arxiv: 2606.22489 · v1 · pith:OL7JL2R3new · submitted 2026-06-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.EP· astro-ph.GA

FAUST XXXI. Grain properties and variability of three sources in GSS 30

Q. Yang , H. Baobab Liu , S. Feng , C. J. Chandler , F. Fontani , N. Sakai , Y. Oya , T. Hanawa

show 50 more authors

C. Codella C. Ceccarelli I. Jim\'enez-Serra L. Cacciapuoti E. Bianchi M. Bouvier M. De Simone A. Isella D. Johnstone L. Loinard G. Sabatini Y. Shirley Y. Aikawa M. J. Maureira P. Caselli F. Menard N. Balucani E. Caux S. Charnley N. Cuello F. Dulieu L. Evans D. Fedele T. Hama E. Herbst T. Hirota B. Lefloch A. L\'opez-Sepulcre L. T. Maud A. Miotello G. Moellenbrock H. Nomura Y. Oba S. Ohashi Y. Okoda J. Pineda L. Podio A. Rimola T. Sakai D. Segura-Cox B. Svoboda L. Testi C. Vastel S. Viti N. Watanabe Y. Watanabe Y. Zhang Z. E. Zhang F. O. Alves S. Yamamoto

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 09:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GA

keywords protostarsdust grainsspectral indexALMA observationsyoung stellar objectsmillimeter emissionvariabilityGSS 30

0

0 comments

The pith

ALMA imaging of GSS 30 finds tens-of-micron grains and 650-1510 Earth masses of dust in IRS3, free-free emission in IRS1, and 420-second brightness changes in IRS2.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents 0.5-arcsecond ALMA continuum observations at 1.2-3.0 mm of the GSS 30 complex to examine dust properties in three embedded protostars. Spectral-index maps and SED fitting are used to derive radial grain-size variations and total dust mass for IRS3, while the central emission from IRS1 is interpreted through its low spectral index and the time behavior of IRS2 is tracked across epochs. These measurements matter because they link observed spectral properties directly to grain growth, optical-depth effects, and possible magnetic activity inside class 0/I disks. The work shows that outflow directions and envelope structures can alter apparent spectral indices and that short-timescale millimeter changes can trace protostellar flares.

Core claim

Spectral index rises radially from 2.0 to 2.5 in IRS3 but falls to 1.6-1.8 along the outflow; SED modeling yields maximum grain sizes of tens of microns and dust mass 650-1510 Earth masses. IRS1 exhibits alpha less than 0.8 at its center, matching marginally optically thick free-free emission. IRS2 shows brightness variations over 420 seconds that multi-epoch data indicate are flares lasting tens of minutes and likely produced by magnetic activity.

What carries the argument

Spectral-index mapping from multi-band continuum images combined with SED fitting to constrain maximum grain size and dust mass; multi-epoch brightness tracking to detect variability.

If this is right

Grain growth to tens of microns and dust masses of hundreds of Earth masses can already be present inside class 0/I disks.
Lower spectral indices along outflow directions can arise from cold envelope dust obscuring warmer inner material.
Millimeter continuum can vary on minute timescales when magnetic activity occurs in the protostar.
Extended structures around IRS1 may trace streamers or outflow-disk interactions that affect apparent disk properties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If similar spectral-index gradients appear in other embedded sources, grain growth may be a common early-stage process rather than a later one.
Repeated short-cadence observations could test whether the flares correlate with accretion-rate changes or X-ray bursts.
Higher-resolution data might separate the contributions of envelope obscuration from true radial grain-size changes.

Load-bearing premise

The observed spectral indices are taken to reflect dust grain properties and optical depth without major contributions from calibration errors or other emission processes, and the brightness changes are taken to be intrinsic rather than artifacts.

What would settle it

A new set of 1.2-3 mm observations that recovers a flat or inverted spectral-index map for IRS3 or shows no brightness change in IRS2 on 420-second timescales would falsify the reported grain sizes and flare interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22489 by A. Isella, A. L\'opez-Sepulcre, A. Miotello, A. Rimola, B. Lefloch, B. Svoboda, C. Ceccarelli, C. Codella, C. J. Chandler, C. Vastel, D. Fedele, D. Johnstone, D. Segura-Cox, E. Bianchi, E. Caux, E. Herbst, F. Dulieu, F. Fontani, F. Menard, F. O. Alves, G. Moellenbrock, G. Sabatini, H. Baobab Liu, H. Nomura, I. Jim\'enez-Serra, J. Pineda, L. Cacciapuoti, L. Evans, L. Loinard, L. Podio, L. Testi, L. T. Maud, M. Bouvier, M. De Simone, M. J. Maureira, N. Balucani, N. Cuello, N. Sakai, N. Watanabe, P. Caselli, Q. Yang, S. Charnley, S. Feng, S. Ohashi, S. Viti, S. Yamamoto, T. Hama, T. Hanawa, T. Hirota, T. Sakai, Y. Aikawa, Y. Oba, Y. Okoda, Y. Oya, Y. Shirley, Y. Watanabe, Y. Zhang, Z. E. Zhang.

Figure 1. Figure 1: The continuum images obtained by combining the ALMA 12 m and 7 m arrays, using Briggs weighting of 2.0 to enhance the recovery of more extended emissions. Graymap shows the primary beam uncorrected continuum emission at 1.2 mm (Setup2), while the 3σ black contour shows the extend structure and cyan contours overlay emissions ranging of [5, 50, 100, 200]×σ (σ = 47.6 µJy beam−1 ) for the compact region to … view at source ↗

Figure 2. Figure 2: Graymap displays a zoomed-in view of the primary beam corrected continuum emission towards IRS3 and IRS1 at 1.2 mm (Setup2), 1.3 mm (Setup1) and 3.0 mm (Setup3). The phase center (0,0) position is at coordinate according to Table A.2. (a)-(f) Using the same contours as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Figure 3. Figure 3: Spatial distribution of the 106–218 GHz spectral index (α106−218GHz; color) and the 218 GHz intensity distribution (contours). All images were generated with circular beams with FWHM= 0 ′′ .6. Contour levels are 276 µJy beam−1 (3-σ) ×[1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256]. The red and blue dashed arrows indicate the redshifted and blueshifted outflows traced by CCH (N = 3–2, J = 7/2–5/2, F = 4–3 and 3–2) emiss… view at source ↗

Figure 4. Figure 4: Images of IRS2 at 1.2 mm with the time bin of 1 minute and the first and last frames having time bins of 98 s and 82 s, respectively. Red cross denote the IRS2 at center of α2000 = 16h26m22s.39, δ2000 = −24◦22′53′′ .51, and the yellow dashed circle has the radius of 1′′ .5. Sky-blue ellipses in the lower-left corner of each panel represent the synthesized beam (1′′ .39 × 1 ′′ .11, PA = -83.8◦ ). nents. Sin… view at source ↗

Figure 5. Figure 5: 1.2 mm light curve of IRS2, integrated from the 1′′ .5 circular region (yellow dashed circle in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

Figure 6. Figure 6: The observed spectral energy distributions (SED; symbols), overplotted with the predictions from our simplified SED model (solid lines. We quote the observations reported in Dzib et al. (2013); Kirk et al. (2017); Coutens et al. (2019). The data points show in full circle, and the inverted triangle denote the upper limit. In the following, we discuss these three possibilities based on a simple SED model th… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

To advance our understanding of dust properties in class 0/I young stellar objects, it is crucial to resolve their structures at multiple wavelengths and investigate how grain growth and environmental effects shape their spectral properties. We present 0.5 arcsec resolution ALMA observations of the GSS 30 complex at 1.2-3.0 mm from the FAUST large programme, achieving a linear resolution of 69 au. We analyse the dust continuum emission and perform modelling to constrain dust properties and disk structures. For IRS3, the spectral index increases radially from 2.0 at the centre to 2.5 at the disk edge, while decreasing to 1.6-1.8 along the outflow direction. The asymmetric low-alpha region towards the northeastern blueshifted lobe may result from cold outer envelope dust obscuring warmer inner regions. SED fitting suggests maximum grain sizes of tens of microns and a dust mass of 650-1510 M_earth. IRS1 is associated with an extended north-eastern structure, which may represent an outflow-disk complex, a trailing structure linked to a circumbinary disk, or a gas streamer accreting onto IRS1. The central IRS1 shows alpha < 0.8, consistent with marginally optically thick free-free emission. IRS2 displays brightness variations over 420 s, and multi-epoch comparison suggests a flare lasting tens of minutes, likely caused by magnetic activity in the protostar. Our results highlight the importance of environmental effects, including dust obscuration and streamer structures, in shaping the observed properties of young disks, and reveal millimetre variability associated with possible protostellar magnetic flares.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

New ALMA maps and a short-timescale variability detection in GSS 30 are the real additions here, but the grain-size fit for IRS3 runs into the exact spectral-index problem the stress-test flags.

read the letter

The paper's main value is the 0.5-arcsec ALMA continuum data at 1.2-3 mm on three class 0/I sources, plus the multi-epoch coverage that caught brightness changes in IRS2 over 420 seconds. That variability, compared across epochs and interpreted as a possible magnetic flare, is new for these objects and worth noting. The radial spectral-index map for IRS3 (rising from 2.0 at center to 2.5 at edge) and the very low central alpha in IRS1 are also fresh measurements from the FAUST program.

The SED modeling that yields maximum grain sizes of tens of microns and 650-1510 Earth masses of dust for IRS3 is the main interpretive step. The authors correctly flag environmental effects like possible obscuration along the outflow and streamer-like structures around IRS1.

The soft spot is exactly the one in the stress-test note. An observed central alpha of 2.0 is hard to reconcile with a_max of only tens of microns under standard optically thin assumptions, because that would normally give beta around 1-1.7 and alpha closer to 3. The fit therefore requires the radiative-transfer model to produce high enough central optical depth to flatten the spectrum. The abstract does not show that this is demonstrated, so any underestimate of temperature or overestimate of density would push the inferred grain size too low. The variability claim also rests on limited epochs and would benefit from explicit checks against calibration or imaging artifacts.

This is a targeted observational paper on one small region. People already working on GSS 30 or on mm variability in embedded protostars will get direct use from the maps and light curve. It does not claim a broad new framework, so its audience is narrow.

I would send it to peer review. The data are new and the analysis is transparent enough that referees can test the optical-depth and variability interpretations directly.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents 0.5-arcsec ALMA observations at 1.2-3.0 mm of the GSS 30 complex from the FAUST program. It derives spectral indices for three embedded sources, reports a radial increase from 2.0 to 2.5 in IRS3 with SED fitting that yields a_max of tens of microns and dust mass 650-1510 M_earth, interprets IRS1's central alpha < 0.8 as marginally optically thick free-free emission, and attributes IRS2 brightness variations over 420 s to protostellar magnetic flares, while noting environmental effects such as outflow obscuration and possible streamers.

Significance. If the radiative-transfer modeling is shown to produce the required central optical depths, the work supplies useful multi-wavelength constraints on grain growth in Class 0/I disks and reports a rare mm-wavelength variability detection. The new high-resolution data and emphasis on environmental influences are positive contributions to the field.

major comments (1)

[Abstract / SED fitting section] Abstract and modeling section: the central spectral index ~2.0 for IRS3 is reconciled with a_max of only tens of microns only if the fitted model produces tau ≳ 1 at the wavelengths used; the manuscript does not report the derived central optical-depth values or perform the necessary sensitivity tests on temperature/density structure, leaving the grain-size inference vulnerable to the alternative explanation of larger grains (beta ~ 0) in the optically thin limit.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract should state the exact frequency pairs or bands used to compute the reported spectral indices.
[Modeling / results section] Clarify whether the quoted dust mass assumes a standard gas-to-dust ratio and list the opacity model (e.g., astronomical silicate) adopted in the SED fits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's positive assessment of our work and their recommendation for major revision. We address the single major comment below by agreeing to include additional details from our modeling to support the grain growth interpretation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / SED fitting section] Abstract and modeling section: the central spectral index ~2.0 for IRS3 is reconciled with a_max of only tens of microns only if the fitted model produces tau ≳ 1 at the wavelengths used; the manuscript does not report the derived central optical-depth values or perform the necessary sensitivity tests on temperature/density structure, leaving the grain-size inference vulnerable to the alternative explanation of larger grains (beta ~ 0) in the optically thin limit.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. Upon re-examination of our radiative transfer modeling, the best-fit models do indeed yield central optical depths τ ≳ 1 at both 1.2 mm and 3.0 mm for IRS3, which supports the interpretation that the observed spectral index of ~2.0 arises in the optically thick regime for maximum grain sizes of tens of microns rather than requiring β ≈ 0 in the thin limit. In the revised version of the manuscript, we will explicitly report these central optical depth values and include a brief discussion of the sensitivity of the results to assumptions about the temperature and density structure. This addition will strengthen the robustness of our grain-size conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new observations and independent SED modeling

full rationale

The paper reports fresh ALMA continuum maps at 1.2-3 mm, directly measures radial spectral-index profiles from those maps, and then performs standard radiative-transfer SED fitting to the observed fluxes and indices to constrain a_max and dust mass. None of the load-bearing steps (spectral-index extraction, optical-depth inference, or grain-size fitting) reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs or to a self-citation chain; the modeling assumptions are stated explicitly and the results remain falsifiable against the raw visibilities. No self-definitional, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or uniqueness-imported-from-authors patterns appear.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard dust modeling assumptions and fitting procedures common in the field.

free parameters (2)

maximum grain size = tens of microns
Derived from SED fitting for IRS3
dust mass = 650-1510 M_earth
From modeling

axioms (2)

domain assumption Dust opacity models link spectral index to grain size distribution
Standard assumption in interpreting mm continuum emission
domain assumption Brightness variations over short timescales indicate intrinsic source variability
Assumed for attributing to magnetic flares

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6138 in / 1252 out tokens · 30068 ms · 2026-06-26T09:53:33.326995+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references

[1]

E., Sz˝ ucs, L., et al

Agurto-Gangas, C., Pineda, J. E., Sz˝ ucs, L., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A147 ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C. L., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, L3

2019
[2]

O., Girart, J

Alves, F. O., Girart, J. M., Caselli, P., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, L3

2017
[3]

& Montmerle, T

Andre, P. & Montmerle, T. 1994, ApJ, 420, 837

1994
[4]

M., Huang, J., Pérez, L

Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, L41

2018
[5]

2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

Bae, J., Isella, A., Zhu, Z., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y . Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 423

2023
[6]

2016, ARA&A, 54, 491

Bally, J. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 491

2016
[7]

Beckwith, S. V . W. & Sargent, A. I. 1991, ApJ, 381, 250

1991
[8]

Beckwith, S. V . W., Sargent, A. I., Chini, R. S., & Guesten, R. 1990, AJ, 99, 924

1990
[9]

2015, A&A, 581, A119

Beuther, H., Henning, T., Linz, H., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A119

2015
[10]

D., Linz, H., et al

Beuther, H., Soler, J. D., Linz, H., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 168

2020
[11]

P., Zhu, Z., et al

Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., Zhu, Z., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, L45

2018
[12]

Bjerkeli, P., van der Wiel, M. H. D., Harsono, D., Ramsey, J. P., & Jørgensen, J. K. 2016, Nature, 540, 406

2016
[13]

A., et al

Bontemps, S., André, P., Kaas, A. A., et al. 2001, A&A, 372, 173

2001
[14]

2021, A&A, 653, A117

Bouvier, M., López-Sepulcre, A., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 653, A117

2021
[15]

2017, A&A, 604, A52

Bracco, A., Palmeirim, P., André, P., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A52

2017
[16]

J., et al

Cacciapuoti, L., Macias, E., Maury, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A4

2023
[17]

J., et al

Cacciapuoti, L., Testi, L., Maury, A. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A188

2025
[18]

2024b, ApJ, 961, 90 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al

Cacciapuoti, L., Testi, L., Podio, L., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 961, 90 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501

2022
[19]

C., Ladd, E

Chen, H., Myers, P. C., Ladd, E. F., & Wood, D. O. S. 1995, ApJ, 445, 377

1995
[20]

P., Launhardt, R., & Henning, T

Chen, X. P., Launhardt, R., & Henning, T. 2007, A&A, 475, 277

2007
[21]

2014, ApJ, 785, L12

Christiaens, V ., Casassus, S., Perez, S., van der Plas, G., & Ménard, F. 2014, ApJ, 785, L12

2014
[22]

M., Gurwell, M

Chung, C.-Y ., Andrews, S. M., Gurwell, M. A., et al. 2024, ApJS, 273, 29

2024
[23]

2021, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8, 227

Codella, C., Ceccarelli, C., Chandler, C., et al. 2021, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8, 227

2021
[24]

B., Jiménez-Serra, I., et al

Coutens, A., Liu, H. B., Jiménez-Serra, I., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A58

2019
[25]

A., Teague, R., et al

Czekala, I., Loomis, R. A., Teague, R., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 2

2021
[26]

Dolidze, M. V . & Arakelyan, M. A. 1959, Soviet Ast., 3, 434

1959
[27]

B., Cuello, N., et al

Dong, R., Liu, H. B., Cuello, N., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 331

2022
[28]

Draine, B. T. 2006, ApJ, 636, 1114

2006
[29]

A., Loinard, L., Mioduszewski, A

Dzib, S. A., Loinard, L., Mioduszewski, A. J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 63

2013
[30]

Elias, J. H. 1978, ApJ, 224, 453

1978
[31]

L., Evans, II, N

Enoch, M. L., Evans, II, N. J., Sargent, A. I., & Glenn, J. 2009, ApJ, 692, 973

2009
[32]

Friesen, R. K. & Jarvis, E. 2024, ApJ, 969, 70

2024
[33]

K., Pon, A., Bourke, T

Friesen, R. K., Pon, A., Bourke, T. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 158

2018
[34]

J., Valdivia, V ., et al

Galametz, M., Maury, A. J., Valdivia, V ., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A5 Galván-Madrid, R., Liu, H. B., Izquierdo, A. F., et al. 2018, ApJ, 868, 39

2019
[35]

M., et al

Gieser, C., Caselli, P., Segura-Cox, D. M., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A165

2025
[36]

L., Strom, K

Grasdalen, G. L., Strom, K. M., & Strom, S. E. 1973, ApJ, 184, L53

1973
[37]

D., Evans, II, N

Green, J. D., Evans, II, N. J., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 123 Güdel, M. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 217

2013
[38]

V ., Ramos, A., et al

Harsono, D., Persson, M. V ., Ramos, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A26

2020
[39]

J., Brown, J

Herczeg, G. J., Brown, J. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Pontoppidan, K. M. 2011, A&A, 533, A112

2011
[40]

Hildebrand, R. H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267

1983
[41]

Hull, C. L. H. & Zhang, Q. 2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, 3

2019
[42]

2003, PASJ, 55, 653

Imanishi, K., Nakajima, H., Tsujimoto, M., Koyama, K., & Tsuboi, Y . 2003, PASJ, 55, 653

2003
[43]

D., & Evans, II, N

Je, H., Lee, J.-E., Lee, S., Green, J. D., & Evans, II, N. J. 2015, ApJS, 217, 6 Jørgensen, J. K., Bourke, T. L., Myers, P. C., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 479 Jørgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., Visser, R., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 861

2015
[44]

& van Moorsel, G

Jorsater, S. & van Moorsel, G. A. 1995, AJ, 110, 2037

1995
[45]

M., Di Francesco, J., et al

Kirk, H., Dunham, M. M., Di Francesco, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838, 114

2017
[46]

B., Lai, S.-P., et al

Ko, C.-L., Liu, H. B., Lai, S.-P., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 172

2020
[47]

G., Maureira, M

Kong, S., Arce, H. G., Maureira, M. J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 104

2019
[48]

M., Matzner, C

Kratter, K. M., Matzner, C. D., Krumholz, M. R., & Klein, R. I. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1585

2010
[49]

Lee, C.-F., Ho, P. T. P., Li, Z.-Y ., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0152

2017
[50]

A., Feigelson, E

Leous, J. A., Feigelson, E. D., Andre, P., & Montmerle, T. 1991, ApJ, 379, 683

1991
[51]

I.-H., Liu, H

Li, J. I.-H., Liu, H. B., Hasegawa, Y ., & Hirano, N. 2017, ApJ, 840, 72

2017
[52]

W., et al

Li, S., Sanhueza, P., Lee, C. W., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 165

2022
[53]

2023, ApJ, 949, 109

Li, S., Sanhueza, P., Zhang, Q., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, 109

2023
[54]

B., Li, D., et al

Lin, Y ., Liu, H. B., Li, D., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 32

2016
[55]

Liu, H. B. 2019, ApJ, 877, L22

2019
[56]

B., Dunham, M

Liu, H. B., Dunham, M. M., Pascucci, I., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A54

2018
[57]

B., Galván-Madrid, R., Forbrich, J., et al

Liu, H. B., Galván-Madrid, R., Forbrich, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 155

2014
[58]

B., Mérand, A., Green, J

Liu, H. B., Mérand, A., Green, J. D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 97

2019
[59]

B., Takami, M., Kudo, T., et al

Liu, H. B., Takami, M., Kudo, T., et al. 2016, Science Advances, 2, e1500875

2016
[60]

2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 943556

Liu, J., Zhang, Q., & Qiu, K. 2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 943556

2022
[61]

2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 837

Lu, X., Li, G.-X., Zhang, Q., & Lin, Y . 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 837

2022
[62]

Machida, M. N. & Hosokawa, T. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1719

2013
[63]

Mamajek, E. E. 2008, Astronomische Nachrichten, 329, 10

2008
[64]

M., et al

Massi, M., Forbrich, J., Menten, K. M., et al. 2006, A&A, 453, 959

2006
[65]

J., Pineda, J

Maureira, M. J., Pineda, J. E., Liu, H. B., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, L5

2024
[66]

2024, A&A, 686, A253

Mauxion, J., Lesur, G., & Maret, S. 2024, A&A, 686, A253

2024
[67]

Mezger, P. G. & Henderson, A. P. 1967, ApJ, 147, 471

1967
[68]

M., Pérez, L

Miley, J. M., Pérez, L. M., Agurto-Gangas, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 11

2025
[69]

2014, A&A, 567, A32

Miotello, A., Testi, L., Lodato, G., et al. 2014, A&A, 567, A32

2014
[70]

M., van Dishoeck, E

Murillo, N. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., Hacar, A., Harsono, D., & Jørgensen, J. K. 2022, A&A, 658, A53

2022
[71]

A., Hashimoto, J., et al

Muto, T., Grady, C. A., Hashimoto, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, L22

2012
[72]

B., Ohashi, S., et al

Nakatani, R., Liu, H. B., Ohashi, S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, L2 Öberg, K. I., Guzmán, V . V ., Walsh, C., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 1

2020
[73]

J., Jørgensen, J

Ohashi, N., Tobin, J. J., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 8 Ortiz-León, G. N., Loinard, L., Dzib, S. A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, L33 Ortiz-León, G. N., Loinard, L., Kounkel, M. A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 141

2023
[74]

& Fissel, L

Pattle, K. & Fissel, L. 2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, 15

2019
[75]

E., Segura-Cox, D., Caselli, P., et al

Pineda, J. E., Segura-Cox, D., Caselli, P., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1158 Planck Collaboration XIV, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2014, A&A, 564, A45

2020
[76]

& Cornwell, T

Rau, U. & Cornwell, T. J. 2011, A&A, 532, A71

2011
[77]

Reynolds, S. P. 1986, ApJ, 304, 713

1986
[78]

J., et al

Sabatini, G., Bianchi, E., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, L16

2025
[79]

2024, A&A, 684, L12

Sabatini, G., Podio, L., Codella, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, L12

2024
[80]

I., Stephens, I

Sadavoy, S. I., Stephens, I. W., Myers, P. C., et al. 2019, ApJS, 245, 2

2019

Showing first 80 references.