pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22157 · v1 · pith:Z2LHT3CJnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · 🧮 math.OC · cs.SY· econ.TH· eess.SY

Information Design under Uncertain Utilities: Probabilistic and CVaR Approaches

Furkan Sezer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 11:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC cs.SYecon.THeess.SY
keywords information designuncertain payoffsCalibrated Bayes Correlated EquilibriumCVaRprobabilistic constraintslinear-quadratic-Gaussiandecentralization theorem
0
0 comments X

The pith

Information design with uncertain agent payoffs admits convex reformulations under linear-quadratic-Gaussian structure using probabilistic and CVaR constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a solution concept called Calibrated Bayes Correlated Equilibrium to address information design when the designer is uncertain about agents' payoff coefficients. It shows that the nonconvex design problem becomes tractable through convex second-order cone and semidefinite programming reformulations when the setting is linear-quadratic-Gaussian and certain feasibility conditions hold. The resulting designs also limit how much agents' actions can correlate across the population. A reader would care because many real-world information design problems involve incomplete knowledge of how participants value outcomes, and these methods provide concrete ways to compute good designs despite that uncertainty.

Core claim

The paper establishes that augmenting the Bayes correlated equilibrium with a corrector policy yields the Cal-BCE concept, which preserves incentive compatibility under payoff uncertainty. Under a linear-quadratic-Gaussian structure, the information design problem with two-sided probabilistic and CVaR constraints admits convex reformulations as second-order cone programs and semidefinite programs, with feasibility ensured by a Hadamard invertibility condition on the relevant matrices. A joint decentralization theorem further shows that these designs bound the covariances between agents' actions, with the CVaR version providing a tighter bound at a given tolerance level.

What carries the argument

The Calibrated Bayes Correlated Equilibrium (Cal-BCE), which incorporates a corrector policy to maintain incentive compatibility when payoff coefficients are uncertain.

If this is right

  • The probabilistic and CVaR designs both limit cross-agent action covariances.
  • The CVaR design caps these covariances more tightly than the probabilistic design at the same tolerance.
  • Realized performance ordering between the designs depends on the specific calibration thresholds used.
  • Experiments on sector ETFs demonstrate that the probabilistic approach yields higher average welfare while CVaR offers superior protection against poor outcomes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The methods could apply to other classes of risk measures if similar convex reformulations exist.
  • Practitioners facing payoff uncertainty might select between the two designs depending on whether mean performance or tail risks matter more in their application.
  • The covariance capping result suggests potential applications in regulating information flows in systems where agents have private but uncertain valuations.

Load-bearing premise

The problem must have a linear-quadratic-Gaussian structure and satisfy the Hadamard invertibility condition to allow the convex reformulations and guarantee their feasibility.

What would settle it

Observe whether the second-order cone or semidefinite programs derived in the paper produce solutions when applied to a linear-quadratic-Gaussian instance that meets the Hadamard condition, or check if the ETF experiments replicate the reported welfare and tail performance differences.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22157 by Furkan Sezer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Normalized welfare distributions across 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Standardized welfare distributions (rescaled to mean zero, unit variance) across the three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Heatmaps of the estimated equilibrium map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Equilibrium structure across the three formulations, shown as a single overlaid scatter. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mean normalized welfare (left) and CVaR@95% of normalized welfare (right) as a function of confidence level β ∈ {0.90, 0.95, 0.99}. The CVaR design’s tail metric improves monotonically with β (from 3.2 × 10−6 at β = 0.90 to 9.5 × 10−6 at β = 0.99), while its mean welfare remains nearly flat (about a 3% range), confirming that tighter tail constraints improve worst-case outcomes at minimal efficiency cost. … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Raw welfare and CVaR@95% across design objectives (welfare maximization and conta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Welfare distributions under normal (top row) and stressed (bottom row, XLK −5σ) conditions for the baseline, probabilistic, and CVaR designs. Under stress, mean welfare rises for all three designs: the large negative XLK payoff shock shifts the quadratic objective in a direction that benefits agents whose equilibrium maps route the XLK signal into positive net payoffs. The CVaR design exhibits a contained … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Estimation robustness of the CVaR design across estimators (ridge vs. OLS) and bootstrap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Runtime scaling of the convex information design formulations (log–log scale). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper studies information design when the designer lacks precise knowledge of agents' payoff coefficients. The Calibrated Bayes Correlated Equilibrium (Cal-BCE) is introduced as a solution concept that augments the Bayes correlated equilibrium with a corrector policy preserving incentive compatibility under the designer's structural uncertainty, adapting its revelation principle to this setting. The design problem is nonconvex in general, but under a linear-quadratic-Gaussian structure it admits convex second-order cone and semidefinite reformulations under two-sided probabilistic and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) constraints, with feasibility guaranteed by a Hadamard invertibility condition. A joint decentralization theorem shows that both designs cap cross-agent action covariances, the CVaR design more tightly at a common tolerance; but because the formulations operate at design-specific feasibility thresholds, the realized ordering is calibration-dependent. Experiments on fifteen sector ETFs confirm the trade-off: the probabilistic design attains higher mean welfare and the CVaR design better tail protection, with neither dominating outright.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Calibrated Bayes Correlated Equilibrium (Cal-BCE) as a solution concept for information design under uncertain agent utilities. Under a linear-quadratic-Gaussian structure, the design problem with two-sided probabilistic and CVaR constraints is claimed to admit convex second-order cone and semidefinite programming reformulations, with feasibility ensured by a Hadamard invertibility condition. A joint decentralization theorem is stated showing that both designs bound cross-agent action covariances (with CVaR tighter at equal tolerance), though realized ordering is calibration-dependent. Experiments on fifteen sector ETFs are reported to illustrate the mean-welfare versus tail-protection trade-off.

Significance. If the claimed convex reformulations and decentralization result hold under the stated LQG assumptions, the work would supply tractable optimization tools for information design with structural uncertainty, extending BCE concepts to robust settings and offering concrete guidance via the ETF experiments on the calibration dependence of design ordering.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the LQG structure yields convex SOC/SDP reformulations (preserving incentive compatibility via Cal-BCE) is asserted without any equations, derivation steps, or verification that the reformulations remain incentive-compatible; this is load-bearing for the contribution and cannot be assessed from the supplied material.
minor comments (1)
  1. The ETF experiments are described only at a high level without data tables, error bars, baseline comparisons, or explicit values for the risk-tolerance parameters, limiting evaluation of the reported trade-off.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and for identifying the need to strengthen the abstract's presentation of the core technical claim. We address the single major comment below and indicate the planned revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the LQG structure yields convex SOC/SDP reformulations (preserving incentive compatibility via Cal-BCE) is asserted without any equations, derivation steps, or verification that the reformulations remain incentive-compatible; this is load-bearing for the contribution and cannot be assessed from the supplied material.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, being a concise summary, does not contain the equations or derivation steps. The full manuscript derives the convex SOCP and SDP reformulations in Sections 3.2–3.3 under the LQG structure, shows that the Cal-BCE corrector policy preserves incentive compatibility by construction, and invokes the Hadamard invertibility condition for feasibility. The decentralization theorem appears in Section 4. Because the referee notes that the claim cannot be assessed from the supplied material, we will revise the abstract to include a brief high-level outline of the reformulation steps together with explicit references to the relevant theorems and sections. This change will be incorporated in the next version of the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The provided abstract and description introduce Cal-BCE as a solution concept and claim that under an LQG structure the design problem admits convex SOC/SDP reformulations with feasibility via a Hadamard invertibility condition, plus a joint decentralization theorem on covariance capping. No equations, self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are quoted or described that would reduce any central claim to its own inputs by construction. The calibration-dependence note on ordering is an explicit acknowledgment of parameter sensitivity rather than a hidden circularity. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the stated structural assumptions, with ETF experiments serving as external checks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The linear-quadratic-Gaussian assumption and Hadamard invertibility condition function as domain assumptions required for the convex claims.

free parameters (1)
  • risk tolerance levels
    Probabilistic and CVaR constraints require tolerance parameters whose specific values affect feasibility and ordering; these are not derived from first principles.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The underlying information design problem has linear-quadratic-Gaussian structure
    Invoked to obtain convex SOCP and SDP reformulations.
  • domain assumption Hadamard invertibility condition holds
    Required to guarantee feasibility of the reformulated programs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5706 in / 1294 out tokens · 21004 ms · 2026-06-26T11:36:02.915808+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Systemic risk and stability in financial networks.American Economic Review, 105(2):564–608, 2015

    Daron Acemoglu, Asuman Ozdaglar, and Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi. Systemic risk and stability in financial networks.American Economic Review, 105(2):564–608, 2015

    2015

  2. [2]

    Warning against recurring risks: An information design approach.Management Science, 66(10):4612–4629, 2020

    Saed Alizamir, Francis de V´ ericourt, and Shouqiang Wang. Warning against recurring risks: An information design approach.Management Science, 66(10):4612–4629, 2020

    2020

  3. [3]

    Zachariadis

    Ricardo Alonso and Konstantinos E. Zachariadis. Persuading large investors. Discussion Paper DP15792, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), 2021

    2021

  4. [4]

    Regret- minimizing bayesian persuasion.Games and Economic Behavior, 136:226–248, 2022

    Yakov Babichenko, Inbal Talgam-Cohen, Haifeng Xu, and Konstantin Zabarnyi. Regret- minimizing bayesian persuasion.Games and Economic Behavior, 136:226–248, 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    Pricing decisions in a two-period closed-loop supply chain under asymmetric information and uncertainty.European Journal of Operational Research, 313:845–860, 2024

    Cornelia Beranek, Werner Jammernegg, and Stefan Langer. Pricing decisions in a two-period closed-loop supply chain under asymmetric information and uncertainty.European Journal of Operational Research, 313:845–860, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    First-price auctions with general information structures: Implications for bidding and revenue.Econometrica, 85(1):107–143, 2017

    Dirk Bergemann, Benjamin Brooks, and Stephen Morris. First-price auctions with general information structures: Implications for bidding and revenue.Econometrica, 85(1):107–143, 2017

    2017

  7. [7]

    Optimal information disclosure in classic auctions.American Economic Review: Insights, 4(3):267–282, 2022

    Dirk Bergemann, Tibor Heumann, Stephen Morris, Constantine Sorokin, and Eyal Winter. Optimal information disclosure in classic auctions.American Economic Review: Insights, 4(3):267–282, 2022

    2022

  8. [8]

    Robust predictions in games with incomplete informa- tion.Econometrica, 81(4):1251–1308, 2013

    Dirk Bergemann and Stephen Morris. Robust predictions in games with incomplete informa- tion.Econometrica, 81(4):1251–1308, 2013

    2013

  9. [9]

    Information design: A unified perspective.Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1):44–95, March 2019

    Dirk Bergemann and Stephen Morris. Information design: A unified perspective.Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1):44–95, March 2019

    2019

  10. [10]

    Studies on robust social influence mechanisms: In- centives for efficient network routing in uncertain settings.IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 37(1):98–115, 2017

    Philip N Brown and Jason R Marden. Studies on robust social influence mechanisms: In- centives for efficient network routing in uncertain settings.IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 37(1):98–115, 2017

    2017

  11. [11]

    The value of information design in supply chain man- agement.Management Science, 71(8):6545–6558, 2025

    Ozan Candogan and Huseyin Gurkan. The value of information design in supply chain man- agement.Management Science, 71(8):6545–6558, 2025

    2025

  12. [12]

    Optimal disclosure of information to privately informed agents.Theoretical Economics, 18(3):1225–1269, 2023

    Ozan Candogan and Philipp Strack. Optimal disclosure of information to privately informed agents.Theoretical Economics, 18(3):1225–1269, 2023. 31

    2023

  13. [13]

    Information design in optimal auctions.Journal of Economic Theory, 211:105710, 2023

    Yi-Chun Chen and Xiangqian Yang. Information design in optimal auctions.Journal of Economic Theory, 211:105710, 2023

    2023

  14. [14]

    Reducing congestion through information design

    Sanmay Das, Emir Kamenica, and Renee Mirka. Reducing congestion through information design. In2017 55th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), pages 1279–1284, 2017

    2017

  15. [15]

    Constrained information design.Mathematics of Operations Research, 49(1):78–106, 2024

    Laura Doval and Vasiliki Skreta. Constrained information design.Mathematics of Operations Research, 49(1):78–106, 2024

    2024

  16. [16]

    Preparing for the worst but hoping for the best: Robust (bayesian) persuasion.Econometrica, 90(5):2017–2051, 2022

    Piotr Dworczak and Alessandro Pavan. Preparing for the worst but hoping for the best: Robust (bayesian) persuasion.Econometrica, 90(5):2017–2051, 2022

    2017

  17. [17]

    Financial fragility and information design.Economics Letters, 232:111356, 2023

    Zhongjie Fan and Dunzhe Tang. Financial fragility and information design.Economics Letters, 232:111356, 2023

    2023

  18. [18]

    Ferguson, Philip N

    Bryce L. Ferguson, Philip N. Brown, and Jason R. Marden. Information signaling with con- current monetary incentives in bayesian congestion games.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(7):8028–8041, 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    Griesbach, Martin Hoefer, Max Klimm, and Tim Koglin

    Simon M. Griesbach, Martin Hoefer, Max Klimm, and Tim Koglin. Information design for congestion games with unknown demand. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 9722–9730, 2024

    2024

  20. [20]

    Persuading multiple audiences: Strategic complementarities and (robust) regulatory disclosures

    Nicolas Inostroza. Persuading multiple audiences: Strategic complementarities and (robust) regulatory disclosures. Working Paper 4400717, Rotman School of Management, March 2023

    2023

  21. [21]

    Interactive information design.Mathe- matics of Operations Research, 47(1):153–175, 2022

    Fr´ ed´ eric Koessler, Marie Laclau, and Tristan Tomala. Interactive information design.Mathe- matics of Operations Research, 47(1):153–175, 2022

    2022

  22. [22]

    Persuasion with unknown beliefs.Theoretical Economics, 17(3):1075–1107, 2022

    Svetlana Kosterina. Persuasion with unknown beliefs.Theoretical Economics, 17(3):1075–1107, 2022

    2022

  23. [23]

    Information disclosure and full surplus extraction in mechanism design

    Daniel Kr¨ ahmer. Information disclosure and full surplus extraction in mechanism design. Journal of Economic Theory, 189:105020, 2020

    2020

  24. [24]

    Information design with unknown prior, 2025

    Ce Li and Tao Lin. Information design with unknown prior, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Social value of public information.American Economic Review, 92(5):1521–1534, 2002

    Stephen Morris and Hyun Song Shin. Social value of public information.American Economic Review, 92(5):1521–1534, 2002

    2002

  26. [26]

    The design of macroprudential stress tests.The Review of Financial Studies, 36(11):4460–4501, 2023

    Dmitry Orlov, Pavel Zryumov, and Andrzej Skrzypacz. The design of macroprudential stress tests.The Review of Financial Studies, 36(11):4460–4501, 2023

    2023

  27. [27]

    Kulkarni

    Shraddha Pathak and Ankur A. Kulkarni. A scalable bayesian persuasion framework for epidemic containment on heterogeneous networks.Journal of Mathematical Economics, 119:103134, 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Optimization of conditional value-at-risk.Journal of risk, 2:21–42, 2000

    R Tyrrell Rockafellar and Stanislav Uryasev. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk.Journal of risk, 2:21–42, 2000

    2000

  29. [29]

    Robust social welfare maximization via information design in linear-quadratic-gaussian games.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 7:3096–3101, 2023

    Furkan Sezer and Ceyhun Eksin. Robust social welfare maximization via information design in linear-quadratic-gaussian games.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 7:3096–3101, 2023. 32

    2023

  30. [30]

    Optimal information provision for strategic hybrid workers

    Sohil Shah, Saurabh Amin, and Patrick Jaillet. Optimal information provision for strategic hybrid workers. In2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 3807–

  31. [31]

    Information design, signaling, and central bank transparency.International Journal of Central Banking, 14(5):223–258, December 2018

    Wataru Tamura. Information design, signaling, and central bank transparency.International Journal of Central Banking, 14(5):223–258, December 2018

    2018

  32. [32]

    Value of information in bayesian routing games.Operations Research, 69(1):148–163, 2021

    Manxi Wu, Saurabh Amin, and Asuman E Ozdaglar. Value of information in bayesian routing games.Operations Research, 69(1):148–163, 2021

    2021

  33. [33]

    Learning to persuade on the fly: Robustness against ignorance.Operations Research, 73(1):194–208, 2025

    You Zu, Krishnamurthy Iyer, and Haifeng Xu. Learning to persuade on the fly: Robustness against ignorance.Operations Research, 73(1):194–208, 2025. A Notation Here is a table introducing the key notation of the paper. Table 6: Summary of key notation. Symbol Description ζ(ω|γ) Information structure: distribution of signalsωgiven payoff stateγ ϕ(a|γ) Actio...

    2025