pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.14898 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

Self-Interacting Dark Matter with Mass Segregation: A Unified Explanation of Dwarf Cores and Small-Scale Lenses

Daneng Yang , Yi-Zhong Fan , Siyuan Hou , Yue-Lin Sming Tsai This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 08:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords self-interacting dark mattermass segregationdwarf galaxy coresstrong gravitational lensingsmall-scale structurevelocity-dependent interactionsgravothermal evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two-component self-interacting dark matter with inter-species collisions produces mass segregation that forms dwarf cores and boosts small-scale lensing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to demonstrate that velocity-dependent interactions both within and between two dark matter species lead to natural mass segregation through collisional relaxation. This segregation raises central densities in halos, which permits the development of cores in dwarf galaxies even after baryons compress the inner regions. At the same time the higher central densities enlarge the Einstein radii and strengthen strong-lensing signals on small scales, reproducing the reported excess of galaxy-galaxy lenses while still satisfying cluster-scale limits. A reader would care because the same set of interactions supplies a single mechanism that links several longstanding small-scale structure puzzles without violating larger-scale constraints.

Core claim

In two-component self-interacting dark matter models with inter-species interactions, mass segregation arises naturally from collisional relaxation, enhancing central densities and gravothermal evolution. Models with velocity-dependent interactions, both within and between species, can connect several small-scale observations while remaining consistent with cluster-scale constraints. This combination enables core formation in dwarf halos, where the presence of baryons increases the inner densities and enhances the predicted strong lensing signatures. Using cosmological and controlled simulations alongside an accurate parametric model, the work shows that this framework can explain the dark-1

What carries the argument

Mass segregation driven by inter-species collisions in a two-component velocity-dependent SIDM model, which concentrates heavier particles toward halo centers and thereby raises central densities and lensing cross-sections beyond those of one-component SIDM.

If this is right

  • Dwarf halos form cores even when baryons increase inner densities.
  • Strong-lensing efficiency on small scales rises by a factor of a few, matching reported galaxy-galaxy lensing excesses.
  • Cluster-scale constraints remain satisfied because the velocity dependence weakens interactions at high speeds.
  • Dark perturbers observed in strong-lensing systems can be accounted for by the denser central regions of the two-component halos.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mass-segregation mechanism may alter the predicted stellar velocity dispersions inside dwarfs in ways distinguishable from other SIDM variants.
  • Future wide-field lensing surveys could test whether the number of small-scale lenses increases as predicted once mass segregation is included.
  • If the two species have different masses, the model may predict a characteristic radial segregation pattern that could be searched for in high-resolution simulations of galaxy formation.

Load-bearing premise

Inter-species interactions must produce enough mass segregation to raise central densities and Einstein radii more than one-component SIDM does, with baryons further amplifying the lensing effect without violating cluster constraints.

What would settle it

A set of strong-lensing observations showing that the Einstein radii or lensing efficiencies of small-scale perturbers are no larger than those predicted by cold dark matter would falsify the claimed enhancement from mass segregation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14898 by Daneng Yang, Siyuan Hou, Yi-Zhong Fan, Yue-Lin Sming Tsai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Effective cross section per mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Projected logarithmic density slope [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of simulated gravitational lenses in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Density profiles of all cluster subhalos with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Bound subhalo mass ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In two-component self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) models with inter-species interactions, mass segregation arises naturally from collisional relaxation, enhancing central densities and gravothermal evolution. We demonstrate that models with velocity-dependent interactions, both within and between species, can connect several small-scale observations while remaining consistent with cluster-scale constraints. This combination enables core formation in dwarf halos, where the presence of baryons increases the inner densities and enhances the predicted strong lensing signatures. Using cosmological and controlled simulations alongside an accurate parametric model, we present proof-of-principle examples showing that this framework can explain the structure of dark perturbers observed in strong lensing systems, and can enhance the efficiency of small-scale lenses by a factor of a few, in line with the excess reported in galaxy-galaxy strong-lensing observations. Importantly, mass segregation can enhance the Einstein radii of SIDM halos relative to their cold dark matter (CDM) counterparts, overcoming a key challenge in one-component SIDM scenarios. Our results present mass segregation in two-component SIDM as a self-consistent, testable framework with the potential to address multiple small-scale challenges in structure formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a two-component self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) model with velocity-dependent intra- and inter-species interactions. Through cosmological and controlled simulations plus a parametric model, it claims that inter-species scattering produces mass segregation that raises central densities, enabling core formation in dwarf halos; baryons further amplify inner densities to enhance strong-lensing Einstein radii by a factor of a few relative to CDM (overcoming the one-component SIDM deficit) while remaining consistent with cluster-scale constraints.

Significance. If the quantitative results hold, the work supplies a unified, testable mechanism linking dwarf cores, small-scale lensing excess, and cluster consistency within SIDM. The combination of controlled simulations and a parametric model is a strength that could enable falsifiable predictions for future lensing surveys.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4 (controlled simulations)] §4 (controlled simulations): the factor-of-a-few enhancement in small-scale lensing efficiency is shown only for a narrow set of velocity-dependent cross-section normalizations; no systematic scan that varies the inter-species interaction strength independently of the intra-species one while holding cluster-scale constraints fixed is reported, which is load-bearing for the unification claim.
  2. [§5 (parametric model)] §5 (parametric model): the model is presented as demonstrating stable mass segregation that raises central density above both CDM and single-component SIDM even after baryonic contraction, yet the quantitative size of the segregation-induced boost is not shown with error bars or exclusion criteria across halo masses, undermining the central lensing-enhancement assertion.
  3. [Baryon–DM coupling section] Baryon–DM coupling section: the statement that baryons increase inner densities and enhance lensing signatures requires explicit demonstration that the inter-species scattering still produces net mass segregation once baryonic contraction is included self-consistently; without this, the claimed advantage over one-component SIDM may not survive.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'enhance the efficiency of small-scale lenses by a factor of a few' should be accompanied by the specific numerical range and the halo-mass interval over which it applies.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions: add simulation resolution, particle number, and convergence tests so readers can judge whether the reported density profiles are numerically robust.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which highlight important aspects for strengthening our claims. We respond point by point below, indicating revisions where they will improve the manuscript while defending the core results as presented.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (controlled simulations): the factor-of-a-few enhancement in small-scale lensing efficiency is shown only for a narrow set of velocity-dependent cross-section normalizations; no systematic scan that varies the inter-species interaction strength independently of the intra-species one while holding cluster-scale constraints fixed is reported, which is load-bearing for the unification claim.

    Authors: Our selected normalizations represent viable points that simultaneously satisfy cluster constraints while producing the reported small-scale effects, consistent with the proof-of-principle nature of the work. We agree a broader scan would better support the unification claim. We will add a targeted parameter scan in the revised §4, varying inter-species strength independently while enforcing cluster-scale limits, and report the resulting lensing enhancements. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §5 (parametric model): the model is presented as demonstrating stable mass segregation that raises central density above both CDM and single-component SIDM even after baryonic contraction, yet the quantitative size of the segregation-induced boost is not shown with error bars or exclusion criteria across halo masses, undermining the central lensing-enhancement assertion.

    Authors: The parametric model is designed to capture the analytic trend of the segregation boost rather than a full statistical survey. We will revise §5 to include quantitative boost values with error estimates propagated from simulation scatter, and show the enhancement range across halo masses with approximate exclusion boundaries based on the explored parameter space. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Baryon–DM coupling section: the statement that baryons increase inner densities and enhance lensing signatures requires explicit demonstration that the inter-species scattering still produces net mass segregation once baryonic contraction is included self-consistently; without this, the claimed advantage over one-component SIDM may not survive.

    Authors: Our controlled simulations already incorporate baryonic contraction via an adiabatic potential and demonstrate that inter-species scattering yields net mass segregation and higher central densities relative to one-component SIDM. We acknowledge that a fully self-consistent hydrodynamical treatment would be ideal. In the revision we will add explicit comparisons in the baryon–DM section showing the segregation signal persists under our baryonic modeling, with a note on the limitations of the approximation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on simulation outputs and parametric modeling without algebraic reduction to inputs.

full rationale

The paper presents its central results through cosmological and controlled simulations combined with an accurate parametric model, offering proof-of-principle examples for mass segregation effects in two-component SIDM. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are quoted that reduce any prediction or uniqueness claim to a fitted parameter or prior self-referential result by construction. The framework is positioned as testable and consistent with cluster-scale constraints via external simulation benchmarks rather than internal redefinition. This constitutes a self-contained approach against external falsifiability, warranting a zero circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework assumes standard collisional relaxation physics for mass segregation and velocity-dependent scattering rates; free parameters include the normalization and velocity scaling of intra- and inter-species cross sections, which are adjusted to fit dwarf and lensing data while respecting cluster bounds.

free parameters (2)
  • velocity-dependent cross-section normalization
    Sets the strength of particle scattering; adjusted to produce observed core sizes and lensing boosts.
  • inter-species interaction strength
    Controls mass segregation efficiency; chosen to enhance central densities beyond single-species SIDM.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Collisional relaxation in two-component systems naturally produces mass segregation that raises central density.
    Invoked to link inter-species interactions to enhanced dwarf cores and lensing.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5753 in / 1323 out tokens · 44443 ms · 2026-05-19T08:42:04.291564+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cosmology of Inelastic Self-Interacting Dark Matter: Linear Evolution and Observational Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Inelastic self-interacting dark matter with small mass splitting produces a cutoff in the matter power spectrum at k > 1 h Mpc^{-1} whose location depends on cross-section normalization, velocity dependence, dark matt...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Small-Scale Challenges to the ΛCDM Paradigm,

    James S. Bullock and Michael Boylan-Kolchin, “Small- Scale Challenges to the ΛCDM Paradigm,” Ann. Rev. As- tron. Astrophys. 55, 343–387 (2017), arXiv:1707.04256 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    The distribution of dark matter in galaxies

    Paolo Salucci, “The distribution of dark matter in galaxies,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 27, 2 (2019), arXiv:1811.08843 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    The cored distribution of dark matter in spiral galaxies

    Gianfranco Gentile, P. Salucci, U. Klein, D. Vergani, and P. Kalberla, “The Cored distribution of dark matter in spi- ral galaxies,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.351, 903 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0403154

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    A trail of dark-matter-free galaxies from a bullet-dwarf collision,

    Pieter van Dokkum et al., “A trail of dark-matter-free galax- ies from a bullet-dwarf collision,” Nature 605, 435–439 (2022), arXiv:2205.08552 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    The Spur and the Gap in GD- 1: Dynamical evidence for a dark substructure in the Milky Way halo,

    Ana Bonaca, David W. Hogg, Adrian M. Price-Whelan, and Charlie Conroy, “The Spur and the Gap in GD- 1: Dynamical evidence for a dark substructure in the Milky Way halo,” (2018), 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2873, arXiv:1811.03631 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2873 2018

  6. [6]

    Observational evidence for self-interacting cold dark matter

    David N. Spergel and Paul J. Steinhardt, “Observational ev- idence for selfinteracting cold dark matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3760–3763 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9909386

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure

    Sean Tulin and Hai-Bo Yu, “Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,” Phys. Rept. 730, 1–57 (2018), arXiv:1705.02358 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Dark Matter Halos as Particle Colliders: A Unified Solution to Small-Scale Structure Puzzles from Dwarfs to Clusters

    Manoj Kaplinghat, Sean Tulin, and Hai-Bo Yu, “Dark Mat- ter Halos as Particle Colliders: Unified Solution to Small- Scale Structure Puzzles from Dwarfs to Clusters,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 041302 (2016), arXiv:1508.03339 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Observable tests of self-interacting dark mat- ter in galaxy clusters: cosmological simulations with SIDM and baryons,

    Andrew Robertson, David Harvey, Richard Massey, Vincent Eke, Ian G. McCarthy, Mathilde Jauzac, Baojiu Li, and Joop Schaye, “Observable tests of self-interacting dark mat- ter in galaxy clusters: cosmological simulations with SIDM and baryons,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.488, 3646–3662 (2019), arXiv:1810.05649 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    The interplay of Self-Interacting Dark Matter and baryons in shaping the halo evolution

    Giulia Despali, Martin Sparre, Simona Vegetti, Mark V o- gelsberger, Jes´us Zavala, and Federico Marinacci, “The in- terplay of Self-Interacting Dark Matter and baryons in shap- ing the halo evolution,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 484, 4563 (2019), arXiv:1811.02569 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Constraining Dissipative Dark Matter Self-Interactions,

    Rouven Essig, Samuel D. Mcdermott, Hai-Bo Yu, and Yi-Ming Zhong, “Constraining Dissipative Dark Matter Self-Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 121102 (2019), arXiv:1809.01144 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Baryonic clues to the puzzling di- versity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves,

    Isabel M. E. Santos-Santos, Julio F. Navarro, Andrew Robertson, Alejandro Ben ´ıtez-Llambay, Kyle A. Oman, Mark R. Lovell, Carlos S. Frenk, Aaron D. Ludlow, Azadeh Fattahi, and Adam Ritz, “Baryonic clues to the puzzling di- versity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves,” MNRAS 495, 58– 77 (2020), arXiv:1911.09116 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    The onset of gravothermal core col- lapse in velocity-dependent self-interacting dark matter sub- haloes,

    Hannah C. Turner, Mark R. Lovell, Jes ´us Zavala, and Mark V ogelsberger, “The onset of gravothermal core col- lapse in velocity-dependent self-interacting dark matter sub- haloes,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 505, 5327–5339 6 (2021), arXiv:2010.02924 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    N-body simulations of dark matter with frequent self-interactions,

    Moritz S. Fischer, Marcus Br ¨uggen, Kai Schmidt-Hoberg, Klaus Dolag, Felix Kahlhoefer, Antonio Ragagnin, and An- drew Robertson, “N-body simulations of dark matter with frequent self-interactions,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 505, 851–868 (2021), arXiv:2012.10277 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Orbital evolution of satellite galaxies in self-interacting dark matter models,

    Oren Slone, Fangzhou Jiang, Mariangela Lisanti, and Manoj Kaplinghat, “Orbital evolution of satellite galaxies in self-interacting dark matter models,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 043014 (2023), arXiv:2108.03243 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Core-collapse, evap- oration, and tidal effects: the life story of a self-interacting dark matter subhalo,

    Zhichao Carton Zeng, Annika H. G. Peter, Xiaolong Du, Andrew Benson, Stacy Kim, Fangzhou Jiang, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, and Mark V ogelsberger, “Core-collapse, evap- oration, and tidal effects: the life story of a self-interacting dark matter subhalo,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 513, 4845–4868 (2022), arXiv:2110.00259 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Strong lensing signatures of self-interacting dark matter in low- mass haloes,

    Daniel Gilman, Jo Bovy, Tommaso Treu, Anna Nierenberg, Simon Birrer, Andrew Benson, and Omid Sameie, “Strong lensing signatures of self-interacting dark matter in low- mass haloes,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.507, 2432–2447 (2021), arXiv:2105.05259 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    TangoSIDM: Tantalizing models of Self-Interacting Dark Matter,

    Camila A. Correa, Matthieu Schaller, Sylvia Ploeckinger, Noemi Anau Montel, Christoph Weniger, and Shinichiro Ando, “TangoSIDM: Tantalizing models of Self-Interacting Dark Matter,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.517, 3045–3063 (2022), arXiv:2206.11298 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Yang and H.-B

    Daneng Yang and Hai-Bo Yu, “Gravothermal evolution of dark matter halos with differential elastic scattering,” JCAP 2022, 077 (2022), arXiv:2205.03392 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Adhikari et al.,Astrophysical Tests of Dark Matter Self-Interactions,2207.10638

    Susmita Adhikari et al., “Astrophysical Tests of Dark Mat- ter Self-Interactions,” Rev. Mod. Phys. (in press), (2022), arXiv:2207.10638 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Uni- versal gravothermal evolution of isolated self-interacting dark matter halos for velocity-dependent cross-sections,

    Nadav Joseph Outmezguine, Kimberly K. Boddy, Sophia Gad-Nasr, Manoj Kaplinghat, and Laura Sagunski, “Uni- versal gravothermal evolution of isolated self-interacting dark matter halos for velocity-dependent cross-sections,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 523, 4786–4800 (2023), arXiv:2204.06568 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Motivations for a large self-interacting dark matter cross-section from Milky Way satellites,

    Maya Silverman, James S. Bullock, Manoj Kaplinghat, Vic- tor H. Robles, and Mauro Valli, “Motivations for a large self-interacting dark matter cross-section from Milky Way satellites,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 518, 2418–2435 (2022), arXiv:2203.10104 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    A parametric model for self-interacting dark mat- ter halos,

    Daneng Yang, Ethan O. Nadler, Hai-Bo Yu, and Yi-Ming Zhong, “A parametric model for self-interacting dark mat- ter halos,” JCAP 02, 032 (2024), arXiv:2305.16176 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    The im- pact of baryonic potentials on the gravothermal evolution of self-interacting dark matter haloes,

    Yi-Ming Zhong, Daneng Yang, and Hai-Bo Yu, “The im- pact of baryonic potentials on the gravothermal evolution of self-interacting dark matter haloes,” Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc. 526, 758–770 (2023), arXiv:2306.08028 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Evolution and properties of self-interacting dark matter subhalos until core collapse,

    Zhichao Carton Zeng, Annika H. G. Peter, Xiaolong Du, Shengqi Yang, Andrew Benson, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, Fangzhou Jiang, Charlie Mace, and R. Benton Metcalf, “Evolution and properties of self-interacting dark matter subhalos until core collapse,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 063001 (2025), arXiv:2310.09910 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Tidal Formation of Dark Matter Deficit Diffuse Galaxy NGC 1052-DF2 by SIDM,

    Zhao-Chen Zhang, Xiao-Jun Bi, and Peng-Fei Yin, “Tidal Formation of Dark Matter Deficit Diffuse Galaxy NGC 1052-DF2 by SIDM,” Astrophys. J. 981, 89 (2025), arXiv:2403.11403 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Self-interacting Dark Matter Interpretation of Crater II,

    Xingyu Zhang, Hai-Bo Yu, Daneng Yang, and Haipeng An, “Self-interacting Dark Matter Interpretation of Crater II,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 968, L13 (2024), arXiv:2401.04985 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Dianoga SIDM: Galaxy clus- ter self-interacting dark matter simulations,

    Antonio Ragagnin, Massimo Meneghetti, Francesco Calura, Giulia Despali, Klaus Dolag, Moritz S. Fischer, Carlo Gio- coli, and Lauro Moscardini, “Dianoga SIDM: Galaxy clus- ter self-interacting dark matter simulations,” Astron. Astro- phys. 687, A270 (2024), arXiv:2404.01383 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    SIDM Concerto: Compilation and Data Re- lease of Self-interacting Dark Matter Zoom-in Simulations,

    Ethan O. Nadler, Demao Kong, Daneng Yang, and Hai- Bo Yu, “SIDM Concerto: Compilation and Data Re- lease of Self-interacting Dark Matter Zoom-in Simulations,” (2025), arXiv:2503.10748 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Probing Signals of Self- Interacting Dark Matter Core Collapse in \textscHi-Rich Galaxies,

    Demao Kong and Hai-Bo Yu, “Probing Signals of Self- Interacting Dark Matter Core Collapse in \textscHi-Rich Galaxies,” (2025), arXiv:2501.06413 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Formation of the Little Red Dots from the Core-collapse of Self-interacting Dark Matter Halos,

    Fangzhou Jiang, Zixiang Jiang, Haonan Zheng, Luis C. Ho, Kohei Inayoshi, Xuejian Shen, Mark V ogelsberger, and Wei-Xiang Feng, “Formation of the Little Red Dots from the Core-collapse of Self-interacting Dark Matter Halos,” (2025), arXiv:2503.23710 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Self-Interacting Dark Matter Solves the Final Parsec Problem of Supermassive Black Hole Mergers,

    Gonzalo Alonso- ´Alvarez, James M. Cline, and Caitlyn De- war, “Self-Interacting Dark Matter Solves the Final Parsec Problem of Supermassive Black Hole Mergers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 021401 (2024), arXiv:2401.14450 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Unexpected clus- tering pattern in dwarf galaxies challenges formation mod- els,

    Ziwen Zhang, Yangyao Chen, Yu Rong, Huiyuan Wang, Houjun Mo, Xiong Luo, and Hao Li, “Unexpected clus- tering pattern in dwarf galaxies challenges formation mod- els,” Nature 642, 47–52 (2025), arXiv:2504.03305 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    A Self- interacting Dark Matter Solution to the Extreme Diversity of Low-mass Halo Properties,

    Ethan O. Nadler, Daneng Yang, and Hai-Bo Yu, “A Self- interacting Dark Matter Solution to the Extreme Diversity of Low-mass Halo Properties,” Astrophys. J. Lett.958, L39 (2023), arXiv:2306.01830 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    The “Little Dark Dot

    Shubo Li, Ran Li, Kaihao Wang, Zixiang Jia, Xiaoyue Cao, Carlos S. Frenk, Fangzhou Jiang, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Shaun Cole, Qiuhan He, Samuel C. Lange, Richard Massey, James W. Nightingale, Andrew Robertson, Maxi- milian von Wietersheim-Kramsta, and Xianghao Ma, “The “Little Dark Dot”: Evidence for Self-Interacting Dark Matter in the Strong Lens SDSSJ09...

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Detection of a Dark Substructure through Gravitational Imaging

    S. Vegetti, L. V . E. Koopmans, A. Bolton, T. Treu, and R. Gavazzi, “Detection of a dark substructure through gravitational imaging,” MNRAS 408, 1969–1981 (2010), arXiv:0910.0760 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1969

  37. [37]

    Gravitational detection of a low-mass dark satellite at cosmological distance

    S. Vegetti, D. J. Lagattuta, J. P. McKean, M. W. Auger, C. D. Fassnacht, and L. V . E. Koopmans, “Gravitational detection of a low-mass dark satellite galaxy at cosmo- logical distance,” Nature (London) 481, 341–343 (2012), arXiv:1201.3643 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  38. [38]

    De- tecting low-mass haloes with strong gravitational lensing II: constraints on the density profiles of two detected sub- haloes,

    Giulia Despali, Felix M. Heinze, Christopher D. Fassnacht, Simona Vegetti, Cristiana Spingola, and Ralf Klessen, “De- tecting low-mass haloes with strong gravitational lensing II: constraints on the density profiles of two detected sub- haloes,” (2024), arXiv:2407.12910 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Gravita- tional imaging through a triple source plane lens: revisit- 7 ing the ΛCDM-defying dark subhalo in SDSSJ0946+1006,

    Daniel J. Ballard, Wolfgang J. R. Enzi, Thomas E. Col- lett, Hannah C. Turner, and Russell J. Smith, “Gravita- tional imaging through a triple source plane lens: revisit- 7 ing the ΛCDM-defying dark subhalo in SDSSJ0946+1006,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 528, 7564–7586 (2024), arXiv:2309.04535 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    The overconcentrated dark halo in the strong lens SDSS J0946+1006 is a sub- halo: evidence for self interacting dark matter?

    Wolfgang J. R. Enzi, Coleman M. Krawczyk, Daniel J. Ballard, and Thomas E. Collett, “The overconcentrated dark halo in the strong lens SDSS J0946+1006 is a sub- halo: evidence for self interacting dark matter?” (2024), arXiv:2411.08565 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    An excess of small-scale grav- itational lenses observed in galaxy clusters,

    Massimo Meneghetti et al., “An excess of small-scale grav- itational lenses observed in galaxy clusters,” Science 369, 1347–1351 (2020), arXiv:2009.04471 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters,

    Massimo Meneghetti et al. , “The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters,” Astron. Astrophys. 668, A188 (2022), arXiv:2204.09065 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    A persistent excess of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing observed in galaxy clusters,

    Massimo Meneghetti et al., “A persistent excess of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing observed in galaxy clusters,” As- tron. Astrophys. 678, L2 (2023), arXiv:2309.05799 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Self-interacting Dark Matter, Core Collapse, and the Galaxy–Galaxy Strong-lensing Discrepancy,

    Isaque Dutra, Priyamvada Natarajan, and Daniel Gilman, “Self-interacting Dark Matter, Core Collapse, and the Galaxy–Galaxy Strong-lensing Discrepancy,” Astrophys. J. 978, 38 (2025), arXiv:2406.17024 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Self-interacting dark mat- ter and small-scale gravitational lenses in galaxy clusters,

    Daneng Yang and Hai-Bo Yu, “Self-interacting dark mat- ter and small-scale gravitational lenses in galaxy clusters,” Phys. Rev. D104, 103031 (2021), arXiv:2102.02375 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Diversifying halo structures in two-component self- interacting dark matter models via mass segregation,

    Daneng Yang, Yue-Lin Sming Tsai, and Yi-Zhong Fan, “Diversifying halo structures in two-component self- interacting dark matter models via mass segregation,” (2025), arXiv:2504.02303 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    To collapse or not to collapse: Halo evolution with self-interacting dark mat- ter mass segregation,

    Yashraj Patil and Moritz S. Fischer, “To collapse or not to collapse: Halo evolution with self-interacting dark mat- ter mass segregation,” (2025), arXiv:2506.06272 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Dynamical Evolu- tions in Globular Clusters and Dwarf Galaxies: Conduc- tion Fluid Simulations,

    Yi-Ming Zhong and Stuart L. Shapiro, “Dynamical Evolu- tions in Globular Clusters and Dwarf Galaxies: Conduc- tion Fluid Simulations,” (2025), arXiv:2505.18251 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    A stringent upper limit on dark mat- ter self-interaction cross-section from cluster strong lens- ing,

    Kevin E. Andrade, Jackson Fuson, Sophia Gad-Nasr, Demao Kong, Quinn Minor, M. Grant Roberts, and Manoj Kaplinghat, “A stringent upper limit on dark mat- ter self-interaction cross-section from cluster strong lens- ing,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 510, 54–81 (2021), arXiv:2012.06611 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Detecting Dark Matter Cores in Galaxy Clusters with Strong Lensing

    Kevin E. Andrade, Quinn Minor, Anna Nierenberg, and Manoj Kaplinghat, “Detecting dark matter cores in galaxy clusters with strong lensing,” MNRAS 487, 1905–1926 (2019), arXiv:1901.00507 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  51. [51]

    Strong Dark Matter Self-interactions Diversify Halo Populations within and surrounding the Milky Way,

    Daneng Yang, Ethan O. Nadler, and Hai-Bo Yu, “Strong Dark Matter Self-interactions Diversify Halo Populations within and surrounding the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. 949, 67 (2023), arXiv:2211.13768 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Can Feedback Solve the Too Big to Fail Problem?

    Shea Garrison-Kimmel, Miguel Rocha, Michael Boylan- Kolchin, James Bullock, and Jaspreet Lally, “Can Feedback Solve the Too Big to Fail Problem?” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 433, 3539 (2013), arXiv:1301.3137 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    Testing the parametric model for self-interacting dark matter us- ing matched halos in cosmological simulations,

    Daneng Yang, Ethan O. Nadler, and Hai-Bo Yu, “Testing the parametric model for self-interacting dark matter us- ing matched halos in cosmological simulations,” Phys. Dark Univ. 47, 101807 (2025), arXiv:2406.10753 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Cold dark matter haloes in the Planck era: evolution of structural parameters for Einasto and NFW profiles

    Aaron A. Dutton and Andrea V . Macci`o, “Cold dark matter haloes in the Planck era: evolution of structural parameters for Einasto and NFW profiles,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 441, 3359–3374 (2014), arXiv:1402.7073 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    An unexpected high concentra- tion for the dark substructure in the gravitational lens SDSSJ0946+1006,

    Quinn E. Minor, Sophia Gad-Nasr, Manoj Kaplinghat, and Simona Vegetti, “An unexpected high concentra- tion for the dark substructure in the gravitational lens SDSSJ0946+1006,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 507, 1662–1683 (2021), arXiv:2011.10627 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Bayesian Strong Gravitational-Lens Modeling on Adaptive Grids: Objective Detection of Mass Substructure in Galaxies

    S. Vegetti and L. V . E. Koopmans, “Bayesian Strong Gravitational-Lens Modelling on Adaptive Grids: Objec- tive Detection of Mass Substructure in Galaxies,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 392, 945 (2009), arXiv:0805.0201 [astro- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  57. [57]

    Detection of lensing substructure using ALMA observations of the dusty galaxy SDP.81

    Yashar D. Hezaveh et al., “Detection of lensing substructure using ALMA observations of the dusty galaxy SDP.81,” As- trophys. J. 823, 37 (2016), arXiv:1601.01388 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    SHARP – IX. The dense, low-mass perturbers in B1938+666 and J0946+1006: implications for cold and self-interacting dark matter,

    Maryam Tajalli, Simona Vegetti, Conor M. O’Riordan, Si- mon D. M. White, Christopher D. Fassnacht, Devon M. Powell, J. P. McKean, and Giulia Despali, “SHARP – IX. The dense, low-mass perturbers in B1938+666 and J0946+1006: implications for cold and self-interacting dark matter,” (2025), arXiv:2505.07944 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Strongly lensed cluster substructures are not in tension with ΛCDM,

    Yannick M. Bah ´e, “Strongly lensed cluster substructures are not in tension with ΛCDM,” MNRAS 505, 1458–1463 (2021), arXiv:2101.12112 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    The galaxy-galaxy strong lensing cross-sections of simulated ΛCDM galaxy clusters,

    Andrew Robertson, “The galaxy-galaxy strong lensing cross-sections of simulated ΛCDM galaxy clusters,” MN- RAS 504, L7–L11 (2021), arXiv:2101.12067 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    A Universal Analytic Model for Gravitational Lens- ing by Self-Interacting Dark Matter Halos,

    Siyuan Hou, Daneng Yang, Nan Li, and Guoliang Li, “A Universal Analytic Model for Gravitational Lens- ing by Self-Interacting Dark Matter Halos,” (2025), arXiv:2502.14964 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Isother- mal elliptical gravitational lens models

    R. Kormann, P. Schneider, and M. Bartelmann, “Isother- mal elliptical gravitational lens models.” AAP 284, 285– 299 (1994). SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Cluster density profiles and constraint The reconstruction of cluster mass profiles has presented one of the most robust constraints on SIDM in clusters, which varies but is generically around 0.1 cm 2/g [8, 49,...

    work page 1994