pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21259 · v1 · pith:BF5TQLGRnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

Role of the Local Electric-Field in High-Field Conditioning of DC Electrodes:Numerical and Experimental Insights

Victoria Madeleine Bjelland , William Lee Millar , Morten Kildemo , Walter Wuensch This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 12:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph
keywords high-field conditioningDC electrodeselectric breakdownMonte Carlo simulationsurface electric fieldvoltage holdingpulsed DC system
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher local electric fields raise both breakdown risk and conditioning speed in DC electrodes, balancing to set breakdown locations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines spatial variation in conditioning for high-field pulsed DC electrodes that have a radially changing surface electric field. Locations at higher fields show more breakdowns but also condition more rapidly, and this competition accounts for the actual positions where breakdowns are recorded during the process. Experimental data come from camera-based triangulation of each breakdown event, which is then matched against Monte Carlo simulations of the same geometry. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies a concrete mechanism for why conditioning succeeds or fails at particular sites inside real high-voltage hardware.

Core claim

In pairs of high-field DC electrodes with a radially varying surface electric field, the locations of breakdowns observed during conditioning arise from the opposing influences of an elevated breakdown probability and an elevated conditioning rate at higher local fields; Monte Carlo simulations that incorporate both effects reproduce the measured breakdown-position statistics.

What carries the argument

The field-dependent competition between breakdown-initiation probability and progressive surface conditioning, implemented in Monte Carlo simulations that evolve the electrode state under repeated high-voltage pulses.

If this is right

  • Breakdowns during conditioning occur away from the absolute highest-field sites because conditioning proceeds fastest there.
  • The overall voltage-holding capability improves as the surface conditions at different rates across regions of different field strength.
  • Monte Carlo runs using only the measured field map and the two field-dependent rates are sufficient to forecast where breakdowns will appear.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designers could deliberately shape the field distribution to accelerate conditioning in critical areas without raising the final breakdown rate.
  • The same balance may govern conditioning in radio-frequency structures where surface fields also vary spatially.
  • A controlled test with uniform-field electrodes would isolate whether the observed position statistics truly require the field-variation mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The Monte Carlo model correctly captures how the local electric field controls both the chance of a breakdown and the rate at which the surface improves during conditioning.

What would settle it

Breakdown-position maps recorded on a new electrode geometry with a different radial field profile that deviate systematically from the Monte Carlo predictions for that same profile.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21259 by Morten Kildemo, Victoria Madeleine Bjelland, Walter Wuensch, William Lee Millar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conditioning curves of a 12 GHz copper RF cavity (T24 PSI N1 [17]) that was tested in CERN’s high-gradient test facility (a) and a copper DC electrode that was tested in the LES with a gap size of 60 µm (b), illustrating a typical asymptotic increase in applied field. Note that the x-axes differ in scale by an order of magnitude. Long-term tests performed on X-band (∼12 GHz) RF cavities have shown that the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Electric field distribution on the second cell of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Cross-sectional views of the LES shown from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cross-section of the tapered electrode geometry. Due to the small gap size, units of µm are used on the z-axis, while units of mm are used on the x-axis. Dimensions h1 and r0 are shown for completion, but were fixed at 60 µm and 20 mm respectively and not varied in simulation. In practice, some deviation from this idealized approxi￾mation arises due to field enhancement at electrode edges [PITH_FULL_IMAGE… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Conditioning curve for the sloped electrode pair. The black line is the applied voltage, the red line is the number of accumulated breakdowns, and the green line is the breakdown rate. The center of the electrode reached Ecenter = 80 MV/m after 20 M pulses. (b) Accumulated breakdown locations over the cathode surface. The darker circle on the surface represents the effective field-exposed area, which i… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a-c) Spatially located breakdown positions, divided into sections A (inner), B (middle), and C (outer). d-f) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Breakdown number versus the distance from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Polynomial fits to BDD over the radius of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Conditioning, the progressive increase of voltage-holding through the controlled application of fields, is an important and widely used process for bringing high-field and high-voltage devices up to their full operating parameters. Here, a study is presented on how conditioning can vary within a device, specifically, when there is a spatial variation in the surface electric field. What has been observed in high-field pulsed direct-current electrodes and radio-frequency structures is that locations exposed to higher fields exhibit a greater tendency to breakdown, but this increase is counteracted by an increased conditioning rate. This interplay explains the observed breakdown locations and provides important insights into the mechanisms underlying both conditioning and breakdown. This study combines Monte Carlo simulations with experimental results from pairs of high-field electrodes with a radially varying surface electric field. Results are presented from a high-field pulsed DC system, in which the position of each breakdown during conditioning was recorded by triangulation using a pair of cameras, and the results are compared with Monte Carlo simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines spatial variation in conditioning of high-field pulsed DC electrodes under a radially varying surface electric field. It reports that sites exposed to higher fields show increased breakdown probability, offset by faster conditioning; Monte Carlo simulations of both processes are compared directly to experimental breakdown locations triangulated via dual-camera imaging, with the match used to support the claimed interplay between field strength, breakdown, and conditioning.

Significance. If the Monte Carlo model correctly encodes the competing mechanisms for the specific geometry, the work supplies a falsifiable, spatially resolved test of conditioning physics that is directly relevant to high-voltage device design. The experimental triangulation method and the parameter-free comparison to simulation constitute clear strengths.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the central observation but supplies no quantitative metrics (e.g., breakdown-rate ratios, conditioning curves, or goodness-of-fit between simulation and data); adding one or two such numbers would strengthen the summary without lengthening it.
  2. [Methods / Figure captions] Figure captions and the methods section should explicitly state the number of conditioning cycles, the voltage ramp protocol, and the Monte Carlo ensemble size so that the spatial-distribution comparison can be reproduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the accurate summary of our findings on the competing effects of local field strength on breakdown probability versus conditioning rate, and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via independent experiment-simulation comparison

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on a direct, falsifiable comparison between experimentally triangulated breakdown locations (recorded via cameras in a pulsed DC system) and Monte Carlo simulation outputs for a radially varying field geometry. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain; the Monte Carlo model encodes physical mechanisms independently of the target spatial distribution, and the experimental data provide an external benchmark. This matches the default case of a non-circular paper whose results are not forced by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5713 in / 1125 out tokens · 33244 ms · 2026-06-26T12:43:57.003183+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Direct large-area observation of subsurface plastic activity in conditioned copper electrodes

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Large-area EBSD on a sloped-anode conditioned copper electrode reveals three-tier misorientation increases that match the spatial profile of a Monte Carlo conditioning-state variable and indicate subsurface plastic de...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The application of an electric field produces a local conditioning effect, i.e., exposure to high electric fields increases the surface’s propensity for estab- lishing electric fields without arcing

  2. [2]

    The probability of arcing scales strongly with the local electric field, with higher fields corresponding to an increased probability of arcing. In addition to more pragmatic motivations, such as optimizing conditioning procedures, one of the key ob- jectives was to investigate the interplay between these two counteracting effects and the discrepancies in...

  3. [3]

    Kulkarni, D

    S. Kulkarni, D. Canat, C. Arnoux, and N. Kumar, in Proc. of the 30th Int. Symp. on Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum (ISDEIV) (2023) pp. 45–48

    2023

  4. [4]

    L. S. Cowie, D. J. Scott, G. Burt, and W. L. Millar, in Proc. of IPAC’18 (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzer- land, 2018) pp. 3852–3855

    2018

  5. [5]

    Catalán Lasheras, H

    N. Catalán Lasheras, H. Damerau, R. L. Gerard, A. Grudiev, T. Lucas, G. McMonagle, J. Paszkiewicz, S. Pitman, A. Solodko, I. Syratchev, A. Vnuchenko, M. Volpi, B. Woolley, W. Wuensch, and V. del Pozo Ro- mano, in Proc. of IPAC’18 (2018) p. WEPMF074, cERN- ACC-2018-156, CLIC-Note-1149

    2018

  6. [6]

    Schulte, C

    R. Schulte, C. Johnstone, S. Boucher, E. Esarey, C. G. R. Geddes, M. Kravchenko, S. Kutsaev, B. W. Loo, F. Méot, B. Mustapha, K. Nakamura, E. A. Nanni, L. Obst-Huebl, S. E. Sampayan, C. B. Schroeder, K. Sheng, A. M. Sni- jders, E. Snively, S. G. Tantawi, and J. Van Tilborg, Applied Sciences 13, 10.3390/app13085021 (2023)

    work page doi:10.3390/app13085021 2023

  7. [7]

    Aicheler, P

    M. Aicheler, P. Burrows, M. Draper, T. Garvey, P. Le- brun, K. Peach, N. Phinney, H. Schmickler, D. Schulte, and N. Toge, A Multi-TeV Linear Collider Based on CLIC Technology, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs (CERN, Geneva, 2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Brunner, P

    O. Brunner, P. Burrows, S. Calatroni, N. Catalan, R. Corsini, G. D’Auria, S. Doebert, F.-G. Angeles, A. Grudiev, A. Latina, T. Lefevre, G. McMonagle, J. Os- borne, Y. Papaphilippou, A. Robson, C. Rossi, R. Ru- ber, D. Schulte, S. Stapnes, and W. Wuensch, The CLIC project, Tech. Rep. (CERN, Geneva, 2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Martinez-Reviriego, N

    P. Martinez-Reviriego, N. Fuster-Martínez, D. Esper- ante, M. Boronat, B. Gimeno, C. Blanch, D. González- Iglesias, P. Martín-Luna, E. Martínez, A. Menendez, L. Pedraza, J. Fernández, J. Fuster, A. Grudiev, N. C. Lasheras, and W. Wuensch, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 57, 103164 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Woolley, G

    B. Woolley, G. Burt, A. Dexter, R. Peacock, L. Millar, N. Catalan Lasheras, A. Degiovanni, A. Grudiev, G. Mc- Monagle, i. Syratchev, W. Wuensch, E. Rodriguez Cas- tro, and J. Giner Navarro, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 23 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    Millar, G

    W. Millar, G. Burt, and W. Wuensch, in Proc. LINAC’22, International Linear Accelerator Conference No. 31 (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022) pp. 283–286

    2022

  12. [12]

    Profatilova, X

    I. Profatilova, X. Stragier, S. Calatroni, A. Kandratsyeu, E. R. Castro, and W. Wuensch, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler- ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment 953, 163079 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    Wuensch, A

    W. Wuensch, A. Degiovanni, S. Calatroni, A. Korsbäck, F. Djurabekova, R. Rajamäki, and J. Giner-Navarro, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 011007 (2017)

    2017

  14. [14]

    H. H. Braun, S. Döbert, I. Wilson, and W. Wuensch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 224801 (2003)

    2003

  15. [16]

    Dolgashev, S

    V. Dolgashev, S. Tantawi, Y. Higashi, and B. Spataro, Applied Physics Letters 97, 171501 (2010)

    2010

  16. [17]

    Wuensch, C

    W. Wuensch, C. Achard, S. Dobert, H. Braun, I. Syratchev, M. Taborelli, and I. Wilson, in Proceed- ings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference , Vol. 1 (2003) pp. 495–497 Vol.1

    2003

  17. [18]

    Lucas, M

    T. Lucas, M. Boland, N. Catalán Lasheras, P. Gi- ansiracusa, A. Grudiev, T. Lefèvre, G. McMonagle, J. Paszkiewicz, R. Rassool, C. Serpico, I. Syratchev, A. Vnuchenko, M. Volpi, B. Woolley, W. Wuensch, R. Zennaro, and V. del Pozo Romano, in Proc. of IPAC’18 (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland,

  18. [19]

    W. L. Millar, A. Grudiev, W. Wuensch, N. C. Lasheras, G. McMonagle, R. Zennaro, P. Craievich, M. Bopp, T. G. Lucas, M. Volpi, J. Paszkiewicz, A. Edwards, R. Weg- ner, H. Bursali, B. Woolley, A. Magazinik, I. Syratchev, A. Vnuchenko, S. Pitman, V. d. P. Romano, D. B. n. Caballero, and G. Burt, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 70, 1 (2023)

    2023

  19. [20]

    Jacewicz, J

    M. Jacewicz, J. Eriksson, R. Ruber, S. Calatroni, I. Pro- fatilova, and W. Wuensch, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 061002 (2020)

    2020

  20. [21]

    Jacewicz, I

    M. Jacewicz, I. Profatilova, Y. Ashkenazy, S. Calatroni, I. Popov, P. Szaniawski, and W. Wuensch, Journal of Applied Physics 137, 193302 (2025)

    2025

  21. [22]

    M. Nasr, E. Nanni, M. Breidenbach, S. Weathersby, M. Oriunno, and S. Tantawi, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 24, 093201 (2021)

    2021

  22. [23]

    Schneider, A

    M. Schneider, A. Diego, A. Krasnykh, A. Dhar, E. Nanni, N. Matavalan, P. Carriere, R. Berry, and R. Agustsson, JACoW IP AC2024, MOPR29 (2024)

    2024

  23. [24]

    Vernieri, E

    C. Vernieri, E. A. Nanni, S. Dasu, M. E. Peskin, T. Bark- low, R. Bartoldus, P. C. Bhat, K. Black, J. E. Brau, M. Breidenbach, B. Bullard, N. Craig, D. Denisov, L. Gray, P. C. Harris, M. Kagan, Z. Liu, P. Meade, N. Majernik, A. Mohammadi, S. Nagaitsev, D. Ntou- nis, I. Ojalvo, K. Pachal, C. Paus, J. Rosenzweig, C. Schroeder, A. G. Schwartzman, E. Simakov,...

  24. [25]

    H. Li, E. A. Conejero, C. G. Maiano, and R. Zeng, in Proc. SRF’17 (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland,

  25. [26]

    Pierini, Srf cavities: Mostly about technology, CAS Course of RF for Accelerators Lecture (2023), cERN Ac- celerator School (CAS), accessed 2026-06-10

    P. Pierini, Srf cavities: Mostly about technology, CAS Course of RF for Accelerators Lecture (2023), cERN Ac- celerator School (CAS), accessed 2026-06-10

    2023

  26. [27]

    Serafim, R

    C. Serafim, R. Peacock, S. Calatroni, F. Djurabekova, A. T. P. Fontenla, W. Wuensch, S. Sgobba, A. Grudiev, A. Lombardi, E. Sargsyan, S. Ramberger, and G. Bel- lodi, Frontiers in Physics V olume 12 - 2024 , 10.3389/fphy.2024.1308455 (2024)

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1308455 2024

  27. [28]

    Serafim, S

    C. Serafim, S. Calatroni, F. Djurabekova, R. Pea- cock, V. Bjelland, A. T. Perez-Fontenla, W. Wuensch, A. Grudiev, S. Sgobba, A. Lombardi, and E. Sargsyan, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 013101 (2025)

    2025

  28. [29]

    Wuensch, S

    W. Wuensch, S. Calatroni, F. Djurabekova, A. Kyrit- sakis, and Y. Ashkenazy, Fundamental mechanisms of high-electric-field vacuum arc initiation (2025), arXiv:2502.03967 [physics.app-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [30]

    A. K. Mitra, Z. Ang, S. Calic, P. Harmer, S. Kosciel- niak, R. E. Laxdal, W. R. Rawnsley, and R. Shanks, in Proceedings of LINAC2012 (TRIUMF, Tel-A viv, Israel,

  30. [31]

    tRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, 12 Canada, V6T 2A3

  31. [32]

    Papadopoulos, F

    S. Papadopoulos, F. Gerigk, J.-M. Giguet, J. Hansen, J. M. Balula, A. Michet, S. Ramberger, N. Thaus, and R. Wegner, in Proceedings of the 28th Linear Accelera- tor Conference (LINAC 2016) (JACoW Publishing, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, 2017) p. THPLR060, cC-BY- 3.0 license

    2016

  32. [33]

    B. Xiao, S. Belomestnykh, J. Brennan, J. Brutus, G. McIntyre, K. Mernick, C. Pai, K. Smith, T. Xin, A. Zaltsman, and V. Veshcherevich, Physical Re- view Accelerators and Beams 22, 10.1103/physrevaccel- beams.22.030101 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccel- 2019

  33. [34]

    Piquet, M

    O. Piquet, M. Baudrier, A.-C. Chauveau, M. Desmons, P. Hamel, and et al., in Proceedings of IPAC 2022 (JA- CoW, 2022) p. TUPOTK003, contribution to IPAC 2022

    2022

  34. [35]

    Woolley, High Power X-band RF Test Stand Develop- ment and High Power Testing of the CLIC Crab Cavity , Phd thesis, Lancaster University (2015)

    B. Woolley, High Power X-band RF Test Stand Develop- ment and High Power Testing of the CLIC Crab Cavity , Phd thesis, Lancaster University (2015)

    2015

  35. [36]

    Benedetti, M

    S. Benedetti, M. Cerv, S. Magnoni, J. L. N. Quirante, and S. G. Soriano, in Proceedings of LINAC’22 (31st International Linear Accelerator Conference) (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, Liverpool, UK, 2022) pp. 154–157

    2022

  36. [37]

    Trachanas, C

    E. Trachanas, C. Baltador, L. Bellan, G. Fedel, A. Gaget, and et al., in Proceedings of the 17th International Con- ference on Accelerator and Large Experimental Physics Control Systems (ICALEPCS 2023) (JACoW Publish- ing, Venice, Italy, 2023) p. 5, contribution TUPDP080

    2023

  37. [38]

    T. G. Lucas, J. Alex, C. Beard, A. Citterio, H.-H. Braun, P. Craievich, Z. Geng, R. Kalt, F. Loehl, M. Pedrozzi, J.-Y. Raguin, and R. Zennaro, IEEE Transactions on Nu- clear Science 72, 781 (2025)

    2025

  38. [39]

    Degiovanni, W

    A. Degiovanni, W. Wuensch, and J. Giner Navarro, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19, 032001 (2016)

    2016

  39. [40]

    Obermair, T

    C. Obermair, T. Cartier-Michaud, A. Apollonio, W. Mil- lar, L. Felsberger, L. Fischl, H. S. Bovbjerg, D. Woll- mann, W. Wuensch, N. Catalan-Lasheras, M. m. c. Boronat, F. Pernkopf, and G. Burt, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 25, 104601 (2022)

    2022

  40. [41]

    A. D. Cahill, J. B. Rosenzweig, V. A. Dolgashev, S. G. Tantawi, and S. Weathersby, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 21, 102002 (2018)

    2018

  41. [42]

    Adolphsen, W

    C. Adolphsen, W. Baumgartner, K. Jobe, F. L. Pimpec, R. Loewen, D. McCormick, M. Ross, T. Smith, J. Wang, and T. Higo, in Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Acceler- ator Conference, Chicago, IL, June 18–22, 2001 (2001) pp. 478–480, conf.Proc.C0106181, arXiv:physics/0108042 [physics.acc-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  42. [43]

    Adolphsen, in Proceedings of the 21st Particle Accel- erator Conference (PAC 2005) (JACoW, Knoxville, TN, USA, 2005) p

    C. Adolphsen, in Proceedings of the 21st Particle Accel- erator Conference (PAC 2005) (JACoW, Knoxville, TN, USA, 2005) p. 204, sLAC-PUB-11224

    2005

  43. [44]

    Wuensch, The Scaling of the Traveling-Wave RF Breakdown Limit , Tech

    W. Wuensch, The Scaling of the Traveling-Wave RF Breakdown Limit , Tech. Rep. (CERN, Geneva, 2006)

    2006

  44. [45]

    Grudiev, S

    A. Grudiev, S. Calatroni, and W. Wuensch, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 102001 (2009)

    2009

  45. [46]

    Woolley, G

    B. Woolley, G. Burt, A. C. Dexter, R. Peacock, W. L. Millar, N. Catalan Lasheras, A. Degiovanni, A. Grudiev, G. Mcmonagle, I. Syratchev, W. Wuensch, E. Ro- driguez Castro, and J. Giner Navarro, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23, 122002 (2020)

    2020

  46. [47]

    Martinez-Reviriego, N

    P. Martinez-Reviriego, N. Fuster-Martínez, D. Esper- ante, M. Boronat, B. Gimeno, C. Blanch, D. González- Iglesias, P. Martín-Luna, E. Martínez, A. Menendez, L. Pedraza, J. Fernández, J. Fuster, A. Grudiev, N. C. Lasheras, and W. Wuensch, Nucl. Eng. Tech. 57, 103164 (2025)

    2025

  47. [48]

    Matsumoto, T

    S. Matsumoto, T. Abe, Y. Higashi, T. Higo, and Y. Du, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 657, 160 (2011), x-Band Struc- tures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop (XB-10)

    2011

  48. [49]

    X. Wu, M. J. Boronat Arévalo, A. Castilla, N. Catalán Lasheras, A. V. Edwards, A. Grudiev, G. McMonagle, W. L. Millar, I. Syratchev, and W. Wuensch, JACoW IPAC 2021, 1543 (2021)

    2021

  49. [50]

    R. Rajamäki, Vacuum arc localization in CLIC prototype radio frequency accelerating structures , Master’s thesis, Aalto University, Helsinki (2016), supervisors: Walter Wuensch (CERN), Visa Koivunen (Aalto University)

    2016

  50. [51]

    Profatilova, X

    I. Profatilova, X. Stragier, S. Calatroni, A. Kandratsyeu, E. Rodriguez Castro, and W. Wuensch, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., A 953, 163079 (2020)

    2020

  51. [52]

    T. Abe, T. Kageyama, H. Sakai, Y. Takeuchi, and K. Yoshino, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19, 102001 (2016)

    2016

  52. [53]

    Pompili, E

    A. Saressalo, I. Profatilova, W. L. Millar, A. Kyritsakis, S. Calatroni, W. Wuensch, and F. Djurabekova, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 23, 10.1103/physrevac- celbeams.23.113101 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevac- 2020

  53. [54]

    Saressalo, A

    A. Saressalo, A. Kyritsakis, F. Djurabekova, I. Pro- fatilova, J. Paszkiewicz, S. Calatroni, and W. Wuen- sch, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 23, 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.23.023101 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.23.023101 2020

  54. [55]

    Peacock, W

    R. Peacock, W. Wuensch, and G. Burt, in 2020 33rd In- ternational Vacuum Nanoelectronics Conference (IVNC) (2020) pp. 1–2

    2020

  55. [56]

    E. Z. Engelberg, J. Paszkiewicz, R. Peacock, S. Lach- mann, Y. Ashkenazy, and W. Wuensch, Phys. Rev. Ac- cel. Beams 23, 123501 (2020)

    2020

  56. [57]

    Profatilova, W

    I. Profatilova, W. Wuensch, and S. Calatroni, Behaviour of copper during initial conditioning in the pulse DC sys- tem, Tech. Rep. (CERN, Geneva, 2019)

    2019

  57. [58]

    F. Shi, P. Chen, S. Jiang, J. Zhuang, and J. Rao, Elec- tronics 13, 10.3390/electronics13010101 (2024)

    work page doi:10.3390/electronics13010101 2024

  58. [59]

    Peacock, Experimental Investigation of Vacuum Breakdown Triggering Mechanisms in a DC Electrode System, Ph.D

    R. Peacock, Experimental Investigation of Vacuum Breakdown Triggering Mechanisms in a DC Electrode System, Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster U. (2023)

    2023

  59. [60]

    Korsback, F

    A. Korsback, F. Djurabekova, L. M. Morales, I. Pro- fatilova, E. R. Castro, W. Wuensch, S. Calatroni, and T. Ahlgren, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23, 033102 (2020)

    2020

  60. [61]

    J. W. Kovermann, Comparative Studies of High-Gradient Rf and Dc Breakdowns , Ph.D. thesis, Aachen, Tech. Hochsch. (2010)

    2010

  61. [62]

    X. Wu, J. Shi, H. Chen, J. Shao, T. Abe, T. Higo, S. Mat- sumoto, and W. Wuensch, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 052001 (2017)

    2017