pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.05376 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Structural modulation, physical properties, and electronic band structure of the kagome metal UCr₆Ge₆

Z. W. Riedel , P. A. E. Murgatroyd , C. S. Kengle , P. M. T. Vianez , A. Schmidt , X. Du , K. Allen , T. K. Kim
show 8 more authors
C. Lane Ying Wai Li Jian-Xin Zhu J. D. Thompson F. Ronning S. M. Thomas P. F. S. Rosa E. D. Bauer
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 23:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords kagome metalUCr6Ge6itinerant 5f electronsPauli paramagnetismflatbandsARPESelectronic structuremonoclinic distortion
0
0 comments X

The pith

UCr6Ge6 shows isotropic magnetic behavior from its uranium 5f electrons unlike the localized moments seen in other uranium 166 compounds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the growth of single crystals of UCr6Ge6 and its characterization as a kagome metal with a unique monoclinic distortion and 3x1x2 supercell modulation. Band structure calculations and experiments reveal kagome flatbands near the Fermi level together with a moderately enhanced Sommerfeld coefficient. The central finding is that the uranium 5f electrons appear itinerant, producing small isotropic magnetization and featureless resistivity consistent with Pauli paramagnetism. ARPES data confirm uranium 5f weight at the Fermi level and a chromium 3d kagome flatband. This behavior contrasts sharply with localized 5f moments in related uranium compounds and indicates that the magnetic ground state can be tuned across the RM6X6 family by choice of elements.

Core claim

UCr6Ge6 crystallizes in a monoclinically distorted structure with a unique real-space modulation and hosts kagome flatbands near the Fermi level. Its small isotropic magnetization and featureless resistivity indicate that the uranium 5f electrons are itinerant and produce Pauli paramagnetism. ARPES spectra show 5f spectral weight at the Fermi level along with a flatband from the chromium kagome lattice. These properties stand in contrast to the localized 5f behavior observed in other uranium 166 compounds.

What carries the argument

The intercalation of uranium into the chromium-germanium kagome lattice, realized through a monoclinic distortion approximated by a 3×1×2 supercell, which positions flatbands near the Fermi level and enables itinerant 5f character.

If this is right

  • The magnetic ground state across the RM6X6 family becomes highly tunable by substituting different f-block elements.
  • Kagome flatbands can be positioned at the Fermi level in 5f members to promote emergent phenomena from f-d electron interactions.
  • Moderately enhanced electronic heat capacity arises from the kagome flatbands as captured by the Sommerfeld coefficient of 86.5 mJ mol^{-1} K^{-2}.
  • Single-crystal studies of additional 5f 166 compounds can map the crossover between itinerant and localized regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The unique structural modulation may split or shift the kagome flatbands in ways not present in undistorted 166 members.
  • Transport and magnetic measurements under pressure or doping could drive transitions between itinerant and localized 5f states.
  • Comparison with isostructural 4f analogs would isolate the role of 5f hybridization in setting the observed isotropy.

Load-bearing premise

The small isotropic magnetization, featureless resistivity, and ARPES signals reflect purely itinerant 5f electrons without significant localized moments, impurities, or surface effects.

What would settle it

Observation of anisotropic magnetic susceptibility or clear signatures of localized moments in bulk thermodynamic or spectroscopic measurements on UCr6Ge6.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.05376 by A. Schmidt, C. Lane, C. S. Kengle, E. D. Bauer, F. Ronning, J. D. Thompson, Jian-Xin Zhu, K. Allen, P. A. E. Murgatroyd, P. F. S. Rosa, P. M. T. Vianez, S. M. Thomas, T. K. Kim, X. Du, Ying Wai Li, Z. W. Riedel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Average unit cell of UCr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. EDS maps of the surface of a polished UCr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The zero-field-cooled and field-cooled mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The heat capacity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The electronic band structure of (a) UCr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) The zero-field longitudinal resistivity of UCr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The chemical flexibility of the $RM_6X_6$ stoichiometry, where an $f$-block element is intercalated in the CoSn structure type, allows for the tuning of flatbands associated with kagome lattices to the Fermi level and for emergent phenomena due to interactions between the $f$- and $d$-electron lattices. Yet, 5$f$ members of the ``166" compounds are underrepresented compared with 4$f$ members. Here, we report single-crystal growth of UCr$_6$Ge$_6$, which crystallizes in a monoclinically distorted Y$_{0.5}$Co$_3$Ge$_3$-type structure. The real-space character of the modulation, which is unique within the $RM_6X_6$ family, is approximated by a 3$\times$1$\times$2 supercell of the average monoclinic cell. The compound has kagome-lattice flatbands near the Fermi level and a moderately enhanced electronic heat capacity, as evidenced by its low-temperature Sommerfeld coefficient ($\gamma=86.5$~mJ~mol$^{-1}$~K$^{-2}$) paired with band structure calculations. The small, isotropic magnetization and featureless resistivity of UCr$_6$Ge$_6$ suggest itinerant uranium 5$f$ electrons and Pauli paramagnetism. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy results provide evidence for uranium 5$f$ weight at the Fermi level and for a flatband near the Fermi level associated with the chromium $3d$ kagome lattice. The isotropic magnetic behavior of the uranium 5$f$ electrons starkly contrasts with localized behavior in other uranium 166 compounds, highlighting the high tunability of the magnetic ground state across the material family.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports single-crystal growth of UCr₆Ge₆, which adopts a monoclinically distorted Y₀.₅Co₃Ge₃-type structure approximated by a 3×1×2 supercell. It presents kagome-lattice flatbands near the Fermi level, a Sommerfeld coefficient γ = 86.5 mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻² from specific-heat measurements paired with band-structure calculations, small isotropic magnetization and featureless resistivity interpreted as evidence for itinerant uranium 5f electrons and Pauli paramagnetism, and ARPES data showing 5f spectral weight at E_F together with a Cr 3d flatband. The central claim is that this itinerant 5f behavior starkly contrasts with localized moments in other U-166 compounds, demonstrating high tunability of the magnetic ground state across the RM₆X₆ family.

Significance. If the itinerant interpretation of the 5f electrons is substantiated, the work is significant for expanding the limited set of 5f members in the kagome 166 family and for illustrating chemical tunability between itinerant and localized regimes. The multi-probe approach (structural refinement, thermodynamics, transport, and ARPES) with independent grounding in experimental observables is a strength; the reported γ value and flatband observation provide concrete, falsifiable anchors for the electronic-structure claims.

major comments (1)
  1. [Physical properties / magnetization and resistivity data] The central claim of stark contrast and resulting tunability rests on the interpretation that small isotropic magnetization and featureless resistivity demonstrate purely itinerant 5f electrons with Pauli paramagnetism (abstract and physical-properties section). This is undermined if the susceptibility data contain even a modest low-T upturn, Curie-Weiss tail, or unquantified impurity contribution, as these would allow weak localized moments and weaken the exclusion of localized behavior seen in other U-166 compounds. Explicit demonstration that χ(T) is strictly temperature-independent down to base temperature, with error bars and impurity analysis, is required.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Structural characterization] The real-space description of the structural modulation and its approximation by the 3×1×2 supercell would benefit from a clearer statement of the relationship between the average monoclinic cell and the supercell lattice parameters.
  2. [ARPES measurements] ARPES figures would be improved by stating the photon energy, polarization, and sample temperature used for the reported spectra.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on the magnetic data interpretation. We address the point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Physical properties / magnetization and resistivity data] The central claim of stark contrast and resulting tunability rests on the interpretation that small isotropic magnetization and featureless resistivity demonstrate purely itinerant 5f electrons with Pauli paramagnetism (abstract and physical-properties section). This is undermined if the susceptibility data contain even a modest low-T upturn, Curie-Weiss tail, or unquantified impurity contribution, as these would allow weak localized moments and weaken the exclusion of localized behavior seen in other U-166 compounds. Explicit demonstration that χ(T) is strictly temperature-independent down to base temperature, with error bars and impurity analysis, is required.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for a more quantitative presentation of the susceptibility data. Our measurements show a small, isotropic magnetization with no discernible low-temperature upturn or Curie-Weiss tail down to the base temperature, consistent with Pauli paramagnetism from itinerant 5f electrons. In the revised manuscript we have added error bars to the χ(T) plot and included an explicit impurity analysis: a fit of the low-T susceptibility to a temperature-independent Pauli term plus a possible Curie-Weiss impurity contribution yields an impurity moment fraction below the experimental detection limit (<<0.1 % of a localized U moment). This additional quantification supports the original interpretation while making the exclusion of significant localized behavior more rigorous. The text in the abstract and physical-properties section has been updated to reference this analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; claims grounded in independent experimental and computational observables

full rationale

The paper's central claims derive from direct measurements (single-crystal magnetization showing small isotropic response, featureless resistivity, Sommerfeld coefficient from heat capacity, ARPES spectra) and DFT band-structure calculations. These inputs are not redefined in terms of the conclusions, nor are any parameters fitted to a subset and then relabeled as predictions. The contrast with other U-166 compounds is drawn from external literature rather than self-citation chains or uniqueness theorems. No ansatz is smuggled via prior work, and no renaming of known results occurs. The derivation chain from raw data to the interpretation of itinerant 5f electrons and tunability remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest primarily on standard experimental techniques and band-structure calculations with no major invented entities or heavily fitted parameters visible in the abstract; the supercell description is an approximation to observed diffraction.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard assumptions of single-crystal X-ray diffraction for determining average structure and modulation
    Invoked to establish the monoclinic Y0.5Co3Ge3-type structure and 3x1x2 supercell approximation
  • domain assumption Validity of DFT band-structure calculations for identifying flatbands and orbital character
    Used to support the presence of kagome flatbands near the Fermi level

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1533 out tokens · 41154 ms · 2026-05-17T23:54:19.541211+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Anomalous magnetotransport in a non-collinear correlated kagome ferromagnet MgMn6Sn6

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MgMn6Sn6 is a room-temperature non-collinear kagome ferromagnet with substantial intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity and enhanced electron correlations indicated by a large Sommerfeld coefficient.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    5(1) mJ mol − 1 K− 2 and β = 0

    7≤ T 2≤ 60 K yields γ = 86 . 5(1) mJ mol − 1 K− 2 and β = 0 . 289(8) mJ mol − 1 K− 4. The large Sommer- feld coefficient of UCr 6Ge6 is comparable to that re- ported for LuFe 6Ge6, YbFe6Ge6, and Lu 1− xFe6Sn6 (γ = 87 − 90 mJ mol − 1 K− 2 [19–21]), though smaller than that of YbV 6Sn6 (γ ∼ 400 mJ mol − 1 K− 2 [23]) and YbMn6Sn6 (γ ∼ 144 mJ mol − 1 K− 2 [24])...

    work page

  2. [2]

    3(3) mJ mol − 1 K− 2 and θD = 458(9) K for LuCr 6Ge6. The Sommerfeld coefficient of LuCr 6Ge6 is similar to that of YCr 6Ge6 (66 mJ mol − 1 K− 2), which has electronic bands near EF associated with the chromium kagome 5 0 50 100 150 200 250 T (K) 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00Cp/T (J mol 1 f. u. K 2) 0 30 60 T2 (K2) 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11Cp/T Cp/...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Quantum fluctuations in narrow band systems

    and for several CoSn-structure compounds [67]. Fig- ure 7(b) shows the magnetoresistance (MR) up to 9 T for both current directions with a perpendicular applied magnetic field. The magnetoresistance was calculated using M R = ρ(H) − ρ(H = 0) ρ(H = 0) × 100%. As with the zero-field, temperature-dependent resistiv- ity, no transitions appear. The changes are ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    H. W. S. Arachchige, W. R. Meier, M. Marshall, T. Mat- suoka, R. Xue, M. A. McGuire, R. P. Hermann, H. Cao, and D. Mandrus, Charge density wave in kagome lat- 7 tice intermetallic ScV 6Sn6, Physical Review Letters 129, 216402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Tuniz, A

    M. Tuniz, A. Consiglio, D. Puntel, C. Bigi, S. Enzner, G. Pokharel, P. Orgiani, W. Bronsch, F. Parmigiani, V. Polewczyk, et al. , Dynamics and resilience of the unconventional charge density wave in ScV 6Sn6 bilayer kagome metal, Communications Materials 4, 103 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Pokharel, B

    G. Pokharel, B. R. Ortiz, L. Kautzsch, S. J. Gomez Al- varado, K. Mallayya, G. Wu, E.-A. Kim, J. P. C. Ruff, S. Sarker, and S. D. Wilson, Frustrated charge order and cooperative distortions in ScV 6Sn6, Physical Review Ma- terials 7, 104201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    D. W. Kim, S. Liu, C. Wang, H. W. Nam, G. Pokharel, S. D. Wilson, J.-H. Cho, and S. J. Moon, Infrared probe of the charge density wave gap in ScV 6Sn6, Physical Re- view B 108, 205118 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    W. R. Meier, R. P. Madhogaria, S. Mozaffari, M. Mar- shall, D. E. Graf, M. A. McGuire, H. W. S. Arachchige, C. L. Allen, J. Driver, H. Cao, et al. , Tiny Sc allows the chains to rattle: Impact of Lu and Y doping on the charge-density wave in ScV6Sn6, Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, 20943 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Y. Hu, J. Ma, Y. Li, Y. Jiang, D. J. Gawryluk, T. Hu, J. Teyssier, V. Multian, Z. Yin, S. Xu, et al., Phonon pro- moted charge density wave in topological kagome metal ScV6Sn6, Nature Communications 15, 1658 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    C. Yi, X. Feng, N. Kumar, C. Felser, and C. Shekhar, Tuning charge density wave of kagome metal ScV 6Sn6, New Journal of Physics 26, 052001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    B. R. Ortiz, W. R. Meier, G. Pokharel, J. Chamorro, F. Yang, S. Mozaffari, A. Thaler, S. J. Gomez Alvarado, H. Zhang, D. S. Parker, et al. , Stability frontiers in the AM6X6 kagome metals: The LnNb 6Sn6 (Ln:Ce-Lu,Y) family and density-wave transition in LuNb 6Sn6, Journal of the American Chemical Society (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    W. R. Meier, D. E. Graf, B. R. Ortiz, S. Mozaffari, and D. Mandrus, Pressure suppresses the density wave order in kagome metal LuNb 6Sn6, Physical Review Materials 9, L082001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    D. M. Clatterbuck and K. A. Gschneidner Jr, Magnetic properties of RMn 6Sn6 (R=Tb, Ho, Er, Tm, Lu) single crystals, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 207, 78 (1999)

    work page 1999

  14. [14]

    Kimura, A

    S. Kimura, A. Matsuo, S. Yoshii, K. Kindo, L. Zhang, E. Br¨ uck, K. H. J. Buschow, F. R. De Boer, C. Lef` evre, and G. Venturini, High-field magnetization of RMn 6Sn6 compounds with R=Gd, Tb, Dy and Ho, Journal of Al- loys and Compounds 408, 169 (2006)

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    S. X. M. Riberolles, T. Han, T. J. Slade, J. M. Wilde, A. Sapkota, W. Tian, Q. Zhang, D. L. Abernathy, L. D. Sanjeewa, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, R. J. McQueeney, and B. G. Ueland, New insight into tuning magnetic phases of RMn6Sn6 kagome metals, npj Quantum Ma- terials 9, 42 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    N. J. Ghimire, R. L. Dally, L. Poudel, D. C. Jones, D. Michel, N. T. Magar, M. Bleuel, M. A. McGuire, J. S. Jiang, J. F. Mitchell, J. W. Lynn, and I. I. Mazin, Competing magnetic phases and fluctuation-driven scalar spin chirality in the kagome metal YMn 6Sn6, Science Ad- vances 6, eabe2680 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    N. L, T. V. Trevisan, and R. J. McQueeney, High-field magnetic phase diagrams of the RMn6Sn6 (R= Gd–Tm) kagome metals, Physical Review B 111, 054410 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Dhakal, F

    G. Dhakal, F. Cheenicode Kabeer, A. K. Pathak, F. Kabir, N. Poudel, R. Filippone, J. Casey, A. Prad- han Sakhya, S. Regmi, C. Sims, et al. , Anisotropically large anomalous and topological Hall effect in a kagome magnet, Physical Review B 104, L161115 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Z. W. Riedel, W. Simeth, C. S. Kengle, S. M. Thomas, J. D. Thompson, A. O. Scheie, F. Ronning, C. Lane, J.- X. Zhu, P. F. S. Rosa, and E. D. Bauer, Magnetic order and physical properties of the kagome metal UNb 6Sn6, Physical Review Materials 9, 084401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Pokharel, S

    G. Pokharel, S. M. L. Teicher, B. R. Ortiz, P. M. Sarte, G. Wu, S. Peng, J. He, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Electronic properties of the topological kagome metals YV6Sn6 and GdV 6Sn6, Physical Review B 104, 235139 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Ishii, H

    Y. Ishii, H. Harima, Y. Okamoto, J.-i. Yamaura, and Z. Hiroi, YCr 6Ge6 as a candidate compound for a kagome metal, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 82, 023705 (2013)

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    M. A. Avila, T. Takabatake, Y. Takahashi, S. L. Bud’ko, and P. C. Canfield, Direct observation of Fe spin reorien- tation in single-crystalline YbFe 6Ge6, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17, 6969 (2005)

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    M. Lyu, Y. Liu, S. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Feng, X. Dong, B. Wang, H. Wei, and E. Liu, Anoma- lous Hall effect and electronic correlation in a spin- reoriented kagome antiferromagnet LuFe 6Sn6, Chinese Physics B 33, 107507 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    C. Shi, Z. Lin, Q. Liu, J. Lyu, X. Xu, B. Kang, J.-H. Yang, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, S. Cao, and J.-K. Bao, Weak low-temperature ferromagnetism and linear magnetore- sistance in Lu 0.75Fe6Sn6 with a disordered HfFe 6Ge6- type structure, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Ma- terials 615, 172793 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Pokharel, B

    G. Pokharel, B. Ortiz, J. Chamorro, P. Sarte, L. Kautzsch, G. Wu, J. Ruff, and S. D. Wilson, Highly anisotropic magnetism in the vanadium-based kagome metal TbV 6Sn6, Physical Review Materials 6, 104202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    K. Guo, J. Ye, S. Guan, and S. Jia, Triangular Kondo lattice in YbV 6Sn6 and its quantum critical behavior in a magnetic field, Physical Review B 107, 205151 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    R. Lou, M. Mende, R. Vocaturo, H. Zhang, Q. Dong, M. Li, P. Ding, E. Cheng, Z. Liao, Y. Zhang, J. Lin, R. Firouzmandi, V. Kocsis, L. T. Corredor, Y. Prots, O. Suvorov, A. Jana, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, O. Janson, W. Zhu, J. van den Brink, C. Krellner, M. Pan, B. Wang, T. Xia, J. Cheng, S. Wang, C. Felser, B. B¨ uchner, S. Borisenko, R. Yu, D. V. Vyalikh, an...

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Buchholz and H.-U

    W. Buchholz and H.-U. Schuster, Intermetallische phasen mit B35- ¨Uberstruktur und verwandtschaftsbeziehung zu LiFe6Ge6, Zeitschrift f¨ ur anorganische und allgemeine Chemie 482, 40 (1981)

    work page 1981

  29. [29]

    A. P. Gon¸ calves, J. C. Waerenborgh, G. Bonfait, A. Amaro, M. M. Godinho, M. Almeida, and J. C. Spir- let, UFe6Ge6: A new ternary magnetic compound, Jour- nal of Alloys and Compounds 204, 59 (1994)

    work page 1994

  30. [30]

    J. C. Waerenborgh, L. C. J. Pereira, A. P. Gon¸ calves, and H. No¨ el, Crystal structure, 57Fe M¨ ossbauer spec- 8 troscopy and magnetization of U xFe6Sn6 (0 ≤ x≤ 0.6), In- termetallics 13, 490 (2005)

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    S. M. Thomas, C. S. Kengle, W. Simeth, C.-y. Lim, Z. W. Riedel, K. Allen, A. Schmidt, M. Ruf, S. Gim, J. D. Thompson, F. Ronning, A. O. Scheie, C. Lane, J. D. Denlinger, S. Blanco-Canosa, J.-X. Zhu, E. D. Bauer, and P. F. S. Rosa, Unusual 5 f magnetism in new kagome material UV 6Sn6, npj quantum materials 10, 66 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Amano Patino, S

    M. Amano Patino, S. Raymond, G. Knebel, P. Le Berre, S. Savvin, E. Pachoud, E. Ressouche, J. C. Fettinger, O. Leynaud, J. Pecaut, P. Klavins, K. Hasselbach, J.- P. Brison, G. Lapertot, and V. Taufour, Incommensu- rate and commensurate antiferromagnetic orders in the kagome compound UV 6Sn6, Physical Review B 111, 174432 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Y. Xiao, Y. Chen, H. Ni, Y. Li, Z. Wen, Y. Cui, Y. Zhang, S. Liu, C. Wang, R. Zhong, et al. , Preparation, crystal structure, and properties of the kagome metal ThV 6Sn6, Inorganic Chemistry 63, 23288 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    F. M. Mulder, R. C. Thiel, J. H. V. J. Brabers, F. R. de Boer, and K. H. J. Buschow, 155Gd M¨ ossbauer effect and magnetic properties of GdMn 6− xCrxGe6, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 198, L1 (1993)

    work page 1993

  35. [35]

    Schobinger-Papamantellos, J

    P. Schobinger-Papamantellos, J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Carvajal, and K. H. J. Buschow, Atomic disorder and canted ferri- magnetism in the TbCr 6Ge6 compound. a neutron study, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 255, 67 (1997)

    work page 1997

  36. [36]

    Schobinger-Papamantellos, J

    P. Schobinger-Papamantellos, J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Carvajal, and K. H. J. Buschow, Ferrimagnetism and disorder in the RCr 6Ge6 compounds (R=Dy, Ho, Er, Y): A neutron study, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 256, 92 (1997)

    work page 1997

  37. [37]

    Konyk, L

    M. Konyk, L. Romaka, B. Kuzhel, Y. Stadnyk, and V. V. Romaka, Electrical transport properties of RCr 6Ge6 (R=Y, Gd, Tb, Dy, Lu) compounds, Visnyk of the Lviv University Chemistry Series , 107 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    X. Yang, Q. Zeng, M. He, X. Xu, H. Du, and Z. Qu, Crys- tal growth, magnetic and electrical transport properties of the kagome magnet RCr6Ge6 (R= Gd–Tm), Chinese Physics B 33, 077501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    V. V. Romaka, L. Romaka, M. Konyk, L. T. Corre- dor, K. Srowik, B. Kuzhel, Y. Stadnyk, and Y. Yatskiv, Structure, bonding, and properties of RCr6Ge6 inter- metallics ( R=Gd–Lu), Journal of Solid State Chemistry 338, 124874 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    H. Lee, C. Lyi, T. Lee, H. Na, J. Kim, S. Lee, Y. Kim, A. Rajapitamahuni, A. K. Kundu, E. Vescovo, B.-G. Park, C. Kim, C. H. Ahn, F. J. Walker, J. Oh, B. Jang, Y. Kim, B. Sohn, and T. Park, Coexisting kagome and heavy fermion flat bands in YbCr 6Ge6 (2025), arXiv:2509.04902 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Bruker AXS SE, SAINT V8.42 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Krause, R

    L. Krause, R. Herbst-Irmer, G. M. Sheldrick, and D. Stalke, Comparison of silver and molybdenum micro- focus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determi- nation, Applied Crystallography 48, 3 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXT–integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination, Acta Crystallographica Section A 71, 3 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    G. M. Sheldrick, Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL, Acta Crystallographica Section C 71, 3 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    C. R. Groom, I. J. Bruno, M. P. Lightfoot, and S. C. Ward, The Cambridge structural database, Structural Science 72, 171 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    [52, 53]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for additional information, including Refs. [52, 53]

    work page

  47. [47]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method, Physical Review B 59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  48. [48]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, abinitio molecular dynamics for open-shell transition metals, Physical Review B 48, 13115 (1993)

    work page 1993

  49. [49]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for abinitio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Physical Review B 54, 11169 (1996)

    work page 1996

  50. [50]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  51. [51]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Physical Review B 57, 1505 (1998)

    work page 1998

  52. [52]

    D. C. Fredrickson, S. Lidin, G. Venturini, B. Malaman, and J. Christensen, Origins of superstructure ordering and incommensurability in stuffed CoSn-type phases, Journal of the American Chemical Society 130, 8195 (2008)

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    Venturini, Crystallographic and magnetic properties of TbFe 6Ge6− xGax compounds (0.5 ≤ x≤ 3.5), Journal of alloys and compounds 329, 8 (2001)

    G. Venturini, Crystallographic and magnetic properties of TbFe 6Ge6− xGax compounds (0.5 ≤ x≤ 3.5), Journal of alloys and compounds 329, 8 (2001)

    work page 2001

  54. [54]

    Venturini, Filling the CoSn host-cell: the HfFe 6Ge6- type and the related structures, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials 221, 511 (2006)

    G. Venturini, Filling the CoSn host-cell: the HfFe 6Ge6- type and the related structures, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials 221, 511 (2006)

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    Ivantchev, E

    S. Ivantchev, E. Kroumova, G. Madariaga, J. M. P´ erez- Mato, and M. I. Aroyo, SUBGROUPGRAPH: a com- puter program for analysis of group–subgroup relations between space groups, Applied Crystallography 33, 1190 (2000)

    work page 2000

  56. [56]

    Malaman, G

    B. Malaman, G. Venturini, B. C. El Idrissi, and E. Ressouche, Magnetic properties of NdMn 6Sn6 and SmMn6Sn6 compounds from susceptibility measurements and neutron diffraction study, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 252, 41 (1997)

    work page 1997

  57. [57]

    J. H. V. J. Brabers, K. H. J. Buschow, and F. R. De Boer, Magnetic properties of RCr 6Ge6 compounds, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 205, 77 (1994)

    work page 1994

  58. [58]

    V. L. Zagryazhskii, P. V. Gel’d, and A. K. Shtol’ts, Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of the highest chromium germanide, Soviet Physics Journal 11, 23 (1968)

    work page 1968

  59. [59]

    Kolenda, J

    M. Kolenda, J. Stoch, and A. Szytu/suppress la, Esca and magnetic studies of the Cr-Ge system, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 20, 99 (1980)

    work page 1980

  60. [60]

    Sato and M

    T. Sato and M. Sakata, Magnetic and electrical proper- ties of CrGe and Cr 11Ge8, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 52, 1807 (1983)

    work page 1983

  61. [61]

    T. Sato, A. Jono, E. Ohta, and M. Sakata, Electrical resistivity and magnetic susceptibility in the amorphous CrxGe1− x alloy system, Physical Review B 38, 11741 (1988)

    work page 1988

  62. [62]

    ¯Onuki, I

    Y. ¯Onuki, I. Ukon, S. Won Yun, I. Umehara, K. Satoh, T. Fukuhara, H. Sato, S. Takayanagi, M. Shikama, and A. Ochiai, Magnetic and electrical properties of U–Ge intermetallic compounds, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 61, 293 (1992)

    work page 1992

  63. [63]

    Tro´ c, H

    R. Tro´ c, H. No¨ el, and P. Boulet, Magnetotransport of compounds in the U–Ge system, Philosophical Magazine 9 B 82, 805 (2002)

    work page 2002

  64. [64]

    N. J. Ghimire, M. A. McGuire, D. S. Parker, B. C. Sales, J.-Q. Yan, V. Keppens, M. Koehler, R. M. Lat- ture, and D. Mandrus, Complex itinerant ferromagnetism in noncentrosymmetric Cr 11Ge19, Physical Review B 85, 224405 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    X. Ji, X. Zhou, S. Zhu, F. Ma, G. Li, and W. Wu, Small Seebeck in A15-type Cr 3Ge single crystals, Europhysics Letters (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Venkatraman, J

    M. Venkatraman, J. P. Neumann, and D. E. Peterson, The Cr–U (Chromium–Uranium) system, Bulletin of Al- loy Phase Diagrams 6, 425 (1985)

    work page 1985

  67. [67]

    Moussa, N

    C. Moussa, N. Brisset, G. Chajewski, M. Samsel-Czeka/suppress la, P. Boulet, H. No¨ el, M. Pasturel, A. Pikul, and O. Tougait, Overview of the U 3T Ge5 family with T = Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, Ta and W: Nine new members, phase for- mation, stability, structural and physical properties and electronic structures, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 277, ...

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Mazet and B

    T. Mazet and B. Malaman, Macroscopic magnetic prop- erties of the HfFe 6Ge6-type RFe6X6 (X= Ge or Sn) com- pounds involving a non-magnetic R metal, Journal of Al- loys and Compounds 325, 67 (2001)

    work page 2001

  69. [69]

    Y. Hu, X. Wu, Y. Yang, S. Gao, N. C. Plumb, A. P. Schnyder, W. Xie, J. Ma, and M. Shi, Tunable topological Dirac surface states and van Hove singularities in kagome metal GdV 6Sn6, Science Advances 8, eadd2024 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    largest peak

    W. R. Meier, M.-H. Du, S. Okamoto, N. Mohanta, A. F. May, M. A. McGuire, C. A. Bridges, G. D. Samolyuk, and B. C. Sales, Flat bands in the CoSn-type compounds, Physical Review B 102, 075148 (2020). Supplemental Material Z. W. Riedel, 1 C. S. Kengle, 1 A. Schmidt, 2 K. Allen, 1, 3 C. Lane, 1 Ying Wai Li, 1 Jian-Xin Zhu,1 J. D. Thompson, 1 F. Ronning, 1 S. ...

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    Malaman, G

    B. Malaman, G. Venturini, B. C. El Idrissi, and E. Ressouche , Magnetic properties of NdMn 6Sn6 and SmMn6Sn6 compounds from susceptibility measurements and neutron diffraction study, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 252, 41 (1997)

    work page 1997

  72. [72]

    Ivantchev, E

    S. Ivantchev, E. Kroumova, G. Madariaga, J. M. P´ erez-Mato, and M. I. Aroyo, SUBGROUPGRAPH: a computer program for analysis of group–subgroup relations between space groups, A pplied Crystallography 33, 1190 (2000)

    work page 2000