Are LLM Belief Updates Consistent with Bayes' Theorem?
read the original abstract
Do larger and more capable language models learn to update their "beliefs" about propositions more consistently with Bayes' theorem when presented with evidence in-context? To test this, we formulate a Bayesian Coherence Coefficient (BCC) metric and generate a dataset with which to measure the BCC. We measure BCC for multiple pre-trained-only language models across five model families, comparing against the number of model parameters, the amount of training data, and model scores on common benchmarks. Our results provide evidence for our hypothesis that larger and more capable pre-trained language models assign credences that are more coherent with Bayes' theorem. These results have important implications for our understanding and governance of LLMs.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Online Pandora's Box for Contextual LLM Cascading
Introduces a parametric reservation-index policy with GMM estimation and UCB exploration for contextual LLM cascading under output-mediated feedback, claiming dimension-dependent square-root regret.
-
MEDLEY-BENCH: Scale Buys Evaluation but Not Control in AI Metacognition
MEDLEY-BENCH reveals an evaluation/control dissociation in AI metacognition where scale improves reflective scoring but not proportional belief revision, with a consistent knowing/doing gap across 35 models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.