pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18214 · v1 · pith:G5BN5YDDnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · 🧮 math.AP · math.PR

Time and Killed Resolvents in Reflected Optimal Stopping with a Max Payoff

Louis Shuo Wang , Ye Liang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 23:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP math.PR
keywords optimal stoppingreflected diffusionssingular measuresmax payoffcontinuation regionkilled resolventtwo-dimensional diffusions
0
0 comments X

The pith

The singular stopping-gain measure on the kink is non-positive, placing every interior kink point in the continuation region for reflected diffusions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies infinite-horizon optimal stopping for normally reflected two-dimensional diffusions in the positive quadrant with payoff given by the pointwise maximum of two linear functions. The non-smooth payoff produces a singular stopping-gain measure concentrated on the kink line. The authors derive an explicit formula showing that this measure equals a non-positive multiple of surface measure on the kink, with the coefficient involving the diffusion matrix contracted against the normal vector to the kink. Under local ellipticity the measure is strictly negative on the interior of the kink. This forces all interior kink points into the continuation region. The value function is represented using the resolvent killed at first entry to the stopping set, and a reflected Brownian motion example shows that the unrestricted reflected resolvent yields incorrect values.

Core claim

We prove Γ^Δ(dx) = −(n⊤a(x)n)/(2√(1+α²)) σ_Δ(dx) with n=(1,−α), so the diagonal component is non-positive and strictly negative under local ellipticity. This implies every interior kink point lies in the continuation region. The correct value representation uses the resolvent killed at first entry into the stopping set, V=G−R_r^C Γ, and the unrestricted reflected resolvent is generally wrong.

What carries the argument

The singular stopping-gain measure Γ^Δ on the kink set Δ={x1=α x2}, expressed explicitly as a negative multiple of surface measure via the normal n and diffusion matrix a(x).

If this is right

  • Every interior kink point lies in the continuation region.
  • The value function takes the form V=G−R_r^C Γ using the killed resolvent.
  • The unrestricted reflected resolvent produces incorrect values, as shown by the reflected Brownian motion counter-example.
  • Local ellipticity makes the diagonal component of the measure strictly negative.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Numerical schemes for reflected optimal stopping must incorporate killing at the stopping set boundary to avoid systematic error.
  • The kink-avoidance property may extend to other non-smooth payoffs whose level sets create ridges inside reflected domains.
  • The explicit local-time contribution at the kink supplies a concrete correction term that could be inserted into variational inequalities for related control problems.

Load-bearing premise

The processes are normally reflected two-dimensional diffusions in the positive quadrant with the given max payoff, together with local ellipticity of the diffusion matrix.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation or simulation for reflected Brownian motion in which an interior point of the kink line belongs to the stopping set, or in which the unrestricted reflected resolvent recovers the true value, would falsify the claims.

read the original abstract

We study infinite-horizon optimal stopping for normally reflected two-dimensional diffusions in the positive quadrant with max payoff \(G(x_1,x_2)=x_1\vee\alpha x_2\). The non-smooth payoff produces a singular stopping-gain measure on the kink set \(\Delta=\{x_1=\alpha x_2\}\). We prove $\displaystyle \Gamma^\Delta(dx) = -\frac{n^\top a(x)n}{2\sqrt{1+\alpha^2}}\,\sigma_\Delta(dx)$, with $n=(1,-\alpha)$, so the diagonal component is non-positive and strictly negative under local ellipticity. This implies that every interior kink point lies in the continuation region. We further show that the correct value representation uses the resolvent killed at first entry into the stopping set, $\displaystyle V=G-R_r^{\mathcal C}\Gamma$, and give a closed-form reflected Brownian counter-example showing that the unrestricted reflected resolvent is generally wrong. A reflected Brownian benchmark and numerical experiments illustrate the local-time, resolvent-gap, and diagonal-avoidance mechanisms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies infinite-horizon optimal stopping for normally reflected two-dimensional diffusions in the positive quadrant with payoff G(x1,x2)=x1∨αx2. It derives the explicit singular measure Γ^Δ(dx)=−(n⊤a(x)n)/(2√(1+α²))σ_Δ(dx) on the kink line Δ={x1=αx2} with n=(1,−α), shows that the diagonal component is non-positive (strictly negative under local ellipticity), and concludes that interior points of Δ lie in the continuation region. The value function is represented as V=G−R_r^C Γ using the resolvent killed at first entry to the stopping set; a reflected Brownian motion counter-example demonstrates that the unrestricted reflected resolvent is incorrect in general. A benchmark and numerical experiments illustrate the local-time, resolvent-gap, and diagonal-avoidance effects.

Significance. If the central formula and its implications hold, the work supplies a concrete, computable description of the singular stopping-gain measure generated by a Lipschitz but non-smooth payoff under reflection. The negativity result directly constrains the stopping set, while the killed-resolvent representation and the explicit counter-example clarify a common modeling choice in reflected optimal stopping. These elements, together with the benchmark and numerics, provide both theoretical and illustrative value for variational inequalities involving reflected diffusions and kink-type payoffs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Main theorem on Γ^Δ (distributional generator computation)] The derivation of the coefficient in Γ^Δ(dx)=−(n⊤a(x)n)/(2√(1+α²))σ_Δ(dx) is load-bearing for the continuation-region claim. The text states that the formula follows from the distributional action of the generator on G and the jump in the normal derivative across Δ. Please provide the explicit computation of this jump (including the factor ½ from the second-order operator and the normalization by |n|=√(1+α²)) in the section containing the main theorem on Γ^Δ.
  2. [Value-function representation] The killed-resolvent identity V=G−R_r^C Γ is presented as the correct representation once supp(Γ) is known. The complementarity condition and the support result are used to justify it, but the precise passage from the variational inequality to the killed-resolvent formula (as opposed to the unrestricted reflected resolvent) should be spelled out, citing the relevant equation or proposition.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and preliminaries] Notation for the surface measure σ_Δ and the normal n is introduced in the abstract and used throughout; a short dedicated paragraph or table collecting all symbols appearing in the formula for Γ^Δ would improve readability.
  2. [Numerical experiments] The numerical experiments section would benefit from explicit captions stating the parameter values (diffusion coefficients, α, r) used in each panel so that the local-time and resolvent-gap illustrations can be reproduced directly from the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Main theorem on Γ^Δ (distributional generator computation)] The derivation of the coefficient in Γ^Δ(dx)=−(n⊤a(x)n)/(2√(1+α²))σ_Δ(dx) is load-bearing for the continuation-region claim. The text states that the formula follows from the distributional action of the generator on G and the jump in the normal derivative across Δ. Please provide the explicit computation of this jump (including the factor ½ from the second-order operator and the normalization by |n|=√(1+α²)) in the section containing the main theorem on Γ^Δ.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit step-by-step computation of the jump will strengthen the presentation. The coefficient arises from the distributional second-order action of the generator on G: the jump in the normal derivative of G across Δ contributes (after the 1/2 factor from the elliptic operator) a term proportional to n⊤a(x)n, which is then normalized by |n|=√(1+α²) to obtain the surface measure coefficient. We will insert the full calculation, including all intermediate distributional identities, into the section containing the main theorem on Γ^Δ. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Value-function representation] The killed-resolvent identity V=G−R_r^C Γ is presented as the correct representation once supp(Γ) is known. The complementarity condition and the support result are used to justify it, but the precise passage from the variational inequality to the killed-resolvent formula (as opposed to the unrestricted reflected resolvent) should be spelled out, citing the relevant equation or proposition.

    Authors: We will expand the justification. In the revised manuscript we will add a short derivation that starts from the variational inequality, invokes the complementarity condition together with the support result on Γ, and arrives at V = G − R_r^C Γ by applying the killed resolvent operator; we will cite the relevant equation numbers and contrast the argument with the unrestricted reflected resolvent via the counter-example already present in the paper. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is direct distributional computation

full rationale

The paper derives the explicit singular measure Γ^Δ on the kink line Δ by applying the second-order generator to the Lipschitz payoff G and isolating the contribution from the jump in the normal derivative across Δ, yielding the stated coefficient involving n⊤a(x)n after the standard ½ factor. This is a self-contained calculation from the diffusion coefficients and surface measure σ_Δ; the negativity under local ellipticity then follows immediately and places interior points of Δ in the continuation region. The killed-resolvent representation V = G − R_r^C Γ is the direct consequence of the complementarity condition once supp(Γ) is known. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no self-citations are load-bearing for the central formula, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The derivation chain is therefore independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions for reflected diffusions and local ellipticity; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are visible in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The underlying processes are normally reflected two-dimensional diffusions in the positive quadrant.
    Stated as the setting of the study in the first sentence of the abstract.
  • domain assumption Local ellipticity of the diffusion matrix holds to obtain strict negativity.
    Invoked to strengthen the sign result for the diagonal component.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5721 in / 1430 out tokens · 29356 ms · 2026-06-26T23:30:11.262776+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Mathematical Finance7(3), 241–286 (1997)

    Broadie, M., Detemple, J.: The valuation of American options on multiple assets. Mathematical Finance7(3), 241–286 (1997)

    1997

  2. [2]

    Finance and Stochastics3(3), 295–322 (1999)

    Villeneuve, S.: Exercise regions of American options on several assets. Finance and Stochastics3(3), 295–322 (1999)

    1999

  3. [3]

    Quantitative Finance20(11), 1749–1760 (2020)

    Bayer, C., Tempone, R., Wolfers, S.: Pricing American options by exercise rate optimization. Quantitative Finance20(11), 1749–1760 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Management Science61(5), 1094–1107 (2015)

    Battauz, A., De Donno, M., Sbuelz, A.: Real options and American derivatives: The double continuation region. Management Science61(5), 1094–1107 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    Results in Applied Mathematics27, 100621 (2025)

    Wang, L.S., Yu, J.: Analysis framework for stochastic predator–prey model with demographic noise. Results in Applied Mathematics27, 100621 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics66(1), 206–227 (2005)

    Dai, M., Kwok, Y.K.: American options with lookback payoff. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics66(1), 206–227 (2005)

    2005

  7. [7]

    Detemple, J.: Optimal exercise for derivative securities. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 6(1), 459–487 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Mathematics13(17), 2898 (2025)

    Wang, L.S., Yu, J., Li, S., Liu, Z.: Analysis and mean-field limit of a hybrid PDE- ABM modeling angiogenesis-regulated resistance evolution. Mathematics13(17), 2898 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization63(4), 2835–2855 (2025)

    Soner, H.M., Tissot-Daguette, V.: Stopping times of boundaries: Relaxation and continuity. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization63(4), 2835–2855 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Journal of Computational Finance 15(3), 33 (2012)

    Whitehead, T., Mark Reesor, R., Davison, M.: A bias-reduction technique for Monte Carlo pricing of early-exercise options. Journal of Computational Finance 15(3), 33 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    Hiroshima Math

    Tanaka, H.: Stochastic differential equations with reflecting boundary condition in convex regions. Hiroshima Math. J.9(3), 163–177 (1979)

    1979

  12. [12]

    Communications on pure and applied Mathematics37(4), 511–537 (1984)

    Lions, P.-L., Sznitman, A.-S.: Stochastic differential equations with reflecting boundary conditions. Communications on pure and applied Mathematics37(4), 511–537 (1984)

    1984

  13. [13]

    Probability Theory and Related Fields74(3), 455–477 (1987) 24

    Saisho, Y.: Stochastic differential equations for multi-dimensional domain with reflecting boundary. Probability Theory and Related Fields74(3), 455–477 (1987) 24

    1987

  14. [14]

    The Annals of Probability9(2), 302–308 (1981)

    Harrison, J.M., Reiman, M.I.: Reflected Brownian motion on an orthant. The Annals of Probability9(2), 302–308 (1981)

    1981

  15. [15]

    Bioengineering12(10), 1097 (2025)

    Liu, Z., Wang, L.S., Yu, J., Zhang, J., Martel, E., Li, S.: Bidirectional endothelial feedback drives turing-vascular patterning and drug-resistance niches: a hybrid PDE-agent-based study. Bioengineering12(10), 1097 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    The annals of Probability, 554–580 (1993)

    Dupuis, P., Ishii, H.: Sdes with oblique reflection on nonsmooth domains. The annals of Probability, 554–580 (1993)

    1993

  17. [17]

    Journal of Theoretical Probability34(4), 2166–2191 (2021)

    Hino, M., Matsuura, K., Yonezawa, M.: Pathwise uniqueness and non-explosion property of Skorohod SDEs with a class of non-Lipschitz coefficients and non- smooth domains. Journal of Theoretical Probability34(4), 2166–2191 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    Stochastic Processes and their Applications 129(4), 1097–1131 (2019)

    Lundstr¨ om, N.L., ¨Onskog, T.: Stochastic and partial differential equations on non-smooth time-dependent domains. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 129(4), 1097–1131 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    Mathematics13(22), 3583 (2025)

    Liang, Y., Wang, L.S., Yu, J., Liu, Z.: Global well-posedness and stability of nonlocal damage-structured lineage model with feedback and dedifferentiation. Mathematics13(22), 3583 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Potential Analysis65(1), 14 (2026)

    Li, H., Yang, S., Zhang, T.: Wong-Zakai approximations for reflected SDEs in non-smooth time-dependent domains. Potential Analysis65(1), 14 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    The Annals of Applied Probability28(2), 688–750 (2018)

    Lipshutz, D., Ramanan, K.: On directional derivatives of Skorokhod maps in convex polyhedral domains. The Annals of Applied Probability28(2), 688–750 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    The Annals of Probability24(1), 148–181 (1996)

    DeBlassie, R.D.: Brownian motion in a wedge with variable reflection: Existence and uniqueness. The Annals of Probability24(1), 148–181 (1996)

    1996

  23. [23]

    Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications480(1), 123356 (2019)

    Duan, J., Peng, J.: White noise driven SPDEs with oblique reflection: Exis- tence and uniqueness. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications480(1), 123356 (2019)

    2019

  24. [24]

    Electronic Research Archive34(1), 251–290 (2026)

    Wang, L.S., Yu, J.: Algebraic–spectral thresholds and discrete–continuous stabil- ity transfer in Leslie–Gower systems. Electronic Research Archive34(1), 251–290 (2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    The Annals of Applied Probability33(3), 1904–1960 (2023)

    Leimkuhler, B., Sharma, A., Tretyakov, M.V.: Simplest random walk for approx- imating Robin boundary value problems and ergodic limits of reflected diffusions. The Annals of Applied Probability33(3), 1904–1960 (2023)

    1904

  26. [26]

    Mathematics (2026) 25

    Cai, J., Chen, X., Gu, L., Chen, J., Chu, N., Wang, L.S., Liang, Y., Yu, J.: Optimal harvesting for nonlinear size-structured populations with nonlocal environmental feedback. Mathematics (2026) 25

    2026

  27. [27]

    Plos one21(2), 0335163 (2026)

    Wang, L.S., Yu, J., Liu, Z.: A damage-structured PDE model of stem cell hier- archies: The dual role of dedifferentiation in tissue homeostasis and aging. Plos one21(2), 0335163 (2026)

    2026

  28. [28]

    Springer, Basel (2006)

    Peskir, G., Shiryaev, A.: Optimal Stopping and Free-Boundary Problems. Springer, Basel (2006)

    2006

  29. [29]

    In: ´Ecole D’´ et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour IX-1979, pp

    El Karoui, N.: Les aspects probabilistes du contrˆ ole stochastique. In: ´Ecole D’´ et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour IX-1979, pp. 73–238. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1981)

    1979

  30. [30]

    Bensoussan, A., Lions, J.-L.: Applications of Variational Inequalities in Stochastic Control vol. 12. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1982)

    1982

  31. [31]

    Transport Phenomena (0) (2026)

    Yu, J., Wang, L.S., Liu, Z., Liu, J.: Pattern suppression and recovery under one- way versus two-way chemotactic coupling in hybrid partial differential equation– ordinary differential equation models. Transport Phenomena (0) (2026)

    2026

  32. [32]

    (No Title) (1982)

    Friedman, A.: Variational principles and free-boundary problems. (No Title) (1982)

    1982

  33. [33]

    SIAM Journal on control and optimization57(3), 1869–1889 (2019)

    Jacka, S.D., Norgilas, D.: On the compensator in the Doob–Meyer decomposition of the Snell envelope. SIAM Journal on control and optimization57(3), 1869–1889 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Mathematics of Operations Research41(4), 1432–1447 (2016)

    Martyr, R.: Finite-horizon optimal multiple switching with signed switching costs. Mathematics of Operations Research41(4), 1432–1447 (2016)

    2016

  35. [35]

    Electronic Research Archive34(6), 4248–4289 (2026)

    Wang, L.S., Yu, J., Liang, Y., Zhang, J.: The breakdown of linear quasi-cycles: Demographic noise and absorbing boundaries in finite predator–prey systems. Electronic Research Archive34(6), 4248–4289 (2026)

    2026

  36. [36]

    Advances in Applied Probability53(2), 400–424 (2021)

    Christensen, S.,et al.: A class of solvable multidimensional stopping problems in the presence of knightian uncertainty. Advances in Applied Probability53(2), 400–424 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Operations Research69(5), 1591–1607 (2021)

    Ma, Q., Stachurski, J.: Dynamic programming deconstructed: Transformations of the Bellman equation and computational efficiency. Operations Research69(5), 1591–1607 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences (2026)

    Yu, J., Wang, L.S., Liang, Y.: Rigorous analysis of a nonlocal transport–renewal system for physiologically structured populations. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences (2026)

    2026

  39. [39]

    Applied Mathematics & Optimization 79(1), 145–177 (2019) 26

    Ankirchner, S., Klein, M., Kruse, T.: A verification theorem for optimal stopping problems with expectation constraints. Applied Mathematics & Optimization 79(1), 145–177 (2019) 26

    2019

  40. [40]

    Automatica184, 112723 (2026)

    Lv, S., Wu, Z., Xiong, J., Zhang, X.: Robust optimal stopping with regime switching. Automatica184, 112723 (2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    PLoS One21(5), 0350127 (2026)

    Yu, J., Wang, L.S.: Beyond diagonal noise: A better predator-prey modeling framework with cross-covariance. PLoS One21(5), 0350127 (2026)

    2026

  42. [42]

    Journal of Inequalities and Applications2023(1), 99 (2023)

    Jeon, J., Kim, G.: Variational inequality arising from variable annuity with mean reversion environment. Journal of Inequalities and Applications2023(1), 99 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications4(4), 383–402 (1998)

    Caffarelli, L.A.: The obstacle problem revisited. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications4(4), 383–402 (1998)

    1998

  44. [44]

    Inventiones mathematicae171(2), 425–461 (2008)

    Caffarelli, L.A., Salsa, S., Silvestre, L.: Regularity estimates for the solution and the free boundary of the obstacle problem for the fractional Laplacian. Inventiones mathematicae171(2), 425–461 (2008)

    2008

  45. [45]

    Information Technology and Control54(2), 413–438 (2025)

    Wang, Z., Wang, D., Yu, J.: Multi-strategy hybrid improved intelligent algorithm for solving UAV-MTSP. Information Technology and Control54(2), 413–438 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Figalli et al

    Figalli, A., Kim, S., Shahgholian, H.: Constraint maps with free boundaries: the obstacle case: A. Figalli et al. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 248(5), 79 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Advances in Calculus of Variations15(3), 323–349 (2022)

    Focardi, M., Spadaro, E.: The local structure of the free boundary in the fractional obstacle problem. Advances in Calculus of Variations15(3), 323–349 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Duke Mathematical Journal173(12), 2259–2313 (2024)

    Huang, G., Tang, L., Wang, X.-J.: Regularity of free boundary for the Monge– Amp` ere obstacle problem. Duke Mathematical Journal173(12), 2259–2313 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    In: 2022 International Conference on Data Analytics, Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICDACAI), pp

    Gao, Y., Li, L., Yu, J.: Rolling prediction model of closing price based on EEMD data noise reduction and HGS-DELM. In: 2022 International Conference on Data Analytics, Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICDACAI), pp. 255–260 (2022). IEEE

    2022

  50. [50]

    Mathematische Annalen395(3), 75 (2026)

    Du, L., Zhou, Y.: The free boundary for the singular obstacle problem with logarithmic forcing term. Mathematische Annalen395(3), 75 (2026)

    2026

  51. [51]

    Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis248(5), 71 (2024)

    Aleksanyan, G., Kuusi, T.: Quantitative homogenization for the obstacle problem and its free boundary. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis248(5), 71 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Journal of Differential Equations377, 873–887 (2023) 27

    Eberle, S., Shahgholian, H., Weiss, G.S.: The structure of the regular part of the free boundary close to singularities in the obstacle problem. Journal of Differential Equations377, 873–887 (2023) 27

    2023

  53. [53]

    Bulletin of the American mathematical society 27(1), 1–67 (1992)

    Crandall, M.G., Ishii, H., Lions, P.-L.: User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations. Bulletin of the American mathematical society 27(1), 1–67 (1992)

    1992

  54. [54]

    Transport Phenomena 1(2), 20260037 (2026)

    Yu, J., Wang, L.S., Ban, S., Liang, Y.: From microscopic damage to macroscopic games: a dimensionality reduction of stem cell homeostasis. Transport Phenomena 1(2), 20260037 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization62(2), 903–923 (2024)

    Soner, H.M., Yan, Q.: Viscosity solutions for McKean–Vlasov control on a torus. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization62(2), 903–923 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Journal of Functional Analysis289(5), 110936 (2025)

    Cheng, J., Xu, Y.: Viscosity solution to complex hessian equations on compact Hermitian manifolds. Journal of Functional Analysis289(5), 110936 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Electronic Journal of Probability18(34), 1–49 (2013)

    Lamberton, D., Zervos, M.: On the optimal stopping of a one-dimensional diffusion. Electronic Journal of Probability18(34), 1–49 (2013)

    2013

  58. [58]

    SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization53(1), 167–184 (2015)

    De Angelis, T.: A note on the continuity of free-boundaries in finite-horizon opti- mal stopping problems for one-dimensional diffusions. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization53(1), 167–184 (2015)

    2015

  59. [59]

    The Annals of Applied Probability29(1), 505–530 (2019)

    Peskir, G.: Continuity of the optimal stopping boundary for two-dimensional diffusions. The Annals of Applied Probability29(1), 505–530 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization57(1), 402–436 (2019)

    De Angelis, T., Stabile, G.: On lipschitz continuous optimal stopping boundaries. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization57(1), 402–436 (2019)

    2019

  61. [61]

    Annals of Applied Probability30(3), 1007–1031 (2020)

    De Angelis, T., Peskir, G.: Global c 1regularity of the value function in optimal stopping problems. Annals of Applied Probability30(3), 1007–1031 (2020)

    2020

  62. [62]

    Theory of Probability & Its Applications31(4), 604–626 (1987)

    Krylov, N.: An approach to controlled diffusion processes. Theory of Probability & Its Applications31(4), 604–626 (1987)

    1987

  63. [63]

    Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013)

    Revuz, D., Yor, M.: Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013)

    2013

  64. [64]

    Fukushima, M., Oshima, Y., Takeda, M.: Dirichlet Forms and Symmetric Markov Processes vol. 19. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2011)

    2011

  65. [65]

    springer, New York (2014) 28

    Karatzas, I., Shreve, S.: Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus. springer, New York (2014) 28

    2014