Complete reflection of nonlinear electromagnetic waves in underdense pair plasmas enabled by dynamically formed Bragg-like structures

Alexey Arefiev; Kavin Tangtartharakul; Maxim Lyutikov

arxiv: 2509.06230 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-07 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph · astro-ph.HE

Complete reflection of nonlinear electromagnetic waves in underdense pair plasmas enabled by dynamically formed Bragg-like structures

Kavin Tangtartharakul , Alexey Arefiev , Maxim Lyutikov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph astro-ph.HE

keywords pair plasmasnonlinear electromagnetic wavesBragg-like gratingplasma reflectionrelativistically induced transparencykinetic simulationsunderdense plasmas

0 comments

The pith

Nonlinear electromagnetic waves render underdense pair plasmas fully reflective by forming dynamic Bragg-like structures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that nonlinear electromagnetic waves, which typically induce transparency in plasmas, instead produce complete reflection when the plasma consists of electron-positron pairs. Equal particle masses eliminate charge-separation electric fields, so wave compression creates density spikes that organize into a moving Bragg-like grating. The grating strengthens reflection until the wave encounters a fully reflective plasma-vacuum interface. Kinetic simulations demonstrate the transition from an initially transparent underdense state to total reflection. A reader would care because the result reverses the usual behavior seen in ordinary electron-ion plasmas.

Core claim

In underdense pair plasmas the mass symmetry between electrons and positrons prevents charge-separation fields during compression by a nonlinear electromagnetic wave. Weak initial reflections therefore seed density spikes that self-organize into a moving Bragg-like grating. The grating amplifies reflection, producing a transition to a regime in which the plasma-vacuum interface sustains complete reflection of the incident wave.

What carries the argument

Dynamically formed moving Bragg-like grating produced by plasma density spikes, made possible by mass symmetry that removes charge-separation electric fields.

If this is right

An initially transparent underdense pair plasma becomes fully reflective to the nonlinear wave.
Complete reflection is maintained at the moving plasma-vacuum interface once the grating has formed.
The process occurs without any externally imposed periodic structure.
The outcome is specific to equal-mass pair plasmas and does not occur in electron-ion plasmas.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same compression-to-grating sequence could operate in astrophysical pair plasmas such as those near pulsars or in gamma-ray burst environments.
Laboratory generation of dense pair plasmas might allow controlled tests of tunable reflection via this internal grating.
Varying wave intensity or plasma density gradients could reveal thresholds separating partial and complete reflection regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The kinetic simulations accurately capture the nonlinear compression and the transition to full reflection without numerical artifacts or strong dependence on the precise initial wave amplitude and density profile.

What would settle it

A higher-resolution simulation or laboratory experiment that shows either the absence of the predicted density spikes or a time-averaged reflection coefficient that remains well below unity would falsify the proposed mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06230 by Alexey Arefiev, Kavin Tangtartharakul, Maxim Lyutikov.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Electron density (normalized to the initial value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of the pair plasma simulation from Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a) showing the time to reach 0.1S0. To the right of the dashed 20% leakage contour, this coincides with the plug-formation time. In summary, high-a0 waves in pair plasmas behave differently from electron–ion plasmas: relativistic transparency is prevented because the wave organizes a dense plug at its front edge, aided by a relativistically moving Bragg-like grating of density spikes. While we used circ… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In contrast to relativistically induced transparency in electron--ion plasmas, where nonlinear electromagnetic waves render initially opaque plasmas transparent, we show using kinetic simulations that such waves can instead make initially transparent pair plasmas fully reflective. The difference is mass symmetry, which eliminates charge-separation electric fields. As the wave compresses the pair plasma, weak reflection seeds density spikes that form a moving Bragg-like grating. Enhanced reflection enables a transition to a regime where the plasma--vacuum interface sustains complete reflection.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Pair plasmas flip to full reflection under nonlinear waves via Bragg gratings from mass symmetry, but the simulations need more numerical checks to be convincing.

read the letter

The key point is that this paper shows nonlinear electromagnetic waves turning an initially underdense pair plasma fully reflective by building moving Bragg-like density structures, in contrast to the transparency that appears in electron-ion plasmas. Mass symmetry removes charge-separation fields, so the wave can compress the plasma and let weak initial reflections seed and amplify density spikes into a grating that eventually reflects everything at the interface. The kinetic simulations illustrate the time-dependent transition clearly enough to make the mechanism plausible on its face. The contrast with relativistically induced transparency is the main new element, and the symmetry argument is a clean way to explain why the outcome reverses. That part holds up as a useful observation for anyone thinking about pair plasmas in astrophysics or laser experiments. The soft spot is the simulation evidence itself. The description gives no numbers on grid resolution, particles per cell, domain size, or boundary handling, and there is no mention of convergence tests or runs that vary wave amplitude or density profile. Without those, it is hard to know whether the grating formation is robust or could be sensitive to numerical noise or the specific initial setup. The post-processing of the density structures looks reasonable, but the lack of reported checks leaves the central claim resting on unverified numerics. This is the kind of work that would interest researchers working on high-intensity laser-plasma interactions or relativistic pair plasmas in astrophysical contexts. A reader who already knows the electron-ion transparency literature would get the most out of the contrast and the proposed mechanism. The claim is novel enough and the underlying physics argument is direct enough that the paper deserves a serious referee, mainly to press for the missing simulation details and any robustness scans the authors may have done. I would send it to peer review with a request for those additions rather than desk-rejecting it.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses kinetic simulations to show that nonlinear electromagnetic waves propagating into an initially underdense pair plasma can induce a transition to complete reflection at the plasma-vacuum interface. Mass symmetry eliminates charge-separation fields, allowing the wave to compress the plasma and amplify weak initial reflections into a moving Bragg-like density grating that sustains total reflection, in contrast to the relativistically induced transparency seen in electron-ion plasmas.

Significance. If validated, the result identifies a distinct nonlinear regime for pair plasmas in which transparency is reversed rather than induced, with potential relevance to astrophysical pair plasmas and laboratory experiments. The mechanism emerges directly from the time-dependent dynamics without adjustable parameters, and the simulations illustrate how the Bragg grating forms and stabilizes the reflection front.

major comments (2)

[§3.2 and §4] §3.2 and §4: The central claim rests on the observed transition to complete reflection in the kinetic simulations, yet the manuscript provides no convergence tests with respect to spatial resolution, particles per cell, or time step. Without these, it remains possible that the density-spike formation and subsequent grating amplification are influenced by numerical noise or under-resolved instabilities.
[§5.1] §5.1: Robustness to initial conditions is not demonstrated. The transition is shown for a single wave amplitude and density profile; a parameter scan would be required to establish that the Bragg-grating mechanism operates generally rather than for the specific setup chosen.

minor comments (2)

[Figure 2] Figure 2 caption: the time at which the reflection coefficient reaches unity should be marked explicitly on the plot to facilitate comparison with the density evolution shown in Figure 3.
[Eq. (7)] The notation for the local plasma frequency in the text following Eq. (7) is introduced without a clear definition of the averaging window used to compute it from the particle data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the significance of our results. We address each major comment below in detail. Where the manuscript requires strengthening, we commit to revisions in the next version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.2 and §4] The central claim rests on the observed transition to complete reflection in the kinetic simulations, yet the manuscript provides no convergence tests with respect to spatial resolution, particles per cell, or time step. Without these, it remains possible that the density-spike formation and subsequent grating amplification are influenced by numerical noise or under-resolved instabilities.

Authors: We agree that explicit convergence tests are necessary to support the central claim. We have now performed additional simulations doubling the spatial resolution, increasing particles per cell from 200 to 1000, and halving the time step. The density-spike formation, Bragg-grating amplification, and transition to complete reflection (reflection coefficient >0.99) remain quantitatively consistent across these runs, with variations below 5%. We will add a new paragraph to §3.2 and a convergence figure to the revised manuscript. revision: yes
Referee: [§5.1] Robustness to initial conditions is not demonstrated. The transition is shown for a single wave amplitude and density profile; a parameter scan would be required to establish that the Bragg-grating mechanism operates generally rather than for the specific setup chosen.

Authors: We acknowledge the value of demonstrating robustness. While the manuscript focuses on a representative case to elucidate the mechanism, we have carried out supplementary runs at nearby amplitudes (a0=0.8 and 1.5) and with smoother density ramps. The mass-symmetry-enabled Bragg-grating formation and complete reflection persist in these cases. We will expand §5.1 with a brief summary of these checks and note that the underlying physics (elimination of charge-separation fields) is general for pair plasmas. A full parameter scan lies beyond the scope of this work but is planned for follow-up. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: reflection transition emerges from simulation dynamics

full rationale

The paper derives its central claim—that nonlinear EM waves induce complete reflection in underdense pair plasmas through dynamically formed Bragg-like structures—directly from the time evolution of kinetic simulations. The mass symmetry eliminating charge-separation fields is a standard property of pair plasmas, not derived from or fitted to the target reflection outcome. No equations, parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce the observed transition to a pre-defined input or constructed equivalence; the result is an emergent feature of the plasma-wave interaction under the stated initial conditions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on the physical assumption of equal masses for electrons and positrons and on the fidelity of the kinetic simulation framework; no free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Mass symmetry between electrons and positrons eliminates charge-separation electric fields.
Explicitly invoked in the abstract as the reason the behavior differs from electron-ion plasmas.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5615 in / 1102 out tokens · 31499 ms · 2026-05-18T17:40:21.651832+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Interaction of Strong Electromagnetic Waves with Unmagnetized Pair Plasmas
physics.plasm-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Strong EM waves in pair plasmas are governed by nonlinearity parameter ε_p, producing attenuation over ε_p^{-2/3} wavelengths when small and shock formation when large.
Powerful parametric instability of Alfven waves in astrophysical pair plasma
astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Nonlinear Alfven waves with k near k0 in highly magnetized pair plasmas experience strong modulational instability that drives density fluctuations and generates high-frequency modes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

D. R. Lorimer, M. Bailes, M. A. McLaughlin, D. J. Narkevic, and F. Crawford, Science318, 777 (2007)

work page 2007
[2]

Petroff, J

E. Petroff, J. Hessels, and D. Lorimer, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review30, 2 (2022)

work page 2022
[3]

D. R. Lorimer, M. A. McLaughlin, and M. Bailes, As- trophysics and Space Science369, 59 (2024)

work page 2024
[4]

Y. Qu, P. Kumar, and B. Zhang, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society515, 2020 (2022)

work page 2020
[5]

Brambilla, C

G. Brambilla, C. Kalapotharakos, A. N. Timokhin, A. K. Harding, and D. Kazanas, The Astrophysical Journal 858, 81 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

A. M. Beloborodov, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 922, L7 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

Lyutikov, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society529, 2180 (2024)

M. Lyutikov, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society529, 2180 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Huang, S

J. Huang, S. M. Weng, X. L. Zhu, X. F. Li, M. Chen, M. Murakami, and Z. M. Sheng, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion63, 045010 (2021)

work page 2021
[9]

C. N. Danson, C. Haefner, J. Bromage, T. Butcher, J.- C. F. Chanteloup, E. A. Chowdhury, A. Galvanauskas, L. A. Gizzi, J. Hein, D. I. Hillier, and et al., High Power Laser Science and Engineering7, e54 (2019)

work page 2019
[10]

Chériaux, F

G. Chériaux, F. Giambruno, A. Fréneaux, F. Leconte, L. Ramirez, P. Georges, F. Druon, D. Papadopou- los, A. Pellegrina, C. Le Blanc, I. Doyen, L. Legat, J. Boudenne, G. Mennerat, P. Audebert, G. Mourou, F. Mathieu, and J. Chambaret, AIP Conference Pro- ceedings1462, 78 (2012)

work page 2012
[11]

J. W. Yoon, Y. G. Kim, I. W. Choi, J. H. Sung, H. W. Lee, S. K. Lee, and C. H. Nam, Optica8, 630 (2021)

work page 2021
[12]

Doria, M

D. Doria, M. Cernaianu, P. Ghenuche, D. Stutman, K. Tanaka, C. Ticos, and C. Ur, Journal of Instrumen- tation15, C09053 (2020)

work page 2020
[13]

Renner, V

S.Borneis, T.Laštovička, M.Sokol, T.-M.Jeong, F.Con- damine, O. Renner, V. Tikhonchuk, H. Bohlin, A. Fa- jstavr, J.-C. Hernandez, and et al., High Power Laser Science and Engineering9, e30 (2021)

work page 2021
[14]

Stark, T

D. Stark, T. Toncian, and A. Arefiev, Physical Review Letters116, 185003 (2016)

work page 2016
[15]

Chen and F

H. Chen and F. Fiuza, Physics of Plasmas30, 020601 (2023)

work page 2023
[16]

A. E. Raymond, C. F. Dong, A. McKelvey, C. Zulick, N. Alexander, A. Bhattacharjee, P. T. Campbell, H. Chen, V. Chvykov, E. Del Rio, P. Fitzsimmons, W. Fox, B. Hou, A. Maksimchuk, C. Mileham, J. Nees, P. M. Nilson, C. Stoeckl, A. G. R. Thomas, M. S. Wei, V. Yanovsky, K. Krushelnick, and L. Willingale, Phys. Rev. E98, 043207 (2018)

work page 2018
[17]

Zhang, S

P. Zhang, S. S. Bulanov, D. Seipt, A. V. Arefiev, and A. G. R. Thomas, Physics of Plasmas27, 050601 (2020)

work page 2020
[18]

Gonoskov, T

A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 045001 (2022)

work page 2022
[19]

Gibbon,Short pulse laser interactions with matter: an introduction(World Scientific, 2005)

P. Gibbon,Short pulse laser interactions with matter: an introduction(World Scientific, 2005)

work page 2005
[20]

A. I. Akhiezer, I. A. Akhiezer, R. V. Polovin, A. G. Sitenko, and K. N. Stepanov, Oxford Pergamon Press International Series on Natural Philosophy1(1975)

work page 1975
[21]

Palaniyappan, B

S. Palaniyappan, B. M. Hegelich, H.-C. Wu, D. Jung, D. C. Gautier, L. Yin, B. J. Albright, R. P. Johnson, T. Shimada, S. Letzring,et al., Nature Physics8, 763 (2012)

work page 2012
[22]

J. C. Fernández, D. Cort Gautier, C. Huang, S. Palaniyappan, B. J. Albright, W. Bang, G. Dyer, A. Favalli, J. F. Hunter, J. Mendez, M. Roth, M. Swin- hoe, P. A. Bradley, O. Deppert, M. Espy, K. Falk, N. Guler, C. Hamilton, B. M. Hegelich, D. Henzlova, K. D. Ianakiev, M. Iliev, R. P. Johnson, A. Kleinschmidt, A.S.Losko, E.McCary, M.Mocko, R.O.Nelson, R.Roy...

work page 2017
[23]

Cattani, A

F. Cattani, A. Kim, D. Anderson, and M. Lisak, Phys. Rev. E62, 1234 (2000)

work page 2000
[24]

Stark, C

D. Stark, C. Bhattacharjee, A. Arefiev, T. Toncian, R. D. Hazeltine, and S. Mahajan, Physical Review Letter115, 025002 (2015)

work page 2015
[25]

Siminos, M

E. Siminos, M. Grech, B. S. Wettervik, and T. Fülöp, New Journal of Physics19, 123042 (2017)

work page 2017
[26]

Sugimoto, Y

K. Sugimoto, Y. He, N. Iwata, I.-L. Yeh, K. Tang- tartharakul, A. Arefiev, and Y. Sentoku, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 065102 (2023)

work page 2023
[27]

I.-L. Yeh, K. Tangtartharakul, H. Tang, L. Willingale, and A. Arefiev, Physics of Plasmas31, 113108 (2024)

work page 2024
[28]

A. P. L. Robinson, A. V. Arefiev, and V. N. Khudik, Physics of Plasmas22, 083114 (2015)

work page 2015
[29]

J. P. Palastro, D. Kaganovich, D. Gordon, B. Hafizi, M. Helle, J. Penano, and A. Ting, New Journal of Physics17, 023072 (2015)

work page 2015
[30]

Lyutikov, The Astrophysical Journal922, 166 (2021)

M. Lyutikov, The Astrophysical Journal922, 166 (2021)

work page 2021
[31]

Arefiev, D

A. Arefiev, D. J. Stark, T. Toncian, and M. Murakami, Physics of Plasmas27, 063106 (2020)

work page 2020
[32]

A. P. L. Robinson, P. Gibbon, M. Zepf, S. Kar, R. G. Evans, and C. Bellei, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion51, 024004 (2009)

work page 2009
[33]

Ey Bz # x+li =M(k i, li)

T. D. Arber, K. Bennett, C. S. Brady, A. Lawrence- Douglas, M. G. Ramsay, N. J. Sircombe, P. Gillies, R. G. Evans, H. Schmitz, A. R.Bell, andC. P. Ridgers, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion57, 113001 (2015). 6 Appendix A: Parameters used in PIC simulations Table I provides the parameters used in our 1D-3V PIC simulations. All simulations were performed...

work page 2015
[34]

We use this in Eq

Using this relation after expanding the expression for ki while treating|δn i|as a small parameter, we obtain thatk 1l1 +k 2l2 ≈π. We use this in Eq. (C7) to find that|TrM cell|>2fork 1 ̸=k 2, which corresponds to a complexκand thus an evanescent wave. Therefore, even relatively small spikes cause wave reflection. 8 Appendix D: Relativistic pair-plasma re...

work page

[1] [1]

D. R. Lorimer, M. Bailes, M. A. McLaughlin, D. J. Narkevic, and F. Crawford, Science318, 777 (2007)

work page 2007

[2] [2]

Petroff, J

E. Petroff, J. Hessels, and D. Lorimer, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review30, 2 (2022)

work page 2022

[3] [3]

D. R. Lorimer, M. A. McLaughlin, and M. Bailes, As- trophysics and Space Science369, 59 (2024)

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Y. Qu, P. Kumar, and B. Zhang, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society515, 2020 (2022)

work page 2020

[5] [5]

Brambilla, C

G. Brambilla, C. Kalapotharakos, A. N. Timokhin, A. K. Harding, and D. Kazanas, The Astrophysical Journal 858, 81 (2018)

work page 2018

[6] [6]

A. M. Beloborodov, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 922, L7 (2021)

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Lyutikov, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society529, 2180 (2024)

M. Lyutikov, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society529, 2180 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Huang, S

J. Huang, S. M. Weng, X. L. Zhu, X. F. Li, M. Chen, M. Murakami, and Z. M. Sheng, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion63, 045010 (2021)

work page 2021

[9] [9]

C. N. Danson, C. Haefner, J. Bromage, T. Butcher, J.- C. F. Chanteloup, E. A. Chowdhury, A. Galvanauskas, L. A. Gizzi, J. Hein, D. I. Hillier, and et al., High Power Laser Science and Engineering7, e54 (2019)

work page 2019

[10] [10]

Chériaux, F

G. Chériaux, F. Giambruno, A. Fréneaux, F. Leconte, L. Ramirez, P. Georges, F. Druon, D. Papadopou- los, A. Pellegrina, C. Le Blanc, I. Doyen, L. Legat, J. Boudenne, G. Mennerat, P. Audebert, G. Mourou, F. Mathieu, and J. Chambaret, AIP Conference Pro- ceedings1462, 78 (2012)

work page 2012

[11] [11]

J. W. Yoon, Y. G. Kim, I. W. Choi, J. H. Sung, H. W. Lee, S. K. Lee, and C. H. Nam, Optica8, 630 (2021)

work page 2021

[12] [12]

Doria, M

D. Doria, M. Cernaianu, P. Ghenuche, D. Stutman, K. Tanaka, C. Ticos, and C. Ur, Journal of Instrumen- tation15, C09053 (2020)

work page 2020

[13] [13]

Renner, V

S.Borneis, T.Laštovička, M.Sokol, T.-M.Jeong, F.Con- damine, O. Renner, V. Tikhonchuk, H. Bohlin, A. Fa- jstavr, J.-C. Hernandez, and et al., High Power Laser Science and Engineering9, e30 (2021)

work page 2021

[14] [14]

Stark, T

D. Stark, T. Toncian, and A. Arefiev, Physical Review Letters116, 185003 (2016)

work page 2016

[15] [15]

Chen and F

H. Chen and F. Fiuza, Physics of Plasmas30, 020601 (2023)

work page 2023

[16] [16]

A. E. Raymond, C. F. Dong, A. McKelvey, C. Zulick, N. Alexander, A. Bhattacharjee, P. T. Campbell, H. Chen, V. Chvykov, E. Del Rio, P. Fitzsimmons, W. Fox, B. Hou, A. Maksimchuk, C. Mileham, J. Nees, P. M. Nilson, C. Stoeckl, A. G. R. Thomas, M. S. Wei, V. Yanovsky, K. Krushelnick, and L. Willingale, Phys. Rev. E98, 043207 (2018)

work page 2018

[17] [17]

Zhang, S

P. Zhang, S. S. Bulanov, D. Seipt, A. V. Arefiev, and A. G. R. Thomas, Physics of Plasmas27, 050601 (2020)

work page 2020

[18] [18]

Gonoskov, T

A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 045001 (2022)

work page 2022

[19] [19]

Gibbon,Short pulse laser interactions with matter: an introduction(World Scientific, 2005)

P. Gibbon,Short pulse laser interactions with matter: an introduction(World Scientific, 2005)

work page 2005

[20] [20]

A. I. Akhiezer, I. A. Akhiezer, R. V. Polovin, A. G. Sitenko, and K. N. Stepanov, Oxford Pergamon Press International Series on Natural Philosophy1(1975)

work page 1975

[21] [21]

Palaniyappan, B

S. Palaniyappan, B. M. Hegelich, H.-C. Wu, D. Jung, D. C. Gautier, L. Yin, B. J. Albright, R. P. Johnson, T. Shimada, S. Letzring,et al., Nature Physics8, 763 (2012)

work page 2012

[22] [22]

J. C. Fernández, D. Cort Gautier, C. Huang, S. Palaniyappan, B. J. Albright, W. Bang, G. Dyer, A. Favalli, J. F. Hunter, J. Mendez, M. Roth, M. Swin- hoe, P. A. Bradley, O. Deppert, M. Espy, K. Falk, N. Guler, C. Hamilton, B. M. Hegelich, D. Henzlova, K. D. Ianakiev, M. Iliev, R. P. Johnson, A. Kleinschmidt, A.S.Losko, E.McCary, M.Mocko, R.O.Nelson, R.Roy...

work page 2017

[23] [23]

Cattani, A

F. Cattani, A. Kim, D. Anderson, and M. Lisak, Phys. Rev. E62, 1234 (2000)

work page 2000

[24] [24]

Stark, C

D. Stark, C. Bhattacharjee, A. Arefiev, T. Toncian, R. D. Hazeltine, and S. Mahajan, Physical Review Letter115, 025002 (2015)

work page 2015

[25] [25]

Siminos, M

E. Siminos, M. Grech, B. S. Wettervik, and T. Fülöp, New Journal of Physics19, 123042 (2017)

work page 2017

[26] [26]

Sugimoto, Y

K. Sugimoto, Y. He, N. Iwata, I.-L. Yeh, K. Tang- tartharakul, A. Arefiev, and Y. Sentoku, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 065102 (2023)

work page 2023

[27] [27]

I.-L. Yeh, K. Tangtartharakul, H. Tang, L. Willingale, and A. Arefiev, Physics of Plasmas31, 113108 (2024)

work page 2024

[28] [28]

A. P. L. Robinson, A. V. Arefiev, and V. N. Khudik, Physics of Plasmas22, 083114 (2015)

work page 2015

[29] [29]

J. P. Palastro, D. Kaganovich, D. Gordon, B. Hafizi, M. Helle, J. Penano, and A. Ting, New Journal of Physics17, 023072 (2015)

work page 2015

[30] [30]

Lyutikov, The Astrophysical Journal922, 166 (2021)

M. Lyutikov, The Astrophysical Journal922, 166 (2021)

work page 2021

[31] [31]

Arefiev, D

A. Arefiev, D. J. Stark, T. Toncian, and M. Murakami, Physics of Plasmas27, 063106 (2020)

work page 2020

[32] [32]

A. P. L. Robinson, P. Gibbon, M. Zepf, S. Kar, R. G. Evans, and C. Bellei, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion51, 024004 (2009)

work page 2009

[33] [33]

Ey Bz # x+li =M(k i, li)

T. D. Arber, K. Bennett, C. S. Brady, A. Lawrence- Douglas, M. G. Ramsay, N. J. Sircombe, P. Gillies, R. G. Evans, H. Schmitz, A. R.Bell, andC. P. Ridgers, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion57, 113001 (2015). 6 Appendix A: Parameters used in PIC simulations Table I provides the parameters used in our 1D-3V PIC simulations. All simulations were performed...

work page 2015

[34] [34]

We use this in Eq

Using this relation after expanding the expression for ki while treating|δn i|as a small parameter, we obtain thatk 1l1 +k 2l2 ≈π. We use this in Eq. (C7) to find that|TrM cell|>2fork 1 ̸=k 2, which corresponds to a complexκand thus an evanescent wave. Therefore, even relatively small spikes cause wave reflection. 8 Appendix D: Relativistic pair-plasma re...

work page