistic activity grammars. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 61(12): 1323--1334

  121. [129]

    In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning

    Lee Y, Lim JJ, Anandkumar A and Zhu Y (2022) Adversarial skill chaining for long-horizon robot manipulation via terminal state regularization. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 406--416

  122. [130]

    Journal of Machine Learning Research 17(39): 1--40

    Levine S, Finn C, Darrell T and Abbeel P (2016) End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies. Journal of Machine Learning Research 17(39): 1--40

  123. [131]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01643

    Levine S, Kumar A, Tucker G and Fu J (2020) Offline reinforcement learning: Tutorial, review, and perspectives on open problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01643

  124. [132]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Li C, Xia F, Mart \' n-Mart \' n R, Lingelbach M, Srivastava S, Shen B, Vainio KE, Gokmen C, Dharan G, Jain T, Kurenkov A, Liu CK, Gweon H, Wu J, Li FF and Savarese S (2022) igibson 2.0: Object-centric simulation for robot learning of everyday household tasks. In: Conference o...

  125. [133]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(4): 2325--2332

    Li G, Jin Z, Volpp M, Otto F, Lioutikov R and Neumann G (2023) Prodmp: A unified perspective on dynamic and probabilistic movement primitives. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(4): 2325--2332

  126. [134]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations

    Li J, Lu T, Cao X, Cai Y and Wang S (2021) Meta-imitation learning by watching video demonstrations. In: International Conference on Learning Representations

  127. [135]

    Advanced Engineering Informatics 58: 102140

    Li R and Zou Z (2023) Enhancing construction robot learning for collaborative and long-horizon tasks using generative adversarial imitation learning. Advanced Engineering Informatics 58: 102140

  128. [136]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations

    Li X, Liu M, Zhang H, Yu C, Xu J, Wu H, Cheang C, Jing Y, Zhang W, Liu H, Li H and Kong T (2024) Vision-language foundation models as effective robot imitators. In: International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?id=lFYj0oibGR

  129. [137]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    Li Y, Deng Y, Zhang J, Jang J, Memmel M, Garrett CR, Ramos F, Fox D, Li A, Gupta A and Goyal A (2025) HAMSTER : Hierarchical action models for open-world robot manipulation. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?id=h7aQxzKbq6

  130. [138]

    In: 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Li Y, Zhu JY, Tedrake R and Torralba A (2019) Connecting touch and vision via cross-modal prediction. In: 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 10601--10610

  131. [139]

    In: 2024 IEEE-RAS 23rd International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)

    Liconti D, Toshimitsu Y and Katzschmann R (2024) Leveraging pretrained latent representations for few-shot imitation learning on an anthropomorphic robotic hand. In: 2024 IEEE-RAS 23rd International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids). pp. 181--188

  132. [140]

    In: 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)

    Lim JH, He K, Yi Z, Hou C, Zhang C, Sui Y and Li L (2023) Adaptive learning based upper-limb rehabilitation training system with collaborative robot. In: 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, pp. 1--5

  133. [141]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16823

    Lin T, Zhang Y, Li Q, Qi H, Yi B, Levine S and Malik J (2024) Learning visuotactile skills with two multifingered hands. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16823

  134. [142]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: 44776--44791

    Liu B, Zhu Y, Gao C, Feng Y, Liu Q, Zhu Y and Stone P (2023 a ) Libero: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: 44776--44791

  135. [143]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17418

    Liu J, Li C, Wang G, Lee L, Zhou K, Chen S, Xiong C, Ge J, Zhang R and Zhang S (2024) Self-corrected multimodal large language model for end-to-end robot manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17418

  136. [144]

    In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229

    Liu J, Zu L, He L and Wang D (2023 b ) Clue: Calibrated latent guidance for offline reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229. pp. 906--927

  137. [145]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Liu N, Li S, Du Y, Torralba A and Tenenbaum JB (2022 a ) Compositional visual generation with composable diffusion models. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, pp. 423--439

  138. [146]

    In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Liu W, Wang J, Wang Y, Wang W and Lu C (2025) Forcemimic: Force-centric imitation learning with force-motion capture system for contact-rich manipulation. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

  139. [147]

    Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 77: 102360

    Liu Z, Liu Q, Xu W, Wang L and Zhou Z (2022 b ) Robot learning towards smart robotic manufacturing: A review. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 77: 102360

  140. [148]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11144

    L \"o dige PW, Li MX and Lioutikov R (2024) Use the force, bot!--force-aware prodmp with event-based replanning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11144

  141. [149]

    In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229

    Luo J, Dong P, Wu J, Kumar A, Geng X and Levine S (2023) Action-quantized offline reinforcement learning for robotic skill learning. In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229. pp. 1348--1361

  142. [150]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    Luo J, Sushkov O, Pevceviciute R, Lian W, Su C, Vecerik M, Ye N, Schaal S and Scholz J (2021) Robust Multi-Modal Policies for Industrial Assembly via Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrations: A Large-Scale Study . In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems. Virtual. doi...

  143. [151]

    Makoviychuk V, Wawrzyniak L, Margolis Y, Lin Y, Makadia A, Macklin M, Issac AH, State G and Yumer E (2021) Isaac gym: High performance gpu based physics simulation for robot learning

  144. [152]

    In: CoRL 2022 Workshop on Pre-training Robot Learning

    Mandi Z, Bharadhwaj H, Moens V, Song S, Rajeswaran A and Kumar V (2022 a ) Cacti: A framework for scalable multi-task multi-scene visual imitation learning. In: CoRL 2022 Workshop on Pre-training Robot Learning

  145. [153]

    In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Mandi Z, Liu F, Lee K and Abbeel P (2022 b ) Towards more generalizable one-shot visual imitation learning. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 2434--2444

  146. [154]

    In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Mart \' n-Mart \' n R, Lee MA, Gardner R, Savarese S, Bohg J and Garg A (2019) Variable impedance control in end-effector space: An action space for reinforcement learning in contact-rich tasks. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS...

  147. [155]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 5(3): 53--71

    Mason MT (1986) Mechanics and planning of manipulator pushing operations. The International Journal of Robotics Research 5(3): 53--71

  148. [156]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(4): 11205--11212

    Mees O, Hermann L and Burgard W (2022 a ) What matters in language conditioned robotic imitation learning over unstructured data. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(4): 11205--11212

  149. [157]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(3): 7327--7334

    Mees O, Hermann L, Rosete-Beas E and Burgard W (2022 b ) Calvin: A benchmark for language-conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manipulation tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(3): 7327--7334

  150. [158]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    Memmel M, Berg J, Chen B, Gupta A and Francis J (2025) STRAP : Robot sub-trajectory retrieval for augmented policy learning. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?id=4VHiptx7xe

  151. [159]

    Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 73: 102223

    Merckaert K, Convens B, ju Wu C, Roncone A, Nicotra MM and Vanderborght B (2022) Real-time motion control of robotic manipulators for safe human–robot coexistence. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 73: 102223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102223. ://www...

  152. [160]

    In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Nair A, Chen D, Agrawal P, Isola P, Abbeel P, Malik J and Levine S (2017) Combining self-supervised learning and imitation for vision-based rope manipulation. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 2146--2153

  153. [161]

    In: 2013 16th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR)

    Nemec B, Abu-Dakka FJ, Ridge B, Ude A, J rgensen JA, Savarimuthu TR, Jouffroy J, Petersen HG and Kr \"u ger N (2013) Transfer of assembly operations to new workpiece poses by adaptation to the desired force profile. In: 2013 16th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (...

  154. [162]

    Neville H (1985) Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part i-iii. Trans. of the ASME Journal of Dynamic System, Measurement, and Control 107: 1

  155. [163]

    In: Icml, volume 1

    Ng AY and Russell S (2000) Algorithms for inverse reinforcement learning. In: Icml, volume 1. p. 2

  156. [164]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: 13497--13510

    Nie W, Vahdat A and Anandkumar A (2021) Controllable and compositional generation with latent-space energy-based models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: 13497--13510

  157. [165]

    European Urology 57(2): 196--201

    Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, Nielsen ME, Wallen EM and Pruthi RS (2010) Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. European Urology 57(2): 196--201

  158. [166]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Noseworthy M, Paul R, Roy S, Park D and Roy N (2020) Task-conditioned variational autoencoders for learning movement primitives. In: Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. 933--944

  159. [167]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6(2): 2737--2744

    Oikawa M, Kusakabe T, Kutsuzawa K, Sakaino S and Tsuji T (2021) Reinforcement learning for robotic assembly using non-diagonal stiffness matrix. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6(2): 2737--2744

  160. [168]

    In: 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Okada M, Komatsu M, Okumura R and Taniguchi T (2023) Learning compliant stiffness by impedance control-aware task segmentation and multi-objective bayesian optimization with priors. In: 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. ...

  161. [169]

    In: 2020 3rd International Symposium on Small-scale Intelligent Manufacturing Systems (SIMS)

    Onstein IF, Semeniuta O and Bjerkeng M (2020) Deburring using robot manipulators: A review. In: 2020 3rd International Symposium on Small-scale Intelligent Manufacturing Systems (SIMS). IEEE, pp. 1--7

  162. [170]

    In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

    Osa T, Staub C and Knoll A (2010) Framework of automatic robot surgery system using visual servoing. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. pp. 1837--1842

  163. [171]

    IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 15(2): 675--691

    Osa T, Sugita N and Mitsuishi M (2018) Online trajectory planning and force control for automation of surgical tasks. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 15(2): 675--691

  164. [172]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

    Ozdamar I, Sirintuna D, Arbaud R and Ajoudani A (2024) Pushing in the dark: A reactive pushing strategy for mobile robots using tactile feedback. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

  165. [173]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    O’Neill A, Rehman A, Maddukuri A, Gupta A, Padalkar A, Lee A, Pooley A, Gupta A, Mandlekar A, Jain A, Tung A, Bewley A, Herzog A, Irpan A, Khazatsky A, Rai A, Gupta A, Wang A, Singh A, Garg A, Kembhavi A, Xie A, Brohan A, Raffin A, Sharma A, Yavary A, Jain A, Balakrishna A, Wa...

  166. [174]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26

    Paraschos A, Daniel C, Peters JR and Neumann G (2013) Probabilistic movement primitives. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26

  167. [175]

    In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Peng XB, Andrychowicz M, Zaremba W and Abbeel P (2018) Sim-to-real transfer of robotic control with dynamics randomization. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 3803--3810

  168. [176]

    PLOS ONE 11(2): 1--26

    Peternel L, Noda T, Petrič T, Ude A, Morimoto J and Babič J (2016) Adaptive control of exoskeleton robots for periodic assistive behaviours based on emg feedback minimisation. PLOS ONE 11(2): 1--26. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148942. ://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148942

  169. [177]

    In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Peternel L, Petri c T and Babi c J (2015) Human-in-the-loop approach for teaching robot assembly tasks using impedance control interface. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 1497--1502

  170. [178]

    Autonomous Robots 36(1-2): 123--136

    Peternel L, Petri c T, Oztop E and Babi c J (2014) Teaching robots to cooperate with humans in dynamic manipulation tasks based on multi-modal human-in-the-loop approach . Autonomous Robots 36(1-2): 123--136. doi:10.1007/s10514-013-9361-0. ://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10514-0...

  171. [179]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2(2): 719--726

    Peternel L, Rozo L, Caldwell D and Ajoudani A (2017) A method for derivation of robot task-frame control authority from repeated sensory observations. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2(2): 719--726

  172. [180]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics 34(6): 1636--1642

    Petric T, Gams A, Colasanto L, Ijspeert AJ and Ude A (2018) Accelerated Sensorimotor Learning of Compliant Movement Primitives . IEEE Transactions on Robotics 34(6): 1636--1642. doi:10.1109/TRO.2018.2861921. ://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8437179/

  173. [181]

    Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 11(May): 1--12

    Petri c T, Simpson CS, Ude A and Ijspeert AJ (2017) Hammering Does Not Fit Fitts' Law . Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 11(May): 1--12. doi:10.3389/fncom.2017.00045. ://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2017.00045/full

  174. [182]

    Pap n 6-C3 : 462--467

    PJ M and BDO A (1971) Nonlinear regulator theory and an inverse optimal control problem. Pap n 6-C3 : 462--467

  175. [183]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations

    Pong V, Gu S, Dalal M and Levine S (2018) Temporal difference models: Model-free deep rl for model-based control. In: International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?id=Skw0n-W0Z

  176. [184]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    Prasad A, Lin K, Wu J, Zhou L and Bohg J (2024) Consistency Policy: Accelerated Visuomotor Policies via Consistency Distillation . In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems. doi:10.15607/RSS.2024.XX.071

  177. [185]

    Applied Intelligence 55(1): 1--15

    Qian K, Yue Z and Bai J (2025) Hierarchical kernelized movement primitives for learning human-robot collaborative trajectories in referred object handover. Applied Intelligence 55(1): 1--15

  178. [186]

    In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning

    Rafailov R, Hatch KB, Kolev V, Martin JD, Phielipp M and Finn C (2023) Moto: Offline pre-training to online fine-tuning for model-based robot learning. In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 3654--3671

  179. [187]

    In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Rahmatizadeh R, Abolghasemi P, B \"o l \"o ni L and Levine S (2018) Vision-based multi-task manipulation for inexpensive robots using end-to-end learning from demonstration. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 3758--3765

  180. [188]

    Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 103(2): 126--133

    Raibert MH and Craig JJ (1981) Hybrid position/force control of manipulators. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 103(2): 126--133

  181. [189]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.10087

    Rajeswaran A, Kumar V, Gupta A, Vezzani G, Schulman J, Todorov E and Levine S (2017) Learning complex dexterous manipulation with deep reinforcement learning and demonstrations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.10087

  182. [190]

    Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems 3(1): 297--330

    Ravichandar H, Polydoros AS, Chernova S and Billard A (2020) Recent advances in robot learning from demonstration. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems 3(1): 297--330

  183. [191]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Ren A, Veer S and Majumdar A (2021) Generalization guarantees for imitation learning. In: Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. 1426--1442

  184. [192]

    ACM Computing Surveys 55(10): 1--17

    Rethmeier N and Augenstein I (2023) A primer on contrastive pretraining in language processing: Methods, lessons learned, and perspectives. ACM Computing Surveys 55(10): 1--17

  185. [193]

    In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics

    Ross S and Bagnell D (2010) Efficient reductions for imitation learning. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, pp. 661--668

  186. [194]

    In: 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Royo-Miquel J, Hamaya M, Beltran-Hernandez CC and Tanaka K (2023) Learning robotic assembly by leveraging physical softness and tactile sensing. In: 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). pp. 6469--6476

  187. [195]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(4): 8775--8782

    Salhotra G, Liu ICA, Dominguez-Kuhne M and Sukhatme GS (2022) Learning deformable object manipulation from expert demonstrations. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(4): 8775--8782

  188. [196]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(4): 6169--6176

    Sasagawa A, Fujimoto K, Sakaino S and Tsuji T (2020) Imitation learning based on bilateral control for human--robot cooperation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(4): 6169--6176

  189. [197]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 42(13): 1133--1184

    Saveriano M, Abu-Dakka FJ, Kramberger A and Peternel L (2023) Dynamic movement primitives in robotics: A tutorial survey. The International Journal of Robotics Research 42(13): 1133--1184

  190. [198]

    In: Workshop on Bilateral Paradigms on Humans and Humanoids: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003)

    Schaal S, Peters J, Nakanishi J and Ijspeert A (2003) Control, planning, learning, and imitation with dynamic movement primitives. In: Workshop on Bilateral Paradigms on Humans and Humanoids: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003). pp. 1--21

  191. [199]

    In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Scherzinger S, Roennau A and Dillmann R (2019) Contact skill imitation learning for robot-independent assembly programming. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 4309--4316

  192. [200]

    In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Seita D, Ganapathi A, Hoque R, Hwang M, Cen E, Tanwani AK, Balakrishna A, Thananjeyan B, Ichnowski J, Jamali N, Yamane K, Iba S, Canny J and Goldberg K (2020) Deep imitation learning of sequential fabric smoothing from an algorithmic supervisor. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International...

  193. [201]

    In: Robotics: Science and Systems, volume 10

    Seker MY, Imre M, Piater JH and Ugur E (2019) Conditional neural movement primitives. In: Robotics: Science and Systems, volume 10

  194. [202]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    Sermanet P, Xu K and Levine S (2017) Unsupervised perceptual rewards for imitation learning. In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

  195. [203]

    In: Robotics: Science and Systems

    Shaw K, Agarwal A, Bahl S, Srirama MK, Kirchmeyer A, Kannan A, Sivakumar A and Pathak D (2024) Demonstrating learning from humans on open-source dexterous robot hands. In: Robotics: Science and Systems

  196. [204]

    Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 404: 132306

    Sherstinsky A (2020) Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (rnn) and long short-term memory (lstm) network. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 404: 132306

  197. [205]

    In: 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Smart Technologies (ICETST)

    Sherwani F, Asad MM and Ibrahim BSKK (2020) Collaborative robots and industrial revolution 4.0 (ir 4.0). In: 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Smart Technologies (ICETST). IEEE, pp. 1--5

  198. [206]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    Shi LX, Hu Z, Zhao TZ, Sharma A, Pertsch K, Luo J, Levine S and Finn C (2024) Yell At Your Robot: Improving On-the-Fly from Language Corrections . In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

  199. [207]

    In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Shi Y, Chen Z, Liu H, Riedel S, Gao C, Feng Q, Deng J and Zhang J (2021) Proactive action visual residual reinforcement learning for contact-rich tasks using a torque-controlled robot. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 765--771

  200. [208]

    Science Robotics 5(41): eaaz9239

    Shih B, Shah D, Li J, Thuruthel TG, Park YL, Iida F, Bao Z, Kramer-Bottiglio R and Tolley MT (2020) Electronic skins and machine learning for intelligent soft robots. Science Robotics 5(41): eaaz9239. doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aaz9239. ://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobot...

  201. [209]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Shridhar M, Manuelli L and Fox D (2022) Cliport: What and where pathways for robotic manipulation. In: Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. 894--906

  202. [210]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Shridhar M, Manuelli L and Fox D (2023) Perceiver-actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipulation. In: Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. 785--799

  203. [211]

    Springer Science & Business Media

    Siciliano B and Villani L (1999) Robot force control. Springer Science & Business Media

  204. [212]

    In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Sidiropoulos A and Doulgeri Z (2021) A reversible dynamic movement primitive formulation. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 3147--3153

  205. [213]

    In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (iros)

    Solak G and Jamone L (2019) Learning by demonstration and robust control of dexterous in-hand robotic manipulation skills. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (iros). IEEE, pp. 8246--8251

  206. [214]

    In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Stepputtis S, Bandari M, Schaal S and Amor HB (2022) A system for imitation learning of contact-rich bimanual manipulation policies. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 11810--11817

  207. [215]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Stone A, Xiao T, Lu Y, Gopalakrishnan K, Lee KH, Vuong Q, Wohlhart P, Kirmani S, Zitkovich B, Xia F, Finn C and Hausman K (2023) Open-world object manipulation using pre-trained vision-language models. In: Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. 3397--3417

  208. [216]

    Robotics and Autonomous Systems 156: 104224

    Suomalainen M, Karayiannidis Y and Kyrki V (2022) A survey of robot manipulation in contact. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 156: 104224

  209. [217]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research 40(10-11): 1306--1325

    Tanwani AK, Yan A, Lee J, Calinon S and Goldberg K (2021) Sequential robot imitation learning from observations. The International Journal of Robotics Research 40(10-11): 1306--1325

  210. [218]

    https://drake.mit.edu

    Tedrake R and the Drake Development Team (2019) Drake: A planning, control, and analysis toolbox for nonlinear dynamical systems. https://drake.mit.edu

  211. [219]

    In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Tobin J, Fong R, Ray A, Schneider J, Zaremba W and Abbeel P (2017) Domain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 23--30

  212. [220]

    In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

    Todorov E, Erez T and Tassa Y (2012) Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, pp. 5026--5033

  213. [221]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 10(1): 240--247

    Tsuji C, Coronado E, Osorio P and Venture G (2025) Adaptive contact-rich manipulation through few-shot imitation learning with force-torque feedback and pre-trained object representations. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 10(1): 240--247. doi:10.1109/LRA.2024.3497713

  214. [222]

    IEEE Access : 1--1

    Tsuji T (2025) Mamba as a motion encoder for robotic imitation learning. IEEE Access : 1--1

  215. [223]

    In: 2019 IEEE-RAS 19th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)

    Tsurumine Y, Cui Y, Yamazaki K and Matsubara T (2019) Generative adversarial imitation learning with deep p-network for robotic cloth manipulation. In: 2019 IEEE-RAS 19th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids). IEEE, pp. 274--280

  216. [224]

    In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Ude A, Nemec B, Petri \'c T and Morimoto J (2014) Orientation in cartesian space dynamic movement primitives. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 2997--3004

  217. [225]

    Robotica 38(3): 457--474

    Ugur E and Girgin H (2020) Compliant parametric dynamic movement primitives. Robotica 38(3): 457--474

  218. [226]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04380

    Urain J, Mandlekar A, Du Y, Shafiullah M, Xu D, Fragkiadaki K, Chalvatzaki G and Peters J (2024) Deep generative models in robotics: A survey on learning from multimodal demonstrations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04380

  219. [227]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics 31(6): 1458--1471

    Ureche ALP, Umezawa K, Nakamura Y and Billard A (2015) Task parameterization using continuous constraints extracted from human demonstrations. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 31(6): 1458--1471

  220. [228]

    Mechatronics 107: 103307

    Van Duong L (2025) A tactile reflex arc for physical human--robot interaction. Mechatronics 107: 103307

  221. [229]

    In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Van Hoof H, Chen N, Karl M, Van Der Smagt P and Peters J (2016) Stable reinforcement learning with autoencoders for tactile and visual data. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 3928--3934

  222. [230]

    In: NIPS

    Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez A, Kaiser L and Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. In: NIPS

  223. [231]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.08817

    Vecerik M, Hester T, Scholz J, Wang F, Pietquin O, Piot B, Heess N, Roth \"o rl T, Lampe T and Riedmiller M (2017) Leveraging demonstrations for deep reinforcement learning on robotics problems with sparse rewards. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.08817

  224. [232]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15123

    Vedove MD, Abu-Dakka FJ, Palopoli L, Fontanelli D and Saveriano M (2024) Meshdmp: Motion planning on discrete manifolds using dynamic movement primitives. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15123

  225. [233]

    In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Vogt D, Stepputtis S, Grehl S, Jung B and Amor HB (2017) A system for learning continuous human-robot interactions from human-human demonstrations. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 2882--2889

  226. [234]

    In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229

    Walke HR, Black K, Zhao TZ, Vuong Q, Zheng C, Hansen-Estruch P, He AW, Myers V, Kim MJ, Du M, Lee A, Fang K, Finn C and Levine S (2023) Bridgedata v2: A dataset for robot learning at scale. In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229. pp. 1723--1736

  227. [235]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Wan W, Zhu Y, Shah R and Zhu Y (2024) Lotus: Continual imitation learning for robot manipulation through unsupervised skill discovery. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 537--544

  228. [236]

    International Journal of Robotics Research 2(2): 11--20

    Wang A (2023) Efficient assembly in robotics. International Journal of Robotics Research 2(2): 11--20

  229. [237]

    In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229

    Wang C, Fan L, Sun J, Zhang R, Fei-Fei L, Xu D, Zhu Y and Anandkumar A (2023) Mimicplay: Long-horizon imitation learning by watching human play. In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229. pp. 201--221

  230. [238]

    In: 2021 3rd International Symposium on Robotics & Intelligent Manufacturing Technology (ISRIMT)

    Wang C, Lin C, Liu B, Su C, Xu P and Xie L (2021) Deep reinforcement learning with shaping exploration space for robotic assembly. In: 2021 3rd International Symposium on Robotics & Intelligent Manufacturing Technology (ISRIMT). IEEE, pp. 345--351

  231. [239]

    In: RSS 2024 Workshop: Data Generation for Robotics

    Wang C, Shi H, Wang W, Zhang R, Fei-Fei L and Liu K (2024 a ) Dexcap: Scalable and portable mocap data collection system for dexterous manipulation. In: RSS 2024 Workshop: Data Generation for Robotics

  232. [240]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)

    Wang L, Zhang K, Zhou A, Simchowitz M and Tedrake R (2024 b ) Robot fleet learning via policy merging. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). ://openreview.net/forum?id=IL71c1z7et

  233. [241]

    In: Robotics: science and systems

    Wang L, Zhao J, Du Y, Adelson EH and Tedrake R (2024 c ) Poco: Policy composition from and for heterogeneous robot learning. In: Robotics: science and systems

  234. [242]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(2): 3930--3937

    Wang S, Lambeta M, Chou PW and Calandra R (2022 a ) Tacto: A fast, flexible, and open-source simulator for high-resolution vision-based tactile sensors. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(2): 3930--3937. doi:10.1109/LRA.2022.3146945

  235. [243]

    Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8: 777363

    Wang Y, Beltran-Hernandez CC, Wan W and Harada K (2022 b ) An adaptive imitation learning framework for robotic complex contact-rich insertion tasks. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8: 777363

  236. [244]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30

    Wang Z, Merel JS, Reed SE, de Freitas N, Wayne G and Heess N (2017) Robust imitation of diverse behaviors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30

  237. [245]

    Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 104(1): 65--77

    Whitney DE (1982) Quasi-static assembly of compliantly supported rigid parts. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 104(1): 65--77

  238. [246]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations

    Wu H, Jing Y, Cheang C, Chen G, Xu J, Li X, Liu M, Li H and Kong T (2024) Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation. In: International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?id=NxoFmGgWC9

  239. [247]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Wu P, Escontrela A, Hafner D, Abbeel P and Goldberg K (2023) Daydreamer: World models for physical robot learning. In: Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. 2226--2240

  240. [248]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Xian Z, Gkanatsios N, Gervet T, Ke TW and Fragkiadaki K (2023) Chaineddiffuser: Unifying trajectory diffusion and keypose prediction for robotic manipulation. In: Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. 2323--2339

  241. [249]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 9(4): 3179--3186

    Xiang G, Li S, Shuang F, Gao F and Yuan X (2024) Sc-airl: Share-critic in adversarial inverse reinforcement learning for long-horizon task. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 9(4): 3179--3186

  242. [250]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Xiong H, Fu H, Zhang J, Bao C, Zhang Q, Huang Y, Xu W, Garg A and Lu C (2023) Robotube: Learning household manipulation from human videos with simulated twin environments. In: Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. 1--10

  243. [251]

    Scientific Reports 15(1): 9196

    Xu B, Ud Din M and Hussain I (2025) Conditional variational auto encoder based dynamic motion for multitask imitation learning. Scientific Reports 15(1): 9196

  244. [252]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05240

    Xu J, Hou Z, Liu Z and Qiao H (2019) Compare contact model-based control and contact model-free learning: A survey of robotic peg-in-hole assembly strategies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05240

  245. [253]

    IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 28(3): 1234--1244

    Xu X, You M, Zhou H, Qian Z and He B (2022) Robot imitation learning from image-only observation without real-world interaction. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 28(3): 1234--1244

  246. [254]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04115

    Yan G, Wu YH and Wang X (2024) Dnact: Diffusion guided multi-task 3d policy learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04115

  247. [255]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 30(3): 777--787

    Yang C, Chen C, He W, Cui R and Li Z (2018) Robot learning system based on adaptive neural control and dynamic movement primitives. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 30(3): 777--787

  248. [256]

    IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 24(9): 2535--2549

    Yang G, Pang Z, Deen MJ, Dong M, Zhang YT, Lovell N and Rahmani AM (2020 a ) Homecare robotic systems for healthcare 4.0: Visions and enabling technologies. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 24(9): 2535--2549

  249. [257]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Yang J, Mark MS, Vu B, Sharma A, Bohg J and Finn C (2024) Robot fine-tuning made easy: Pre-training rewards and policies for autonomous real-world reinforcement learning. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 4804--4811

  250. [258]

    In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Yang J, Zhang J, Settle C, Rai A, Antonova R and Bohg J (2022) Learning periodic tasks from human demonstrations. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 8658--8665

  251. [259]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20382

    Yang L, Suh H, Zhao T, Graesdal BP, Kelestemur T, Wang J, Pang T and Tedrake R (2025) Physics-driven data generation for contact-rich manipulation via trajectory optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20382

  252. [260]

    In: 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)

    Yang PC, Koganti N, Garcia Ricardez GA, Yamamoto M, Takamatsu J and Ogasawara T (2020 b ) Context dependent trajectory generation using sequence-to-sequence models for robotic toilet cleaning. In: 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communica...

  253. [261]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2(2): 397--403

    Yang PC, Sasaki K, Suzuki K, Kase K, Sugano S and Ogata T (2016) Repeatable folding task by humanoid robot worker using deep learning. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2(2): 397--403

  254. [262]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Yang W, Angleraud A, Pieters RS, Pajarinen J and Kämäräinen JK (2023) Seq2seq imitation learning for tactile feedback-based manipulation. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 5829--5836. doi:10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10161145

  255. [263]

    In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Yoo Y, Lee CY and Zhang BT (2021) Multimodal anomaly detection based on deep auto-encoder for object slip perception of mobile manipulation robots. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 11443--11449

  256. [264]

    In: Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS)

    Yu T, Finn C, Xie A, Dasari S, Zhang T, Abbeel P and Levine S (2018) One-shot imitation from observing humans via domain-adaptive meta-learning. In: Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS)

  257. [265]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Yu T, Quillen D, He Z, Julian R, Hausman K, Finn C and Levine S (2020) Meta-world: A benchmark and evaluation for multi-task and meta reinforcement learning. In: Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. 1094--1100

  258. [266]

    In: 2018 IEEE international conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO)

    Zachiotis GA, Andrikopoulos G, Gornez R, Nakamura K and Nikolakopoulos G (2018) A survey on the application trends of home service robotics. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, pp. 1999--2006

  259. [267]

    Frontiers in Neurorobotics 18: 1368243

    Zang Y, Wang P, Zha F, Guo W, Li C and Sun L (2024) Human skill knowledge guided global trajectory policy reinforcement learning method. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 18: 1368243

  260. [268]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2(3): 1240--1247

    Zeestraten MJ, Havoutis I, Silv \'e rio J, Calinon S and Caldwell DG (2017) An approach for imitation learning on riemannian manifolds. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2(3): 1240--1247

  261. [269]

    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 125(9): 3981--4012

    Zeng X, Zhu G, Gao Z, Ji R, Ansari J and Lu C (2023) Surface polishing by industrial robots: a review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 125(9): 3981--4012

  262. [270]

    Journal of Robotics 1(1): 1--10

    Zhang A (2023) Learning adaptation for robotic operation. Journal of Robotics 1(1): 1--10

  263. [271]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(9): 5512--5519

    Zhang F and Demiris Y (2023) Visual-tactile learning of garment unfolding for robot-assisted dressing. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(9): 5512--5519

  264. [272]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21989

    Zhang H, Solak G and Ajoudani A (2025 a ) Bresa: Bio-inspired reflexive safe reinforcement learning for contact-rich robotic tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21989

  265. [273]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00287

    Zhang H, Solak G, Hjorth S and Ajoudani A (2025 b ) Towards passive safe reinforcement learning: A comparative study on contact-rich robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00287

  266. [274]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 9(6): 5631--5638

    Zhang H, Solak G, Lahr GJG and Ajoudani A (2024) Srl-vic: A variable stiffness-based safe reinforcement learning for contact-rich robotic tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 9(6): 5631--5638. doi:10.1109/LRA.2024.3396368

  267. [275]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    Zhang H, Zhu C, Wang X, Zhou Z, Yin C, Li M, Xue L, Wang Y, Hu S, Liu A, Guo P and Zhang LY (2025 c ) Badrobot: Jailbreaking embodied LLM s in the physical world. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?id=ei3qCntB66

  268. [276]

    In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Zhang T, McCarthy Z, Jow O, Lee D, Chen X, Goldberg K and Abbeel P (2018) Deep imitation learning for complex manipulation tasks from virtual reality teleoperation. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Ieee, pp. 5628--5635

  269. [277]

    Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 77: 102359

    Zhang T, Sun H and Zou Y (2022) An electromyography signals-based human-robot collaboration system for human motion intention recognition and realization. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 77: 102359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102359. ://www.scienced...

  270. [278]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6(2): 2225--2232

    Zhang X, Sun L, Kuang Z and Tomizuka M (2021) Learning variable impedance control via inverse reinforcement learning for force-related tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6(2): 2225--2232

  271. [279]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    Zhang Y, Ke L, Deshpande A, Gupta A and Srinivasa S (2023) Cherry-Picking with Reinforcement Learning . In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

  272. [280]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(3): 8036--8043

    Zhao J, Giammarino A, Lamon E, Gandarias JM, De Momi E and Ajoudani A (2022 a ) A hybrid learning and optimization framework to achieve physically interactive tasks with mobile manipulators. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(3): 8036--8043

  273. [281]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems

    Zhao TZ, Kumar V, Levine S and Finn C (2023) Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware . In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems. Daegu, Republic of Korea. doi:10.15607/RSS.2023.XIX.016

  274. [282]

    In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Zhao TZ, Luo J, Sushkov O, Pevceviciute R, Heess N, Scholz J, Schaal S and Levine S (2022 b ) Offline meta-reinforcement learning for industrial insertion. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 6386--6393

  275. [283]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    Zhao W, Ding P, Min Z, Gong Z, Bai S, Zhao H and Wang D (2025) VLAS : Vision-language-action model with speech instructions for customized robot manipulation. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. ://openreview.net/forum?id=K4FAFNRpko

  276. [284]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Zhou G, Ke L, Srinivasa S, Gupta A, Rajeswaran A and Kumar V (2023) Real world offline reinforcement learning with realistic data source. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 7176--7183

  277. [285]

    In: Proceedings of The 7th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 229

    Zitkovich B, Yu T, Xu S, Xu P, Xiao T, Xia F, Wu J, Wohlhart P, Welker S, Wahid A, Vuong Q, Vanhoucke V, Tran H, Soricut R, Singh A, Singh J, Sermanet P, Sanketi PR, Salazar G, Ryoo MS, Reymann K, Rao K, Pertsch K, Mordatch I, Michalewski H, Lu Y, Levine S, Lee L, Lee TWE, Lea...

  278. [286]

    IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems 15(4): 1812--1824

    Özdemir O, Kerzel M, Weber C, Hee Lee J and Wermter S (2023) Language-model-based paired variational autoencoders for robotic language learning. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems 15(4): 1812--1824

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.