pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00883 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Towards High Fidelity Face Swapping: A Comprehensive Survey and New Benchmark

Qi Li , Weining Wang , Shuangjun Du , Bo Peng , Jing Dong , Kun Wang , Zhenan Sun , Ming-Hsuan Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 19:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords face swappingsurveybenchmark datasetGANdiffusion modelsimage manipulationdeepfakescomputer vision
0
0 comments X

The pith

Face swapping methods fall into five paradigms that require a balanced demographic benchmark and fixed protocols for fair comparison.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Face swapping replaces one face with another in images or videos using generative models such as GANs and diffusion models, yet approaches remain scattered and evaluations vary widely. The paper groups existing techniques into five major paradigms based on their core design choices for transferring identity and attributes. This organization makes it possible to compare principles, strengths, and weaknesses across groups in a systematic way. To support reliable testing, the authors release a new dataset with even demographic coverage and controlled variations in factors like age, pose, and expression, plus standard evaluation rules. Experiments on sample methods from each paradigm then expose consistent patterns in where current techniques succeed or fail.

Core claim

Existing face swapping methods can be organized into five major paradigms whose design principles, strengths, and limitations become visible through systematic review; a new high-quality benchmark dataset with balanced demographics and explicit attribute variations, together with standardized evaluation protocols, enables consistent robustness assessment and yields new performance insights.

What carries the argument

The five-paradigm taxonomy that classifies face swapping methods by design principles, paired with the CASIA FaceSwapping benchmark dataset and its standardized evaluation protocols.

If this is right

  • Methods from different paradigms display distinct trade-offs when handling identity preservation versus attribute changes such as lighting or expression.
  • Standardized protocols allow direct, reproducible comparisons that reduce conflicting claims across papers.
  • The benchmark reveals performance gaps tied to demographic factors, guiding targeted improvements.
  • The unified view supports development of face swapping systems that combine strengths from multiple paradigms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same paradigm-based organization could be applied to neighboring tasks such as face reenactment or editing to reduce fragmentation.
  • Extending the benchmark to video sequences would test whether current protocols capture temporal consistency issues.
  • Insights on demographic biases could feed into detection systems that identify swapped content more reliably across populations.

Load-bearing premise

The five-paradigm classification covers all significant face swapping techniques without major gaps or overlaps, and the new benchmark plus protocols give a representative sample of real-world conditions.

What would settle it

A newly published face swapping technique that fits none of the five paradigms, or benchmark results that reverse the performance ordering seen on other datasets, would show the framework does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00883 by Bo Peng, Jing Dong, Kun Wang, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Qi Li, Shuangjun Du, Weining Wang, Zhenan Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sample results obtained by (a) face swapping method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the proposed FSGAN approach. (a) The recurrent reenactment generator Fig4: The flowchart of FSGAN [37] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of style transfer–based methods. (a) Latent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normalized radar charts of face swapping methods across the proposed protocols: (a) Normal, (b) Cross-ethnicity, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Line chart of face swapping methods across the proposed protocols for different metrics: (a) ID retrieval, (b) ID similarity, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Qualitative results of face swapping methods across different protocols. (a) Normal protocol (top four rows), (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Face swapping has witnessed significant progress in recent years, largely driven by advances in deep generative models such as GANs and diffusion models.Despite these advances, existing methods remain fragmented across different paradigms, and their evaluation is highly inconsistent due to the lack of standardized datasets and protocols. Moreover, prior surveys primarily focus on broader deepfake generation or detection, leaving face swapping insufficiently studied as a standalone problem. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey and benchmark for face swapping. We provide a structured review of existing methods, organizing them into five major paradigms and systematically analyzing their design principles, strengths, and limitations. To enable fair and controlled evaluation, we introduce CASIA FaceSwapping, a high-quality benchmark with balanced demographic distributions and explicit attribute variations, and establish standardized protocols to assess the robustness of different face swapping methods. Extensive experiments on representative approaches yield new insights into the performance characteristics and limitations of current techniques. Overall, our work provides a unified perspective and a principled evaluation framework to facilitate the development of more robust and controllable face swapping methods. More results can be found at https://github.com/CASIA-NLPRAI/face-swapping-survey.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a comprehensive survey of face swapping techniques, organizing existing methods into five major paradigms and analyzing their design principles, strengths, and limitations. It introduces the CASIA FaceSwapping benchmark dataset, which features balanced demographic distributions and explicit attribute variations, along with standardized evaluation protocols. The work includes extensive experiments on representative methods to provide insights into current techniques' performance and limitations, with the goal of establishing a unified perspective and principled framework for future research in high-fidelity face swapping.

Significance. If the taxonomy is comprehensive without major omissions or overlaps and the benchmark construction is representative, this work would provide a valuable unified evaluation framework for face swapping research. The introduction of a demographically balanced dataset with attribute controls and standardized protocols directly addresses fragmentation in prior evaluations, while the reported experiments on representative methods offer concrete insights into robustness. Credit is due for the new benchmark, public GitHub resources, and the focus on real-world variations.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the five paradigms are referenced but not named or briefly characterized, which would help readers immediately grasp the taxonomy structure.
  2. The manuscript should include an explicit table or section listing the inclusion criteria used to assign methods to each of the five paradigms, to allow independent verification of the taxonomy boundaries.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our survey, the recognition of the CASIA FaceSwapping benchmark, and the recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the emphasis on the value of a unified evaluation framework.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely descriptive survey and benchmark

full rationale

The paper is a survey that organizes existing face-swapping methods into five paradigms based on explicit inclusion criteria and reviews their design principles without any derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or predictions. The new CASIA FaceSwapping benchmark is introduced with documented construction details (demographic balancing, attribute annotations, protocols) that stand as independent contributions rather than reductions to prior inputs. No self-citation chains, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked to justify core claims; all taxonomy boundaries and evaluation standards are defined directly in the manuscript. This matches the default expectation for non-circular survey papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a survey and benchmark paper whose claims rest on the completeness of the literature review and the representativeness of the new dataset. No free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented physical entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Advances in deep generative models such as GANs and diffusion models have driven recent progress in face swapping.
    Stated directly in the opening sentence of the abstract as background.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5522 in / 1316 out tokens · 76867 ms · 2026-05-09T19:56:10.523640+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The creation and detection of deepfakes: A survey,

    Y . Mirsky and W. Lee, “The creation and detection of deepfakes: A survey,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–41, 2021. 2 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE 15 TABLE VI: Temporal consistency comparison of face swapping methods on video clips. Subject consistency and background consistency are computed to measure frame...

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey,

    T. T. Nguyen, Q. V . H. Nguyen, D. T. Nguyen, D. T. Nguyen, T. Huynh- The, S. Nahavandi, T. T. Nguyen, Q.-V . Pham, and C. M. Nguyen, “Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey,”CVIU, vol. 223, p. 103525, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Countering malicious deepfakes: Survey, battleground, and horizon,

    F. Juefei-Xu, R. Wang, Y . Huang, Q. Guo, L. Ma, and Y . Liu, “Countering malicious deepfakes: Survey, battleground, and horizon,” IJCV, vol. 130, no. 7, pp. 1678–1734, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Deepfakes generation and detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forward,

    M. Masood, M. Nawaz, K. M. Malik, A. Javed, A. Irtaza, and H. Malik, “Deepfakes generation and detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forward,”Applied Intelligence, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 3974–4026, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Deepfake detection: A comprehensive survey from the reliability perspective,

    T. Wang, X. Liao, K. P. Chow, X. Lin, and Y . Wang, “Deepfake detection: A comprehensive survey from the reliability perspective,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1–35, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Deepfake generation and detection: A benchmark and survey,

    G. Pei, J. Zhang, M. Hu, Z. Zhang, C. Wang, Y . Wu, G. Zhai, J. Yang, and D. Tao, “Deepfake generation and detection: A benchmark and survey,”ACM Computing Surveys, 2026. 2

    work page 2026

  7. [7]

    One shot face swapping on megapixels,

    Y . Zhu, Q. Li, J. Wang, C.-Z. Xu, and Z. Sun, “One shot face swapping on megapixels,” inCVPR, 2021, pp. 4834–4844. 2, 6, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Stargan: Unified generative adversarial networks for multi-domain image-to- image translation,

    Y . Choi, M. Choi, M. Kim, J.-W. Ha, S. Kim, and J. Choo, “Stargan: Unified generative adversarial networks for multi-domain image-to- image translation,” inCVPR, 2018, pp. 8789–8797. 2

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks,

    T. Karras, S. Laine, and T. Aila, “A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks,” inCVPR, 2019, pp. 4401–4410. 2, 3

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Semantic-aware one-shot face re- enactment with dense correspondence estimation,

    Y . Liu, Q. Li, Z. Sun, and T. Tan, “Semantic-aware one-shot face re- enactment with dense correspondence estimation,”MIR, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan,

    T. Karras, S. Laine, M. Aittala, J. Hellsten, J. Lehtinen, and T. Aila, “Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan,” inCVPR, 2020, pp. 8110–8119. 3

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Alias-free generative adversarial networks,

    T. Karras, M. Aittala, S. Laine, E. H ¨ark¨onen, J. Hellsten, J. Lehtinen, and T. Aila, “Alias-free generative adversarial networks,”NeurIPS, vol. 34, pp. 852–863, 2021. 3

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Image2stylegan: How to embed images into the stylegan latent space?

    R. Abdal, Y . Qin, and P. Wonka, “Image2stylegan: How to embed images into the stylegan latent space?” inICCV, 2019, pp. 4432–4441. 3

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Image2stylegan++: How to edit the embedded images?

    ——, “Image2stylegan++: How to edit the embedded images?” in CVPR, 2020, pp. 8296–8305. 3

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Stylespace analysis: Disen- tangled controls for stylegan image generation,

    Z. Wu, D. Lischinski, and E. Shechtman, “Stylespace analysis: Disen- tangled controls for stylegan image generation,” inCVPR, 2021, pp. 12 863–12 872. 3

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Towards spatially disentangled manipulation of face images with pre-trained stylegans,

    Y . Liu, Q. Li, Q. Deng, and Z. Sun, “Towards spatially disentangled manipulation of face images with pre-trained stylegans,”TCSVT, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1725–1739, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,”NeurIPS, vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020. 3, 6

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces,

    V . Blanz and T. Vetter, “A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces,” inSeminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, 2023, pp. 157–164. 3

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Exchanging faces in images,

    V . Blanz, K. Scherbaum, T. Vetter, and H.-P. Seidel, “Exchanging faces in images,” inComputer Graphics Forum, vol. 23, no. 3, 2004, pp. 669–676. 3

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    Reanimating faces in images and video,

    V . Blanz, C. Basso, T. Poggio, and T. Vetter, “Reanimating faces in images and video,” inComputer Graphics Forum, vol. 22, no. 3, 2003, pp. 641–650. 3

    work page 2003

  21. [21]

    3d-model-based face replacement in video,

    Y .-T. Cheng, V . Tzeng, Y . Liang, C.-C. Wang, B.-Y . Chen, Y .-Y . IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE 16 Chuang, and M. Ouhyoung, “3d-model-based face replacement in video,” inSIGGRAPH, 2009, pp. 1–1. 3

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Pose-free face swapping based on a deformable 3d shape morphable model,

    Y . Lin and S. Wang, “Pose-free face swapping based on a deformable 3d shape morphable model,”IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 305–314, 2014. 3

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Face swapping under large pose variations: A 3d model based approach,

    Y . Lin, S. Wang, Q. Lin, and F. Tang, “Face swapping under large pose variations: A 3d model based approach,” inICME, 2012, pp. 333–338. 3

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    A unified framework for high fidelity face swap and expression reenactment,

    B. Peng, H. Fan, W. Wang, J. Dong, and S. Lyu, “A unified framework for high fidelity face swap and expression reenactment,”TCSVT, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 3673–3684, 2021. 3

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    On face segmentation, face swapping, and face perception,

    Y . Nirkin, I. Masi, A. T. Tuan, T. Hassner, and G. Medioni, “On face segmentation, face swapping, and face perception,” inFG, 2018, pp. 98–105. 3

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Hififace: 3d shape and semantic prior guided high fidelity face swapping,

    Y . Wang, X. Chen, J. Zhu, W. Chu, Y . Tai, C. Wang, J. Li, Y . Wu, F. Huang, and R. Ji, “Hififace: 3d shape and semantic prior guided high fidelity face swapping,” inIJCAI, 2021, pp. 1136–1142. 3, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization,

    X. Huang and S. Belongie, “Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization,” inICCV, 2017, pp. 1501–1510. 4, 5

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Learning dynamic 3d geometry and texture for video face swapping,

    C. Otto, J. Naruniec, L. Helminger, T. Etterlin, G. Mignone, P. Chan- dran, G. Zoss, C. Schroers, M. Gross, P. Gotardoet al., “Learning dynamic 3d geometry and texture for video face swapping,” inCom- puter Graphics Forum, vol. 41, no. 7, 2022, pp. 611–622. 4

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    3d-aware face swapping,

    Y . Li, C. Ma, Y . Yan, W. Zhu, and X. Yang, “3d-aware face swapping,” inCVPR, 2023, pp. 12 705–12 714. 4

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Efficient geometry-aware 3d generative adversarial networks,

    E. R. Chan, C. Z. Lin, M. A. Chan, K. Nagano, B. Pan, S. De Mello, O. Gallo, L. J. Guibas, J. Tremblay, S. Khamiset al., “Efficient geometry-aware 3d generative adversarial networks,” inCVPR, 2022, pp. 16 123–16 133. 4

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    DeepFakes, https://github.com/ondyari/FaceForensics/tree/master/datas et/DeepFakes, accessed: 2026-04-15. 4, 8

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Fast face-swap using convolutional neural networks,

    I. Korshunova, W. Shi, J. Dambre, and L. Theis, “Fast face-swap using convolutional neural networks,” inICCV, 2017, pp. 3677–3685. 4

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Introducing explicit gaze constraints to face swapping,

    E. Wilson, F. Shic, and E. Jain, “Introducing explicit gaze constraints to face swapping,” inProceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, 2023, pp. 1–7. 4

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    High fidelity face swapping via semantics disentanglement and structure enhancement,

    F. Liu, L. Yu, H. Xie, C. Liu, Z. Ding, Q. Yang, and Y . Zhang, “High fidelity face swapping via semantics disentanglement and structure enhancement,” inMM, 2023, pp. 6907–6917. 4

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Stableswap: stable face swapping in a shared and controllable latent space,

    Y . Zhu, W. Zhao, Y . Tang, Y . Rao, J. Zhou, and J. Lu, “Stableswap: stable face swapping in a shared and controllable latent space,”TMM,

    work page

  36. [36]

    FaceSwap-GAN, https://github.com/shaoanlu/faceswap- GAN, accessed: 2026-04-15. 4, 8

    work page 2026

  37. [37]

    Fsgan: Subject agnostic face swapping and reenactment,

    Y . Nirkin, Y . Keller, and T. Hassner, “Fsgan: Subject agnostic face swapping and reenactment,” inICCV, 2019, pp. 7184–7193. 4, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Fsganv2: Improved subject agnostic face swapping and reen- actment,

    ——, “Fsganv2: Improved subject agnostic face swapping and reen- actment,”TPAMI, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 560–575, 2022. 4, 10

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Few-shot head swapping in the wild,

    C. Shu, H. Wu, H. Zhou, J. Liu, Z. Hong, C. Ding, J. Han, J. Liu, E. Ding, and J. Wang, “Few-shot head swapping in the wild,” inCVPR, 2022, pp. 10 789–10 798. 4

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Rsgan: face swapping and editing using face and hair representation in latent spaces,

    R. Natsume, T. Yatagawa, and S. Morishima, “Rsgan: face swapping and editing using face and hair representation in latent spaces,” in SIGGRAPH, 2018, pp. 1–2. 4

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale,

    A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, J. Uszkoreit, and N. Houlsby, “An image is worth 16x16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale,” inICLR, 2021. 4

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Transfs: Face swapping using transformer,

    W. Cao, T. Wang, A. Dong, and M. Shu, “Transfs: Face swapping using transformer,” inFG, 2023, pp. 1–8. 4

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Face transformer: Towards high fidelity and accurate face swapping,

    K. Cui, R. Wu, F. Zhan, and S. Lu, “Face transformer: Towards high fidelity and accurate face swapping,” inCVPR Workshop, 2023, pp. 668–677. 4

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” NeurIPS, vol. 30, 2017. 5

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Simswap: An efficient framework for high fidelity face swapping,

    R. Chen, X. Chen, B. Ni, and Y . Ge, “Simswap: An efficient framework for high fidelity face swapping,” inMM, 2020, pp. 2003–2011. 5, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Simswap++: Towards faster and high-quality identity swapping,

    X. Chen, B. Ni, Y . Liu, N. Liu, Z. Zeng, and H. Wang, “Simswap++: Towards faster and high-quality identity swapping,”TPAMI, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 576–592, 2024. 5, 10

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Designing one unified framework for high-fidelity face reenactment and swapping,

    C. Xu, J. Zhang, Y . Han, G. Tian, X. Zeng, Y . Tai, Y . Wang, C. Wang, and Y . Liu, “Designing one unified framework for high-fidelity face reenactment and swapping,” inECCV, 2022, pp. 54–71. 5

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Flowface: Semantic flow-guided shape-aware face swapping,

    H. Zeng, W. Zhang, C. Fan, T. Lv, S. Wang, Z. Zhang, B. Ma, L. Li, Y . Ding, and X. Yu, “Flowface: Semantic flow-guided shape-aware face swapping,” inAAAI, vol. 37, no. 3, 2023, pp. 3367–3375. 5

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Flowface++: Explicit semantic flow-supervised end-to- end face swapping,

    Y . Zhang, H. Zeng, B. Ma, W. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Y . Ding, T. Lv, and C. Fan, “Flowface++: Explicit semantic flow-supervised end-to- end face swapping,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12686, 2023. 5

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Selfswapper: Self-supervised face swapping via shape agnostic masked autoencoder,

    J. Lee, J. Hyung, S. Jung, and J. Choo, “Selfswapper: Self-supervised face swapping via shape agnostic masked autoencoder,” inECCV, 2024, pp. 383–400. 5

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Advancing high fidelity identity swapping for forgery detection,

    L. Li, J. Bao, H. Yang, D. Chen, and F. Wen, “Advancing high fidelity identity swapping for forgery detection,” inCVPR, 2020, pp. 5074–

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Rsface: subject agnostic face swapping with expression high fidelity,

    G. Yang, T. Wang, X. Fang, and j. Zhang, “Rsface: subject agnostic face swapping with expression high fidelity,”The Visual Computer, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 5497–5511, 2023. 5

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Paste you into game: Towards expression and identity consistency face swapping,

    H. Zeng, W. Zhang, K. Chen, Z. Zhang, L. Li, and Y . Ding, “Paste you into game: Towards expression and identity consistency face swapping,” inIEEE Conference on Games, 2022, pp. 1–8. 5

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Learning disentan- gled representation for one-shot progressive face swapping,

    Q. Li, W. Wang, C. Xu, Z. Sun, and M.-H. Yang, “Learning disentan- gled representation for one-shot progressive face swapping,”TPAMI, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 8348–8364, 2024. 5

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Blendface: Re-designing identity encoders for face-swapping,

    K. Shiohara, X. Yang, and T. Taketomi, “Blendface: Re-designing identity encoders for face-swapping,” inICCV, 2023, pp. 7634–7644. 5, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Information bottleneck disentanglement for identity swapping,

    G. Gao, H. Huang, C. Fu, Z. Li, and R. He, “Information bottleneck disentanglement for identity swapping,” inCVPR, 2021, pp. 3404–

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Identity-preserving face swapping via dual surrogate generative models,

    Z. Huang, F. Tang, Y . Zhang, J. Cao, C. Li, S. Tang, J. Li, and T.-Y . Lee, “Identity-preserving face swapping via dual surrogate generative models,”TOG, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1–19, 2024. 5, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Facedancer: Pose-and occlusion-aware high fidelity face swapping,

    F. Rosberg, E. E. Aksoy, F. Alonso-Fernandez, and C. Englund, “Facedancer: Pose-and occlusion-aware high fidelity face swapping,” inWACV, 2023, pp. 3454–3463. 5, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Reinforced disentanglement for face swapping without skip connection,

    X. Ren, X. Chen, P. Yao, H.-Y . Shum, and B. Wang, “Reinforced disentanglement for face swapping without skip connection,” inICCV, 2023, pp. 20 665–20 675. 5

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Smooth-swap: A simple enhancement for face-swapping with smoothness,

    J. Kim, J. Lee, and B.-T. Zhang, “Smooth-swap: A simple enhancement for face-swapping with smoothness,” inCVPR, 2022, pp. 10 779– 10 788. 5

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Fastswap: A lightweight one-stage framework for real-time face swapping,

    S.-M. Yoo, T.-M. Choi, J.-W. Choi, and J.-H. Kim, “Fastswap: A lightweight one-stage framework for real-time face swapping,” in WACV, 2023, pp. 3558–3567. 5

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Mobilefaceswap: A lightweight framework for video face swapping,

    Z. Xu, Z. Hong, C. Ding, Z. Zhu, J. Han, J. Liu, and E. Ding, “Mobilefaceswap: A lightweight framework for video face swapping,” inAAAI, vol. 36, no. 3, 2022, pp. 2973–2981. 5

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Phinet-gan: Bringing real-time face swapping to embedded devices,

    A. Ancilotto, F. Paissan, and E. Farella, “Phinet-gan: Bringing real-time face swapping to embedded devices,” inIEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events, 2023, pp. 677–682. 5

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    La- tentswap: An efficient latent code mapping framework for face swap- ping,

    C. Choi, M. Kim, J. Lee, H.-K. Song, Y . Kim, and S. Kim, “La- tentswap: An efficient latent code mapping framework for face swap- ping,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18351, 2024. 6

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    High fidelity face- swapping with style convtransformer and latent space selection,

    J. Yang, C. Cheng, S. Xiao, G. Lan, and J. Wen, “High fidelity face- swapping with style convtransformer and latent space selection,”TMM,

    work page

  66. [66]

    End-to-end face-swapping via adap- tive latent representation learning,

    C. Lin, P. Hu, C. Shen, and Q. Li, “End-to-end face-swapping via adap- tive latent representation learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04186,

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    High-resolution face swapping via latent semantics disentanglement,

    Y . Xu, B. Deng, J. Wang, Y . Jing, J. Pan, and S. He, “High-resolution face swapping via latent semantics disentanglement,” inCVPR, 2022, pp. 7642–7651. 6, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Style- face: Towards identity-disentangled face generation on megapixels,

    Y . Luo, J. Zhu, K. He, W. Chu, Y . Tai, C. Wang, and J. Yan, “Style- face: Towards identity-disentangled face generation on megapixels,” in ECCV, 2022, pp. 297–312. 6

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Fine-grained face swapping via regional gan inversion,

    Z. Liu, M. Li, Y . Zhang, C. Wang, Q. Zhang, J. Wang, and Y . Nie, “Fine-grained face swapping via regional gan inversion,” inCVPR, 2023, pp. 8578–8587. 6, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Region-aware face swapping,

    C. Xu, J. Zhang, M. Hua, Q. He, Z. Yi, and Y . Liu, “Region-aware face swapping,” inCVPR, 2022, pp. 7632–7641. 6, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    Styleswap: Style-based generator empowers robust face swapping,

    Z. Xu, H. Zhou, Z. Hong, Z. Liu, J. Liu, Z. Guo, J. Han, J. Liu, E. Ding, and J. Wang, “Styleswap: Style-based generator empowers robust face swapping,” inECCV, 2022, pp. 661–677. 6

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    Controlface: Feature disentangling for controllable face swapping,

    X. Zhang, W. Zhou, K. Liu, H. Tang, Z. Zhang, W. Zhang, and N. Yu, “Controlface: Feature disentangling for controllable face swapping,” Journal of Imaging, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2024. 6 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE 17

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Styleipsb: Identity- preserving semantic basis of stylegan for high fidelity face swapping,

    D. Jiang, D. Song, R. Tong, and M. Tang, “Styleipsb: Identity- preserving semantic basis of stylegan for high fidelity face swapping,” inCVPR, 2023, pp. 352–361. 6

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Mfim: Megapixel facial identity manipulation,

    S. Na, “Mfim: Megapixel facial identity manipulation,” inECCV, 2022, pp. 143–159. 6

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    DiffFace: Diffusion-based face swapping with facial guidance,

    K. Kim, Y . Kim, S. Cho, J. Seo, J. Nam, K. Lee, S. Kim, and K. Lee, “Diffface: Diffusion-based face swapping with facial guidance,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.13344, 2022. 7

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Face-adapter for pre-trained diffusion models with fine- grained id and attribute control,

    Y . Han, J. Zhu, K. He, X. Chen, Y . Ge, W. Li, X. Li, J. Zhang, C. Wang, and Y . Liu, “Face-adapter for pre-trained diffusion models with fine- grained id and attribute control,” inECCV, 2024, pp. 20–36. 7, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Diffswap: High- fidelity and controllable face swapping via 3d-aware masked diffusion,

    W. Zhao, Y . Rao, W. Shi, Z. Liu, J. Zhou, and J. Lu, “Diffswap: High- fidelity and controllable face swapping via 3d-aware masked diffusion,” inCVPR, 2023, pp. 8568–8577. 7, 10, 11, 15

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    Realistic and efficient face swapping: A unified approach with diffusion models,

    S. Baliah, Q. Lin, S. Liao, X. Liang, and M. H. Khan, “Realistic and efficient face swapping: A unified approach with diffusion models,” in WACV, 2025, pp. 1062–1071. 7

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    Uniface++: Revisiting a unified framework for face reenactment and swapping via 3d priors,

    C. Xu, Y . Qian, S. Zhu, B. Sun, J. Zhao, Y . Liu, and X. Li, “Uniface++: Revisiting a unified framework for face reenactment and swapping via 3d priors,”IJCV, vol. 133, no. 7, pp. 4538–4554, 2025. 7

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Hs-diffusion: Semantic-mixing diffusion for head swapping,

    Q. Wang, L. Liu, M. Hua, P. Zhu, W. Zuo, Q. Hu, H. Lu, and B. Cao, “Hs-diffusion: Semantic-mixing diffusion for head swapping,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06458, 2022. 7

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.