pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.07615 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

XRISM/Resolve observations of Hercules X-1: vertical structure and kinematics of the disk wind

Peter Kosec , Laura Brenneman , Erin Kara , Teruaki Enoto , Takuto Narita , Koh Sakamoto , Rudiger Staubert , Francesco Barra
show 6 more authors
Andrew Fabian Jon M. Miller Ciro Pinto Daniele Rogantini Dominic Walton Yutaro Nagai
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords accretion disk windsX-ray binariesHercules X-1XRISMwind velocity structureionization parameterorbital motion
0
0 comments X

The pith

In Hercules X-1 the disk wind accelerates from 250 km/s to 600 km/s as it rises higher after orbital correction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper exploits the warped, precessing accretion disk in Hercules X-1 to obtain multiple sightlines through its disk wind. XRISM/Resolve spectra taken over 210 ks, together with supporting XMM-Newton, NuSTAR and Chandra data, allow time-resolved measurements of wind properties at different orbital phases. After removing the detected 170 km/s orbital motion signature, the wind velocity is seen to increase from 250 km/s near the disk to 600 km/s at greater heights while column density falls and the ionization parameter log ξ changes only from 3.65 to 3.9. This height-dependent mapping supplies a more complete picture of how disk winds remove mass and angular momentum from the accretion flow.

Core claim

The observations reveal that, once the binary orbital motion is subtracted, the disk wind velocity rises steadily from 250 km/s to 600 km/s with increasing height above the disk. Column density decreases with height in the expected manner, yet the ionization parameter evolves only weakly. A new orbital-phase dependence also appears, indicating a second wind component visible briefly after eclipse by the companion star.

What carries the argument

The warped, precessing accretion disk that supplies a continuous range of sightlines through the vertical structure of the disk wind.

If this is right

  • Mass outflow rates can be integrated over the measured velocity and density profile instead of relying on a single sightline.
  • Disk winds remove a substantial fraction of transferred mass, altering the long-term accretion history and binary evolution.
  • The nearly constant ionization with height implies the wind remains in a similar ionization state while expanding.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same vertical acceleration may operate in other X-ray binaries but remains hidden without a precessing disk that provides multiple sightlines.
  • High-resolution spectroscopy of additional precessing systems could test whether velocity gradients of this magnitude are generic.
  • Incorporating height-dependent kinematics into wind models would refine estimates of angular-momentum loss and disk truncation radii.

Load-bearing premise

Changes in observed wind velocity, column density and ionization with orbital phase arise from sampling different heights in a stable wind rather than from intrinsic time variability or changing geometry unrelated to height.

What would settle it

Detailed modeling or observations in a non-precessing system that show no systematic velocity increase or column-density decrease with phase would indicate the trends are not height-dependent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.07615 by Andrew Fabian, Ciro Pinto, Daniele Rogantini, Dominic Walton, Erin Kara, Francesco Barra, Jon M. Miller, Koh Sakamoto, Laura Brenneman, Peter Kosec, Rudiger Staubert, Takuto Narita, Teruaki Enoto, Yutaro Nagai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Raw XRISM lightcurve (events of all qualities included) from the September 2024 campaign on Her X-1. Time T=0 corresponds to the beginning of the XRISM observation at MJD=60563.09653. Horizontal arrows show the overlaps of simultaneous observations with XMM-Newton, Chandra and NuSTAR as well as their durations. The approximate clean exposures are given in the legend for each observatory. Some of the notabl… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison between the time-averaged high-flux XRISM /Resolve spectrum, focusing on the Fe K energy band, with simultaneous data from XMM-Newton EPIC-pn. The most notable spectral features are described and their rest-frame energies are shown with blue vertical dashed lines. The EPIC-pn data were shifted in energy to account for the known gain shift issue at high count rates (see Appendix A of P. Kosec et … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the Fe XXVI region between the 3 Her X-1 high-flux orbits. Fe XXVI absorption originates in the disk wind, and clear variability is observed from orbit to orbit. The line optical depth decreases, and it becomes broader and shifts to higher energies, indicating that the wind increases in velocity as well as velocity width. Incorrect primary continuum modeling could have con￾sequences for the i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time-averaged high-flux XRISM spectrum of Her X-1 (all 3 orbits combined), fitted with the phenomenological emission and absorption spectral model. The primary continuum is shown in blue. Two highly broadened emission lines are required in addition to the primary continuum for a satisfactory fit of the Fe K complex (blue and magenta). Narrow Fe I Kα and Kβ emission lines are shown in red. On top of this co… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Disk wind velocity versus Her X-1 precession phase and orbital phase. The best-fitting velocity with no corrections applied is in red. Clear orbital motion is ob￾served in the evolution of this velocity. In black, we show the velocity evolution after correcting for the orbital motion of the neutron star. Her X-1 eclipses by the secondary star are shown with green horizontal lines. emission spectral model t… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time-resolved phenomenological analysis of the disk wind properties using the slab model. The two panels on the left show the best-fitting ionic column densities of Fe XXV (top) and Fe XXVI (bottom). The two panels on the right show the kinematics of the wind (assuming the same kinematics for both lines), its outflow velocity (top) and the velocity width (bottom). The green vertical lines with shading indi… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time-resolved physical photoionization analysis of the disk wind properties. The two panels on the left show the best-fitting disk wind column density NH (top) and its ionization parameter log(ξ/erg cm s−1 ) (bottom), and the two panels on the right show the kinematics of the wind, its outflow velocity (top) and the velocity width (bottom). The green vertical lines with shading indicate the Her X-1 eclipse… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Narrow-band XRISM spectra focusing on the Fe XXV and XXVI energy region from the physical time-resolved analysis (using the pion model) split into 10 segments alongside with the best-fitting spectral model. Only Hp event spectra are shown. The top left panel includes labels describing the different spectral features observed in Her X-1. We use the segment numbering scheme (from P1 to P10) defined in [PITH… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The full-band spectral fit of Orbit 1 (with XMM) using the final pion model with the best-fitting disk wind elemental abundances, alongside with the residuals to this fit (lower panel). XMM-Newton RGS 1, 2, XRISM (Hp events only), NuSTAR FPMA and FPMB data are shown. We note that most of the spikes across the RGS 1 and 2 model are not imprinted by the disk wind but are due to instrumental features (CCD chi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

X-ray binary accretion disk winds can carry away a significant fraction of the matter transferred from the companion and hence strongly affect the accretion flow and the long-term evolution of the binary. However, accurate mass outflow rate measurements are challenging due to uncertainties in our understanding of the 3D wind structure. Most studies employ absorption line spectroscopy that only gives us a single sightline through the wind streamlines. Hercules X-1 is a peculiar X-ray binary which allows us to avoid this issue, as its warped, precessing accretion disk naturally presents a range of sightlines through the vertical structure of its disk wind. Here we present the first results from a large, coordinated campaign on Her X-1 led by the new XRISM observatory (with an exposure of 210 ks) and supported by XMM-Newton, NuSTAR and Chandra. We perform a time-resolved analysis and constrain the wind properties. With XRISM/Resolve, we directly detect the Her X-1 orbital motion with an amplitude of 170 km/s in the evolution of the wind velocity. After correcting for this effect, we observe an increase in wind velocity from 250 km/s to 600 km/s as the wind rises to greater heights above the disk. The wind column density decreases with increasing height, as expected, but its ionization parameter log($\xi$/erg cm s$^{-1}$) evolves only weakly from 3.65 to 3.9 as the wind expands away. Additionally, we detect a new orbital dependence of the wind properties, revealing a likely second component that appears only briefly after the eclipse by the secondary star.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports XRISM/Resolve observations of the accretion disk wind in Hercules X-1, using the system's warped, precessing disk to sample different sightlines through the wind's vertical structure. Time-resolved absorption-line spectroscopy yields a direct detection of orbital motion with amplitude 170 km/s; after correction, wind velocity rises from 250 km/s to 600 km/s with increasing height, column density declines, and log ξ evolves only weakly from 3.65 to 3.9. A new orbital-phase dependence is also reported, interpreted as evidence for a transient second wind component visible shortly after eclipse.

Significance. If the geometric interpretation holds, the work supplies rare empirical constraints on the vertical kinematics and ionization structure of a disk wind in an X-ray binary, directly addressing uncertainties in mass-outflow-rate estimates that affect accretion flow and binary evolution models. The high-resolution, time-resolved XRISM data and explicit orbital-motion correction constitute a clear methodological advance over single-sightline studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and time-resolved analysis section] The central claim that velocity, column, and ionization trends trace vertical structure via changing sightlines through a steady, azimuthally symmetric wind is load-bearing and rests on the assumption (stated in the abstract) that precession monotonically varies line-of-sight height while radial launch radius and temporal effects remain fixed. No explicit tests, Monte-Carlo simulations, or alternative models (e.g., time-variable launch or azimuthal asymmetry on the 35-day timescale) are presented to quantify the risk that the observed 250–600 km/s trend arises from radial or temporal confounding instead.
  2. [§4] §4 (spectral fitting and results): the manuscript provides insufficient detail on the absorption-line modeling (specific line lists, continuum choices, error-bar derivation, data-exclusion criteria, and any post-hoc velocity corrections). Without these, it is not possible to verify whether the reported velocity increase and weak log ξ evolution are robust against modeling choices or alternative interpretations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The ionization parameter is written as log(ξ/erg cm s⁻¹); standard notation in the field is log ξ (with units stated once in the text or table caption) to avoid visual clutter.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions should explicitly state the orbital-phase bins used for each spectrum and the corresponding estimated height range above the disk to make the geometric mapping transparent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be clarified and strengthened. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and time-resolved analysis section] The central claim that velocity, column, and ionization trends trace vertical structure via changing sightlines through a steady, azimuthally symmetric wind is load-bearing and rests on the assumption (stated in the abstract) that precession monotonically varies line-of-sight height while radial launch radius and temporal effects remain fixed. No explicit tests, Monte-Carlo simulations, or alternative models (e.g., time-variable launch or azimuthal asymmetry on the 35-day timescale) are presented to quantify the risk that the observed 250–600 km/s trend arises from radial or temporal confounding instead.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the geometric interpretation of the velocity, column-density, and ionization trends as sampling different heights through a steady, azimuthally symmetric wind is central to the paper and rests on the assumption that precession primarily changes the line-of-sight height. The direct detection of the 170 km s^{-1} orbital-motion signature in the time-resolved velocity evolution provides independent kinematic support for separating orbital effects from the intrinsic wind velocity. While the submitted manuscript did not contain explicit Monte-Carlo simulations or quantitative alternative models, the observed monotonic increase in velocity with precession phase, the decline in column density, and the very weak change in log ξ are difficult to reconcile with strong radial or 35-day temporal variations. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion that explicitly considers alternative scenarios (time-variable launch radius, azimuthal asymmetry) and explains why they are disfavored by the data; we will also include a simple sensitivity test that perturbs the assumed launch radius and re-derives the velocity-height relation to quantify robustness. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (spectral fitting and results): the manuscript provides insufficient detail on the absorption-line modeling (specific line lists, continuum choices, error-bar derivation, data-exclusion criteria, and any post-hoc velocity corrections). Without these, it is not possible to verify whether the reported velocity increase and weak log ξ evolution are robust against modeling choices or alternative interpretations.

    Authors: We agree that the current level of detail in §4 is insufficient for full reproducibility and independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will expand this section to specify: the atomic line lists and databases used to model the absorption features; the functional form and free parameters of the continuum model; the statistical method employed to derive parameter uncertainties (including any use of MCMC sampling or Δχ² contours); the precise criteria for excluding data segments (e.g., eclipse intervals, low-count bins, or instrumental artifacts); and a step-by-step account of the post-hoc orbital-velocity correction that was applied before reporting the wind velocities. These additions will allow readers to assess the robustness of the reported trends against modeling choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results follow directly from time-resolved spectroscopy and known system geometry

full rationale

The paper reports direct measurements of absorption-line velocities and column densities from XRISM/Resolve spectra across precession phases. Orbital motion is detected in the data (amplitude 170 km/s) and subtracted to isolate the residual trend, which is then interpreted using the independently established 35-day precession and warp geometry of Her X-1. No step equates a derived quantity to its own fitted inputs by construction, no load-bearing claim rests on an unverified self-citation, and the central trends (velocity rising from 250 to 600 km/s, weak ionization change) are extracted quantities rather than tautological redefinitions. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the observational dataset.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the domain assumption that the warped precessing disk supplies independent vertical sightlines and on standard X-ray spectral modeling assumptions for wind absorption lines; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond routine fitting of velocity, column, and ionization.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The warped, precessing accretion disk naturally presents a range of sightlines through the vertical structure of its disk wind
    Invoked in the abstract to justify interpreting observed changes as height-dependent wind properties.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5879 in / 1412 out tokens · 37028 ms · 2026-05-18T08:28:00.932222+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We perform a time-resolved analysis and constrain the wind properties... After correcting for this effect, we observe an increase in wind velocity from 250 km/s to 600 km/s... column density decreases... log(ξ) evolves only weakly from 3.65 to 3.9

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. XRISM/Resolve observations of Hercules X-1: a pulsating, highly broadened Fe K emission line from the neutron star accretion column

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New XRISM observations confirm a highly broadened, pulsating Fe K line from the accretion column of Hercules X-1 that varies with pulse phase and evolves with the 35-day precession cycle.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    , author =

    Begelman, M. C., McKee, C. F., & Shields, G. A. 1983, ApJ, 271, 70, doi: 10.1086/161178

    work page doi:10.1086/161178 1983

  3. [3]

    Boroson, B., Kallman, T., & Vrtilek, S. D. 2001, ApJ, 562, 925, doi: 10.1086/323850

    work page doi:10.1086/323850 2001

  4. [4]

    1979, , 228, 939, 10.1086/156922

    Cash, W. 1979, ApJ, 228, 939, doi: 10.1086/156922 Castro Segura, N., Knigge, C., Long, K. S., et al. 2022, Nature, 603, 52, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04324-2 de Plaa, J., Kaastra, J. S., Tamura, T., et al. 2004, A&A, 423, 49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20047170

    work page doi:10.1086/156922 1979

  5. [5]

    E., Boynton, P

    Deeter, J. E., Boynton, P. E., & Pravdo, S. H. 1981, ApJ, 247, 1003, doi: 10.1086/159110 den Herder, J. W., Brinkman, A. C., Kahn, S. M., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000058 21 D´ ıaz Trigo, M., Sidoli, L., Boirin, L., & Parmar, A. N. 2012, A&A, 543, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219049

    work page doi:10.1086/159110 1981

  6. [6]

    2024, ApJ, 973, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6769

    Gallegos-Garcia, M., Jacquemin-Ide, J., & Kalogera, V. 2024, ApJ, 973, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6769

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6769 2024

  7. [7]

    Gerend, D., & Boynton, P. E. 1976, ApJ, 209, 562, doi: 10.1086/154751

    work page doi:10.1086/154751 1976

  8. [8]

    A., Craig, W

    Harrison, F. A., Craig, W. W., Christensen, F. E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Fl¨ oer, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178 H¨ olzer, G., Fritsch, M., Deutsch, M., H¨ artwig, J., & F¨ orster, E. 1997, PhRvA, 56, 4554, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.4554

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/2/103 2013

  9. [9]

    L., Awaki, H., et al

    Ishisaki, Y., Kelley, R. L., Awaki, H., et al. 2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12181, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, & K. Nakazawa, 121811S, doi: 10.1117/12.2630654

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2630654 2022

  10. [10]

    2001, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 365, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

    Jansen, F., Lumb, D., Altieri, B., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000036 2001

  11. [11]

    2002, ApJ, 578, 391, doi: 10.1086/342348

    Zane, S., & Ramsay, G. 2002, ApJ, 578, 391, doi: 10.1086/342348

    work page doi:10.1086/342348 2002

  12. [12]

    Hailey, C. J. 2005, ApJ, 625, 931, doi: 10.1086/426702

    work page doi:10.1086/426702 2005

  13. [13]

    S., & Bleeker , J

    Kaastra, J. S., & Bleeker, J. A. M. 2016, A&A, 587, A151, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527395

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527395 2016

  14. [14]

    S., Mewe, R., & Nieuwenhuijzen, H

    Kaastra, J. S., Mewe, R., & Nieuwenhuijzen, H. 1996, in UV and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas, 411–414

    work page 1996

  15. [15]

    S., Steenbrugge, K

    Kaastra, J. S., Steenbrugge, K. C., Raassen, A. J. J., et al. 2002, A&A, 386, 427, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020235

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020235 2002

  16. [16]

    Katz, J. I. 1973, Nature Physical Science, 246, 87, doi: 10.1038/physci246087a0

    work page doi:10.1038/physci246087a0 1973

  17. [17]

    Keshet, N., Behar, E., & Miller, J. M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.19440, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.19440

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.19440 2025

  18. [18]

    C., Pinto, C., et al

    Kosec, P., Fabian, A. C., Pinto, C., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 3730, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3200

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3200 2020

  19. [19]

    C., et al

    Kosec, P., Kara, E., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 959, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acfc3e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfc3e

  20. [20]

    J., et al

    Kosec, P., Pinto, C., Walton, D. J., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 3978, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1626

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1626 2018

  21. [21]

    C., et al

    Kosec, P., Kara, E., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 936, 185, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac897e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac897e 2022

  22. [22]

    2023b, Nature Astronomy, 7, 715, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01929-7

    Kosec, P., Kara, E., Fabian, A., et al. 2023b, Nature Astronomy, 7, 715, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01929-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01929-7

  23. [23]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b5a

    Kosec, P., Rogantini, D., Kara, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b5a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b5a 2024

  24. [24]

    2000, ApJ, 539, 413, doi: 10.1086/309200

    Kotani, T., Ebisawa, K., Dotani, T., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, 413, doi: 10.1086/309200

    work page doi:10.1086/309200 2000

  25. [25]

    A., & Abdallah, M

    Leahy, D. A., & Abdallah, M. H. 2014, ApJ, 793, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/79

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/793/2/79 2014

  26. [26]

    C., Reynolds, C

    Lee, J. C., Reynolds, C. S., Remillard, R., et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, 1102, doi: 10.1086/338588

    work page doi:10.1086/338588 2002

  27. [27]

    S., & Kallman, T

    Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., & Kallman, T. 2016, A&A, 596, A65, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628721

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628721 2016

  28. [28]

    2025, PASJ, 77, psaf057, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf057

    Miura, D., Yamaguchi, H., Ballhausen, R., et al. 2025, PASJ, 77, psaf057, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf057

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf057 2025

  29. [29]

    L., et al

    Mochizuki, Y., Tsujimoto, M., Kelley, R. L., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad946d Mu˜ noz-Darias, T., Jim´ enez-Ibarra, F., Panizo-Espinar, G., et al. 2019, ApJL, 879, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2768

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad946d 2024

  30. [30]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.05412, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.05412

    Neilsen, J., & Degenaar, N. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.05412, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.05412

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.05412 2023

  31. [31]

    O., Bianchi, S., et al

    Parra, M., Petrucci, P. O., Bianchi, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346920

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346920 2024

  32. [32]

    J., & Fabian, A

    Pinto, C., Middleton, M. J., & Fabian, A. C. 2016, Nature, 533, 64

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    N., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01273.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423L.127R 423, L127

    Ponti, G., Fender, R. P., Begelman, M. C., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, L11, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01224.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01224.x 2012

  34. [34]

    P., Quaintrell, H., Still, M

    Reynolds, A. P., Quaintrell, H., Still, M. D., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 288, 43, doi: 10.1093/mnras/288.1.43 S´ anchez-Sierras, J., & Mu˜ noz-Darias, T. 2020, A&A, 640, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038406

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/288.1.43 1997

  35. [35]

    M., Leahy, D

    Scott, D. M., Leahy, D. A., & Wilson, R. B. 2000, ApJ, 539, 392, doi: 10.1086/309203

    work page doi:10.1086/309203 2000

  36. [36]

    Harrison, F. A. 2016, A&A, 590, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527955 Str¨ uder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000066

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527955 2016

  37. [37]

    M., et al

    Tananbaum, H., Gursky, H., Kellogg, E. M., et al. 1972, ApJL, 174, L143, doi: 10.1086/180968

    work page doi:10.1086/180968 1972

  38. [38]

    Tashiro, M. S. 2022, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 31, 2230001, doi: 10.1142/S0218271822300014

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271822300014 2022

  39. [39]

    E., Lasota, J

    Tetarenko, B. E., Lasota, J. P., Heinke, C. O., Dubus, G., & Sivakoff, G. R. 2018, Nature, 554, 69, doi: 10.1038/nature25159

    work page doi:10.1038/nature25159 2018

  40. [40]

    N., et al

    Tombesi, F., Cappi, M., Reeves, J. N., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, A57

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    1978, ApJL, 219, L105, doi: 10.1086/182617

    Truemper, J., Pietsch, W., Reppin, C., et al. 1978, ApJL, 219, L105, doi: 10.1086/182617

    work page doi:10.1086/182617 1978

  42. [42]

    1998, ApJ, 492, 782, doi: 10.1086/305063

    Ueda, Y., Inoue, H., Tanaka, Y., et al. 1998, ApJ, 492, 782, doi: 10.1086/305063

    work page doi:10.1086/305063 1998

  43. [43]

    2004, ApJ, 609, 325 22

    Ebisawa, K. 2004, ApJ, 609, 325 22

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    C., Tananbaum, H

    Weisskopf, M. C., Tananbaum, H. D., Van Speybroeck, L. P., & O’Dell, S. L. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4012, X-Ray Optics, Instruments, and Missions III, ed. J. E. Truemper & B. Aschenbach, 2–16, doi: 10.1117/12.391545 XRISM Collaboration, Audard, M., Awaki, H., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L34, do...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.391545 2000