pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26878 · v1 · pith:7VKQ7BGYnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

The Emerging Population of High-energy Emitting Radio Galaxies

G. Bruni , V. S. Paliya , D. J. Saikia , L. Bassani , R. D. Baldi , E. Bronzini , F. D'Ammando , S. del Palacio
show 17 more authors
M. Kadler Y. Y. Kovalev D. V. Lal G. Migliori B. Mingo J. Moldon L. Ostorero F. Panessa M. Persic I. Prandoni L. Ricci T. Savolainen F. Shankar F. Tavecchio E. Traianou F. Ubertosi T. Venturi
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 04:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords radio galaxiesgamma-ray emissionactive galactic nucleiparticle accelerationjetsleptonic processesmisaligned AGN
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gamma-ray detections from misaligned radio galaxies indicate efficient particle acceleration occurs throughout the radio-loud AGN population.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines high-energy emission from radio galaxies as a way to connect accretion, jet formation, and particle acceleration in active galactic nuclei. Detections of gamma rays from misaligned sources such as compact symmetric objects, FR0 galaxies, FRI and FRII galaxies, and giant radio galaxies show that this acceleration is not restricted to blazars. The evidence supports a model in which synchrotron, synchrotron self-Compton, and external inverse-Compton processes act together across scales from the inner regions to the extended lobes. A possible hadronic contribution is noted in dense environments. The work points to how combined observations can map these processes and their effects on host galaxy evolution.

Core claim

The recent detection of gamma-ray emission from misaligned radio galaxies, including Compact Symmetric Objects, FR0, FRI/II, and Giant Radio Galaxies, demonstrates that efficient particle acceleration is not limited to blazars but occurs throughout the full radio-loud AGN population. This finding supports a unifying framework where leptonic synchrotron, synchrotron self-Compton, and external inverse-Compton processes coexist across multiple spatial scales, from the inner jet and corona to the extended lobes, possibly with a hadronic contribution in dense environments.

What carries the argument

The unifying framework in which leptonic synchrotron, synchrotron self-Compton, and external inverse-Compton processes coexist across multiple spatial scales from the inner jet to extended lobes.

If this is right

  • Particle acceleration operates in compact symmetric objects, FR0, FRI/II, and giant radio galaxies as well as blazars.
  • Leptonic processes dominate across inner jet, corona, and lobes, with possible hadronic input in dense regions.
  • Multi-scale mapping can connect central engine activity to large-scale energy release and host galaxy feedback.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the associations hold, similar acceleration physics would apply regardless of jet orientation to the line of sight.
  • The framework could be tested by checking whether gamma-ray variability correlates with changes in compact radio cores.
  • This view suggests radio galaxy lobes carry a larger share of the total AGN energy output than previously modeled.

Load-bearing premise

The gamma-ray sources must be correctly identified with the listed radio galaxies rather than chance alignments, background objects, or misclassifications.

What would settle it

A survey that finds the gamma-ray positions do not match the radio galaxy locations or reveals unrelated origins for the emissions would disprove the claimed population and associations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26878 by B. Mingo, D. J. Saikia, D. V. Lal, E. Bronzini, E. Traianou, F. D'Ammando, F. Panessa, F. Shankar, F. Tavecchio, F. Ubertosi, G. Bruni, G. Migliori, I. Prandoni, J. Moldon, L. Bassani, L. Ostorero, L. Ricci, M. Kadler, M. Persic, R. D. Baldi, S. del Palacio, T. Savolainen, T. Venturi, V. S. Paliya, Y. Y. Kovalev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Broadband SED of IGR J18249−3243 (adapted from Bruni et al. 2022). Orange and blue symbols in the radio frequency range represent the lobe and core flux densities, respectively. The grey line shows the average spectrum of the blazar 3C 273 normalized to the 5 GHz core flux of the target, serving as a reference for a typical beamed AGN spectrum. Dashed curves mark the individual model components (dotted for… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Sketch of the different radiative processes at play in radio galaxies: synchrotron and synchrotron self-Compton are predominant in the inner region of the jet, along with coronal emission in the X-ray band. In the lobes, inverse Compton off Galactic Foreground Light (GFL), External Background Light (EBL), and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is present. The typical physical scale (bottom ruler) spans from… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-energy emission from radio galaxies provides a unique laboratory to study the connection between accretion, jet formation, and particle acceleration in active galactic nuclei (AGN). The recent detection of $\gamma$-ray emission from misaligned radio galaxies - including Compact Symmetric Objects (CSOs), FR0, FRI/II, and even Giant Radio Galaxies (GRGs) - has shown that efficient particle acceleration is not limited to blazars, but occurs throughout the full radio-loud AGN population. This finding supports a unifying framework where leptonic synchrotron, synchrotron self-Compton (SSC), and external inverse-Compton (EIC) processes coexist across multiple spatial scales, from the inner jet and corona to the extended lobes, possibly with a hadronic contribution in dense environments. The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will be pivotal in advancing this field. SKA1-Low will detect and characterize diffuse, low-surface-brightness emission tracing aged plasma and jet duty cycles. SKA1-Mid will enable high-resolution spectral and polarimetric studies of compact jets and nuclear regions, while SKA-VLBI will connect parsec- to kiloparsec-scale structures, identifying the exact sites of high-energy dissipation. In synergy with forthcoming high-energy missions such as NewAthena and CTAO, SKA will provide the first spatially resolved, multi-scale view of particle acceleration and energy release in misaligned AGN, unveiling the physical link between the central engine and its large-scale feedback on the host galaxy evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that recent γ-ray detections from misaligned radio galaxies (CSOs, FR0, FRI/II, and GRGs) demonstrate efficient particle acceleration throughout the radio-loud AGN population, supporting a unifying multi-scale framework with coexisting leptonic (synchrotron, SSC, EIC) and possible hadronic processes. It positions the SKA (with SKA1-Low, SKA1-Mid, and SKA-VLBI) as key for future spatially resolved studies in synergy with NewAthena and CTAO.

Significance. If the source associations hold, the synthesis correctly highlights the extension of high-energy emission studies to the full radio-loud AGN population and the multi-scale nature of the emission sites. It appropriately flags SKA's capabilities for tracing aged plasma, jet duty cycles, and parsec-to-kiloparsec connections. As a descriptive perspective without new data, derivations, or modeling, its value lies in framing observational prospects rather than advancing quantitative predictions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of an 'emerging population' supporting a 'unifying framework' is load-bearing on the physical association of the cited γ-ray sources with the listed radio galaxy classes. The text states the detections as established facts and proceeds directly to the framework without referencing or presenting angular separation statistics, cross-match radii, or Monte-Carlo false-association probabilities needed to rule out chance alignments, background blazars, or misclassifications.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment on source associations. We address it directly below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen this foundation while preserving the perspective nature of the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of an 'emerging population' supporting a 'unifying framework' is load-bearing on the physical association of the cited γ-ray sources with the listed radio galaxy classes. The text states the detections as established facts and proceeds directly to the framework without referencing or presenting angular separation statistics, cross-match radii, or Monte-Carlo false-association probabilities needed to rule out chance alignments, background blazars, or misclassifications.

    Authors: We agree that robust justification of the associations is essential for the central claim. The detections referenced are drawn from published discovery papers on CSOs, FR0s, FRI/II, and GRGs, each of which performed dedicated cross-matching with Fermi-LAT catalogs and assessed false-association rates via Monte Carlo or angular separation methods. In the revised manuscript we will add a short paragraph (or expanded footnote) explicitly citing these statistical validations from the original works, thereby grounding the 'emerging population' statement without introducing new analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely descriptive review with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is a review-style discussion of an emerging observational population. It states the existence of gamma-ray detections from misaligned radio galaxies as an established fact and proceeds to describe implications for unification and future SKA observations. No equations, parameters, predictions, or fitted quantities appear in the supplied text. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The central premise rests on external observational claims rather than reducing by construction to any input defined within the paper itself. This is the normal case of a self-contained descriptive paper with no derivation chain to inspect for circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; no mathematical model, free parameters, axioms, or new physical entities are introduced or fitted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5933 in / 1046 out tokens · 50891 ms · 2026-06-26T04:21:10.182590+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. A. Abdo et al. The Astrophysical Journal, 720: 0 912--922, 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/912

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/1/912 2010

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    M. Ajello et al. , 892 0 (2): 0 105, Apr. 2020. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab791e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab791e 2020

  3. [3]

    R. D. Baldi . The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 31: 0 3, 2023. doi:10.1007/s00159-023-00148-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-023-00148-3 2023

  4. [4]

    R. D. Baldi and A. Capetti . , 508 0 (2): 0 603--614, Dec. 2009. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913021

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913021 2009

  5. [5]

    R. D. Baldi , A. Capetti , and F. Massaro . Astronomy & Astrophysics, 609: 0 A1, 2018. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731333

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731333 2018

  6. [6]

    R. D. Baldi , A. Capetti , and G. Giovannini . , 482 0 (2): 0 2294--2304, Jan. 2019 a . doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2703

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2703 2019

  7. [7]

    R. D. Baldi , A. Capetti , and G. Giovannini . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 482: 0 2294--2305, 2019 b . doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2848

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2848 2019

  8. [8]

    R. D. Baldi et al. Galaxies, 7 0 (3): 0 76, 2019 c . doi:10.3390/galaxies7030076

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies7030076 2019

  9. [9]

    R. D. Baldi et al. In Advancing Astrophysics with the SKA -- II (AASKAII). 2026. arXiv search: Report number AASKAII/Baldi01

    2026

  10. [10]

    Barcons et al

    X. Barcons et al. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 608: 0 A1, 2017

    2017

  11. [11]

    R. H. Becker , R. L. White , and D. J. Helfand . , 450: 0 559, Sept. 1995. doi:10.1086/176166

    work page doi:10.1086/176166 1995

  12. [12]

    P. N. Best and T. M. Heckman . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 421: 0 1569--1582, 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20414.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20414.x 2012

  13. [13]

    Boughelilba and A

    M. Boughelilba and A. Reimer . , 955 0 (2): 0 L41, Oct. 2023. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf83c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf83c 2023

  14. [14]

    Bronzini , P

    E. Bronzini , P. Grandi , E. Torresi , and S. Buson . , 977 0 (1): 0 L16, Dec. 2024. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad93cf

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad93cf 2024

  15. [15]

    Morphological evidence of restarted radio activity

    G. Bruni , F. Panessa , L. Bassani , et al. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494: 0 902--914, 2020. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa735

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa735 2020

  16. [16]

    Bruni , F

    G. Bruni , F. Panessa , L. Bassani , et al. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513: 0 886--899, 2022. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac865

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac865 2022

  17. [17]

    Cao et al

    Z. Cao et al. , 971 0 (2): 0 L45, Aug. 2024. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5e6d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5e6d 2024

  18. [18]

    Casadio et al

    C. Casadio et al. , 808 0 (2): 0 162, Aug. 2015. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/162

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/162 2015

  19. [19]

    J. J. Condon et al. , 115 0 (5): 0 1693--1716, May 1998. doi:10.1086/300337

    work page doi:10.1086/300337 1998

  20. [20]

    Cruise , M

    M. Cruise , M. Guainazzi , J. Aird , et al. Nature Astronomy, 9: 0 36--44, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02416-3. arXiv:2501.03100

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02416-3 2025

  21. [21]

    Dabhade , M

    P. Dabhade , M. Mahato , J. Bagchi , et al. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 642: 0 A153, 2020. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037049

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037049 2020

  22. [22]

    Dewdney et al

    P. Dewdney et al. Ska1 design baseline description, Jan. 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16895574

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16895574 2022

  23. [23]

    Fanaroff et al

    B. Fanaroff et al. , 505: 0 6003--6016, 2021. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1540

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1540 2021

  24. [24]

    B. L. Fanaroff and J. M. Riley . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 167: 0 31P--36P, 1974. doi:10.1093/mnras/167.1.31P

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/167.1.31p 1974

  25. [25]

    Ghisellini

    G. Ghisellini . Memorie della Societ \`a Astronomica Italiana , 82: 0 104--113, 2011

    2011

  26. [26]

    Ghisellini, F

    G. Ghisellini, F. Tavecchio, and M. Chiaberge. A&A, 432: 0 401--410, 2005. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041404

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041404 2005

  27. [27]

    Grandi , A

    P. Grandi , A. Capetti , and R. D. Baldi . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 457: 0 2--12, 2016. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2894

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2894 2016

  28. [28]

    M. J. Hardcastle and J. H. Croston . , 415 0 (1): 0 133--142, July 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18678.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18678.x 2011

  29. [29]

    M. J. Hardcastle et al. , 622: 0 A12, Feb. 2019. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833893

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833893 2019

  30. [30]

    M. J. Hardcastle et al. In Advancing Astrophysics with the SKA -- II (AASKAII). 2026. arXiv search: Report number AASKAII/Hardcastle01

    2026

  31. [31]

    Hofmann , R

    W. Hofmann , R. Zanin , and CTA Consortium . arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2305.12888, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    IceCube-Gen2 Collaboration . J. Phys. G, 48 0 (6): 0 060501, 2021. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abbd48

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abbd48 2021

  33. [33]

    N. S. Khatiya et al. , 971 0 (1): 0 84, Aug. 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad534c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad534c 2024

  34. [34]

    and Ghisellini, G

    M. Kino and K. Asano . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 412: 0 L20--L24, 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00999.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00999.x 2011

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    M. Kino , H. Ito , N. Kawakatu , and H. Nagai . , 395 0 (1): 0 L43--L47, May 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00638.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00638.x 2009

  36. [36]

    KM3NeT Collaboration . J. Phys. G, 43 0 (8): 0 084001, 2016. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/8/084001

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/8/084001 2016

  37. [37]

    D. V. Lal . , 915 0 (2): 0 126, 2021. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac042d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac042d 2021

  38. [38]

    D. V. Lal and A. P. Rao . , 420: 0 491--499, 2004. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035777

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035777 2004

  39. [39]

    D. V. Lal , M. J. Hardcastle , and R. P. Kraft . , 390 0 (3): 0 1105--1116, 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13810.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13810.x 2008

  40. [40]

    D. V. Lal et al. , 722: 0 1735--1743, Oct. 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1735

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/722/2/1735 2010

  41. [41]

    D. V. Lal et al. , 764: 0 83, 2013. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/83

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/764/1/83 2013

  42. [42]

    D. V. Lal et al. Galaxies, 9: 0 87, 2021. doi:10.3390/galaxies9040087

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies9040087 2021

  43. [43]

    M. L. Lister et al. The Astrophysical Journal, 899: 0 141, 2020. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba18d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba18d 2020

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    D. McConnell et al. , 37: 0 e048, Nov. 2020. doi:10.1017/pasa.2020.41

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2020.41 2020

  45. [45]

    Migliori et al

    G. Migliori et al. The Astrophysical Journal, 780: 0 165, 2014. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/165

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/165 2014

  46. [46]

    Migliori et al

    G. Migliori et al. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 821: 0 L31, 2016. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/821/2/L31

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/821/2/l31 2016

  47. [47]

    Mingo et al

    B. Mingo et al. , 488 0 (2): 0 2701--2721, Sept. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1901

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1901 2019

  48. [48]

    Mingo et al

    B. Mingo et al. , 511 0 (3): 0 3250--3271, Apr. 2022. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac140

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac140 2022

  49. [49]

    Nandra et al

    K. Nandra et al. Athena mission proposal, 2013

    2013

  50. [50]

    C. P. O'Dea . Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 110: 0 493--532, 1998. doi:10.1086/316162

    work page doi:10.1086/316162 1998

  51. [51]

    Ostorero et al

    L. Ostorero et al. , 715 0 (2): 0 1071--1093, June 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/715/2/1071

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/715/2/1071 2010

  52. [52]

    V. S. Paliya . The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 918: 0 L39, 2021. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac1f0d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac1f0d 2021

  53. [53]

    V. S. Paliya et al. The Astrophysical Journal, 976: 0 120, 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad85e2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad85e2 2024

  54. [54]

    V. S. Paliya et al. The Astrophysical Journal, 989: 0 36, 2025

    2025

  55. [55]

    Pannikkote , V

    M. Pannikkote , V. S. Paliya , and D. J. Saikia . The Astrophysical Journal, 957: 0 73, 2023. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf6aa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf6aa 2023

  56. [56]

    T. J. Pearson and A. C. S. Readhead . , 328: 0 114, May 1988. doi:10.1086/166274

    work page doi:10.1086/166274 1988

  57. [57]

    Persic and Y

    M. Persic and Y. Rephaeli . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 485: 0 2001--2009, 2019 a . doi:10.1093/mnras/stz511

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz511 2001

  58. [58]

    Persic and Y

    M. Persic and Y. Rephaeli . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490: 0 1489--1502, 2019 b . doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2680

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2680 2019

  59. [59]

    Persic and Y

    M. Persic and Y. Rephaeli . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491: 0 5740--5757, 2020. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3659

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3659 2020

  60. [60]

    Principe et al

    G. Principe et al. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 635: 0 A185, 2020. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937049

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937049 2020

  61. [61]

    A. C. S. Readhead et al. The Astrophysical Journal, 460: 0 612--627, 1996. doi:10.1086/176996

    work page doi:10.1086/176996 1996

  62. [62]

    T. W. Shimwell et al. , 598: 0 A104, Feb. 2017. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629313

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629313 2017

  63. [63]

    , 680 0 (2): 0 911--925, June 2008

    Stawarz et al. , 680 0 (2): 0 911--925, June 2008. doi:10.1086/587781

    work page doi:10.1086/587781 2008

  64. [64]

    Swain , V

    S. Swain , V. S. Paliya , D. J. Saikia , and C. S. Stalin . The Astrophysical Journal, 979: 0 97, 2025

    2025

  65. [65]

    R., Schaye, J., Kay, S

    F. Tavecchio and G. Ghisellini. MNRAS Letters, 385: 0 L98--L102, 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00441.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00441.x 2008

  66. [66]

    Tavecchio et al

    F. Tavecchio et al. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 475: 0 5529--5534, 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty251

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty251 2018

  67. [67]

    Torresi et al

    E. Torresi et al. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 476: 0 5535--5547, 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty520

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty520 2018

  68. [68]

    Ubertosi et al

    F. Ubertosi et al. , 961 0 (1): 0 134, Jan. 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad11d8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad11d8 2024

  69. [69]

    Ubertosi et al

    F. Ubertosi et al. , 693: 0 A171, Jan. 2025. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452430

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452430 2025

  70. [70]

    P. N. Wilkinson et al. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 432: 0 L87--L90, 1994. doi:10.1086/187516

    work page doi:10.1086/187516 1994

  71. [71]

    Ye et al

    X.-H. Ye et al. , 708: 0 A56, Mar. 2026. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556939

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556939 2026