The Structural Sources of Verb Meaning Revisited: Large Language Models Display Syntactic Bootstrapping
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:KGJ2XOALrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Syntactic bootstrapping (Gleitman, 1990) is the hypothesis that children use the syntactic environments in which a verb occurs to learn its meaning. In this paper, we examine whether large language models exhibit a similar behavior. We do this by training RoBERTa and GPT-2 on perturbed datasets where syntactic information is ablated. Our results show that models' verb representation degrades more when syntactic cues are removed than when co-occurrence information is removed. Furthermore, the representation of mental verbs, for which syntactic bootstrapping has been shown to be particularly crucial in human verb learning, is more negatively impacted in such training regimes than physical verbs. In contrast, models' representation of nouns is affected more when co-occurrences are distorted than when syntax is distorted. In addition to reinforcing the important role of syntactic bootstrapping in verb learning, our results demonstrated the viability of testing developmental hypotheses on a larger scale through manipulating the learning environments of large language models.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Is Child-Directed Language Optimized for Word Learning? A Computational Study of Verb Meaning Acquisition
Computational experiments show verb learning benefits in child-directed language likely stem from spoken register properties rather than unique optimization for children.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.