pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24090 · v1 · pith:ESOK7DSKnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Oscillating Imprints of Dark Matter in Mesons Decays

Prisco Lo Chiatto , Babette D\"obrich , Gilad Perez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 16:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords ultralight dark matterCKM matrix oscillationsmeson decaysNA62 experimentflavor physicsevent countingtime-dependent signatures
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ultralight dark matter induces oscillations in CKM matrix elements that flavor experiments can detect through direct counting of meson decay events.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how ultralight dark matter can cause the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements to oscillate over time in two theoretical setups based on Nelson-Barr and Froggatt-Nielsen mechanisms. It outlines a search strategy in meson decays at flavor factories, highlighting NA62 as promising due to its large kaon sample. Lifetime-based observables lose sensitivity when the total particle flux is not known precisely, while direct event counting preserves the standard statistical scaling. This turns time-dependent flavor measurements into a new channel for testing ultralight dark matter.

Core claim

In scenarios where ultralight dark matter couples to the Standard Model via Nelson-Barr or Froggatt-Nielsen-inspired mechanisms, it produces oscillations in CKM matrix elements. These oscillations appear in meson decay rates. Lifetime observables suffer a parametric degradation in sensitivity when the total flux is uncertain, whereas direct counting of events retains 1/√N scaling and offers a robust probe. NA62 provides the strongest near-term reach owing to its kaon statistics.

What carries the argument

oscillations in CKM matrix elements induced by ultralight dark matter couplings

If this is right

  • Direct counting of decay events retains the expected 1/√N improvement in sensitivity.
  • NA62 stands out as the leading facility for such a search because of its high kaon statistics.
  • Time-dependent signatures in flavor observables become a viable channel for ultralight dark matter.
  • Both the Nelson-Barr and Froggatt-Nielsen frameworks allow the required couplings while addressing other theoretical issues.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same direct-counting approach could be adapted at other high-statistics flavor facilities if they collect sufficient data.
  • Non-observation would place limits on the strength of the dark matter couplings in these frameworks.
  • The method might generalize to time-dependent oscillations in other parameters if analogous couplings exist.

Load-bearing premise

Ultralight dark matter couples to the Standard Model in a way that produces observable oscillations in CKM matrix elements.

What would settle it

A search at NA62 that finds no time-dependent variation in the number of specific meson decay events, beyond ordinary statistical fluctuations, would show the oscillations are absent at the expected level.

read the original abstract

We study scenarios in which ultralight dark matter (ULDM) causes oscillations of the Cabibbo--Kobayashi--Maskawa (CKM) matrix elements, considering two frameworks. The first, previously proposed in the literature, employs the Nelson--Barr mechanism to solve the strong CP problem and the CKM phase is identified with a pseudo-Nambu--Goldstone boson. The second, inspired by Froggatt--Nielsen flavor models, relies on quadratic couplings of the ULDM to the Standard Model while naturally suppressing linear couplings. On the experimental side, we outline a strategy to search for such oscillations at flavor factories using meson decays, focusing on the NA62 experiment as the most promising candidate for discovery thanks to its large kaon statistics. We show that the sensitivity of lifetime-based observables is parametrically degraded when the total particle flux is not known exactly, leading to a substantial loss of sensitivity compared to naive estimates. We therefore advocate alternative observables based on direct counting of events, which retain the expected $1/\sqrt{N}$ scaling and provide a robust probe of oscillating CKM elements. Our results highlight flavor experiments as a novel probe of ULDM through time-dependent signatures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies ultralight dark matter inducing oscillations in CKM matrix elements in two frameworks: Nelson-Barr mechanism and a Froggatt-Nielsen inspired model. It proposes searching for these oscillations in meson decays at flavor factories, with NA62 being promising due to large kaon statistics. The manuscript demonstrates that lifetime-based observables suffer from parametric degradation in sensitivity when the total particle flux is not known exactly, and advocates for direct event counting observables that maintain 1/√N scaling.

Significance. If the sensitivity analysis holds, this work identifies flavor experiments as a new probe for ultralight dark matter through time-dependent effects in CKM elements. The emphasis on robust observables is a valuable contribution for experimental searches.

minor comments (1)
  1. A quantitative comparison (e.g., via an equation or table) of the degraded scaling versus 1/√N would strengthen the central experimental recommendation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the manuscript, including the recognition that the work identifies flavor experiments as a new probe for ultralight dark matter and that the emphasis on robust observables is a valuable contribution. The report recommends minor revision but lists no specific major comments under the MAJOR COMMENTS section.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's central claims concern the parametric degradation of sensitivity in lifetime-based observables due to unknown particle flux and the advantage of direct event counting observables, which follow from general statistical considerations about flux uncertainty and 1/√N scaling. These arguments do not reduce to any fitted parameter renamed as prediction, self-definitional construction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The theoretical setups draw on established Nelson-Barr and Froggatt-Nielsen mechanisms from prior literature without the paper smuggling in its own ansatz or uniqueness theorem as the sole justification. No equations or derivations in the abstract or description exhibit the specific reductions required for circularity flags.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed beyond the high-level description of the two frameworks.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Nelson-Barr mechanism identifies the CKM phase with a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson that can oscillate due to ULDM.
    Invoked as the first framework in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Froggatt-Nielsen inspired models allow quadratic ULDM couplings while suppressing linear ones.
    Invoked as the second framework in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5746 in / 1392 out tokens · 60643 ms · 2026-06-30T16:02:13.336652+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 127–132

    1983

  2. [2]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 133–136

    1983

  3. [3]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137–141

    1983

  4. [4]

    Yu,Primer on Axion Physics,Annalen Phys.536(2024), no

    F. Yu,Primer on Axion Physics,Annalen Phys.536(2024), no. 1 2300106, [arXiv:2308.08612]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    D¨ obrich and I

    B. D¨ obrich and I. G. Irastorza,Experiments to test the hypothesis for solar and dark matter axions,arXiv:2507.06414

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks

    A. Arvanitaki, J. Huang, and K. Van Tilburg,Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks,Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 1 015015, [arXiv:1405.2925]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Hubisz, S

    J. Hubisz, S. Ironi, G. Perez, and R. Rosenfeld,A note on the quality of dilatonic ultralight dark matter,Phys. Lett. B851(2024) 138583, [arXiv:2401.08737]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan, J. Mardon, S. Rajendran, and W. A. Terrano,Dark Matter Direct Detection with Accelerometers,Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 7 075029, [arXiv:1512.06165]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Banerjee, H

    A. Banerjee, H. Kim, and G. Perez,Coherent relaxion dark matter,Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 11 115026, [arXiv:1810.01889]

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Sub-eV scalar dark matter through the super-renormalizable Higgs portal

    F. Piazza and M. Pospelov,Sub-eV scalar dark matter through the super-renormalizable Higgs portal,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 043533, [arXiv:1003.2313]. – 21 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    M. Dine, G. Perez, W. Ratzinger, and I. Savoray,Nelson-Barr ultralight dark matter,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 1 015049, [arXiv:2405.06744]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    C. B. Adams et al.,Axion Dark Matter, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022.arXiv:2203.14923

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Antypas et al.,New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter, arXiv:2203.14915

    D. Antypas et al.,New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter, arXiv:2203.14915

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Arakawa et al.,Probing Ultralight Dark Matter at the Mega-Planck Scale with the Thorium Nuclear Clock,arXiv:2602.16804

    J. Arakawa et al.,Probing Ultralight Dark Matter at the Mega-Planck Scale with the Thorium Nuclear Clock,arXiv:2602.16804

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Dai and T

    C.-J. Dai and T. Li,Constraint on ultralight Nelson-Barr dark matter from time-dependent nuclear decay,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 5 055001, [arXiv:2506.22081]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    J. Guo, J. Liu, C. Peng, X.-P. Wang, and H. Zhao,Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter with Off-Diagonal Flavor Couplings,arXiv:2603.17237

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Direct Detection of Ultralight Dark Matter via Charged Lepton Flavor Violation

    I. Bigaran, P. J. Fox, Y. Gouttenoire, R. Harnik, G. Krnjaic, T. Menzo, and J. Zupan,Direct Detection of Ultralight Dark Matter via Charged Lepton Flavor Violation, arXiv:2503.07722

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Bauer and S

    M. Bauer and S. Chakraborti,Oscillating Resonances: Imprints of ultralight dark matter at colliders,arXiv:2601.19844

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    M. H. Fieg, P. J. Fox, J. Zhang, A. Ghosh, V. Varada, and D. Whiteson,Time-dependent signals of new physics at the LHC,arXiv:2605.11071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    A. Hees, O. Minazzoli, E. Savalle, Y. V. Stadnik, and P. Wolf,Violation of the equivalence principle from light scalar dark matter,Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 6 064051, [arXiv:1807.04512]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Bento, G

    L. Bento, G. C. Branco, and P. A. Parada,A Minimal model with natural suppression of strong CP violation,Phys. Lett. B267(1991) 95–99

    1991

  22. [22]

    S. M. Barr,Solving the Strong CP Problem Without the Peccei-Quinn Symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.53(1984) 329

    1984

  23. [23]

    A. E. Nelson,Naturally Weak CP Violation,Phys. Lett. B136(1984) 387–391

    1984

  24. [24]

    The Nelson-Barr Relaxion

    O. Davidi, R. S. Gupta, G. Perez, D. Redigolo, and A. Shalit,Nelson-Barr relaxion,Phys. Rev. D99(2019), no. 3 035014, [arXiv:1711.00858]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Losada, Y

    M. Losada, Y. Nir, G. Perez, I. Savoray, and Y. Shpilman,Time dependent CP-even and CP-odd signatures of scalar ultralight dark matter in neutrino oscillations,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 5 055004, [arXiv:2302.00005]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  27. [27]

    Kim and G

    H. Kim and G. Perez,Oscillations of atomic energy levels induced by QCD axion dark matter,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 1 015005, [arXiv:2205.12988]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Holdom and M

    B. Holdom and M. E. Peskin,Raising the Axion Mass,Nucl. Phys. B208(1982) 397–412

    1982

  29. [29]

    K. Choi, C. W. Kim, and W. K. Sze,Mass Renormalization by Instantons and the Strong CP Problem,Phys. Rev. Lett.61(1988) 794

    1988

  30. [30]

    V. A. Rubakov,Grand unification and heavy axion,JETP Lett.65(1997) 621–624, [hep-ph/9703409]. – 22 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  31. [31]

    A Visible QCD Axion from an Enlarged Color Group

    T. Gherghetta, N. Nagata, and M. Shifman,A Visible QCD Axion from an Enlarged Color Group,Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 11 115010, [arXiv:1604.01127]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    M. K. Gaillard, M. B. Gavela, R. Houtz, P. Quilez, and R. Del Rey,Color unified dynamical axion,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018), no. 11 972, [arXiv:1805.06465]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Cs´ aki, M

    C. Cs´ aki, M. Ruhdorfer, and Y. Shirman,UV Sensitivity of the Axion Mass from Instantons in Partially Broken Gauge Groups,JHEP04(2020) 031, [arXiv:1912.02197]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Kivel, J

    A. Kivel, J. Laux, and F. Yu,Supersizing axions with small size instantons,JHEP11(2022) 088, [arXiv:2207.08740]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Delaunay, M

    C. Delaunay, M. Geller, Z. Heller-Algazi, G. Perez, and K. Springmann,Natural ultralight dark matter: The quadratic twin,Phys. Rev. D113(2026), no. 3 035011, [arXiv:2507.12514]

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Banerjee, G

    A. Banerjee, G. Perez, M. Safronova, I. Savoray, and A. Shalit,The phenomenology of quadratically coupled ultra light dark matter,JHEP10(2023) 042, [arXiv:2211.05174]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov,Remarks on Higgs Boson Interactions with Nucleons,Phys. Lett. B78(1978) 443–446

    1978

  38. [38]

    D. B. Kaplan and M. B. Wise,Couplings of a light dilaton and violations of the equivalence principle,JHEP08(2000) 037, [hep-ph/0008116]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  39. [39]

    Variable Stars: which Nyquist Frequency ?

    L. Eyer and P. Bartholdi,Variable stars: which nyquist frequency ?,Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser.135(1999) 1, [astro-ph/9808176]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  40. [40]

    C. Koen,The nyquist frequency for irregularly spaced time-series: a calculation formula, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society371(09, 2006) 1390–1394, [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/371/3/1390/3279226/mnras0371-1390.pdf]

    2006

  41. [41]

    N. R. Lomb,Least - squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data,Astrophys. Space Sci.39(1976) 447–462

    1976

  42. [42]

    J. D. Scargle,Studies in astronomical time series analysis. 2. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data,Astrophys. J.263(1982) 835–853

    1982

  43. [43]

    N. E. Huang, Z. Shen, S. R. Long, M. C. Wu, H. H. Shih, Q. Zheng, N.-C. Yen, C. C. Tung, and H. H. Liu,The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A454 (Mar., 1998) 903–998

    1998

  44. [44]

    W. L. Deemer and D. F. Votaw,Estimation of parameters of truncated or censored exponential distributions,The Annals of Mathematical Statistics26(1955), no. 3 498–504. [45]KLOECollaboration, F. Ambrosino et al.,Measurement of the charged kaon lifetime with the KLOE detector,JHEP01(2008) 073, [arXiv:0712.1112]. [46]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, S. Navas...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1955

  45. [45]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells,Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, [arXiv:1007.1727]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)]. [48]NA62Collaboration, E. Cortina Gil et al.,The Beam and detector of the NA62 experiment at CERN,JINST12(2017), no. 05 P05025, [arXiv:1703.08501]. – 23 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  46. [46]

    H. W. Atherton, C. Bovet, N. Doble, G. von Holtey, L. Piemontese, A. Placci, M. Placidi, D. E. Plane, M. Reinharz, and E. Rossa,Precise Measurements of Particle Production by 400-GeV/cProtons on Beryllium Targets, . [50]NA62Collaboration, A. Bethani et al.,Development of a new CEDAR for kaon identification at the NA62 experiment at CERN,JINST19(2024), no....

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Gatignon,Private communication, Nov., 2025

    L. Gatignon,Private communication, Nov., 2025. [52]MICROSCOPECollaboration, P. Touboul et al.,MICROSCOPE Mission: Final Results of the Test of the Equivalence Principle,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 12 121102, [arXiv:2209.15487]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Equivalence Principle Violations and Couplings of a Light Dilaton

    T. Damour and J. F. Donoghue,Equivalence Principle Violations and Couplings of a Light Dilaton,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 084033, [arXiv:1007.2792]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  49. [49]

    The Scalar Strange Content of the Nucleon from Lattice QCD

    P. Junnarkar and A. Walker-Loud,Scalar strange content of the nucleon from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 114510, [arXiv:1301.1114]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    A. Coc, N. J. Nunes, K. A. Olive, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni,Coupled Variations of Fundamental Couplings and Primordial Nucleosynthesis,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 023511, [astro-ph/0610733]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  51. [51]

    K. Blum, R. T. D’Agnolo, M. Lisanti, and B. R. Safdi,Constraining Axion Dark Matter with Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,Phys. Lett. B737(2014) 30–33, [arXiv:1401.6460]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum,Can dark matter induce cosmological evolution of the fundamental constants of Nature?,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015), no. 20 201301, [arXiv:1503.08540]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    Sibiryakov, P

    S. Sibiryakov, P. Sørensen, and T.-T. Yu,BBN constraints on universally-coupled ultralight scalar dark matter,JHEP12(2020) 075, [arXiv:2006.04820]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Bouley, P

    T. Bouley, P. Sørensen, and T.-T. Yu,Constraints on ultralight scalar dark matter with quadratic couplings,JHEP03(2023) 104, [arXiv:2211.09826]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    X. Gan, H. Kim, and A. Mitridate,Probing quadratically coupled ultralight dark matter with pulsar timing arrays,Phys. Rev. D113(2026), no. 6 063034, [arXiv:2510.13945]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Probing axions with neutron star inspirals and other stellar processes

    A. Hook and J. Huang,Probing axions with neutron star inspirals and other stellar processes,JHEP06(2018) 036, [arXiv:1708.08464]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Balkin, J

    R. Balkin, J. Serra, K. Springmann, and A. Weiler,The QCD axion at finite density,JHEP 07(2020) 221, [arXiv:2003.04903]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Zhang, Z

    J. Zhang, Z. Lyu, J. Huang, M. C. Johnson, L. Sagunski, M. Sakellariadou, and H. Yang, First Constraints on Nuclear Coupling of Axionlike Particles from the Binary Neutron Star Gravitational Wave Event GW170817,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 16 161101, [arXiv:2105.13963]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Balkin, J

    R. Balkin, J. Serra, K. Springmann, S. Stelzl, and A. Weiler,White dwarfs as a probe of exceptionally light QCD axions,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 9 095032, [arXiv:2211.02661]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Bauer, S

    M. Bauer, S. Chakraborti, and G. Rostagni,Axion bounds from quantum technology,JHEP 05(2025) 023, [arXiv:2408.06412]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Balkin, J

    R. Balkin, J. Serra, K. Springmann, S. Stelzl, and A. Weiler,Heavy neutron stars from light scalars,JHEP02(2025) 141, [arXiv:2307.14418]. – 24 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Bauer and S

    M. Bauer and S. Chakraborti,Validity of bounds on light axions for f≲1013 GeV,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 10 103019, [arXiv:2408.06408]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Banerjee, I

    A. Banerjee, I. M. Bloch, Q. Bonnefoy, S. A. R. Ellis, G. Perez, I. Savoray, K. Springmann, and Y. V. Stadnik,Momentum and Matter Matter for Axion Dark Matter Matters on Earth, arXiv:2502.04455

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Y. G. del Castillo, B. Hammett, and J. Jaeckel,Enhanced axion-wind near Earth’s surface, JCAP10(2025) 022, [arXiv:2502.04456]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Search for ultralight scalar dark matter with atomic spectroscopy

    K. Van Tilburg, N. Leefer, L. Bougas, and D. Budker,Search for ultralight scalar dark matter with atomic spectroscopy,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015), no. 1 011802, [arXiv:1503.06886]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    A. Hees, J. Gu´ ena, M. Abgrall, S. Bize, and P. Wolf,Searching for an oscillating massive scalar field as a dark matter candidate using atomic hyperfine frequency comparisons,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 6 061301, [arXiv:1604.08514]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  67. [67]

    C. J. Kennedy, E. Oelker, J. M. Robinson, T. Bothwell, D. Kedar, W. R. Milner, G. E. Marti, A. Derevianko, and J. Ye,Precision Metrology Meets Cosmology: Improved Constraints on Ultralight Dark Matter from Atom-Cavity Frequency Comparisons,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020), no. 20 201302, [arXiv:2008.08773]. [73]BACONCollaboration, K. Beloy et al.,Frequency ratio...

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Sherrill et al.,Analysis of atomic-clock data to constrain variations of fundamental constants,New J

    N. Sherrill et al.,Analysis of atomic-clock data to constrain variations of fundamental constants,New J. Phys.25(2023), no. 9 093012, [arXiv:2302.04565]. [75]DESCollaboration, E. O. Nadler et al.,Milky Way Satellite Census. III. Constraints on Dark Matter Properties from Observations of Milky Way Satellite Galaxies,Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(2021) 091101, [arXi...

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Hoferichter and J

    M. Hoferichter and J. R. de Elvira,Nucleon mass: trace anomaly andσ-terms, arXiv:2506.23902. A Parameter Estimation The estimation of a parameter from experimental data is a classical problem in statistics. In this paper, we use maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE). Given a data set, where each observationx i is assumed to be drawn from a probability distr...

    work page arXiv