pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.30740 · v1 · pith:BMGSMSK6new · submitted 2026-05-29 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI

GSAM: A Generalizable and Safe Robotic Framework for Articulated Object Manipulation

Beichen Shao , Mengying Xie , Heng Su , Wanyi Zhang , Mingyan Li , Yan Ding , Fausto Giunchiglia , Chao Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 22:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AI
keywords articulated object manipulationrobotic frameworkvision-based perceiverVLM refinerinteraction constraintskinematic planninggeneralizationcollision avoidance
0
0 comments X

The pith

GSAM corrects vision-based kinematic estimates with a VLM refiner and uses LLM-generated constraints to plan safer trajectories for articulated objects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces GSAM to handle the diversity of articulated objects and the risks of end-effector collisions that limit existing robotic methods. It generates initial kinematic parameters from vision, refines them through a fine-tuned VLM that applies chain-of-thought commonsense reasoning, and creates interaction constraints that an LLM turns into planning rules. A kinematic-aware planner then verifies reachability while avoiding obstacles. Experiments across 50 hinge tasks in five object categories and varied starting positions report higher success rates and lower variability than baselines. Readers would care because service robots need reliable ways to open doors, drawers, and similar items without causing damage.

Core claim

GSAM generates kinematic parameters via a vision-based perceiver, refines raw estimates that deviate from commonsense using a fine-tuned VLM with chain-of-thought reasoning, builds an interaction constraint function generator that encodes object, pose, and obstacle knowledge, lets an LLM functionalize those constraints for trajectory and posture planning, and applies a kinematic-aware manipulation planner; this combination yields a 36.0 percent higher success rate and 3.1 percent lower standard deviation on 50 hinge tasks across five object categories and 50 random end-effector-handle configurations.

What carries the argument

The interaction constraint function generator that folds articulated object geometry, interaction pose, and obstacle avoidance into constraints later functionalized by an LLM.

If this is right

  • Manipulation succeeds on a wider range of articulated objects from multiple categories.
  • Random initial end-effector positions lead to fewer failed attempts.
  • Destructive collisions are reduced through explicit constraint enforcement during planning.
  • Performance variability across repeated trials drops measurably.
  • The same pipeline supports both trajectory and posture planning under reachability checks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The correction step could apply to other perception-heavy robotic tasks where commonsense priors improve raw sensor data.
  • Extending the constraint generator beyond hinges would require only new object geometry inputs if the refiner generalizes.
  • Real-time versions might reduce planning latency if the LLM functionalizer is distilled into faster models.

Load-bearing premise

The vision-based perceiver produces raw kinematic estimates that deviate from commonsense and require reliable correction by the fine-tuned VLM refiner using chain-of-thought reasoning.

What would settle it

An ablation experiment that removes the VLM refiner and shows that uncorrected kinematic estimates produce no gain in success rate or reduction in standard deviation compared with the best baseline.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.30740 by Beichen Shao, Chao Chen, Fausto Giunchiglia, Heng Su, Mengying Xie, Mingyan Li, Wanyi Zhang, Yan Ding.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustrations of (a) the kinematic parameters of articulated objects and (b) the correct/wrong interaction between end-effectors and handles. effectiveness of the above methods, two critical issues remain to be addressed. (1) Generalization challenge due to diverse articulated objects. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: GSAM overview. KPP extracts visual features and decodes them into raw kinematic parameters. KPR refines them via VLM-based commonsense reasoning. The refined parameters and the constructed knowledge base are passed to CFG’s LLM to generate Python constraint functions. KMP then converts these into end-effector coordinates and 3D waypoints to control mobile manipulators. comprises two modules: the VLM-based … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Articulated object manipulation is a unique challenge for service robots. Existing methods employ end-to-end policy learning, visionmotion planning, and large-language/visual-language model (LLM/VLM), but often overlook the diversity of articulated objects and the complexity of interactions between end-effector and handle, leading to limited generalization and destructive collisions. To address this, we propose GSAM, a generalizable and safe robotic framework for articulated object manipulation. Specifically, a vision-based perceiver generates the kinematic parameters. Considering that pre-trained markers in perceiver yield raw estimations that may deviate from commonsense, we present a f ine-tuned VLM-based refiner, using chain-of-thought (COT) commonsense reasoning to refine perception. To prevent destructive collisions, we design an interaction constraint function generator, integrating articulated object, interaction pose, and obstacle avoidance knowledge into a base. LLM then functionalize these constraints and apply them to trajectory and posture planning. A kinematic-aware manipulation planner verifies reachability for trajectory and posture. Experiments on 50 hinge tasks across 5 object categories and 50 randomly initialized end-effectorhandle configurations show that GSAM reduces standard deviation by 3.1% and improves manipulation success rate by 36.0% compared to the best baseline, respectively demonstrating the superior object generalization and interaction safety of GSAM in practical scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to introduce GSAM, a framework for articulated object manipulation consisting of a vision-based perceiver for kinematic parameters, a fine-tuned VLM refiner using chain-of-thought commonsense reasoning to correct raw estimations, an interaction constraint function generator, an LLM to functionalize constraints for trajectory and posture planning, and a kinematic-aware manipulation planner. On 50 hinge tasks across 5 object categories with 50 random end-effector-handle configurations, it reports a 36.0% improvement in manipulation success rate and 3.1% reduction in standard deviation over the best baseline.

Significance. If validated, the approach could contribute to more generalizable and safer robotic manipulation of articulated objects by mitigating perception errors and collision risks through hybrid vision-VLM-constraint methods. The emphasis on commonsense reasoning in perception refinement is a notable aspect for real-world service robot applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The headline experimental result (36.0% success-rate lift, 3.1% std reduction on 50 tasks) is presented without details on baseline implementations, statistical significance, error bars, data splits, or random seeds, preventing verification of the central performance claim.
  2. [Abstract / Experiments] The framework's claimed gains rest on the unablated assumption that the VLM refiner meaningfully corrects the perceiver's kinematic estimates; no perception-error metrics (e.g., joint-angle RMSE with vs. without refiner) or ablation isolating the refiner are provided, leaving the attribution of improvements to this component unsupported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Typographical error: 'f ine-tuned' appears with a space; should be 'fine-tuned'.
  2. [Abstract] Missing hyphen/space: 'end-effectorhandle' should read 'end-effector-handle'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on experimental clarity and component validation. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that strengthen the presentation without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The headline experimental result (36.0% success-rate lift, 3.1% std reduction on 50 tasks) is presented without details on baseline implementations, statistical significance, error bars, data splits, or random seeds, preventing verification of the central performance claim.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from additional context. The full manuscript details baseline implementations, statistical significance testing (including p-values), error bars from repeated trials, data splits across the 5 object categories, and random seeds in Section 4 (Experiments). In the revision we will expand the abstract with a brief clause referencing these elements and the experimental protocol to improve verifiability while respecting length constraints. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract / Experiments] The framework's claimed gains rest on the unablated assumption that the VLM refiner meaningfully corrects the perceiver's kinematic estimates; no perception-error metrics (e.g., joint-angle RMSE with vs. without refiner) or ablation isolating the refiner are provided, leaving the attribution of improvements to this component unsupported.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of isolating the VLM refiner's contribution. The current manuscript reports end-to-end success rates but does not include perception-specific metrics or a dedicated ablation. We will add these to the revised Experiments section, including joint-angle RMSE comparisons with and without the refiner, plus an ablation table attributing performance gains to individual components. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; framework claims rest on modular components and external experiments

full rationale

The paper describes a pipeline (vision perceiver → VLM refiner with CoT → constraint generator → kinematic planner) whose performance is evaluated via comparative experiments on 50 tasks. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce any claimed prediction or result to an input by construction. The reported gains (36% success-rate lift, 3.1% std reduction) are presented as empirical outcomes of the integrated system rather than tautological re-statements of fitted quantities or prior self-citations. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the supplied experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The VLM refiner and LLM constraint generator implicitly rely on pre-trained models whose internal assumptions are not audited here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5792 in / 1145 out tokens · 16153 ms · 2026-06-28T22:38:49.852376+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (2024)

    Chi, C., Xu, Z., Pan, C., Cousineau, E., Burchfiel, B., Feng, S., Tedrake, R., Song, S.: Universal Manipulation Interface: In-The-Wild Robot Teaching Without In-The- Wild Robots. In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning (2024)

    Huang, W., Wang, C., Li, Y., Zhang, R., Fei-Fei, L.: ReKep: Spatio-Temporal Rea- soning of Relational Keypoint Constraints for Robotic Manipulation. In: Conference on Robot Learning (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp

    Yu, Q., Wang, J., Liu, W., Hao, C., Liu, L., Shao, L., Lu, C.: Gamma: Generalizable Articulation Modeling and Manipulation for Articulated Objects. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 5419–5426 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Ehsani, K., Han, W., Herrasti, A., VanderBilt, E., Weihs, L., Kolve, E., Kembhavi, A., Mottaghi, R.: ManipulaTHOR: A Framework for Visual Object Manipulation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4497–4506 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Liu, J., Mahdavi-Amiri, A., Savva, M.: PARIS: Part-level Reconstruction and Mo- tion Analysis for Articulated Objects. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 352–363 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Jiang, H., Mao, Y., Savva, M., Chang, A.X.: OPD: Single-View 3D Openable Part Detection. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 410–426 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Qian, S., Fouhey, D.F.: Understanding 3D Object Interaction from a Single Image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 21753–21763 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14087 (2023)

    Sun, X., Jiang, H., Savva, M., Chang, A.X.: OPDMulti: Openable Part Detection for Multiple Objects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14087 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp

    Xia, W., Wang, D., Pang, X., Wang, Z., Zhao, B., Hu, D., Li, X.: Kinematic-Aware Prompting for Generalizable Articulated Object Manipulation with LLMs. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2073–2080 (2024) 16 B. Shao et al

    2024

  10. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

    Kirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A.C., Lo, W.-Y., Dollár, P., Girshick, R.: Segment Anything. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2022)

    He, K., Chen, X., Xie, S., Li, Y., Dollár, P., Girshick, R.: Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2020)

    Tancik, M., Srinivasan, P., Mildenhall, B., Fridovich-Keil, S., Raghavan, N., Sing- hal, U., Ramamoorthi, R., Barron, J., Ng, R.: Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    In: AdvancesinNeuralInformationProcessingSystems,vol.35,pp.24824–24837(2022)

    Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., Zhou, D., et al.: Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. In: AdvancesinNeuralInformationProcessingSystems,vol.35,pp.24824–24837(2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Frontiers of Computer Science (2024)

    Yang, K., Cao, N., Ding, Y., Chen, C.: BestMan: A Modular Mobile Manipulator Platform for Embodied AI with Unified Simulation-Hardware APIs. Frontiers of Computer Science (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-025-41109-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11704-025-41109-6 2024

  15. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Mo, K., Zhu, S., Chang, A.X., Yi, L., Tripathi, S., Guibas, L.J., Su, H.: PartNet: A Large-scale Benchmark for Fine-grained and Hierarchical Part-level 3D Object Understanding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 909–918 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp

    Su, H., Xie, M., Cao, N., Ding, Y., Shao, B., Long, X., Gu, F., Chen, C.: OVA- Fields: Weakly Supervised Open-Vocabulary Affordance Fields for Robot Opera- tional Part Detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 6385–6395 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Wang,J.,Cao,N.,Ding,Y.,Xie,M.,Gu,F.,Chen,C.:SKE-Layout:SpatialKnowl- edge Enhanced Layout Generation with LLMs. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 19414–19423 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research37(4-5), 421–436 (2018)

    Levine, S., Pastor, P., Krizhevsky, A., Ibarz, J., Quillen, D.: Learning Hand-Eye Coordination for Robotic Grasping with Deep Learning and Large-Scale Data Col- lection. The International Journal of Robotics Research37(4-5), 421–436 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    In: Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing, vol

    Shao, B., Cao, N., Ding, Y., Wang, X., Gu, F., Chen, C.: MoMa-Pos: An Efficient Object-Kinematic-Aware Base Placement Determination Framework for Mobile Ma- nipulation. In: Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing, vol. 16383, pp. 254–270. Springer, Singapore (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-8405- 5_14

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8405- 2026

  20. [20]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters8(12), 8494–8501 (2023)

    Fan, W., Guo, X., Feng, E., Lin, J., Wang, Y., Liang, J., Garrad, M., Rossiter, J., Zhang, Z., Lepora, N., Wei, L., Zhang, D.: Digital Twin- Driven Mixed Reality Framework for Immersive Teleoperation with Haptic Rendering. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters8(12), 8494–8501 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2023.3325784

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2023.3325784 2023

  21. [21]

    In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ InternationalConferenceonIntelligentRobotsandSystems,pp.12156–12163(2024)

    Wu, P., Shentu, Y., Yi, Z., Lin, X., Abbeel, P.: GELLO: A General, Low-Cost, and Intuitive Teleoperation Framework for Robot Manipulators. In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ InternationalConferenceonIntelligentRobotsandSystems,pp.12156–12163(2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    In: Robotics: Science and Systems (2025)

    Gupta, A., Zhang, M., Sathua, R., Gupta, S.: Opening Articulated Objects in the Real World. In: Robotics: Science and Systems (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics32(1), 161–175 (2016) Generalizable and Safe Articulated Object Manipulation 17

    Karayiannidis, Y., Smith, C., Barrientos, F.E.V., Ögren, P., Kragic, D.: An Adap- tive Control Approach for Opening Doors and Drawers under Uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Robotics32(1), 161–175 (2016) Generalizable and Safe Articulated Object Manipulation 17

    2016

  24. [24]

    651–673 (2018)

    Kalashnikov, D., Irpan, A., Pastor, P., Ibarz, J., Herzog, A., Jang, E., Quillen, D., Holly,E.,Kalakrishnan,M.,Vanhoucke,V.,Levine,S.:ScalableDeepReinforcement LearningforVision-BasedRoboticManipulation.In:ConferenceonRobotLearning, pp. 651–673 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    In: Pro- ceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (2022)

    Bahl, S., Gupta, A., Pathak, D.: Human-to-Robot Imitation in the Wild. In: Pro- ceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representa- tions (2023)

    Ma, Y.J., Sodhani, S., Jayaraman, D., Bastani, O., Kumar, V., Zhang, A.: VIP: To- wards Universal Visual Reward and Representation via Value-Implicit Pre-training. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representa- tions (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Robot Learning, vol

    Wang, C., Fan, L., Sun, J., Zhang, R., Fei-Fei, L., Xu, D., Zhu, Y., Anandkumar, A.: MimicPlay: Long-Horizon Imitation Learning by Watching Human Play. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Robot Learning, vol. 229, pp. 201–221 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, vol

    Wong, J., Tung, A., Kurenkov, A., Mandlekar, A., Fei-Fei, L., Savarese, S., Martín- Martín, R.: Error-Aware Imitation Learning from Teleoperation Data for Mobile Manipulation. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, vol. 164, pp. 1367–1378 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE-RAS 22nd International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    Seo, M., Han, S., Sim, K., Bang, S.H., Gonzalez, C., Sentis, L., Zhu, Y.: Deep Im- itation Learning for Humanoid Loco-Manipulation through Human Teleoperation. In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE-RAS 22nd International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 1–8 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (2023)

    Zhao, T.Z., Kumar, V., Levine, S., Finn, C.: Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware. In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning (2024)

    Fu, Z., Zhao, T.Z., Finn, C.: Mobile ALOHA: Learning Bimanual Mobile Ma- nipulation Using Low-Cost Whole-Body Teleoperation. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research44(10-11), 1684–1704 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1177/02783649241273668

    Chi, C., Xu, Z., Feng, S., Cousineau, E., Du, Y., Burchfiel, B., Tedrake, R., Song, S.: Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Ac- tion Diffusion. The International Journal of Robotics Research (2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/02783649241273668

    work page doi:10.1177/02783649241273668 2024

  33. [33]

    Intelligent Service Robotics17(5), 1091–1107 (2024)

    Kim, Y., Kim, D., Choi, J., Park, J., Oh, N., Park, D.: A Survey on Integration of Large Language Models with Intelligent Robots. Intelligent Service Robotics17(5), 1091–1107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-024-00495-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11370-024-00495-6 2024

  34. [34]

    IEEE Transactions on Automation Sci- ence and Engineering (2025)

    Yao, T., Wang, H., Lu, B., Ge, J., Pei, Z., Kowarschik, M., Qi, P., et al.: Sim2Real Learning with Domain Randomization for Autonomous Guidewire Navigation in Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Procedures. IEEE Transactions on Automation Sci- ence and Engineering (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    In: Robotics: Science and Systems (2025)

    Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Nakura, M., Bhowal, P., Kuo, C.-L., Chen, Y.-T., Erickson, Z., Held, D.: ArticuBot: Learning Universal Articulated Object Manipulation Policy via Large Scale Simulation. In: Robotics: Science and Systems (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research30(7), 846–894 (2011)

    Karaman, S., Frazzoli, E.: Sampling-Based Algorithms for Optimal Motion Plan- ning. The International Journal of Robotics Research30(7), 846–894 (2011)

    2011

  37. [37]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation12(4), 566–580 (1996)

    Kavraki, L.E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., Overmars, M.H.: Probabilistic Roadmaps for Path Planning in High-Dimensional Configuration Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation12(4), 566–580 (1996)

    1996

  38. [38]

    In: Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (2023) 18 B

    Wu, P., Shentu, F., Lin, X., Abbeel, P.: GELLO: A General, Low-Cost, and In- tuitive Teleoperation Framework for Robot Manipulators. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (2023) 18 B. Shao et al

    2023

  39. [39]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Mo, K., Guibas, L.J., Mukadam, M., Gupta, A., Tulsiani, S.: Where2Act: From Pixels to Actions for Articulated 3D Objects. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 6813–6823 (2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    In: Robotics: Science and Systems (2024)

    Chen, Q., Walsman, A., Memmel, M., Mo, K., Fang, A., Fox, D., Gupta, A.: URD- Former: A Pipeline for Constructing Articulated Simulation Environments from Real-World Images. In: Robotics: Science and Systems (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning (2024)

    Huang, S., Chang, H., Liu, Y., Zhu, Y., Dong, H., Gao, P., Boularias, A., Li, H.: A3VLM: Actionable Articulation-Aware Vision Language Model. In: Conference on Robot Learning (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2024)

    Chen, F., Zheng, Y., Wang, Z., Chi, W., Liu, S.: RBI-RRT*: Efficient Sampling- Based Path Planning for High-Dimensional State Space. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2024)

    2024