pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10113 · v1 · pith:BSIHTXFWnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Emotion Profiling in LLM-Based Literary Translation: Systematic Shifts Across MT and Post-Editing

Antonio Castaldo , Johanna Monti , Sheila Castilho This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 16:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords emotion profilingliterary translationmachine translationpost-editingLLMemotional fingerprintsauthor's voiceItalian science fiction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Machine translation systems imprint distinct emotional profiles on literary texts that differ from human translations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares LLM-based translations of Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake into Italian against post-edited versions, a human translation, and a baseline corpus of contemporary Italian science fiction. It applies lexicon-based and multilingual modeling to track emotions at a fine-grained level across systems. The analysis reveals that each MT model produces its own statistically significant emotional pattern. These patterns shift only partially toward human norms during post-editing. The result is reduced fidelity to the original author's emotional voice in machine-assisted literary work.

Core claim

LLM translations of literary fiction carry model-specific and statistically significant emotional fingerprints that deviate from both human translations and the norms of the target-language genre; post-editing narrows but does not remove these systematic shifts, so the author's voice is only partly preserved.

What carries the argument

Lexicon-based and multilingual modeling applied to measure emotional variation across MT outputs, post-edits, and human reference texts.

If this is right

  • Each MT model leaves a detectable emotional signature on the translated novel.
  • Post-editing reduces the distance to human emotional norms but leaves residual model-specific effects.
  • Authorial voice preservation is limited when literary translation relies on current LLM systems.
  • Emotional profiling can distinguish translation methods even when surface fluency appears similar.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Workflows for literary post-editing could add explicit checks for emotional drift.
  • The finding raises the question of whether similar fingerprints appear in other genres or language pairs.
  • If the effect is general, human-only translation may be required for projects where emotional fidelity is central.
  • Extending the method to track specific emotion categories could isolate which aspects of voice are most altered.

Load-bearing premise

Lexicon-based and multilingual modeling methods capture emotional profiles in literary text in a way that matches human reader perception.

What would settle it

A replication study on the same texts that finds no statistically significant emotional differences between any MT system and the human translation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10113 by Antonio Castaldo, Johanna Monti, Sheila Castilho.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Emotional density and intensity across MT systems, their post-edited (PE) versions, and human translation (HT). scores. We show the results of both metrics side￾by-side in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Emotional trajectory across MT systems, their post-edited (PE) versions, and human translation (HT). Trajectory is smoothed using a 5-line rolling mean. The bottom of the figure shows per-sentence standard deviation, indicating disagreements across versions. While post-editing increases intensity and den￾sity across all models, this behavior does not al￾ways translate to better preservation of emotional pe… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper investigates whether LLM translations exhibit identifiable emotional profiles and how post-editing reshapes them toward human-like norms. We compare LLM translations of Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake with their post-edited versions and a human translation, using a large-scale corpus of contemporary Italian science-fiction as a baseline. We examine emotion through lexicon-based and multilingual modeling, conducting a fine-grained analysis of emotional variation across systems. We find that MT systems introduce model-specific and statistically significant emotional fingerprints across translations, leading to a limited preservation of an author's voice.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines emotional profiles in translations of Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake from English to Italian, comparing outputs from multiple LLM-based MT systems, their post-edited versions, a human translation, and a large baseline corpus of contemporary Italian science fiction. Using lexicon-based and multilingual emotion modeling, it reports model-specific and statistically significant emotional fingerprints in MT outputs that result in limited preservation of the author's voice, with post-editing partially aligning profiles toward human-like norms.

Significance. If the emotion metrics were validated against human judgments on literary text, the work would offer a useful empirical contribution to understanding systematic affective biases in MT for creative writing and the mitigating role of post-editing. The inclusion of a sizable external baseline corpus strengthens the ability to contextualize deviations, and the fine-grained cross-system comparison is a constructive design choice.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and Methods: The claim that MT systems produce 'statistically significant emotional fingerprints' is presented without any reported details on sample sizes, statistical tests performed, p-values, effect sizes, or controls for text length, genre, or lexical density differences between the dystopian novel excerpts and the baseline sci-fi corpus.
  2. [Methods] Methods and Results: The central interpretation that observed score differences constitute 'model-specific emotional fingerprints' limiting authorial voice preservation rests on the untested assumption that lexicon-based and multilingual emotion models accurately proxy human-perceptible emotional content in literary prose; no correlation analysis or human validation study (e.g., reader ratings of valence, arousal, or specific emotions) on the actual translated material is described.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the exact emotion categories and lexicons/models employed, including any language-specific adaptations for Italian.
  2. Add explicit discussion of potential domain mismatch between the emotion detection tools (often trained on general or social media text) and dystopian literary prose.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and outline revisions to improve clarity and transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Methods: The claim that MT systems produce 'statistically significant emotional fingerprints' is presented without any reported details on sample sizes, statistical tests performed, p-values, effect sizes, or controls for text length, genre, or lexical density differences between the dystopian novel excerpts and the baseline sci-fi corpus.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and Methods section should report these details explicitly for reproducibility. The full manuscript contains the underlying statistical comparisons in the Results, but we will revise the abstract to reference the tests performed and expand Methods with sample sizes (number of aligned text segments), the specific tests (e.g., Welch t-tests with multiple-comparison correction), exact p-values, effect sizes, and the controls used for text length (fixed-length segmentation) and lexical density (normalization against the baseline corpus). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods and Results: The central interpretation that observed score differences constitute 'model-specific emotional fingerprints' limiting authorial voice preservation rests on the untested assumption that lexicon-based and multilingual emotion models accurately proxy human-perceptible emotional content in literary prose; no correlation analysis or human validation study (e.g., reader ratings of valence, arousal, or specific emotions) on the actual translated material is described.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the models are applied without a new human validation study on these specific literary translations. The analysis uses established, previously validated resources for multilingual emotion detection. We will add an explicit Limitations paragraph discussing the assumption, citing the models' reported correlations in prior work while noting the absence of direct reader validation here. The comparative design (multiple systems vs. human translation vs. baseline) still demonstrates systematic, model-specific deviations; we will adjust phrasing to present the 'fingerprints' as model-induced shifts rather than direct claims about authorial voice preservation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical comparisons rely on external lexicons, models, and baseline corpus

full rationale

The paper applies established lexicon-based and multilingual emotion detection methods to MT outputs, post-edits, human translation, and an external contemporary Italian SF corpus. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-referential definitions appear. Statistical differences are reported as observations rather than predictions forced by construction. No self-citation chains or uniqueness theorems are invoked to justify core claims. The derivation chain consists of standard tool application followed by comparative analysis and remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract; no free parameters, invented entities, or explicit axioms are stated. The central claim rests on the unstated premise that the chosen emotion measurement techniques are valid for literary text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Lexicon-based and multilingual modeling reliably measure emotional content in literary translations
    Invoked when examining emotional variation across systems and comparing to human-like norms

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5614 in / 1171 out tokens · 27342 ms · 2026-06-27T16:07:30.326090+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Öhman, Emily , editor =. The. Proceedings of the. 2021 , pages =

    2021

  2. [2]

    Evaluating

    Teodorescu, Daniela and Mohammad, Saif , editor =. Evaluating. Findings of the. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.271 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.271 2023

  3. [3]

    Distinguishing

    Jiang, Zhaokun and Lv, Qianxi and Zhang, Ziyin and Lei, Lei , year =. Distinguishing. doi:10.1111/ijal.70160 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1111/ijal.70160

  4. [4]

    Jiang, Zeyuan , month = jun, year =. Does. PLOS ONE , publisher =. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324830 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324830

  5. [5]

    Vanmassenhove, Eva and Shterionov, Dimitar and Gwilliam, Matthew , editor =. Machine. Proceedings of the 16th. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.188 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.188 2021

  6. [6]

    Bizzoni, Yuri and Juzek, Tom S and España-Bonet, Cristina and Dutta Chowdhury, Koel and van Genabith, Josef and Teich, Elke , editor =. How. Proceedings of the 17th. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.18653/v1/2020.iwslt-1.34 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2020.iwslt-1.34 2020

  7. [7]

    Translationese and

    Koppel, Moshe and Ordan, Noam , editor =. Translationese and. Proceedings of the 49th. 2011 , pages =

    2011

  8. [8]

    Digital Scholarship in the Humanities , author =

    On the features of translationese , volume =. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1093/llc/fqt031 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/llc/fqt031 2015

  9. [9]

    Translation

    Mauranen, Anna and Kujamäki, Pekka , month = jan, year =. Translation

  10. [10]

    Zhang, Ran and Zhao, Wei and Eger, Steffen , editor =. How. Proceedings of the 2025. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.548 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.548 2025

  11. [11]

    Baker, Mona , month = jun, year =. Corpus. Text and

  12. [12]

    Findings of the 2017

    Bojar, Ondřej and Chatterjee, Rajen and Federmann, Christian and Graham, Yvette and Haddow, Barry and Huang, Shujian and Huck, Matthias and Koehn, Philipp and Liu, Qun and Logacheva, Varvara and Monz, Christof and Negri, Matteo and Post, Matt and Rubino, Raphael and Specia, Lucia and Turchi, Marco , year =. Findings of the 2017. Proceedings of the. doi:10...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/w17-4717 2017

  13. [13]

    Castilho, Sheila and Resende, Natália , month = jan, year =. Post-. Information , publisher =. doi:10.3390/info13020066 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3390/info13020066

  14. [14]

    and Ramisch, Carlos and Walsh, Abigail and Wójtowicz, Beata and Wróblewska, Alina , editor =

    Savary, Agata and Zeman, Daniel and Barbu Mititelu, Verginica and Barreiro, Anabela and Caftanatov, Olesea and de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine and Dobrovoljc, Kaja and Eryiğit, Gülşen and Giouli, Voula and Guillaume, Bruno and Markantonatou, Stella and Melnik, Nurit and Nivre, Joakim and Ojha, Atul Kr. and Ramisch, Carlos and Walsh, Abigail and Wójtowicz, Be...

    2024

  15. [15]

    Proceedings of the

    Castilho, Sheila and Cavalheiro Camargo, João Lucas and Menezes, Miguel and Way, Andy , editor =. Proceedings of the. 2021 , pages =

    2021

  16. [16]

    Actionability in a

    Coche, Julien and Kropczynski, Jess and Montarnal, Aurélie and Tapia, Andrea and Benaben, Frederick , year =. Actionability in a

  17. [17]

    Proceedings of the

    Barbu, Paul-Gerhard and Lipska-Dieck, Adrianna and Lindner, Lena , editor =. Proceedings of the. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.tsar-1.14 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.tsar-1.14 2025

  18. [18]

    Actionability in a

    Coche, Julien and Kropczynski, Jess and Montarnal, Aurélie and Tapia, Andrea and Benaben, Frederick , month = may, year =. Actionability in a

  19. [19]

    Automating

    Sen, Tan Min and Chun, Zachary Choy Kit and Saikia, Swaagat Bikash and Alsagoff, Syed Ali Redha and Mohor, Banerjee and Wangsajaya, Nadya Yuki and Chan, Alvin , month = mar, year =. Automating

  20. [20]

    Handbook of

    Krennmayr, Tina and Steen, Gerard , editor =. Handbook of. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0881-2_39 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0881-2_39 2017

  21. [21]

    Metaphor

    Tong, Xiaoyu and Choenni, Rochelle and Lewis, Martha and Shutova, Ekaterina , month = mar, year =. Metaphor. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.11810 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.11810

  22. [22]

    Procesamiento del lenguaje natural , author =

    Construcción del. Procesamiento del lenguaje natural , author =. 2023 , pages =

    2023

  23. [23]

    Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural , author =

    Construcción del. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural , author =. 2023 , pages =

    2023

  24. [24]

    Fine-tuning and evaluation of

    Mikelenić, Bojana and Oliver, Antoni and Vidal, Sergi Àlvarez , editor =. Fine-tuning and evaluation of. Proceedings of the. 2025 , pages =

    2025

  25. [25]

    Exploring

    Thai, Katherine and Karpinska, Marzena and Krishna, Kalpesh and Ray, Bill and Inghilleri, Moira and Wieting, John and Iyyer, Mohit , editor =. Exploring. Proceedings of the 2022. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.672 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.672 2022

  26. [26]

    Par3 , copyright =

    Karpinska, Marzena and Thai, Katherine and Krishna, Kalpesh and Wieting, John and Inghilleri, Moira and Iyyer, Mohit , month = may, year =. Par3 , copyright =

  27. [27]

    Gerrits, Kyo and Arenas, Ana Guerberof , editor =. To. Proceedings of. 2025 , pages =

    2025

  28. [28]

    To be or not to be:. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1075/target.22134.gue , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1075/target.22134.gue 2024

  29. [29]

    Information Technology and Management , author =

    Generating creativity through. Information Technology and Management , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10799-025-00454-5 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10799-025-00454-5 2025

  30. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17241 , year=

    Holzner, Niklas and Maier, Sebastian and Feuerriegel, Stefan , month = may, year =. Generative. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.17241 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.17241

  31. [31]

    Ashkinaze, Joshua and Mendelsohn, Julia and Qiwei, Li and Budak, Ceren and Gilbert, Eric , year =. How. Proceedings of the. doi:10.1145/3715928.3737481 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1145/3715928.3737481

  32. [32]

    Leveraging

    Hou, Zhaoyi Joey and Kovashka, Adriana and Li, Xiang Lorraine , month = sep, year =. Leveraging. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.00046 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.00046

  33. [33]

    PsyCh Journal , author =

    Artificial. PsyCh Journal , author =. doi:10.1002/pchj.70042 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/pchj.70042

  34. [34]

    Evaluating

    DiStefano, Paul V and Zeitlen, Daniel and Rafner, Janet and De Chantal, Pier Luc and Peng, Aoran and Miller, Scarlett and Beaty, Roger , month = mar, year =. Evaluating. doi:10.31234/osf.io/k2u87_v1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.31234/osf.io/k2u87_v1

  35. [35]

    Journal of Learning Analytics , author =

    Assessing. Journal of Learning Analytics , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.18608/jla.2025.8571 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.18608/jla.2025.8571 2025

  36. [36]

    Creativity

    Abdoelrazak, Saif , year =. Creativity

  37. [37]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.04265 , abstract =

    Lu, Ximing and Sclar, Melanie and Hallinan, Skyler and Mireshghallah, Niloofar and Liu, Jiacheng and Han, Seungju and Ettinger, Allyson and Jiang, Liwei and Chandu, Khyathi and Dziri, Nouha and Choi, Yejin , month = jan, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.04265 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.04265

  38. [38]

    Building

    Fukuda, So and Ogawa, Hayato and Horio, Kaito and Kawahara, Daisuke and Shibata, Tomohide , month = jun, year =. Building

  39. [39]

    IEEE Access , author =

    Creative. IEEE Access , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3606498 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2025.3606498 2025

  40. [40]

    Kumar, Harsh and Vincentius, Jonathan and Jordan, Ewan and Anderson, Ashton , month = apr, year =. Human. Proceedings of the 2025. doi:10.1145/3706598.3714198 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1145/3706598.3714198 2025

  41. [41]

    Sun, Luning and Gu, Hongyi and Myers, Rebecca and Yuan, Zheng , editor =. A. Intelligent. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/978-981-97-0065-3_9 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-97-0065-3_9 2024

  42. [42]

    and Larios, Diego F

    Mora-Merchan, Javier M. and Larios, Diego F. and Personal, Enrique and León, Carlos , editor =. Autonomous. A. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99987-1_24 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99987-1_24 2025

  43. [43]

    Artificial Intelligence and Applications , author =

    The. Artificial Intelligence and Applications , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.47852/bonviewAIA52024650 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.47852/bonviewaia52024650 2022

  44. [44]

    Which artificial intelligences do people care about most? A conjoint experiment on moral consideration,

    Suh, Sangho and Chen, Meng and Min, Bryan and Li, Toby Jia-Jun and Xia, Haijun , year =. Luminate:. Proceedings of the 2024. doi:10.1145/3613904.3642400 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1145/3613904.3642400 2024

  45. [45]

    Jung, Donghoon and Choi, Jiwoo and Chae, Songeun and Jung, Seohyon , month = oct, year =. Style. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.02025 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02025

  46. [46]

    Journal of Creativity , author =

    Artificial intelligence as a tool for creativity , volume =. Journal of Creativity , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2024.100079 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2024.100079 2024

  47. [47]

    Educational Psychology Review , author =

    Evaluation is. Educational Psychology Review , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09947-1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09947-1 2024

  48. [48]

    op ‘t Hof, Martin and Hu, Ke and Tong, Song and Bai, Honghong , month = jul, year =. The. Journal of Intelligence , publisher =. doi:10.3390/jintelligence13070080 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3390/jintelligence13070080

  49. [49]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , author =

    Assessing the. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i24.34760 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i24.34760 2025

  50. [50]

    Yu, Qiang Yang, and Xing Xie

    A. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1145/3641289 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1145/3641289 2024

  51. [51]

    AI and Ethics , author =

    The creative agency of large language models: a philosophical inquiry , volume =. AI and Ethics , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00557-9 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00557-9 2025

  52. [52]

    Exploring

    Liu, Zifeng and Xing, Wanli and Li, Chenglu and Zhang, Fan and Li, Hai and Minces, Victor , year =. Exploring. Journal of Learning Analytics , publisher =

  53. [53]

    Creativity

    Mohammadi, Behnam , month = jun, year =. Creativity. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.05587 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.05587

  54. [54]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.08744 , abstract =

    Chen, Xiaoyang and Dai, Xinan and Du, Yu and Feng, Qian and Guo, Naixu and Gu, Tingshuo and Gao, Yuting and Gao, Yingyi and Han, Xudong and Jiang, Xiang and Jin, Yilin and Lin, Hongyi and Lin, Shisheng and Li, Xiangnan and Li, Yuante and Li, Yixing and Lai, Zhentao and Ma, Zilu and Peng, Yingrong and Qian, Jiacheng and Sun, Hao-Yu and Sun, Jianbo and Wang...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.08744

  55. [55]

    Falk, Jeanette and Chen, Yiyi and Rafner, Janet and Zhang, Mike and Bjerva, Johannes and Nolte, Alexander , month = apr, year =. How. Proceedings of the 2025. doi:10.1145/3706598.3713447 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1145/3706598.3713447 2025

  56. [56]

    and Wang, Z

    Marrone, Rebecca and Cropley, David H. and Wang, Z. , month = oct, year =. Automatic. Creativity Research Journal , publisher =. doi:10.1080/10400419.2022.2131209 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1080/10400419.2022.2131209 2022

  57. [57]

    Falk, Jeanette and Chen, Yiyi and Rafner, Janet and Zhang, Mike and Bjerva, Johannes and Nolte, Alexander , month = mar, year =. How. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.04290 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.04290

  58. [58]

    Mirowski, Piotr and Love, Juliette and Mathewson, Kory and Mohamed, Shakir , year =. A. Proceedings of the 2024. doi:10.1145/3630106.3658993 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1145/3630106.3658993 2024

  59. [59]

    The Journal of Creative Behavior , author =

    Automated. The Journal of Creative Behavior , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jocb.658 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/jocb.658 2024

  60. [60]

    Exploring

    Weatherby, Scarlet and Ashbourne, Noel and Palmerston, Jacob , month = aug, year =. Exploring. doi:10.36227/techrxiv.172349511.19939559/v1 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.36227/techrxiv.172349511.19939559/v1

  61. [61]

    Creativity

    Bhat, Ninad and Browne, Kieran and Bingemann, Pip , year =. Creativity. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2509.09702 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.09702

  62. [62]

    , issn =

    Automated assessment of creativity in multilingual narratives. , issn =. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts , author =. doi:10.1037/aca0000725 , language =

    work page doi:10.1037/aca0000725

  63. [63]

    Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts , author =

    Multilingual semantic distance:. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1037/aca0000618 , language =

    work page doi:10.1037/aca0000618 2023

  64. [64]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , author =

    ". Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1145/3637361 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1145/3637361 2024

  65. [65]

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications , author =

    Atomic models for the polypeptide backbones of myohemerythrin and hemerythrin , volume =. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications , author =. 1975 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0006-291x(75)90508-2 , language =

    work page doi:10.1016/0006-291x(75)90508-2 1975

  66. [66]

    Investigating

    Poncelas, Alberto and Shterionov, Dimitar and Way, Andy and Maillette de Buy Wenniger, Gideon and Passban, Peyman , editor =. Investigating. Proceedings of the 21st. 2018 , pages =

    2018

  67. [67]

    , year =

    Alemohammad, Sina and Casco-Rodriguez, Josue and Luzi, Lorenzo and Humayun, Ahmed Imtiaz and Babaei, Hossein and LeJeune, Daniel and Siahkoohi, Ali and Baraniuk, Richard G. , year =. Self-. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2307.01850 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.01850

  68. [68]

    Creative

    Liang, Chen , year =. Creative. Computer

  69. [69]

    Sustainable and

    Ayalp, Enes , year =. Sustainable and. cs

  70. [70]

    Computer

    Chen, Junyi , year =. Computer

  71. [71]

    Computer

    Tran, Quoc-Duy , year =. Computer

  72. [72]

    Computer

    Cha, Junuk , year =. Computer

  73. [73]

    Computer

    Guo, Michelle , year =. Computer

  74. [74]

    Spiess, Florian , year =. The. Computer

  75. [75]

    Computer

    Yang, Yaqing , year =. Computer

  76. [76]

    Creative

    Holberton, Tom , year =. Creative. cs

  77. [77]

    Computer

    Ng, Kam Woh , year =. Computer

  78. [78]

    Wang, Tiannan , year =. Weaver:. Computer

  79. [79]

    Creative divergent synthesis with generative models , url =

    Chemla--Romeu-Santos, Axel , year =. Creative divergent synthesis with generative models , url =. Computer

  80. [80]

    Hertzmann, Aaron , year =. Toward. Computer

Showing first 80 references.