pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04375 · v2 · pith:MZACJ7DDnew · submitted 2026-05-06 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.AI· cs.SY

Experiment-as-Code Labs: A Declarative Stack for AI-Driven Scientific Discovery

Zhenning Yang , Yuhan Chen , Patrick Tser Jern Kon , Tongyuan Miao , Hongyi Lin , Venkat Viswanathan , Danai Koutra , Ang Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 00:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.AIcs.SY
keywords experiment-as-codedeclarative configurationsAI for scienceautonomous labslab automationsystems stackscientific discovery
0
0 comments X

The pith

Experiments are encoded as declarative configurations that AI agents generate and systems compile to lab device APIs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a new paradigm called Experiment-as-Code Labs in which experiments are written as declarative configurations instead of imperative scripts. AI agents produce hypotheses and experiment plans as sets of these configurations. A systems layer then applies program analysis, safety checks, resource assignment, and orchestration before the configurations are compiled and executed on physical instruments through their native APIs. This creates a general stack that operates independently of any particular scientific field or piece of equipment.

Core claim

We propose a new paradigm called Experiment-as-Code (EaC) Labs, where a core concept is to encode experiments as declarative configurations that can be compiled down to device-level APIs. AI agents come up with hypotheses and experiments, written as an ensemble of declarative configurations. The systems layer performs program analysis, safety checks, resource assignment, and job orchestration. Finally, programmatic experimentation occurs via actuating the device APIs. This is a general stack that is science-, lab-, and instrument-independent.

What carries the argument

The Experiment-as-Code (EaC) declarative configuration stack, which encodes experiments so that AI-generated plans can be analyzed, safety-checked, and compiled to device APIs.

If this is right

  • AI agents can directly propose and execute experiments in physical labs rather than only in simulation.
  • Safety verification and resource scheduling occur automatically before any device actuation.
  • The same configuration format works across different scientific domains and instrument types.
  • Experiment design shifts from writing custom control code to specifying declarative ensembles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • AI could adjust ongoing physical experiments in response to live sensor data by modifying the active declarative configuration.
  • Standard declarative experiment descriptions might allow easier sharing and reuse of protocols between independent labs.
  • The approach could lower the barrier for non-experts to run complex protocols by letting the AI and stack handle the details.

Load-bearing premise

Complex real-world experiments can be fully captured and executed safely by AI-generated declarative configurations without heavy domain-specific tuning or loss of needed flexibility.

What would settle it

A test in which an AI agent outputs a declarative configuration for a multi-step lab protocol, the system compiles and runs it on actual equipment, safety checks pass, and the physical results align with the intended hypothesis.

read the original abstract

To unleash the full potential of AI for Science, we must untether the agents from a purely digital environment. The agent's ability to control and explore in real-world labs is essential because the physical lab remains foundational to scientific discovery. While some tasks can be performed on a computer (e.g., data analysis, running simulated experiments), Eureka moments could occur at any time while operating lab instruments (e.g., when a scientist notices unexpected clues, intuition may prompt a real-time course change). Although autonomous labs are on the rise, which expose programmable APIs to control scientific instruments via software, bridging the gap between increasingly powerful AI agents and automated lab equipment requires innovation that draws insights from computer systems. We propose a new paradigm called ``Experiment-as-Code (EaC) Labs,'' where a core concept is to encode experiments as declarative configurations that can be compiled down to device-level APIs. AI agents come up with hypotheses and experiments, written as an ensemble of declarative configurations. The systems layer performs program analysis, safety checks, resource assignment, and job orchestration. Finally, programmatic experimentation occurs via actuating the device APIs. This is a general stack that is science-, lab-, and instrument-independent, representing a novel synthesis across the physical, systems, and intelligence layers to unleash the next breakthrough in AI for Science.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new paradigm called 'Experiment-as-Code (EaC) Labs' to bridge AI agents with physical laboratory equipment. Experiments are encoded as declarative configurations that AI agents generate as ensembles; these are compiled to device-level APIs. A systems layer performs program analysis, safety checks, resource assignment, and job orchestration before actuation occurs. The stack is presented as general and independent of specific science domains, labs, or instruments, synthesizing physical, systems, and intelligence layers to enable more autonomous discovery.

Significance. If the declarative stack can be realized with the claimed flexibility, it would offer a valuable architectural synthesis for AI-for-Science systems, potentially allowing agents to control real-world experiments while incorporating safety and orchestration. The high-level proposal correctly identifies the gap between digital AI agents and programmable lab APIs as a systems problem.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The motivation explicitly cites the need to support real-time course changes (e.g., 'Eureka moments' and 'intuition may prompt a real-time course change' during instrument operation), yet the declarative-configuration model is described only as static ensembles compiled to APIs; no mechanisms are given for runtime reconfiguration, live sensor-driven branching, or AI-driven mid-execution updates.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the stack is 'science-, lab-, and instrument-independent' is load-bearing for the proposal's generality, but the description provides no concrete account of how declarative encodings or the systems layer accommodate heterogeneous device APIs and domain-specific constraints without per-instrument or per-domain extensions.
minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript is entirely conceptual and contains no implementation sketch, pseudocode, or worked example of a declarative configuration; adding at least one such illustration would substantially improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive report and positive assessment of the proposal's potential. We address each major comment point-by-point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The motivation explicitly cites the need to support real-time course changes (e.g., 'Eureka moments' and 'intuition may prompt a real-time course change' during instrument operation), yet the declarative-configuration model is described only as static ensembles compiled to APIs; no mechanisms are given for runtime reconfiguration, live sensor-driven branching, or AI-driven mid-execution updates.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's motivation emphasizes real-time adaptability during physical experimentation, while the core description focuses on declarative ensemble generation, compilation, and static orchestration. The systems layer is intended to support dynamic elements through ongoing program analysis and safety re-evaluation, but explicit mechanisms for runtime reconfiguration are not detailed in the current version. In revision, we will expand the systems layer section to outline sensor-driven branching via live feedback loops and AI-agent-triggered mid-execution updates, with re-application of safety checks and resource re-assignment. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the stack is 'science-, lab-, and instrument-independent' is load-bearing for the proposal's generality, but the description provides no concrete account of how declarative encodings or the systems layer accommodate heterogeneous device APIs and domain-specific constraints without per-instrument or per-domain extensions.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the independence claim requires a more explicit technical basis. The manuscript positions declarative configurations as an abstraction that the systems layer compiles to device APIs using program analysis for safety and resource assignment. However, concrete details on handling heterogeneity without extensions are limited. We will revise by adding a description of a unified declarative schema with modular mapping rules and abstract resource models in the systems layer, enabling accommodation of diverse APIs and constraints at the orchestration level rather than through per-domain core changes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: architectural proposal without derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The paper proposes a conceptual paradigm called Experiment-as-Code Labs, encoding experiments as declarative configurations compiled to device APIs, with AI agents generating hypotheses and a systems layer handling analysis and orchestration. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains are present in the provided text or abstract. The central claims concern system architecture and generality across labs rather than any quantity or result that reduces to its own inputs by construction. Self-citations are absent from the load-bearing claims, and the proposal does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior work. This is a standard non-finding for a design-oriented systems paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal depends on untested assumptions about AI capability to generate usable declarative experiment descriptions and the feasibility of general, instrument-independent compilation and safety checking.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption AI agents can reliably produce declarative experiment configurations that capture necessary experimental intent and safety constraints
    Invoked when stating that agents write hypotheses and experiments as declarative configurations.
  • domain assumption A general systems layer can perform program analysis, safety checks, and orchestration across arbitrary labs and instruments
    Central to the claim that the stack is science-, lab-, and instrument-independent.
invented entities (1)
  • Experiment-as-Code Labs declarative stack no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode experiments as configurations compilable to device APIs and orchestrate AI-driven physical experimentation
    Newly introduced framework with no independent evidence or external validation provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5793 in / 1374 out tokens · 51653 ms · 2026-05-21T00:07:39.039798+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

209 extracted references · 209 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2012 , doi =

    Hawkes, Nigel , title =. 2012 , doi =. https://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2555.full.pdf , journal =

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Nature , year=

    Baker, Monya , title=. Nature , year=. doi:10.1038/533452a , url=

    work page doi:10.1038/533452a

  3. [3]

    Wolfram language: Programming language + built-in knowledge , url=

    work page

  4. [4]

    2025 , publisher =

    Yang, Zhenning and Bhatnagar, Archit and Qiu, Yiming and Miao, Tongyuan and Tser Jern Kon, Patrick and Xiao, Yunming and Huang, Yibo and Casado, Martin and Chen, Ang , title =. 2025 , publisher =

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    2024 , eprint=

    The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Ma, T.-H

    Llm and simulation as bilevel optimizers: A new paradigm to advance physical scientific discovery , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09783 , year=

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17044 , year=

    Generation and human-expert evaluation of interesting research ideas using knowledge graphs and large language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17044 , year=

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Scienceagentbench: Toward rigorous assessment of language agents for data-driven scientific discovery

    Scienceagentbench: Toward rigorous assessment of language agents for data-driven scientific discovery , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05080 , year=

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    2024 , eprint=

    Large Language Models as Biomedical Hypothesis Generators: A Comprehensive Evaluation , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02554 , year=

    AI Research Agents for Machine Learning: Search, Exploration, and Generalization in MLE-bench , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02554 , year=

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    2025 , eprint=

    The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    2025 , eprint=

    AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovation , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    2025 , eprint=

    When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Research , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    2025 , eprint=

    Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Review , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update , volume=

    Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool , author=. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Advances in Simulation , volume=

    Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use , author=. Advances in Simulation , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    BMC Medical Education , volume=

    Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of english academic papers by non-native english-speaking medical students-the educational application of ChatGPT , author=. BMC Medical Education , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    2026 , eprint=

    A Survey of AI Scientists , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Evaluating large language model agents for automation of atomic force microscopy , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Nature , volume=

    Autonomous chemical research with large language models , author=. Nature , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    2025 , eprint=

    BLADE: Benchmarking Language Model Agents for Data-Driven Science , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    2024 , eprint=

    DS-Agent: Automated Data Science by Empowering Large Language Models with Case-Based Reasoning , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Advanced Materials , volume=

    SciAgents: automating scientific discovery through bioinspired multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning , author=. Advanced Materials , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    H yp ER : Literature-grounded Hypothesis Generation and Distillation with Provenance

    Vasu, Rosni and Basu, Chandrayee and Dalvi Mishra, Bhavana and Sarasua, Cristina and Clark, Peter and Bernstein, Abraham. H yp ER : Literature-grounded Hypothesis Generation and Distillation with Provenance. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1292

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1292 2025

  25. [25]

    Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM -Based Multi-Agent System

    Su, Haoyang and Chen, Renqi and Tang, Shixiang and Yin, Zhenfei and Zheng, Xinzhe and Li, Jinzhe and Qi, Biqing and Wu, Qi and Li, Hui and Ouyang, Wanli and Torr, Philip and Zhou, Bowen and Dong, Nanqing. Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM -Based Multi-Agent System. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the As...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1368 2025

  26. [26]

    Hypothesis Generation with Large Language Models , url=

    Zhou, Yangqiaoyu and Liu, Haokun and Srivastava, Tejes and Mei, Hongyuan and Tan, Chenhao , year=. Hypothesis Generation with Large Language Models , url=. doi:10.18653/v1/2024.nlp4science-1.10 , booktitle=

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2024.nlp4science-1.10 2024

  27. [27]

    Litllm: A toolkit for scientific literature review.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01788, 2024

    Litllm: A toolkit for scientific literature review , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01788 , year=

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Paperqa: Retrieval-augmented generative agent for scientific research,

    Paperqa: Retrieval-augmented generative agent for scientific research , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07559 , year=

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    2025 , eprint=

    Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Advanced Materials Technologies , year =

    Scientific Discovery at the Press of a Button: Navigating Automated and Cloud Laboratory Landscapes , author =. Advanced Materials Technologies , year =

    work page

  31. [31]

    PLoS ONE , year =

    Automation in the Life Science Research Laboratory , author =. PLoS ONE , year =

    work page

  32. [32]

    2024 , url =

    Top 10 Lab Automation Software Solutions , author =. 2024 , url =

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    2025 , url =

    LabLynx Laboratory Software Suites: Transforming Your Lab to Meet Every Need , author =. 2025 , url =

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    2026 , url =

    Top 15 LIMS Vendors in 2026: Based on Real User Reviews , author =. 2026 , url =

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    2026 , note =

    Terraform by. 2026 , note =

    work page 2026

  36. [36]

    2025 , eprint=

    Automated Cloud Infrastructure-as-Code Reconciliation with AI Agents , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    2025 , publisher =

    Yang, Zhenning and Bhatnagar, Archit and Qiu, Yiming and Miao, Tongyuan and Tser Jern Kon, Patrick and Xiao, Yunming and Huang, Yibo and Casado, Martin and Chen, Ang , title =. 2025 , publisher =. doi:10.1145/3759441.3759443 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1145/3759441.3759443 2025

  38. [38]

    Automated Bug Discovery in Cloud Infrastructure-as-Code Updates with LLM Agents , year=

    Xiang, Yiming and Yang, Zhenning and Peng, Jingjia and Bauer, Hermann and Kon, Patrick Tser Jern and Qiu, Yiming and Chen, Ang , booktitle=. Automated Bug Discovery in Cloud Infrastructure-as-Code Updates with LLM Agents , year=

    work page

  39. [39]

    Automated Lifting for Cloud Infrastructure-as-Code Programs , year=

    Peng, Jingjia and Qiu, Yiming and Kon, Patrick Tser Jern and Zhao, Pinhan and Huang, Yibo and Guo, Zheng and Wang, Xinyu and Chen, Ang , booktitle=. Automated Lifting for Cloud Infrastructure-as-Code Programs , year=

    work page

  40. [40]

    Artificial intelligence in drug development

    Zhang, Kang and Yang, Xin and Wang, Yifei and Yu, Yunfang and Huang, Niu and Li, Gen and Li, Xiaokun and Wu, Joseph C and Yang, Shengyong. Artificial intelligence in drug development. Nat. Med

    work page

  41. [41]

    Machine Learning for Molecular Simulation

    Noé, Frank and Tkatchenko, Alexandre and Müller, Klaus-Robert and Clementi, Cecilia. Machine Learning for Molecular Simulation. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052331

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052331 2020

  42. [42]

    AI4Materials: Transforming the landscape of materials science and enigneering , journal =

    Xue Jiang and Dezhen Xue and Yang Bai and William Yi Wang and Jianjun Liu and Mingli Yang and Yanjing Su , keywords =. AI4Materials: Transforming the landscape of materials science and enigneering , journal =. 2025 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmat.2025.100010 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.revmat.2025.100010 2025

  43. [43]

    and Seshadri, Ram , title =

    Cheetham, Anthony K. and Seshadri, Ram , title =. Chemistry of Materials , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Scaling deep learning for materials discovery , volume =

    Merchant, Amil and Batzner, Simon and Schoenholz, Samuel and Aykol, Muratahan and Cheon, Gowoon and Cubuk, Ekin , year =. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery , volume =. Nature , doi =

    work page

  45. [45]

    Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3

    Abramson, Josh and Adler, Jonas and Dunger, Jack and Evans, Richard and Green, Tim and Pritzel, Alexander and Ronneberger, Olaf and Willmore, Lindsay and Ballard, Andrew J and Bambrick, Joshua and Bodenstein, Sebastian W and Evans, David A and Hung, Chia-Chun and O'Neill, Michael and Reiman, David and Tunyasuvunakool, Kathryn and Wu, Zachary and Z emgulyt...

    work page

  46. [46]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Autonomous platforms for data-driven organic synthesis , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28736-4 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28736-4 2022

  47. [47]

    Nature Synthesis , author =

    Empowering scientists with data-driven automated experimentation , copyright =. Nature Synthesis , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1038/s44160-023-00337-z , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s44160-023-00337-z 2023

  48. [48]

    Nature Synthesis , author =

    The rise of self-driving labs in chemical and materials sciences , copyright =. Nature Synthesis , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1038/s44160-022-00231-0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s44160-022-00231-0 2023

  49. [49]

    Chemistry of Materials , author =

    Self-. Chemistry of Materials , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03593 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03593 2023

  50. [50]

    Digital Discovery , author =

    Driving school for self-driving labs , volume =. Digital Discovery , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1039/D3DD00150D , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1039/d3dd00150d 2023

  51. [51]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Autonomous optimization of non-aqueous. Nature Communications , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32938-1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32938-1 2022

  52. [52]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Differentiable modeling and optimization of non-aqueous. Nature Communications , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51653-7 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51653-7 2024

  53. [53]

    Nature Materials , author =

    Accelerating advanced-materials commercialization , volume =. Nature Materials , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1038/nmat4625 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat4625 2016

  54. [54]

    doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-6wq3x , abstract =

    Chen, Yuhan and Lin, Hongyi and Zhang, Tianyi and Dave, Adarsh and Mitchell, Jared and Whitacre, Jay and Viswanathan, Venkatasubramanian , month = aug, year =. doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-6wq3x , abstract =

    work page doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-6wq3x 2025

  55. [55]

    Nature Synthesis , author =

    Navigating phase diagram complexity to guide robotic inorganic materials synthesis , volume =. Nature Synthesis , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.1038/s44160-024-00502-y , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s44160-024-00502-y 2024

  56. [56]

    Nature , author =

    Nanoscale synthesis and affinity ranking , volume =. Nature , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0056-8 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0056-8 2018

  57. [57]

    Science Advances , author =

    Autonomous materials synthesis via hierarchical active learning of nonequilibrium phase diagrams , volume =. Science Advances , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg4930 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg4930 2021

  58. [58]

    Science Advances , author =

    Real-time experiment-theory closed-loop interaction for autonomous materials science , volume =. Science Advances , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adu7426 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adu7426 2025

  59. [59]

    Chem , author =

    Synthesis in the. Chem , author =. 2016 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2016.06.002 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2016.06.002 2016

  60. [60]

    Jumper , author R

    Highly accurate protein structure prediction with. Nature , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 2021

  61. [61]

    Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics , author =

    Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1002/prot.26237 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/prot.26237 2021

  62. [62]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society , author =

    The. Journal of the American Chemical Society , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1021/jacs.1c09820 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.1c09820 2021

  63. [63]

    Organic Process Research & Development , author =

    Designing. Organic Process Research & Development , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00186 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00186 2023

  64. [64]

    Chemical Science , author =

    Chemistry informer libraries: a chemoinformatics enabled approach to evaluate and advance synthetic methods , volume =. Chemical Science , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1039/C5SC04751J , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1039/c5sc04751j 2016

  65. [65]

    Accounts of Chemical Research , author =

    Chemistry. Accounts of Chemical Research , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00760 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00760 2021

  66. [66]

    Chemical Science , author =

    Predicting reaction conditions from limited data through active transfer learning , volume =. Chemical Science , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1039/D1SC06932B , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1039/d1sc06932b 2022

  67. [67]

    Nature Communications , author =

    Rapid planning and analysis of high-throughput experiment arrays for reaction discovery , volume =. Nature Communications , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39531-0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39531-0 2023

  68. [68]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research , author =

    Bridging the gap between safety and real-time performance in receding-horizon trajectory design for mobile robots , volume =. The International Journal of Robotics Research , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1177/0278364920943266 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1177/0278364920943266 2020

  69. [69]

    2024 , keywords =

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/TRO.2024.3366819 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2024.3366819 2024

  70. [70]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics , author =

    Let us. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/TRO.2025.3584559 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2025.3584559 2025

  71. [71]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics , author =

    Can. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/TRO.2025.3584557 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2025.3584557 2025

  72. [72]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , author =

    Serving. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2024.3355731 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3355731 2024

  73. [73]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , author =

    Bring the. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/LRA.2025.3547299 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2025.3547299 2025

  74. [74]

    Counterfactual

    Mu, Wenhao and Cao, Zhi and Uludag, Mehmed and Rodríguez, Alexander , month = sep, year =. Counterfactual. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.13355 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.13355

  75. [75]

    2023 , keywords =

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26690 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26690 2023

  76. [76]

    Computers and Geotechnics , author =

    Leveraging physics-informed neural networks in geotechnical earthquake engineering:. Computers and Geotechnics , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107137 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107137 2025

  77. [77]

    Aditya and Raskar, Ramesh , month = may, year =

    Chopra, Ayush and Rodríguez, Alexander and Subramanian, Jayakumar and Quera-Bofarull, Arnau and Krishnamurthy, Balaji and Prakash, B. Aditya and Raskar, Ramesh , month = may, year =. Differentiable. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2207.09714 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.09714

  78. [78]

    Vaccine , author =

    Using neural networks to calibrate agent based models enables improved regional evidence for vaccine strategy and policy , volume =. Vaccine , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.060 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.060 2023

  79. [79]

    Li, Ruipu and Rodríguez, Alexander , month = dec, year =. Neural. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.18144 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.18144

  80. [80]

    Adaptive

    Li, Ruipu and Menacho, Daniel and Rodríguez, Alexander , month = aug, year =. Adaptive. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.13362 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.13362

Showing first 80 references.