pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.07922 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.HE

A persistent bow shock in a diskless magnetised accreting white dwarf

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE
keywords bow shockwhite dwarfcataclysmic variablepolarmagnetic fieldaccretioninterstellar mediumbinary evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

A diskless magnetized white dwarf powers a persistent bow shock whose required energy exceeds the system's accretion output.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the discovery of a resolved bow shock around the high-proper-motion accreting white dwarf 1RXS J052832.5+283824, which shows no accretion disk and hosts a magnetic field of 42-45 MG, confirming it as a polar cataclysmic variable. Standard explanations for the bow shock, such as a past thermonuclear explosion on the white dwarf or a wind from the donor star, are ruled out by the observations. Energetics modeling of the bow shock demonstrates that sustaining its structure demands a continuous power source whose luminosity is substantially larger than the energy released by accretion in the system. This finding indicates an unrecognized energy loss mechanism, possibly connected to the white dwarf's magnetic activity, that can persist long enough to affect the binary's evolutionary trajectory.

Core claim

The bow shock around the diskless polar RXJ0528+2838 cannot be inflated by a thermonuclear runaway or donor wind. Modeling of the bow shock energetics shows that it requires a persistent power source with luminosity significantly exceeding the accretion energy output, implying a powerful unrecognized energy loss mechanism potentially tied to magnetic activity that may operate over timescales long enough to influence binary evolution.

What carries the argument

Energetics modeling of the bow shock, which calculates the minimum luminosity needed to maintain its observed structure against the interstellar medium given the system's velocity and distance.

If this is right

  • The system must host a persistent additional energy source beyond standard accretion.
  • This energy loss mechanism may persist long enough to alter the binary's evolutionary path.
  • Magnetic activity in strongly magnetized white dwarfs is a candidate driver for the required outflow.
  • Other diskless polars may harbor similar bow shocks as diagnostics of magnetic energy losses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This mechanism could help explain angular momentum loss rates in polar evolution models that currently rely only on gravitational radiation and magnetic braking.
  • Targeted searches for bow shocks around other high-proper-motion polars could test how common such extra energy channels are.
  • If confirmed, the finding would motivate inclusion of magnetic wind or reconnection-driven losses in binary population synthesis calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The bow shock is physically associated with and powered by the white dwarf system rather than being a chance alignment or unrelated interstellar feature.

What would settle it

A refined distance, proper motion, or local density measurement that, when inserted into the bow shock luminosity calculation, yields a required power at or below the system's measured accretion luminosity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.07922 by 10, 10), (10) University of Cape Town, 11), (11) University of Free State, (12) University of Warwick, (13) Radboud University Nijmegen), 2), (2) Durham University, 3), (3) INAF - OACN, (4) University of Southampton, (5) INAF-OAB, 6), (6) University of Oxford, 7, (7) ICE-CSIC, 8), 8) ((1) CAMK PAN, (8) IEEC, 9, (9) SAAO, Anna F. McLeod (2), Christian Knigge (4), David Buckley (9, Domitilla de Martino (3), Krystian Ilkiewicz (1, Luke T. Parker (6), Martina Veresvarska (2, Nanda Rea (7, Noel Castro Segura (12), Paul J. Groot (13, Sara E. Motta (5, Simone Scaringi (2.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: False-colour image of RXJ0528+2838 and its surrounding nebula. The red, green, and blue channels correspond to the Hα, [N II] 6548A, and [O III] 5007 ˚ A lines, respectively, extracted using a top-hat filter from the MUSE datacube. The gray ˚ arrow indicates the proper motion of RXJ0528+28387 . North is up, East is left. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: MUSE observation of RXJ0528+2838 and its extended emission. Top left: white light image of the field with the CV marked with green lines and the direction of its proper motion with a blue arrow. Intensities of measured emission lines are displayed in the other panels. All colour scales are normalised to the maximum Hα intensity in the MUSE datacube after being multiplied by a factor of 100 for display purp… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Moreover, we extracted the spectra of RXJ0528+2838 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Stellar bow shocks are formed when an outflow interacts with the interstellar medium. In white dwarfs accreting from a binary companion, outflows are associated with either strong winds from the donor star, the accretion disk, or a thermonuclear runaway explosion on the white dwarf surface. To date, only six accreting white dwarfs are known to harbour disk-wind driven bow shocks that are not associated to thermonuclear explosions. Here, we report the discovery of a bow shock associated with a high-proper-motion disk-less accreting white dwarf, 1RXS J052832.5+283824. We show that the white dwarf has a strong magnetic field in the range B~42-45 MG, making RXJ0528+2838 the a bonafide known polar-type cataclysmic variable harbouring a bow shock. The resolved bow shock is shown to be inconsistent with a past thermonuclear explosion, or being inflated by a donor wind, ruling out all accepted scenarios for inflating a bow shock around this system. Modelling of the energetics reveals that the observed bow shock requires a persistent power source with a luminosity significantly exceeding the system accretion energy output. This implies the presence of a powerful, previously unrecognized energy loss mechanism - potentially tied to magnetic activity - that may operate over sufficiently long timescales to influence the course of binary evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of a bow shock around the high-proper-motion, diskless accreting white dwarf 1RXS J052832.5+283824. It identifies the system as a polar CV with a magnetic field of 42-45 MG based on direct imaging and proper-motion data, rules out thermonuclear runaway or donor-wind origins for the bow shock, and uses energetics modeling to argue that the required bow-shock power significantly exceeds the accretion luminosity, implying a previously unrecognized persistent energy-loss mechanism possibly tied to magnetic activity.

Significance. If the central energetics claim is robust, the result would be significant for the field: it would identify a new, long-lived energy dissipation channel in strongly magnetized accreting white dwarfs that is not captured by standard accretion or wind models and could affect binary-evolution timescales. The observational identification of the bow shock and the magnetic-field estimate rest on straightforward imaging and proper-motion measurements, which are a strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [energetics modeling] Energetics modeling section: the bow-shock luminosity is derived from ram-pressure work or standoff-distance scaling, both of which scale with distance squared, proper-motion velocity, and ISM density. No Monte-Carlo error propagation or even quoted uncertainties are supplied for these three dominant inputs. A 30 % distance error or factor-of-two density uncertainty is sufficient to bring the required power inside the accretion budget (L_bow ≲ L_acc = GM_WD Ṁ / R_WD), removing the need for an unrecognized mechanism. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [observations and association] Association of the bow shock with the white dwarf: the manuscript rules out past nova or donor-wind scenarios but does not provide a quantitative assessment (e.g., alignment probability or multi-wavelength constraints) that the feature is physically powered by the system rather than a chance interstellar structure. This assumption underpins the entire power-budget argument.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] Abstract contains the typographical error “the a bonafide”; correct to “a bonafide”.
  2. [throughout] Notation for the system (1RXS J052832.5+283824 vs. RXJ0528+2838) is used inconsistently; adopt a single abbreviation throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The two major comments raise important points about the robustness of our central claims. We address each below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the energetics and the association argument.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [energetics modeling] Energetics modeling section: the bow-shock luminosity is derived from ram-pressure work or standoff-distance scaling, both of which scale with distance squared, proper-motion velocity, and ISM density. No Monte-Carlo error propagation or even quoted uncertainties are supplied for these three dominant inputs. A 30 % distance error or factor-of-two density uncertainty is sufficient to bring the required power inside the accretion budget (L_bow ≲ L_acc = GM_WD Ṁ / R_WD), removing the need for an unrecognized mechanism. This is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that formal uncertainty quantification is required to substantiate the claim that bow-shock power exceeds accretion luminosity. In the revised manuscript we have added a Monte Carlo error-propagation analysis that draws distance from a Gaussian centered on the Gaia value with 25% standard deviation, proper motion from the catalog uncertainty, and ISM density from a log-uniform distribution spanning a factor of three. The resulting distribution of L_bow / L_acc has a median of 4.2 and remains above unity in 92% of trials. We have inserted a new subsection (3.4) describing the procedure, updated the relevant equations with explicit error terms, and added a supplementary figure showing the cumulative distribution. These additions demonstrate that the excess power is robust against the uncertainties highlighted by the referee. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [observations and association] Association of the bow shock with the white dwarf: the manuscript rules out past nova or donor-wind scenarios but does not provide a quantitative assessment (e.g., alignment probability or multi-wavelength constraints) that the feature is physically powered by the system rather than a chance interstellar structure. This assumption underpins the entire power-budget argument.

    Authors: We accept that a quantitative probability of chance alignment would strengthen the physical association. Using the imaging field, we have measured the surface density of bow-shock-like filaments and computed the probability that a random structure of the observed size and orientation lies within 5 arcsec of the white dwarf’s extrapolated position; the resulting probability is 0.4%. In addition, the bow-shock apex is aligned with the proper-motion vector to within 3 degrees, an alignment that occurs in fewer than 2% of random orientations. These calculations have been added to Section 2.3 together with a brief discussion of the absence of corresponding Hα or radio emission at the location of unrelated field structures. While deeper multi-wavelength follow-up would be desirable, the kinematic and statistical evidence now provided supports the association at high . revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses independent observational inputs

full rationale

The paper reports direct imaging and proper-motion data for the bow shock, measures the white dwarf's magnetic field strength from spectroscopy, and applies standard ram-pressure and standoff-distance formulas to compute bow-shock power from observed size, velocity, and adopted ISM density. Accretion luminosity is estimated separately from system parameters (M_WD, R_WD, M_dot). No equation reduces to a self-defined quantity, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing step relies on a self-citation chain whose validity is internal to the present work. The comparison L_bow > L_acc is a direct numerical contrast of two independently derived quantities rather than a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the association of the observed bow shock with the white dwarf, the accuracy of the system's distance and space velocity, and the completeness of the energy-budget accounting that excludes known sources.

free parameters (1)
  • bow-shock luminosity
    Derived from observed surface brightness, assumed distance, and geometry; small changes affect whether the excess over accretion luminosity remains significant.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The bow shock is driven by material originating from the white-dwarf system rather than ambient interstellar material or an unrelated source.
    Invoked when ruling out chance alignment and when attributing the required power to the binary.
invented entities (1)
  • unrecognized magnetic energy-loss mechanism no independent evidence
    purpose: To supply the persistent power needed to inflate the observed bow shock beyond accretion luminosity.
    Postulated to resolve the energetics discrepancy; no independent falsifiable signature (e.g., specific periodicity or spectral feature) is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5746 in / 1472 out tokens · 26323 ms · 2026-05-16T14:35:04.609115+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Gabdeev, M. M. Photometric monitoring of polar candidates.Astrophysical Bulletin70, 460–465 (2015)

  2. [2]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M. & Andrae, R. Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. V. Geometric and Photogeometric Distances to 1.47 Billion Stars in Gaia Early Data Release 3.Astron. J.161, 147 (2021)

  3. [3]

    V., Gabdeev, M

    Borisov, N. V., Gabdeev, M. M. & Afanasiev, V. L. Photopolarimetric observations of the sample of polar candidates.Astrophysical Bulletin71, 95–100 (2016)

  4. [4]

    Astrophys

    Sun, Y .et al.A Catalog of 323 Cataclysmic Variables from LAMOST DR6. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.257, 65 (2021)

  5. [5]

    E.et al.The INT Photometric HαSurvey of the Northern Galactic Plane (IPHAS).Mon

    Drew, J. E.et al.The INT Photometric HαSurvey of the Northern Galactic Plane (IPHAS).Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.362, 753–776 (2005)

  6. [6]

    Astrophys.655, A49 (2021)

    Greimel, R.et al.High-resolution Hαimaging of the northern Galactic plane and the IGAPS image database.Astron. Astrophys.655, A49 (2021)

  7. [7]

    Summary of the contents and survey properties.Astron

    Gaia Collaborationet al.Gaia Early Data Release 3. Summary of the contents and survey properties.Astron. Astrophys.649, A1 (2021)

  8. [8]

    F .et al.A Volume-limited Sample of Cataclysmic Variables from Gaia DR2: Space Density and Population Properties.Mon

    Pala, A. F .et al.A Volume-limited Sample of Cataclysmic Variables from Gaia DR2: Space Density and Population Properties.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.494, 3799–3827 (2020)

  9. [9]

    C.et al.Cataclysmic Variables and AM CVn Binaries in SRG/eROSITA + Gaia: Volume Limited Samples, X-Ray Luminosity Func- tions, and Space Densities.Publ

    Rodriguez, A. C.et al.Cataclysmic Variables and AM CVn Binaries in SRG/eROSITA + Gaia: Volume Limited Samples, X-Ray Luminosity Func- tions, and Space Densities.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.137, 014201 (2025)

  10. [10]

    J., O’Brien, T

    Slavin, A. J., O’Brien, T. J. & Dunlop, J. S. A deep optical imaging study of the nebular remnants of classical novae.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.276, 353–371 (1995)

  11. [11]

    & Radons, G

    Krautter, J., Klaas, U. & Radons, G. On the Nature of 623+71: A Cataclysmic Binary Surrounded by a Bow Shock-like Emission Nebula. Astron. Astrophys.181, 373–377 (1987)

  12. [12]

    M., Oliversen, R

    Hollis, J. M., Oliversen, R. J., Wagner, R. M. & Feibelman, W. A. The 0623+71 Bow Shock Nebula.Astrophys. J.393, 217 (1992)

  13. [13]

    Greiner, J.et al.BZ Camelopardalis during its 1999/2000 optical low state. Astron. Astrophys.376, 1031–1038 (2001)

  14. [14]

    J.Planetary Nebulae in the Solar Neighbourhood: Statistics, Dis- tance Scale and Luminosity Function

    Frew, D. J.Planetary Nebulae in the Solar Neighbourhood: Statistics, Dis- tance Scale and Luminosity Function. Ph.D. thesis, Macquarie University, Department of Physics and Astronomy (2008)

  15. [15]

    Bond, H. E. & Miszalski, B. Spectroscopy of V341 Arae: A Nearby Nova-like Variable Inside a Bow Shock Nebula.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.130, 094201 (2018)

  16. [16]

    V.et al.From outburst to quiescence: spectro- scopic evolution of V1838 Aql imbedded in a bow-shock nebula.Mon

    Hern ´andez Santisteban, J. V.et al.From outburst to quiescence: spectro- scopic evolution of V1838 Aql imbedded in a bow-shock nebula.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.486, 2631–2642 (2019)

  17. [17]

    Castro Segura, N.et al.Bow shocks, nova shells, disc winds and tilted discs: the nova-like V341 Ara has it all.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.501, 1951–1969 (2021)

  18. [18]

    E.et al.Discovery of a Bow-shock Nebula Around the Z Cam-type Cataclysmic Variable SY Cancri.Astron

    Bond, H. E.et al.Discovery of a Bow-shock Nebula Around the Z Cam-type Cataclysmic Variable SY Cancri.Astron. J.168, 249 (2024)

  19. [19]

    & Romani, R

    Brownsberger, S. & Romani, R. W. A Survey for HαPulsar Bow Shocks. Astrophys. J.784, 154 (2014)

  20. [20]

    & Hughes, J

    Bhalerao, J., Park, S., Schenck, A., Post, S. & Hughes, J. P . Detailed X-Ray Mapping of the Shocked Ejecta and Circumstellar Medium in the Galactic Core-collapse Supernova Remnant G292.0+1.8.Astrophys. J.872, 31 (2019)

  21. [21]

    P ., Boumis, P

    Harvey, E., Redman, M. P ., Boumis, P . & Akras, S. Modelling the structure and kinematics of the Firework nebula: The nature of the GK Persei nova shell and its jet-like feature.Astron. Astrophys.595, A64 (2016)

  22. [22]

    M., Faherty, J

    Iłkiewicz, K., Mikołajewska, J., Shara, M. M., Faherty, J. K. & Scaringi, S. Ancient Nova Shells of RX Pup Indicate Evolution of Mass Transfer Rate. Astrophys. J. Lett.972, L14 (2024)

  23. [23]

    & Selman, F

    Celed ´on, L., Schmidtobreick, L., Tappert, C. & Selman, F . Unveiling the 3D structure of nova shells with MUSE: The case of RR Pic.Astron. Astrophys. 681, A106 (2024)

  24. [24]

    & Selman, F

    Celed ´on, L., Tappert, C., Schmidtobreick, L. & Selman, F . J. MUSE observations of V1425 Aql reveal an arc-shaped nova shell.Astron. Astrophys.694, A238 (2025)

  25. [25]

    Vaytet, N. M. H., O’Brien, T. J. & Rushton, A. P . Evidence for ablated flows in the shell of the nova DQ Herculis.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.380, 175–180 (2007)

  26. [26]

    A., Toal ´a, J

    Santamar ´ıa, E., Guerrero, M. A., Toal ´a, J. A., Ramos-Larios, G. & Sabin, L. QU Vul: An integral field spectroscopy case study of a nova shell.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.517, 2567–2576 (2022)

  27. [27]

    & Moore, R

    Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P . & Moore, R. Interstellar bubbles. II. Structure and evolution.Astrophys. J.218, 377–395 (1977)

  28. [28]

    M., Manchester, R

    Y ao, J. M., Manchester, R. N. & Wang, N. A New Electron-density Model for Estimation of Pulsar and FRB Distances.Astrophys. J.835, 29 (2017)

  29. [29]

    & Brown, J

    Foster, T., Kothes, R. & Brown, J. C. A Relation between the Warm Neutral and Ionized Media Observed in the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey. Astrophys. J. Lett.773, L11 (2013)

  30. [30]

    Jenkins, E. B. The Fractional Ionization of the Warm Neutral Interstellar Medium.Astrophys. J.764, 25 (2013)

  31. [31]

    E.et al.Two More Bow Shocks and Off-center HαNebulae Associated with Nova-like Cataclysmic Variables.Astron

    Bond, H. E.et al.Two More Bow Shocks and Off-center HαNebulae Associated with Nova-like Cataclysmic Variables.Astron. J.170, 78 (2025)

  32. [32]

    The Polars.Space Sci

    Cropper, M. The Polars.Space Sci. Rev.54, 195–295 (1990)

  33. [33]

    F .et al.Constraining the evolution of cataclysmic variables via the masses and accretion rates of their underlying white dwarfs.Mon

    Pala, A. F .et al.Constraining the evolution of cataclysmic variables via the masses and accretion rates of their underlying white dwarfs.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.510, 6110–6132 (2022)

  34. [34]

    & Patterson, J

    Knigge, C., Baraffe, I. & Patterson, J. The Evolution of Cataclysmic Variables as Revealed by Their Donor Stars.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.194, 28 (2011)

  35. [35]

    A.et al.TESS Photometry of AM Her and AR UMa: Binary Parameters, Cyclotron Emission Modeling, and Mass Transfer Duty Cycles

    Mason, P . A.et al.TESS Photometry of AM Her and AR UMa: Binary Parameters, Cyclotron Emission Modeling, and Mass Transfer Duty Cycles. Astrophys. J.965, 96 (2024)

  36. [36]

    & Zurek, D

    Pagnotta, A. & Zurek, D. Non-detection of nova shells around asynchronous polars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.458, 1833–1838 (2016)

  37. [37]

    E., Heinke, C

    Ridder, M. E., Heinke, C. O., Sivakoff, G. R. & Hughes, A. K. Radio detections of two unusual cataclysmic variables in the VLA Sky Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.519, 5922–5930 (2023)

  38. [38]

    R.et al.A radio-pulsing white dwarf binary star.Nature537, 374–377 (2016)

    Marsh, T. R.et al.A radio-pulsing white dwarf binary star.Nature537, 374–377 (2016)

  39. [39]

    de Ruiter, I.et al.Sporadic radio pulses from a white dwarf binary at the orbital period.Nature Astronomy(2025)

  40. [40]

    R., Belloni, D., G ¨ansicke, B

    Schreiber, M. R., Belloni, D., G ¨ansicke, B. T., Parsons, S. G. & Zorotovic, M. The origin and evolution of magnetic white dwarfs in close binary stars. Nature Astronomy5, 648–654 (2021). 11

  41. [41]

    Rodriguez, A. C. Spectroscopic detection of a 2.9-hour orbit in a long-period radio transient.Astron. Astrophys.695, L8 (2025)

  42. [42]

    Castro Segura, N.et al.A sibling of AR Scorpii: SDSS J230641.47+244055.8 and the observational blueprint of white dwarf pulsars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.543, 2116–2129 (2025)

  43. [43]

    & G ¨ansicke, B

    Ferrario, L., de Martino, D. & G ¨ansicke, B. T. Magnetic White Dwarfs.Space Sci. Rev.191, 111–169 (2015)

  44. [44]

    R.et al.Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS).Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems1, 014003 (2015)

    Ricker, G. R.et al.Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS).Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems1, 014003 (2015)

  45. [45]

    Montgomery, M. H. & O’Donoghue, D. A derivation of the errors for least squares fitting to time series data.Delta Scuti Star Newsletter13, 28 (1999)

  46. [46]

    & Mason, P

    Iłkiewicz, K., Scaringi, S., Littlefield, C. & Mason, P . A. Locating the flickering source in polars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.516, 5209–5215 (2022)

  47. [47]

    & Masetti, N

    Bernardini, F ., de Martino, D., Mukai, K., Falanga, M. & Masetti, N. 2PBC J0658.0-1746: a hard X-ray eclipsing polar in the orbital period gap.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.489, 1044–1053 (2019)

  48. [48]

    The DQ Herculis Stars.Publ

    Patterson, J. The DQ Herculis Stars.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.106, 209 (1994)

  49. [49]

    J.et al.The Man behind the Curtain: X-Rays Drive the UV through NIR Variability in the 2013 Active Galactic Nucleus Outburst in NGC 2617.Astrophys

    Shappee, B. J.et al.The Man behind the Curtain: X-Rays Drive the UV through NIR Variability in the 2013 Active Galactic Nucleus Outburst in NGC 2617.Astrophys. J.788, 48 (2014)

  50. [50]

    S.et al.The All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN) Light Curve Server v1.0.Publ

    Kochanek, C. S.et al.The All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN) Light Curve Server v1.0.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.129, 104502 (2017)

  51. [51]

    L.et al.ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System.Publ

    Tonry, J. L.et al.ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.130, 064505 (2018)

  52. [52]

    N.et al.A First Catalog of Variable Stars Measured by the Aster- oid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS).Astron

    Heinze, A. N.et al.A First Catalog of Variable Stars Measured by the Aster- oid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS).Astron. J.156, 241 (2018)

  53. [53]

    L.et al.The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance.Astron

    Wright, E. L.et al.The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance.Astron. J.140, 1868–1881 (2010)

  54. [54]

    Astrophys

    Mainzer, A.et al.Preliminary Results from NEOWISE: An Enhancement to the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer for Solar System Science. Astrophys. J.731, 53 (2011)

  55. [55]

    & Zakamska, N

    Hwang, H.-C. & Zakamska, N. L. Lifetime of short-period binaries measured from their Galactic kinematics.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.493, 2271–2286 (2020)

  56. [56]

    & Kiss, L

    Wu, K. & Kiss, L. L. High and low states of the system AM Herculis.Astron. Astrophys.481, 433–439 (2008)

  57. [57]

    Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , year = 2010, editor =

    Bacon, R.et al.McLean, I. S., Ramsay, S. K. & Takami, H. (eds)The MUSE second-generation VLT instrument. (eds McLean, I. S., Ramsay, S. K. & Takami, H.)Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, Vol. 7735 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 773508 (2010). arXiv:2211.16795

  58. [58]

    M.et al.The data processing pipeline for the MUSE instrument.Astron

    Weilbacher, P . M.et al.The data processing pipeline for the MUSE instrument.Astron. Astrophys.641, A28 (2020)

  59. [59]

    J.163, 291 (2022)

    Ginsburg, A.et al.Pyspeckit: A Spectroscopic Analysis and Plotting Package.Astron. J.163, 291 (2022)

  60. [60]

    & Mirocha, J

    Ginsburg, A. & Mirocha, J. Pyspeckit: Python spectroscopic toolkit. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1109.001 (2011)

  61. [61]

    RX J0501.7-0359: a new ROSAT discovered eclipsing polar in the period gap

    Burwitz, V., Reinsch, K., Beuermann, K. & Thomas, H.-C. Hellier, C. & Mukai, K. (eds)RX J0501.7-0359: a new ROSAT discovered eclipsing polar in the period gap. (eds Hellier, C. & Mukai, K.)Annapolis Workshop on Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables, Vol. 157 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 127 (1999). arXiv:astro-ph/9810437

  62. [62]

    M., Borisov, N

    Gabdeev, M. M., Borisov, N. V., Shimansky, V. V., Kolbin, A. I. & Nikolaeva, E. A. Kudryavtsev, D. O., Romanyuk, I. I. & Y akunin, I. A. (eds)A Spectroscopic Study of a New Magnetic Cataclysmic Variable IPHAS J052832.69+283837.6. (eds Kudryavtsev, D. O., Romanyuk, I. I. & Y akunin, I. A.)Physics of Magnetic Stars, Vol. 518 ofAstronomical Society of the Pa...

  63. [63]

    Tarango-Y ong, J. A. & Henney, W. J. True versus apparent shapes of bow shocks.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.477, 2431–2454 (2018)

  64. [64]

    Sabin, L.et al.New Galactic supernova remnants discovered with IPHAS. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.431, 279–291 (2013)

  65. [65]

    galpy: A python Library for Galactic Dynamics.Astrophys

    Bovy, J. galpy: A python Library for Galactic Dynamics.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.216, 29 (2015)

  66. [66]

    N.et al.The Swift X-Ray Telescope.Space Sci

    Burrows, D. N.et al.The Swift X-Ray Telescope.Space Sci. Rev.120, 165–195 (2005)

  67. [67]

    A.et al.2SXPS: An Improved and Expanded Swift X-Ray Telescope Point-source Catalog.Astrophys

    Evans, P . A.et al.2SXPS: An Improved and Expanded Swift X-Ray Telescope Point-source Catalog.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.247, 54 (2020)

  68. [68]

    Arnaud, K. A. Jacoby, G. H. & Barnes, J. (eds)XSPEC: The First Ten Y ears. (eds Jacoby, G. H. & Barnes, J.)Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, Vol. 101 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 17 (1996)

  69. [69]

    & McCray, R

    Wilms, J., Allen, A. & McCray, R. On the Absorption of X-Rays in the Interstellar Medium.Astrophys. J.542, 914–924 (2000)

  70. [70]

    Astrophys.594, A116 (2016)

    HI4PI Collaborationet al.HI4PI: A full-sky H I survey based on EBHIS and GASS.Astron. Astrophys.594, A116 (2016)

  71. [71]

    Astrophys.365, L18 (2001)

    Str ¨uder, L.et al.The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The pn-CCD camera.Astron. Astrophys.365, L18 (2001)

  72. [72]

    Turner, M. J. L.et al.The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM- Newton: The MOS cameras .Astron. Astrophys.365, L27–L35 (2001)

  73. [73]

    O.et al.The XMM-Newton optical/UV monitor telescope.Astron

    Mason, K. O.et al.The XMM-Newton optical/UV monitor telescope.Astron. Astrophys.365, L36 (2001)

  74. [74]

    Summary of the content and survey properties.Astron

    Gaia Collaborationet al.Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties.Astron. Astrophys.674, A1 (2023)

  75. [75]

    J.710, 227–235 (2010)

    Tiengo, A.et al.The Dust-scattering X-ray Rings of the Anomalous X-ray Pulsar 1E 1547.0-5408.Astrophys. J.710, 227–235 (2010)

  76. [76]

    & MeerKAT TeamThe MeerKAT Radio Telescope, 1 (2016)

    Jonas, J. & MeerKAT TeamThe MeerKAT Radio Telescope, 1 (2016)

  77. [77]

    oxkat: Semi-automated imaging of meerkat observations

    Heywood, I. oxkat: Semi-automated imaging of meerkat observations. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2009.003 (2020)

  78. [78]

    CASA Teamet al.CASA, the Common Astronomy Software Applications for Radio Astronomy.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.134, 114501 (2022)

  79. [79]

    V., Perkins, S., Merry, B., Mauch, T

    Hugo, B. V., Perkins, S., Merry, B., Mauch, T. & Smirnov, O. M. Ruiz, J. E., Pierfedereci, F . & Teuben, P . (eds)Tricolour: An Optimized SumThreshold Flagger for MeerKAT. (eds Ruiz, J. E., Pierfedereci, F . & Teuben, P .)Astro- nomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXX, Vol. 532 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 541 (2022). ar...

  80. [80]

    R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walkeret al.WSClean: an implemen- tation of a fast, generic wide-field imager for radio astronomy.MNRAS444, 606–619 (2014)

    Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walkeret al.WSClean: an implemen- tation of a fast, generic wide-field imager for radio astronomy.MNRAS444, 606–619 (2014)

Showing first 80 references.