pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.09981 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

New Insights into Dark Energy from DESI DR2 with CMB and SNIa

Da-Chun Qiang , Jing-Yi Jia , Hao Wei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 05:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords dark energyDESIBAOSNIaCMBLambdaCDMcosmological tensionsw0waCDM
0
0 comments X

The pith

Certain supernova, CMB, and BAO datasets drive the reported tension with the standard cosmological model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests which combinations of current observations produce an apparent preference for dynamical dark energy over the Lambda cold dark matter model. It combines DESI-DR2 baryon acoustic oscillation measurements with different cosmic microwave background datasets and two supernova samples inside the w0waCDM parametrization. The analysis isolates the DESY5 supernova sample (especially its low-redshift portion), Planck CMB temperature and lensing data, ACT-DR6 lensing, and the DESI-DR2 BAO points as the main sources of the deviation. Other pairings that replace these with WMAP, SPT, or the DES supernova sample stay consistent with LambdaCDM at roughly one sigma. The work shows that the choice of which measurements to include can determine whether the data favor an evolving dark energy component.

Core claim

The observed deviations from LambdaCDM arise primarily from the DESY5 SNIa sample, particularly its low-redshift component, together with the Planck CMB data, the lensing measurements of Planck and ACT-DR6, and the DESI-DR2 BAO measurements. Combinations that instead use DES-SN, WMAP, SPT, or ACT-DR6 data remain consistent with LambdaCDM within approximately one sigma.

What carries the argument

Systematic replacement of individual datasets while fitting the w0waCDM model to isolate which observations produce tension with LambdaCDM

If this is right

  • The preference for dynamical dark energy depends strongly on whether the DESY5 or DES supernova sample is used.
  • Planck CMB and lensing data contribute more to the tension than WMAP or SPT data.
  • The DESI-DR2 BAO measurements amplify the deviation only when paired with the tension-driving CMB and supernova sets.
  • Improved calibration and homogeneity checks across supernova and CMB datasets could reconcile the observations with LambdaCDM.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future supernova surveys that avoid the low-redshift regime of DESY5 may not reproduce the current preference for evolving dark energy when combined with DESI BAO.
  • Independent cross-checks that replace Planck lensing with other probes could test whether the tension is tied to a particular experiment's calibration.
  • If the w0waCDM parametrization itself is inadequate, dataset swaps would not cleanly separate tension sources as observed here.

Load-bearing premise

The apparent deviations from LambdaCDM are produced by the listed dataset components rather than by unmodeled systematics, selection effects, or an unsuitable choice of dark-energy parametrization.

What would settle it

A reanalysis that corrects known systematics in the DES-lowz supernova sample and then finds the combined data consistent with LambdaCDM at high significance would falsify the attribution of tension to those specific datasets.

read the original abstract

Analyses by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration suggest a significant deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model when their baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements are combined with Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) data and various Type Ia supernova (SNIa) samples. In this work, we systematically investigate the origin of the deviations from the $\Lambda$CDM reported in recent cosmological analyses by combining different CMB datasets, BAO measurements, and DESY5 SNIa samples within the $w_0w_a$CDM framework. We find that the DESY5 SNIa sample, particularly its low-redshift component (DES-lowz), the Planck CMB data, the lensing measurements of Planck and ACT-DR6, and the DESI-DR2 BAO measurements contribute most significantly to the observed tensions. In contrast, combinations involving DES-SN, WMAP, SPT, and ACT-DR6 remain consistent with $\Lambda$CDM within $\sim1\sigma$. Our results highlight the critical impact of SNIa systematics, CMB data, and the choice of BAO dataset on constraints of dynamical dark energy models. These findings underscore the importance of improved calibration, homogeneity, and cross-validation of observational datasets to robustly assess potential deviations from the standard cosmological model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript systematically combines DESI DR2 BAO measurements with multiple CMB datasets (Planck, WMAP, ACT-DR6, SPT) and SNIa samples (DESY5 including its low-z subset, DES-SN) in the w0waCDM framework. It concludes that the DESY5 SNIa sample (particularly DES-lowz), Planck CMB, Planck/ACT lensing, and DESI-DR2 BAO drive the reported deviations from ΛCDM, while combinations with DES-SN, WMAP, or SPT remain consistent within ~1σ. The work emphasizes the role of dataset choice and SNIa systematics in assessing dynamical dark energy.

Significance. If the dataset-attribution results hold after addressing systematics, the paper offers a useful diagnostic for the origin of current cosmological tensions, highlighting how specific low-z SNIa components and CMB/lensing choices influence w0wa constraints. This could inform cross-validation strategies for upcoming surveys, though the strength depends on demonstrating that apparent tensions are not artifacts of fixed nuisance parameters.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Dataset combinations and results): The central attribution of tension primarily to DES-lowz (and DESY5 overall) is load-bearing for the main claim, yet the analysis appears to fix SNIa nuisance parameters (host-mass step, color-luminosity α/β, peculiar-velocity corrections) to fiducial values without marginalizing over plausible alternatives or reporting sensitivity tests. This leaves open whether the excess deviation is cosmological or an artifact of low-z calibration choices, as noted in the abstract's dataset-contribution paragraph.
  2. [§3] §3 (Methods) and associated tables/figures on tension metrics: The reported ~1σ consistency for combinations involving WMAP or DES-SN versus >2σ deviations for Planck+DESI+DESY5 lacks an explicit error-budget breakdown or covariance checks that isolate dataset effects from unmodeled systematics. Without these, the claim that specific components 'contribute most significantly' cannot be fully verified from the presented swaps.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (or equivalent tension plot): axis labels and legend entries for the different dataset combinations could be clarified to avoid ambiguity when comparing w0-wa contours across panels.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and §2: the phrasing 'systematically investigate the origin' would benefit from a brief explicit statement of the exact nuisance-parameter treatment used for each SNIa sample.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we will make to improve the robustness of our analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Dataset combinations and results): The central attribution of tension primarily to DES-lowz (and DESY5 overall) is load-bearing for the main claim, yet the analysis appears to fix SNIa nuisance parameters (host-mass step, color-luminosity α/β, peculiar-velocity corrections) to fiducial values without marginalizing over plausible alternatives or reporting sensitivity tests. This leaves open whether the excess deviation is cosmological or an artifact of low-z calibration choices, as noted in the abstract's dataset-contribution paragraph.

    Authors: We agree that fixing the SNIa nuisance parameters to fiducial values is a limitation in the current analysis, as it does not fully explore the impact of their uncertainties. To strengthen our claims, we will add sensitivity tests in the revised manuscript by varying the host-mass step, color-luminosity parameters, and peculiar-velocity corrections within their reported ranges and re-evaluating the tension metrics. This will help demonstrate that the attribution to DES-lowz is robust. We will also clarify in the methods section that these parameters are held fixed to focus on dataset combinations, with the new tests addressing potential artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (Methods) and associated tables/figures on tension metrics: The reported ~1σ consistency for combinations involving WMAP or DES-SN versus >2σ deviations for Planck+DESI+DESY5 lacks an explicit error-budget breakdown or covariance checks that isolate dataset effects from unmodeled systematics. Without these, the claim that specific components 'contribute most significantly' cannot be fully verified from the presented swaps.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for a more detailed error budget to support our conclusions. In the revised version, we will include an explicit breakdown of the tension contributions, incorporating covariance considerations between the datasets where applicable. While a complete isolation of all unmodeled systematics may require additional data or modeling beyond the scope of this work, we will expand the discussion to address this and provide the requested checks based on the available information. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in dataset-combination tension analysis

full rationale

The paper fits the standard w0waCDM model to independent combinations of CMB, BAO, and SNIa datasets, then reports which subsets produce the largest deviations from ΛCDM. These attributions are direct outputs of the likelihood comparisons and are not redefined by the fit itself, nor do they rely on self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior work by the same authors. The derivation chain consists of standard cosmological parameter estimation on external data and remains externally falsifiable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumption that the w0waCDM parametrization adequately captures any deviation from ΛCDM and that the listed datasets can be treated as independent once combined.

free parameters (1)
  • w0, wa
    Dark energy equation-of-state parameters at z=0 and their time derivative, fitted to each dataset combination.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The background cosmology is described by the flat w0waCDM model
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the framework for all fits.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5769 in / 1405 out tokens · 40471 ms · 2026-05-19T05:15:35.193816+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Planck PR4 CMB data mildly favors dynamical dark energy, but this preference weakens when accounting for possible excess smoothing, indicating the signal may partly arise from data processing issues.

  2. Measuring neutrino mass in light of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New ACT and DESI data yield model-dependent upper limits on sum of neutrino masses, with holographic dark energy giving the tightest bounds and a consistent preference for degenerate hierarchy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander, M. Alvarez et al.,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025(2025) 021 [2404.03002]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. Allen et al.,DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.14738 [2503.14738]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

    D. Scolnic, D. Brout, A. Carr, A.G. Riess, T.M. Davis, A. Dwomoh et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release,Astrophys. J.938(2022) 113 [2112.03863]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    D. Brout, D. Scolnic, B. Popovic, A.G. Riess, A. Carr, J. Zuntz et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys. J.938(2022) 110 [2202.04077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework

    D. Rubin, G. Aldering, M. Betoule, A. Fruchter, X. Huang, A.G. Kim et al.,Union through UNITY: Cosmology with 2000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework,Astrophys. J.986 (2025) 231 [2311.12098]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results With ~1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using The Full 5-year Dataset

    DES Collaboration, T.M.C. Abbott, M. Acevedo, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, S. Allam et al.,The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,Astrophys. J. Lett.973(2024) L14 [2401.02929]. – 8 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Vincenzi et al

    M. Vincenzi, D. Brout, P. Armstrong, B. Popovic, G. Taylor, M. Acevedo et al.,The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: Cosmological Analysis and Systematic Uncertainties, Astrophys. J.975(2024) 86 [2401.02945]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    The dark energy survey supernova pro- gram: Light curves and 5-year data release,

    B.O. S´ anchez, D. Brout, M. Vincenzi, M. Sako, K. Herner, R. Kessler et al.,The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: Light Curves and 5 Yr Data Release,Astrophys. J.975(2024) 5 [2406.05046]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski,Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter,International Journal of Modern Physics D10(2001) 213 [gr-qc/0009008]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe

    E.V. Linder,Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 091301 [astro-ph/0208512]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    Kumar, A

    U. Kumar, A. Ajith and A. Verma,Evidence for non-cold dark matter from DESI DR2 measurements,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.14419 [2504.14419]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Wang, Evidence for Dynamical Dark Matter (4 2025).arXiv:2504.21481

    D. Wang,Evidence for Dynamical Dark Matter,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.21481 [2504.21481]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Chen and A

    X. Chen and A. Loeb,Evolving Dark Energy or Evolving Dark Matter?,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2505.02645 [2505.02645]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Abedin, L.A

    M. Abedin, L.A. Escamilla, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino and W. Yang,When Dark Matter Heats Up: A Model-Independent Search for Non-Cold Behavior,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2505.09470 [2505.09470]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Li, Y.-M

    T.-N. Li, Y.-M. Zhang, Y.-H. Yao, P.-J. Wu, J.-F. Zhang and X. Zhang,Is non-zero equation of state of dark matter favored by DESI DR2?,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2506.09819 [2506.09819]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    ACT DR6 Leads to Stronger Evidence for Dynamical Dark Matter, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.23029

    D. Wang and K. Bamba,ACT DR6 Leads to Stronger Evidence for Dynamical Dark Matter, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2506.23029 [2506.23029]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Minami and E

    Y. Minami and E. Komatsu,New Extraction of the Cosmic Birefringence from the Planck 2018 Polarization Data,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 221301 [2011.11254]

    work page arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Komatsu, Nature Rev

    E. Komatsu,New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background,Nature Reviews Physics4(2022) 452 [2202.13919]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Nhan Luu, Y.-C

    H. Nhan Luu, Y.-C. Qiu and S.H.H. Tye,Dynamical dark energy from an ultralight axion, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.18120 [2503.18120]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi and W. Yin,Isotropic cosmic birefringence from string axion domain walls without cosmic strings, and DESI results,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.18417 [2503.18417]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Nakagawa, Y

    S. Nakagawa, Y. Nakai, Y.-C. Qiu and M. Yamada,Interpreting Cosmic Birefringence and DESI Data with Evolving Axion inΛCDM,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.18924 [2503.18924]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Ure˜ na-L´ opez, F

    L.A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez, F. Lozano-Rodr´ ıguez, J.O. Rom´ an-Herrera, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi et al.,Updated cosmological constraints on axion dark energy with DESI,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.20178 [2503.20178]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    W. Lin, L. Visinelli and T.T. Yanagida,Testing Quintessence Axion Dark Energy with Recent Cosmological Results,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.17638 [2504.17638]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M.A. Sabogal, R.C. Nunes and E. Di Valentino,Interacting Dark Energy after DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 251003 [2404.15232]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Li and S

    J.-X. Li and S. Wang,A comprehensive numerical study on four categories of holographic dark energy models,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2412.09064 [2412.09064]. – 9 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Chakraborty, P

    A. Chakraborty, P.K. Chanda, S. Das and K. Dutta,DESI results: Hint towards coupled dark matter and dark energy,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.10806 [2503.10806]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Feng, T.-N

    L. Feng, T.-N. Li, G.-H. Du, J.-F. Zhang and X. Zhang,A search for sterile neutrinos in interacting dark energy models using DESI baryon acoustic oscillations and DES supernovae data,Physics of the Dark Universe48(2025) 101935 [2503.10423]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Khoury, M.-X

    J. Khoury, M.-X. Lin and M. Trodden,Apparentw <−1and a LowerS 8 from Dark Axion and Dark Baryons Interactions,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.16415 [2503.16415]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Li and X

    Y.-H. Li and X. Zhang,Cosmic Sign-Reversal: Non-Parametric Reconstruction of Interacting Dark Energy with DESI DR2,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2506.18477 [2506.18477]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    R. Shah, P. Mukherjee and S. Pal,Interacting dark sectors in light of DESI DR2,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.21652 [2503.21652]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Silva, M

    E. Silva, M.A. Sabogal, M. Scherer, R.C. Nunes, E. Di Valentino and S. Kumar,New constraints on interacting dark energy from DESI DR2 BAO observations,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 123511 [2503.23225]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    C. You, D. Wang and T. Yang,Dynamical Dark Energy Implies a Coupled Dark Sector: Insights from DESI DR2 via a Data-Driven Approach,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.00985 [2504.00985]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    S. Pan, S. Paul, E.N. Saridakis and W. Yang,Interacting dark energy after DESI DR2: a challenge forΛCDM paradigm?,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.00994 [2504.00994]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Giarè, Phys

    W. Giar` e,Dynamical Dark Energy Beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO and Type-Ia Supernovae,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2409.17074 [2409.17074]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Y.-H. Pang, X. Zhang and Q.-G. Huang,Reevaluating H 0 tension with non-Planck CMB and DESI BAO joint analysis,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025(2025) 057 [2411.14189]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Huang, R.-G

    L. Huang, R.-G. Cai and S.-J. Wang,The DESI DR1/DR2 evidence for dynamical dark energy is biased by low-redshift supernovae,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2502.04212 [2502.04212]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Efstathiou,Evolving Dark Energy or Supernovae Systematics?, arXiv:2408.07175 (2025)

    G. Efstathiou,Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.538(2025) 875 [2408.07175]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Cortˆ es, A

    M. Cortˆ es and A.R. Liddle,Interpreting DESI’s evidence for evolving dark energy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2024(2024) 007 [2404.08056]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Park and B

    C.-G. Park and B. Ratra,Is excess smoothing of Planck CMB ansiotropy data partially responsible for evidence for dark energy dynamics in otherw(z)CDM parametrizations?,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2501.03480 [2501.03480]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Dhawan, B

    S. Dhawan, B. Popovic and A. Goobar,The axis of systematic bias in SN Ia cosmology and implications for DESI 2024 results,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.540(2025) 1626 [2409.18668]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Updated Cosmological Constraints in Extended Parameter Space with Planck PR4, DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, and Supernovae: Dynamical Dark Energy, Neutrino Masses, Lensing Anomaly, and the Hubble Tension

    S. Roy Choudhury and T. Okumura,Updated Cosmological Constraints in Extended Parameter Space with Planck PR4, DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, and Supernovae: Dynamical Dark Energy, Neutrino Masses, Lensing Anomaly, and the Hubble Tension,Astrophys. J. Lett.976 (2024) L11 [2409.13022]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Gialamas, G

    I.D. Gialamas, G. H¨ utsi, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi, M. Raidal, M. Vasar et al.,Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: Late-time dynamical dark energy or a local effect?,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 043540 [2406.07533]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Allali, A

    I.J. Allali, A. Notari and F. Rompineve,Reduced Hubble tension in dark radiation models after DESI 2024,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025(2025) 023 [2404.15220]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Sakr,The case for a low dark matter density in dynamical dark energy model from local probes,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2501.08915 [2501.08915]

    Z. Sakr,The case for a low dark matter density in dynamical dark energy model from local probes,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2501.08915 [2501.08915]. – 10 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Sakr,Uncovering the bias in the evidence for dynamical dark energy through minimal and generalized modeling approaches,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2501.14366 [2501.14366]

    Z. Sakr,Uncovering the bias in the evidence for dynamical dark energy through minimal and generalized modeling approaches,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2501.14366 [2501.14366]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    C.-G. Park, J. de Cruz Perez and B. Ratra,Is thew 0waCDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck CMB anisotropy data?,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2410.13627 [2410.13627]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari,DESI and SNe: Dynamical Dark Energy,Ω m Tension or Systematics?,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2412.12905 [2412.12905]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    ´O Colg´ ain, S

    E. ´O Colg´ ain, S. Pourojaghi and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari,Implications of DES 5YR SNe Dataset for ¡inline-formula¿¡mml:math¿¡mml:mi¿Λ¡/mml:mi¿¡/mml:math¿¡/inline-formula¿CDM, European Physical Journal C85(2025) 286 [2406.06389]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    G. Liu, Y. Wang and W. Zhao,Impact of LRG1 and LRG2 in DESI 2024 BAO data on dark energy evolution,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2407.04385 [2407.04385]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Z. Wang, S. Lin, Z. Ding and B. Hu,The role of LRG1 and LRG2’s monopole in inferring the DESI 2024 BAO cosmology,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.534(2024) 3869 [2405.02168]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Huang, J

    Z. Huang, J. Liu, J. Mo, Y. Su, J. Wang, Y. Yao et al.,Key drivers of the preference for dynamic dark energy,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 123512 [2405.03983]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain, M.G. Dainotti, S. Capozziello, S. Pourojaghi, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari and D. Stojkovic,Does DESI 2024 ConfirmΛCDM?,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2404.08633 [2404.08633]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A5 [1907.12875]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A8 [1807.06210]

    work page arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Akrami, K.J

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami, K.J. Andersen, M. Ashdown, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck intermediate results. LVII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data processing,Astron. Astrophys.643(2020) A42 [2007.04997]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps

    J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein and A. Lewis,CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2022(2022) 039 [2206.07773]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results

    G. Hinshaw, D. Larson, E. Komatsu, D.N. Spergel, C.L. Bennett, J. Dunkley et al.,Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results,Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.208(2013) 19 [1212.5226]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    Aiola et al

    S. Aiola, E. Calabrese, L. Maurin, S. Naess, B.L. Schmitt, M.H. Abitbol et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2020(2020) 047 [2007.07288]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    T. Louis, A. La Posta, Z. Atkins, H.T. Jense, I. Abril-Cabezas, G.E. Addison et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods andΛCDM Parameters,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.14452 [2503.14452]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    F.J. Qu, B.D. Sherwin, M.S. Madhavacheril, D. Han, K.T. Crowley, I. Abril-Cabezas et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth,Astrophys. J.962(2024) 112 [2304.05202]. – 11 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters

    M.S. Madhavacheril, F.J. Qu, B.D. Sherwin, N. MacCrann, Y. Li, I. Abril-Cabezas et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters, Astrophys. J.962(2024) 113 [2304.05203]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Dutcher, L

    D. Dutcher, L. Balkenhol, P.A.R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, E. Anderes, A.J. Anderson et al., Measurements of the E -mode polarization and temperature-E -mode correlation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 data,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 022003 [2101.01684]

    work page arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Balkenhol, D

    L. Balkenhol, D. Dutcher, A. Spurio Mancini, A. Doussot, K. Benabed, S. Galli et al., Measurement of the CMB temperature power spectrum and constraints on cosmology from the SPT-3G 2018 TT, TE, and EE dataset,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 023510 [2212.05642]

    work page arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Evolving Dark Energy or Supernovae systematics?

    M. Vincenzi, R. Kessler, P. Shah, J. Lee, T.M. Davis, D. Scolnic et al.,Comparing the DES-SN5YR and Pantheon+ SN cosmology analyses: Investigation based on “Evolving Dark Energy or Supernovae systematics?”,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2501.06664 [2501.06664]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    The Carnegie Supernova Project I: Third Photometry Data Release of Low-Redshift Type Ia Supernovae and Other White Dwarf Explosions

    K. Krisciunas, C. Contreras, C.R. Burns, M.M. Phillips, M.D. Stritzinger, N. Morrell et al., The Carnegie Supernova Project. I. Third Photometry Data Release of Low-redshift Type Ia Supernovae and Other White Dwarf Explosions,Astron. J.154(2017) 211 [1709.05146]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    CfA3: 185 Type Ia Supernova Light Curves from the CfA

    M. Hicken, P. Challis, S. Jha, R.P. Kirshner, T. Matheson, M. Modjaz et al.,CfA3: 185 Type Ia Supernova Light Curves from the CfA,Astrophys. J.700(2009) 331 [0901.4787]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  68. [68]

    CfA4: Light Curves for 94 Type Ia Supernovae

    M. Hicken, P. Challis, R.P. Kirshner, A. Rest, C.E. Cramer, W.M. Wood-Vasey et al.,CfA4: Light Curves for 94 Type Ia Supernovae,Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.200(2012) 12 [1205.4493]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  69. [69]

    The Foundation Supernova Survey: Motivation, Design, Implementation, and First Data Release

    R.J. Foley, D. Scolnic, A. Rest, S.W. Jha, Y.C. Pan, A.G. Riess et al.,The Foundation Supernova Survey: motivation, design, implementation, and first data release,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.475(2018) 193 [1711.02474]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [70]

    Park, J.d.C

    C.-G. Park, J.d.C. P´ erez and B. Ratra,Using non-DESI data to confirm and strengthen the DESI 2024 spatially flatw 0waCDM cosmological parametrization result,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 123533 [2405.00502]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Ghosh and C

    B. Ghosh and C. Bengaly,Consistency tests between SDSS and DESI BAO measurements, Physics of the Dark Universe46(2024) 101699 [2408.04432]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Dinda and R

    B.R. Dinda and R. Maartens,Model-agnostic assessment of dark energy after DESI DR1 BAO, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025(2025) 120 [2407.17252]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Delouis, L

    J.M. Delouis, L. Pagano, S. Mottet, J.L. Puget and L. Vibert,SRoll2: an improved mapmaking approach to reduce large-scale systematic effects in the Planck High Frequency Instrument legacy maps,Astron. Astrophys.629(2019) A38 [1901.11386]

    work page arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Efstathiou and S

    G. Efstathiou and S. Gratton,A Detailed Description of the CAMSPEC Likelihood Pipeline and a Reanalysis of the Planck High Frequency Maps,The Open Journal of Astrophysics4 (2021) 8 [1910.00483]

    work page arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec

    E. Rosenberg, S. Gratton and G. Efstathiou,CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.517(2022) 4620 [2205.10869]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    A.J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W.J. Percival, A. Burden and M. Manera,The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample - I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.449(2015) 835 [1409.3242]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  77. [77]

    B. Reid, S. Ho, N. Padmanabhan, W.J. Percival, J. Tinker, R. Tojeiro et al.,SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 12: galaxy target selection and large-scale structure catalogues,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.455(2016) 1553 [1509.06529]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    S. Alam, M. Aubert, S. Avila, C. Balland, J.E. Bautista, M.A. Bershady et al.,Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory,Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 083533 [2007.08991]. – 12 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby,Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Models,Astrophys. J.538 (2000) 473 [astro-ph/9911177]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  80. [80]

    CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology

    C. Howlett, A. Lewis, A. Hall and A. Challinor,CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2012(2012) 027 [1201.3654]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

Showing first 80 references.