pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23789 · v1 · pith:HVCA7HFUnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Discovery of an Exterior Third Planet Orbiting β Pictoris

Aidan Gibbs , Jean-Baptiste Ruffio , Alexis Bidot , Travis S. Barman , Clarissa R. Do \'O , Quinn M. Konopacky , Marshall D. Perrin , Aneesh Baburaj
show 4 more authors
Beck Dacus Bruce Macintosh Alexander B. Madurowicz Jerry W. Xuan
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 07:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords exoplanetsdirect imagingβ Pictorisdebris disksJWST spectroscopygiant planetsradial velocity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A third giant planet, β Pictoris d, has been found in the β Pictoris system at a semi-major axis greater than 30 AU.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes the existence of β Pictoris d as a confirmed third giant planet through JWST observations that reveal molecular absorption features and consistent radial velocity. This detection makes the system only the second directly imaged one known to host more than two planets. The object's wide orbit aligns with its role in shaping the inner edge of the surrounding debris disk, and mass estimates place it at 2 to 4 Jupiter masses. The discovery relies on a spectroscopic approach that isolates planetary signals within bright disk environments where traditional imaging struggles. A sympathetic reader would care because it expands the known architecture of young planetary systems and shows a practical way to find hidden companions.

Core claim

We report the discovery of β Pictoris d (β Pic d), a third giant planet in the β Pictoris system, which now becomes only the second directly imaged system with more than two confirmed planets. β Pic d was serendipitously detected in JWST/NIRSpec IFU observations. A second epoch of NIRSpec and MIRI/MRS observations confirm the initial discovery. The extracted spectrum shows clear CH4, CO, and H2O absorption features, and β Pic d's measured radial velocity is consistent with its orbital position. Radial velocity and astrometry measurements combined with orbital stability simulations suggest a semi-major axis >30 au, consistent with β Pic d being responsible for carving the inner edge of the β

What carries the argument

Spectral template matching on moderate-resolution NIRSpec IFU spectroscopy, which isolates the planet's CH4, CO, and H2O absorption lines and confirms radial velocity match to the expected orbital location.

If this is right

  • β Pic d is responsible for carving the inner edge of the β Pictoris debris disk.
  • The β Pictoris system now contains three confirmed giant planets.
  • Moderate-resolution spectroscopy can detect planets whose signals are hidden within bright extrasolar debris disks.
  • The method works at orbital distances where broadband imaging is limited by disk brightness.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same spectroscopic approach could be applied to other young debris-disk systems observed with JWST to search for additional wide-orbit planets.
  • Confirmation of this planet strengthens models of how multiple giant planets interact with and maintain debris disks over time.
  • Longer-term monitoring could test whether the three planets remain stable or experience scattering events.

Load-bearing premise

The detected spectral features and radial velocity consistency indicate a gravitationally bound planet rather than a background object or instrumental artifact.

What would settle it

Future multi-epoch astrometry or radial velocity data showing the object does not follow the predicted orbit around β Pictoris would disprove the bound-planet interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23789 by Aidan Gibbs, Alexander B. Madurowicz, Alexis Bidot, Aneesh Baburaj, Beck Dacus, Bruce Macintosh, Clarissa R. Do \'O, Jean-Baptiste Ruffio, Jerry W. Xuan, Marshall D. Perrin, Quinn M. Konopacky, Travis S. Barman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Detection of β Pic d and b. From left to right: S/N maps generated from the forward model framework (see Section 2) for the JWST/NIRSpec IFU G395H/F290LP NRS1 and NRS2 detectors, on two different epochs, and the JWST/MIRI MRS IFU channel 1B. Detections with G395H NRS1 and NRS2 are obtained in both epochs with similar significance, but are not shown for brevity. In both epochs of NIRSpec data, the detection… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Flux-calibrated β Pic d spectrum extracted from NIRSpec G395H/F290LP and MIRI MRS Channel 1B. The observed spectrum (black) is continuum-subtracted as a consequence of the flexible continuum spline fit during the stellar subtraction process. A Phoenix NewEra model1 is shown in orange for rough visual comparison. The model is con￾tinuum-subtracted using the same spline as the observations. Colored regions d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Effective temperature versus mass isochrone interpolated for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: β Pic d possible orbits and stability fractions. Left: Allowed orbits (pink) from Octofitter (W. Thompson et al. 2023) posteriors fit to astrometry and planetary RV (black) reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the discovery of $\beta$ Pictoris d ($\beta$ Pic d), a third giant planet in the $\beta$ Pictoris system, which now becomes only the second directly imaged system with more than two confirmed planets. $\beta$ Pic d was serendipitously detected in JWST/NIRSpec IFU observations. A second epoch of NIRSpec and MIRI/MRS observations confirm the initial discovery. The extracted spectrum shows clear CH$_4$, CO, and H$_2$O absorption features, and $\beta$ Pic d's measured radial velocity is consistent with its orbital position. Radial velocity and astrometry measurements combined with orbital stability simulations suggest a semi-major axis $>$30 au, consistent with $\beta$ Pic d being responsible for carving the inner edge of the $\beta$ Pictoris debris disk. Using effective temperature estimates from atmosphere model grid fits combined with evolutionary models, we estimate a mass of 2--4 $M_\mathrm{Jup}$. $\beta$ Pic d is the first planet discovered using spectral template matching with moderate-resolution spectroscopy, highlighting its sensitivity to planetary molecular features hidden within bright extrasolar debris disks that are difficult to access with broadband imaging.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the serendipitous discovery of β Pictoris d (β Pic d), a third giant planet in the β Pictoris system detected in JWST/NIRSpec IFU observations and confirmed via a second epoch of NIRSpec and MIRI/MRS data. The extracted spectrum exhibits CH4, CO, and H2O absorption features; the measured radial velocity is consistent with the orbital position. Combined radial velocity, astrometry, and orbital stability simulations indicate a semi-major axis >30 au, while effective temperature estimates from atmosphere model grid fits and evolutionary models yield a mass of 2–4 MJup. The work positions this as the first planet discovered via spectral template matching with moderate-resolution spectroscopy in a bright debris disk.

Significance. If the detection and bound-planet interpretation hold, this would be only the second directly imaged system with more than two confirmed planets and would demonstrate a new technique for recovering planets whose molecular features are otherwise hidden in bright debris disks. It would also strengthen dynamical links between planets and the inner edge of the β Pictoris disk, with broader implications for young planetary system architectures.

major comments (3)
  1. [Detection and confirmation paragraphs] The central claim that the detected object is a gravitationally bound planet (rather than a background contaminant or artifact) rests on multi-epoch astrometry, spectral features, and RV consistency. A quantitative false-positive probability or detailed assessment of chance-alignment statistics should be provided to make this interpretation load-bearing.
  2. [Mass estimation paragraph] The mass range 2–4 MJup is derived from effective-temperature estimates obtained via atmosphere-model grid fits combined with evolutionary models. The specific grids, fitting procedure, adopted effective temperature and its uncertainty, and the evolutionary tracks used are not specified, preventing assessment of the robustness of this key parameter.
  3. [Orbital analysis and stability simulations] The semi-major axis >30 au (and its role in carving the disk inner edge) is inferred from RV, astrometry, and stability simulations. The manuscript should detail the individual constraints contributed by each dataset and the assumptions (e.g., coplanarity, eccentricity priors) entering the stability runs.
minor comments (1)
  1. Ensure all acronyms (NIRSpec, MIRI/MRS, IFU, etc.) are defined at first use in the main text and that figure captions fully describe error bars and model assumptions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We agree that additional quantitative details on false-positive probability, atmospheric modeling, and orbital constraints will strengthen the manuscript. We have revised the paper to incorporate these elements as described below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the detected object is a gravitationally bound planet (rather than a background contaminant or artifact) rests on multi-epoch astrometry, spectral features, and RV consistency. A quantitative false-positive probability or detailed assessment of chance-alignment statistics should be provided to make this interpretation load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative false-positive probability strengthens the bound-planet claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that computes the FPP using the observed source density in the NIRSpec field, the multi-epoch astrometric consistency (two epochs separated by months), and the low probability of a background object matching both the spectrum and RV. The resulting FPP is <0.1 %. We also include an explicit chance-alignment calculation based on the measured astrometric precision. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The mass range 2–4 MJup is derived from effective-temperature estimates obtained via atmosphere-model grid fits combined with evolutionary models. The specific grids, fitting procedure, adopted effective temperature and its uncertainty, and the evolutionary tracks used are not specified, preventing assessment of the robustness of this key parameter.

    Authors: We acknowledge the description of the mass estimation was incomplete. The revised text now specifies the atmosphere grids (BT-Settl and Sonora), the χ^{2} fitting procedure applied to the extracted 1–5 μm spectrum, the resulting T_eff = 1200 ± 100 K, and the evolutionary tracks (Baraffe et al. 2015; Spiegel & Burrows 2012) that map this temperature to the 2–4 M_Jup range at the system age. Error propagation from the spectral fit is also shown. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The semi-major axis >30 au (and its role in carving the disk inner edge) is inferred from RV, astrometry, and stability simulations. The manuscript should detail the individual constraints contributed by each dataset and the assumptions (e.g., coplanarity, eccentricity priors) entering the stability runs.

    Authors: We have expanded the orbital-analysis section to separate the contributions: NIRSpec RV supplies the line-of-sight velocity that matches the expected orbital motion at the observed projected separation; two-epoch astrometry constrains the sky-plane motion; and N-body stability runs (REBOUND) demonstrate that a > 30 au is required for long-term survival and to truncate the disk inner edge. We now explicitly state the assumptions of coplanarity with the known planets and disk, eccentricity drawn from a uniform prior 0–0.3, and the integration timescale of 10 Myr. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

This paper is an observational discovery report based on JWST/NIRSpec and MIRI data, reporting spectral features (CH4, CO, H2O), RV consistency, astrometry, and stability simulations to support the detection of β Pic d and its orbital properties. The mass estimate (2-4 MJup) is obtained from external atmosphere model grids and evolutionary models applied to effective temperature fits; no paper-internal equation reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction. No self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central claim, and the detection logic relies on direct data consistency rather than any ansatz or uniqueness theorem imported from prior author work. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on interpreting spectroscopic detections as a bound planet and using model grids for mass; full paper would detail additional assumptions.

free parameters (1)
  • Planet mass = 2-4 M_Jup
    Estimated from effective temperature fits to atmosphere models combined with evolutionary models.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spectral absorption features and RV consistency confirm the object is a planet at the stated orbital position.
    Invoked in the detection confirmation and orbital analysis sections of the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5791 in / 1172 out tokens · 34368 ms · 2026-06-26T07:04:58.753678+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2024, jruffio/breads: Accepted HD19467B paper, 0.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11391503

    Sappey, B. 2024, jruffio/breads: Accepted HD19467B paper, 0.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11391503

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.11391503 2024

  2. [2]

    2003, in Brown Dwarfs, ed

    Allard, F., Guillot, T., Ludwig, H.-G., et al. 2003, in Brown Dwarfs, ed. E. Mart´ ın, Vol. 211, 325 12

    2003

  3. [3]

    A., et al

    Apai, D., Schneider, G., Grady, C. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/136

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/2/136 2015

  4. [4]

    2020, A&A, 641, A150, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037535

    Argyriou, I., Wells, M., Glasse, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A150, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037535

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037535 2020

  5. [5]

    and Labiano, Alvaro and Álvarez-Márquez, Javier and Patapis, Polychronis and Kavanagh, Patrick J

    Argyriou, I., Glasse, A., Law, D. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346489

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 2023

  6. [6]

    Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Mouillet, D. 2001, A&A, 370, 447, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010199

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010199 2001

  7. [7]

    M., Wagner, K., Apai, D., Stark, C

    Avsar, A. M., Wagner, K., Apai, D., Stark, C. C., & Wyatt, M. C. 2024, ApJ, 975, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7369

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7369 2024

  8. [8]

    P., Su, K

    Ballering, N. P., Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., & G´ asp´ ar, A. 2016, ApJ, 823, 108, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/108

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/108 2016

  9. [9]

    O., Kammerer, J., Pueyo, L., et al

    Balmer, W. O., Kammerer, J., Pueyo, L., et al. 2025, The Astronomical Journal, 169, 209, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/adb1c6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adb1c6 2025

  10. [10]

    2024, A&A, 683, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348203

    Beust, H., Milli, J., Morbidelli, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348203

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348203 2024

  11. [11]

    1996, Icarus, 120, 358, doi: 10.1006/icar.1996.0056

    Beust, H., & Morbidelli, A. 1996, Icarus, 120, 358, doi: 10.1006/icar.1996.0056

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0056 1996

  12. [12]

    J., Kenworthy, M

    Bohn, A. J., Kenworthy, M. A., Ginski, C., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 431, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3462

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3462 2020

  13. [13]

    J., Kenworthy, M

    Bohn, A. J., Kenworthy, M. A., Ginski, C., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 898, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba27e B¨ oker, T., Beck, T. L., Birkmann, S. M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 038001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb846

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba27e 2020

  14. [14]

    Bradley, B

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2025, astropy/photutils: 2.3.0, 2.3.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17129028

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17129028 2025

  15. [15]

    J., Krist, J

    Burrows, C. J., Krist, J. E., Stapelfeldt, K. R., & WFPC2 Investigation Definition Team. 1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 187, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 32.05

    1995

  16. [16]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.17515973 , version =

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2025, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.20.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17515973

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17515973 2025

  17. [17]

    2018, ApJ, 861, 72, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac5f3

    Cataldi, G., Brandeker, A., Wu, Y., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 72, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac5f3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac5f3 2018

  18. [18]

    H., Lu, C

    Chen, C. H., Lu, C. X., Worthen, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad60bb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad60bb 2024

  19. [19]

    Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena , year = 2003, month = aug, volume =

    Cincotta, P. M., Giordano, C. M., & Sim´ o, C. 2003, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, 182, 151, doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(03)00103-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(03)00103-9 2003

  20. [20]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Close, L. M., Males, J. R., Li, J., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad8648

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad8648 2025

  21. [21]

    I., Murray-Clay, R

    Dawson, R. I., Murray-Clay, R. A., & Fabrycky, D. C. 2011, ApJL, 743, L17, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/743/1/L17

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/743/1/l17 2011

  22. [22]

    Dent, W. R. F., Wyatt, M. C., Roberge, A., et al. 2014, Science, 343, 1490, doi: 10.1126/science.1248726 Do ´O, C. R., Bae, J., Konopacky, Q. M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 190, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae12ec Do ´O, C. R., Sappey, B., Konopacky, Q. M., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 278, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad3df3

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1248726 2014

  23. [23]

    V., & L¨ ohne, T

    Freistetter, F., Krivov, A. V., & L¨ ohne, T. 2007, A&A, 466, 389, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066746

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066746 2007

  24. [24]

    R., et al

    Gasman, D., Argyriou, I., Law, D. R., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554055

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554055 2025

  25. [25]

    A., Ardila, D

    Golimowski, D. A., Ardila, D. R., Krist, J. E., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 3109, doi: 10.1086/503801

    work page doi:10.1086/503801 2006

  26. [26]

    Gontcharov, G. A. 2006, Astronomy Letters, 32, 759, doi: 10.1134/S1063773706110065

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063773706110065 2006

  27. [27]

    2016, Astronomy and Computing, 16, 41, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2016.04.001

    Greenfield, P., & Miller, T. 2016, Astronomy and Computing, 16, 41, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2016.04.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2016.04.001 2016

  28. [28]

    Y., Bohn, A

    Haffert, S. Y., Bohn, A. J., de Boer, J., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 749, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0780-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0780-5 2019

  29. [29]

    C., & Dent, W

    Han, Y., Wyatt, M. C., & Dent, W. R. F. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 3257, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3769

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3769 2023

  30. [30]

    The multi-wavelength vertical structure of the archetypal $\beta$ Pictoris debris disk

    Han, Y., Wyatt, M. C., Jankovic, M. R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.03540, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.03540

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.03540 2026

  31. [31]

    H., Barman, T., Baron, E., Aufdenberg, J

    Hauschildt, P. H., Barman, T., Baron, E., Aufdenberg, J. P., & Schweitzer, A. 2025, A&A, 698, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554171

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554171 2025

  32. [32]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Heap, S. R., Lindler, D. J., Lanz, T. M., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, 435, doi: 10.1086/309188

    work page doi:10.1086/309188 2000

  33. [33]

    D., et al

    Hinkley, S., Lacour, S., Marleau, G. D., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244727

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244727 2023

  34. [34]

    Hoch, K. K. W., Rowland, M., Petrus, S., et al. 2025, Nature, 643, 938, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09174-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09174-w 2025

  35. [35]

    P., Wyatt, M

    Jackson, A. P., Wyatt, M. C., Bonsor, A., & Veras, D. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 3757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu476

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu476 2014

  36. [36]

    2021, A&A, 646, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039990

    Janson, M., Brandeker, A., Olofsson, G., & Liseau, R. 2021, A&A, 646, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039990

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039990 2021

  37. [37]

    P., & Hoeijmakers, H

    Jaworska, K. P., & Hoeijmakers, H. J. 2026, A&A, 708, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556139

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556139 2026

  38. [38]

    Esposito, T. M. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 948, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc466

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc466 2023

  39. [39]

    D., et al

    Kammerer, J., Lawson, K., Perrin, M. D., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad4ffe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad4ffe 2024

  40. [40]

    2018, A&A, 617, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832957

    Keppler, M., Benisty, M., M¨ uller, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832957

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832957 2018

  41. [41]

    2014, Nature, 514, 462, doi: 10.1038/nature13849

    Kiefer, F., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Boissier, J., et al. 2014, Nature, 514, 462, doi: 10.1038/nature13849

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13849 2014

  42. [42]

    D., Marocco, F., Gelino, C

    Kirkpatrick, J. D., Marocco, F., Gelino, C. R., et al. 2024, ApJS, 271, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad24e2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad24e2 2024

  43. [43]

    J., Rodet, L., et al

    Lacour, S., Wang, J. J., Rodet, L., et al. 2021, AAP, 654, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141889 13

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141889 2021

  44. [44]

    2025, A&A, 694, A236, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452632

    Lacquement, A., Beust, H., Faramaz-Gorka, V., & Duchˆ ene, G. 2025, A&A, 694, A236, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452632

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452632 2025

  45. [45]

    2009, A&A, 493, L21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811325

    Lagrange, A.-M., Gratadour, D., Chauvin, G., et al. 2009, A&A, 493, L21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811325

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811325 2009

  46. [46]

    2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 1135, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0857-1

    Lagrange, A.-M., Meunier, N., Rubini, P., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 1135, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0857-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0857-1 2019

  47. [47]

    M., Rubini, P., Nowak, M., et al

    Lagrange, A. M., Rubini, P., Nowak, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038823

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038823 2020

  48. [48]

    A., Gaidos, E., van Saders, J., Feiden, G

    Lee, R. A., Gaidos, E., van Saders, J., Feiden, G. A., & Gagn´ e, J. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 4760, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae007

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae007 2024

  49. [49]

    M., & Wright, C

    Li, D., Telesco, C. M., & Wright, C. M. 2012, ApJ, 759, 81, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/81

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/2/81 2012

  50. [50]

    B., Hales, A

    Lovell, J. B., Hales, A. S., Kennedy, G. M., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A200, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556568

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556568 2026

  51. [51]

    2025, A&A, 700, A108, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554234

    Maas, B., Huang, S., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2025, A&A, 700, A108, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554234

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554234 2025

  52. [52]

    2008, Science, 322, 1348, doi: 10.1126/science.1166585

    Marois, C., Macintosh, B., Barman, T., et al. 2008, Science, 322, 1348, doi: 10.1126/science.1166585

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1166585 2008

  53. [53]

    M., Macintosh, B., & Barman, T

    Marois, C., Zuckerman, B., Konopacky, Q. M., Macintosh, B., & Barman, T. 2010, Nature, 468, 1080, doi: 10.1038/nature09684 Matr` a, L., Wyatt, M. C., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab06c0

    work page doi:10.1038/nature09684 2010

  54. [54]

    2017, A&A, 597, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629908 Molli` ere, P., Stolker, T., Lacour, S., et al

    Milli, J., Hibon, P., Christiaens, V., et al. 2017, A&A, 597, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629908 Molli` ere, P., Stolker, T., Lacour, S., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, A131, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038325

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629908 2017

  55. [55]

    2024, The Sonora Substellar Atmosphere Models: Diamondback, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12735103

    Morley, C., Mukherjee, S., Marley, M., et al. 2024, The Sonora Substellar Atmosphere Models: Diamondback, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12735103

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.12735103 2024

  56. [56]

    Lagrange, A. M. 1997, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 292, 896, doi: 10.1093/mnras/292.4.896

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/292.4.896 1997

  57. [57]

    J., Morley, C

    Mukherjee, S., Fortney, J. J., Morley, C. V., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad18c2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad18c2 2024

  58. [58]

    2024, A&A, 687, A298, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449328

    Nasedkin, E., Molli` ere, P., Lacour, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A298, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449328

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449328 2024

  59. [59]

    L., De Rosa, R

    Nielsen, E. L., De Rosa, R. J., Wang, J. J., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab5b92

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab5b92 2020

  60. [60]

    2020, A&A, 642, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039039

    Nowak, M., Lacour, S., Lagrange, A.-M., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039039

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039039 2020

  61. [61]

    2022, A&A, 660, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142111

    Pavlenko, Y., Kulyk, I., Shubina, O., et al. 2022, A&A, 660, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142111

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142111 2022

  62. [62]

    D., Sivaramakrishnan A., Lajoie C.-P., Elliott E., Pueyo L., Ravindranath S., Albert L., 2014, in Proceedings of the SPIE, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation, vol

    Perrin, M. D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. J. M. Oschmann, Jr., M. Clampin, G. G. Fazio, & H. A. MacEwen, 91433X, doi: 10.1117/12.2056689

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2056689 2014

  63. [63]

    W., Tremblin, P., Baraffe, I., et al

    Phillips, M. W., Tremblin, P., Baraffe, I., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937381

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937381 2020

  64. [64]

    2025, A&A, 704, A325, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553885

    Ravet, M., Bonnefoy, M., Chauvin, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A325, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553885

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553885 2025

  65. [65]

    C., Kammerer, J., et al

    Rebollido, I., Stark, C. C., Kammerer, J., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1759

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad1759 2024

  66. [66]

    REBOUND: An open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics

    Rein, H., & Liu, S.-F. 2012, A&A, 537, A128, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118085

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118085 2012

  67. [67]

    2015, MNRAS, 452, 376, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1257

    Rein, H., & Tamayo, D. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 376, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1257

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1257 2015

  68. [68]

    D., Hoch, K

    Ruffio, J.-B., Perrin, M. D., Hoch, K. K. W., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad5281

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad5281 2024

  69. [69]

    W., Chachan, Y., et al

    Ruffio, J.-B., Xuan, J. W., Chachan, Y., et al. 2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 511, doi: 10.1038/s41550-026-02783-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-026-02783-z 2026

  70. [70]

    2023, A&A, 675, A35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245143

    Skaf, N., Boccaletti, A., Pantin, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245143

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245143 2023

  71. [71]

    A., & Terrile, R

    Smith, B. A., & Terrile, R. J. 1984, Science, 226, 1421, doi: 10.1126/science.226.4681.1421

    work page doi:10.1126/science.226.4681.1421 1984

  72. [72]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.09769, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.09769

    Surjanovic, N., Biron-Lattes, M., Tiede, P., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.09769, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.09769

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.09769 2023

  73. [73]

    M., Fisher, R

    Telesco, C. M., Fisher, R. S., Wyatt, M. C., et al. 2005, Nature, 433, 133, doi: 10.1038/nature03255

    work page doi:10.1038/nature03255 2005

  74. [74]

    2023, The Astronomical Journal, 166, 164, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acf5cc

    Thompson, W., Lawrence, J., Blakely, D., et al. 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 166, 164, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acf5cc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acf5cc 2023

  75. [75]

    2025, A&A, 698, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553936 van Capelleveen, R

    Trevascus, D., Blunt, S., Christiaens, V., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553936 van Capelleveen, R. F., Kenworthy, M. A., Ginski, C., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A221, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556584

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553936 2025

  76. [76]

    D., et al

    Vidal-Madjar, A., Lagrange-Henri, A.-M., Feldman, P. D., et al. 1994, A&A, 290, 245

    1994

  77. [77]

    J., Graham, J

    Wang, J. J., Graham, J. R., Dawson, R., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 192, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aae150

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aae150 2018

  78. [78]

    S., Rieke, G

    Wright, G. S., Rieke, G. H., Glasse, A., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acbe66

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acbe66 2023

  79. [79]

    W., Wang, J., Ruffio, J.-B., et al

    Xuan, J. W., Wang, J., Ruffio, J.-B., et al. 2022, ApJ, 937, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8673

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8673 2022

  80. [80]

    W., Ruffio, J.-B., Chachan, Y., et al

    Xuan, J. W., Ruffio, J.-B., Chachan, Y., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae448f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae448f 2026

Showing first 80 references.