pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24767 · v1 · pith:YMQUCTIVnew · submitted 2026-05-23 · 💻 cs.RO

Enhanced INS/GNSS State Estimation using GNSS-Based Acceleration Measurements

Gal Versano , Itzik Klein This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 12:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords INS/GNSS fusionacceleration measurementGNSS-based accelerationstate estimationunmanned ground vehiclespositioning accuracysensor fusionautonomous navigation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Extracting acceleration from sequences of past GNSS positions and adding it to an INS/GNSS filter improves positioning accuracy by 11-21 percent on real vehicle data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that standard INS/GNSS fusion, which relies only on position updates, can be strengthened by deriving vehicle acceleration from past GNSS measurements through a motion model and treating the result as an additional measurement. This step supplies extra information about vehicle dynamics that position data alone does not provide, especially when the vehicle moves at low speeds or with limited maneuvers. The authors test the modified filter on two real unmanned ground vehicle datasets collected from different platforms and sensor grades, reporting mean position root-mean-square error reductions of 11.40 percent and 20.74 percent relative to the baseline position-aided filter. A reader would care because autonomous ground vehicles require reliable navigation under varied motion conditions, and the method uses only existing GNSS and inertial hardware.

Core claim

The central claim is that acceleration values extracted from sequences of past GNSS positions via a motion model can be integrated into the INS/GNSS filter as an additional measurement update, supplying observability that position updates alone lack and thereby producing consistent reductions in position root-mean-square error of 11.40 percent and 20.74 percent on the two evaluated real-world datasets.

What carries the argument

The GNSS-derived acceleration measurement obtained from past position sequences through a motion model and inserted as an extra update in the INS/GNSS Kalman filter.

Load-bearing premise

Acceleration values computed from GNSS position sequences must be accurate enough and sufficiently independent of the position measurements themselves to supply new information that improves the filter.

What would settle it

On the same two datasets, running the standard position-aided filter and the version with added acceleration updates yields position root-mean-square errors that differ by less than 2 percent or show no consistent improvement in either direction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24767 by Gal Versano, Itzik Klein.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Flowchart of the proposed approach, integrating GNSS-based acceleration updates into the INS/GNSS navigation filter. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Trajectory number 1 of ROOAD dataset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Trajectory number 8 of our dataset. C. Results We compare our proposed approach, GNSS/INS with position and acceleration updates (with Acc, ours) to the baseline, GNSS/INS with only position updates (no Acc, baseline). The performance of our proposed method on the ROOAD dataset is summarized in Table I. The baseline mean PRMSE of 5.00 m is reduced to 4.39 m by adding the acceleration updates, yielding a me… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Trajectory number 4 with with acc update, without acc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accurate and reliable navigation is essential for autonomous ground vehicle operations. Standard INS/GNSS fusion relies on GNSS position updates, which provide limited observability of orientation and inertial sensor error states, particularly during low-dynamic motion. In this work, we propose utilizing past GNSS measurements alongside a motion model to extract meaningful vehicle acceleration information. This acceleration measurement is then integrated into the INS/GNSS filter to improve its robustness and accuracy. The proposed approach is evaluated on two real-world unmanned ground vehicle datasets collected from different mobile platforms and inertial sensor grades. Results demonstrate consistent positioning accuracy improvements relative to the standard position-aided filter, with mean position root mean square error improvements of 11.40 % and 20.74 % on the two datasets, respectively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes extracting vehicle acceleration from sequences of past GNSS position measurements using an assumed motion model and incorporating these as additional measurements in an INS/GNSS Kalman filter to improve observability of orientation and inertial sensor errors, especially in low-dynamic regimes. On two real-world UGV datasets from different platforms and sensor grades, the method reports mean position RMSE improvements of 11.40% and 20.74% relative to a standard position-aided INS/GNSS filter.

Significance. If the derived accelerations supply genuinely independent information, the approach could provide a practical, sensor-free enhancement to INS/GNSS fusion for autonomous ground vehicles. The evaluation on real datasets from distinct hardware is a positive aspect. However, the central empirical claim hinges on whether the acceleration measurements add observability beyond the position updates themselves.

major comments (3)
  1. [Experimental results / filter implementation] The skeptic concern is load-bearing: accelerations computed from the same GNSS position sequence via a motion model are likely to share error sources (multipath, clock bias, model mismatch) with the position measurements. The manuscript must demonstrate that the acceleration innovations are not redundant; this requires explicit analysis of cross-covariance between position and acceleration residuals or innovation whiteness tests in the experimental section.
  2. [Measurement model / acceleration extraction] The abstract and method description provide no information on the specific motion model used to derive acceleration, the time window or differentiation scheme, or the associated noise covariance. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported RMSE gains arise from new information or from optimistic tuning that re-uses correlated data.
  3. [Results tables/figures] Table or figure reporting the RMSE values should include the baseline filter tuning parameters, the acceleration measurement noise model, and any sensitivity analysis to the motion-model assumptions. The 11.40% and 20.74% figures cannot be interpreted without this context.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the notation for the state vector and measurement models to distinguish the standard position-aided filter from the proposed acceleration-aided version.
  2. Add a brief discussion of computational overhead introduced by the additional measurement update.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of demonstrating the independence of the proposed acceleration measurements and providing sufficient implementation details. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental results / filter implementation] The skeptic concern is load-bearing: accelerations computed from the same GNSS position sequence via a motion model are likely to share error sources (multipath, clock bias, model mismatch) with the position measurements. The manuscript must demonstrate that the acceleration innovations are not redundant; this requires explicit analysis of cross-covariance between position and acceleration residuals or innovation whiteness tests in the experimental section.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of non-redundancy is necessary to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add, in the experimental section, both the cross-covariance matrix between position and acceleration residuals and innovation whiteness tests (autocorrelation of normalized innovations) for the two datasets. These analyses will quantify the degree of independence and show that the acceleration channel supplies complementary information beyond the position updates. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Measurement model / acceleration extraction] The abstract and method description provide no information on the specific motion model used to derive acceleration, the time window or differentiation scheme, or the associated noise covariance. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported RMSE gains arise from new information or from optimistic tuning that re-uses correlated data.

    Authors: The method section of the manuscript does describe the extraction procedure, but we acknowledge that the level of detail is insufficient for reproducibility and evaluation. In the revision we will expand Section III to explicitly state the assumed motion model (constant-acceleration kinematic model over a sliding window), the window length and differentiation scheme employed, and the derivation of the acceleration measurement noise covariance from GNSS position error statistics. These additions will allow readers to assess the independence of the derived measurements. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results tables/figures] Table or figure reporting the RMSE values should include the baseline filter tuning parameters, the acceleration measurement noise model, and any sensitivity analysis to the motion-model assumptions. The 11.40% and 20.74% figures cannot be interpreted without this context.

    Authors: We will augment the results section with a new table (or expanded caption) that reports the baseline INS/GNSS filter tuning parameters (process and measurement noise covariances), the acceleration measurement noise model parameters, and a brief sensitivity study varying the motion-model window length. This will provide the necessary context for interpreting the reported RMSE improvements. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical comparison on independent datasets

full rationale

The paper proposes extracting vehicle acceleration from sequences of past GNSS positions via a motion model and fusing the resulting measurements into an INS/GNSS filter. Reported gains (11.40 % and 20.74 % mean position RMSE) are obtained by direct numerical comparison against a standard position-aided baseline on two separate real-world UGV datasets. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown to reduce the claimed improvements to quantities defined by the inputs themselves. The central claim therefore rests on external empirical evidence rather than on any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields minimal ledger entries; the work relies on standard Kalman-filter assumptions for INS/GNSS fusion and an unspecified motion model for acceleration extraction, with no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities stated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of the INS/GNSS Kalman filter (linearized error dynamics, Gaussian noise, etc.) remain valid when an additional acceleration measurement is introduced.
    The paper builds directly on conventional tightly or loosely coupled INS/GNSS fusion without stating modifications to the underlying filter model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5644 in / 1330 out tokens · 38263 ms · 2026-06-30T12:46:36.402794+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mobile robot position determining using odometry method,

    V . Basiuk, S. Maksymova, O. Chala, and O. Miliutina, “Mobile robot position determining using odometry method,”Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 227–234, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    A comprehensive study of mobile robot: history, developments, applications, and future research perspectives,

    R. Raj and A. Kos, “A comprehensive study of mobile robot: history, developments, applications, and future research perspectives,”Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 14, p. 6951, 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Multiple mobile robot task and motion planning: A survey,

    L. Antonyshyn, J. Silveira, S. Givigi, and J. Marshall, “Multiple mobile robot task and motion planning: A survey,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1–35, 2023

    2023

  4. [4]

    Mobile robotics in smart farming: current trends and applications,

    D. F. Yépez-Ponce, J. V . Salcedo, P. D. Rosero-Montalvo, and J. Sanchis, “Mobile robotics in smart farming: current trends and applications,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, p. 1213330, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    An intelligence-based hybrid PSO-SA for mobile robot path planning in warehouse,

    S. Lin, A. Liu, J. Wang, and X. Kong, “An intelligence-based hybrid PSO-SA for mobile robot path planning in warehouse,”Journal of Computational Science, vol. 67, p. 101938, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Design and implementation of an integrated control system for omnidirectional mobile robots in industrial logistics,

    A. Neaz, S. Lee, and K. Nam, “Design and implementation of an integrated control system for omnidirectional mobile robots in industrial logistics,”Sensors, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 3184, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    LiDAR-based SLAM for robotic mapping: state of the art and new frontiers,

    X. Yue, Y . Zhang, J. Chen, J. Chen, X. Zhou, and M. He, “LiDAR-based SLAM for robotic mapping: state of the art and new frontiers,”Industrial Robot: the international journal of robotics research and application, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 196–205, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    A robust autonomous navigation and mapping system based on GPS and LiDAR data for unconstraint environment,

    J. Patoliya, H. Mewada, M. Hassaballah, M. A. Khan, and S. Kadry, “A robust autonomous navigation and mapping system based on GPS and LiDAR data for unconstraint environment,”Earth Science Informatics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2703–2715, 2022

    2022

  9. [9]

    Tightly coupled integration of GNSS, INS, and LiDAR for vehicle navigation in urban environ- ments,

    S. Li, S. Wang, Y . Zhou, Z. Shen, and X. Li, “Tightly coupled integration of GNSS, INS, and LiDAR for vehicle navigation in urban environ- ments,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 24, pp. 24721– 24735, 2022

    2022

  10. [10]

    Bar-Shalom, X

    Y . Bar-Shalom, X. R. Li, and T. Kirubarajan,Estimation with applica- tions to tracking and navigation: theory algorithms and software. John Wiley & Sons, 2001

    2001

  11. [11]

    Principles of GNSS, inertial, and multisensor integrated navigation systems„

    P. D. Groves, “Principles of GNSS, inertial, and multisensor integrated navigation systems„”IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 26–27, 2015

    2015

  12. [12]

    Error state extended Kalman filter localization for underground mining environments,

    I. Brigadnov, A. Lutonin, and K. Bogdanova, “Error state extended Kalman filter localization for underground mining environments,”Sym- metry, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 344, 2023

    2023

  13. [13]

    GNSS/INS fusion with virtual lever-arm measurements,

    A. Borko, I. Klein, and G. Even-Tzur, “GNSS/INS fusion with virtual lever-arm measurements,”Sensors, vol. 18, no. 7, p. 2228, 2018

    2018

  14. [14]

    An effective integrity monitoring scheme for GNSS/INS/vision integration based on error state EKF model,

    H. Jiang, T. Li, D. Song, and C. Shi, “An effective integrity monitoring scheme for GNSS/INS/vision integration based on error state EKF model,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 7063–7073, 2022. 6

    2022

  15. [15]

    Constrained MEMS-based GNSS/INS tightly coupled system with robust kalman filter for accurate land vehicular navigation,

    D. Wang, Y . Dong, Z. Li, Q. Li, and J. Wu, “Constrained MEMS-based GNSS/INS tightly coupled system with robust kalman filter for accurate land vehicular navigation,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 5138–5148, 2019

    2019

  16. [16]

    Invariant Kalman filtering,

    A. Barrau and S. Bonnabel, “Invariant Kalman filtering,”Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 237– 257, 2018

    2018

  17. [17]

    Neural aided adaptive innovation-based invariant Kalman filter,

    B. Diker and I. Klein, “Neural aided adaptive innovation-based invariant Kalman filter,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.26709, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Invariant-EKF-based GNSS/INS/vision integration with high convergence and accuracy,

    C. Xia, X. Li, S. Li, and Y . Zhou, “Invariant-EKF-based GNSS/INS/vision integration with high convergence and accuracy,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    A novel approach for aiding unscented kalman filter for bridging GNSS outages in integrated navigation sys- tems,

    N. Al Bitar and A. Gavrilov, “A novel approach for aiding unscented kalman filter for bridging GNSS outages in integrated navigation sys- tems,”Navigation, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 521–539, 2021

    2021

  20. [20]

    Covariance matching based adaptive unscented Kalman filter for direct filtering in INS/GNSS integration,

    Y . Meng, S. Gao, Y . Zhong, G. Hu, and A. Subic, “Covariance matching based adaptive unscented Kalman filter for direct filtering in INS/GNSS integration,”Acta Astronautica, vol. 120, pp. 171–181, 2016

    2016

  21. [21]

    Adaptive neural unscented Kalman filter,

    A. Levy and I. Klein, “Adaptive neural unscented Kalman filter,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2026

    2026

  22. [22]

    Information-aided inertial navigation: A review,

    D. Engelsman and I. Klein, “Information-aided inertial navigation: A review,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 72, pp. 1–18, 2023

    2023

  23. [23]

    Squeezing position updates for enhanced estimation of land vehicles aided INS,

    I. Klein, Y . Lipman, and E. Vaknin, “Squeezing position updates for enhanced estimation of land vehicles aided INS,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 20, no. 16, pp. 9385–9393, 2020

    2020

  24. [24]

    Continuous INS/DVL fusion in situations of DVL outages,

    I. Klein and Y . Lipman, “Continuous INS/DVL fusion in situations of DVL outages,” in2020 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Symposium (AUV), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2020

    2020

  25. [25]

    AUV acceleration prediction using DVL and deep learning,

    Y . Stolero and I. Klein, “AUV acceleration prediction using DVL and deep learning,” inOCEANS 2025 - Great Lakes, pp. 1–5, 2025

    2025

  26. [26]

    Farrell,Aided navigation: GPS with high rate sensors

    J. Farrell,Aided navigation: GPS with high rate sensors. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 2008

    2008

  27. [27]

    ROOAD: RELLIS off-road Odometry Analysis Dataset,

    G. Chustz and S. Saripalli, “ROOAD: RELLIS off-road Odometry Analysis Dataset,” 2021

    2021

  28. [28]

    Warthog Unmanned Ground Vehicle Robot

    Clearpath Robotics, “Warthog Unmanned Ground Vehicle Robot.” https: //clearpathrobotics.com/warthog-unmanned-ground-vehicle-robot/,

  29. [29]

    Accessed: 2026-01-18

    2026

  30. [30]

    VN-300 Dual Antenna GNSS/INS Product Page

    VectorNav Technologies, “VN-300 Dual Antenna GNSS/INS Product Page.” https://www.vectornav.com/products/detail/vn-300, 2026. Ac- cessed: 2026-01-18

    2026

  31. [31]

    ROSbot XL manual

    Husarion, “ROSbot XL manual.” https://husarion.com/manuals/ rosbot-xl/. Accessed: 2026-01-25

    2026

  32. [32]

    Exiguo EX-300 Dual-Antenna GNSS/INS System

    Arazim Ltd., “Exiguo EX-300 Dual-Antenna GNSS/INS System.” https: //arazim.com/exiguo-ex-300/, 2026. Accessed: 2026-01-18

    2026