pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01156 · v1 · pith:SDLDQKRCnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · ⚛️ physics.comp-ph · cs.CE· physics.geo-ph

Verification of a sequential thermo-poroelasticity formulation in PFLOTRAN

J. Al Kubaisy , G. E. Hammond , S. Karra , J. Burghardt , L. Murdoch , T. Johnson , K. M. Rosso This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 01:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.comp-ph cs.CEphysics.geo-ph
keywords thermo-poroelasticityfixed-stress splitsequential couplingporoelastic benchmarksTHM processesdiscontinuity mappingnumerical verification
0
0 comments X

The pith

A sequential non-iterative fixed-stress split for thermo-poroelastic equations matches analytical benchmark solutions for pressure, temperature, and deformation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper verifies a numerical approach to solving coupled thermal, fluid flow, and mechanical deformation equations in porous media. It uses a sequential strategy where the thermal-hydrologic system is solved first for pressure and temperature, followed by an update for mechanical displacements. This matters for modeling subsurface processes like those in geothermal systems where all three effects interact. Agreement with analytical solutions is shown for several benchmark cases, including handling of discontinuities such as fractures.

Core claim

The thermo-hydrologic equations are solved on control-volume blocks while the quasi-static momentum balance is solved on an element-based dual mesh, with coupling via a strictly sequential non-iterative fixed-stress split. This produces solutions that agree with analytical or semi-analytical responses for pressure diffusion, temperature field, and mechanical deformation in poroelastic and thermo-poroelastic benchmarks. A mapping treatment for discontinuities is also validated against an analytical solution.

What carries the argument

The strictly sequential, non-iterative fixed-stress split that solves the TH system implicitly then updates mechanics.

If this is right

  • Accurate modeling of coupled processes in geologic porous media becomes feasible without iterative coupling.
  • The discontinuity treatment enables simulation of fractures in THM contexts.
  • The approach supports applications involving enhanced geothermal systems and subsurface energy storage.
  • Verification establishes reliability for pressure, temperature, and deformation fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • For problems with moderate coupling strength, avoiding iteration may reduce computational cost without loss of accuracy.
  • The dual mesh approach for mechanics could be adapted to other simulation frameworks.
  • Testing the method on problems with stronger nonlinearities or longer time scales would further confirm its robustness.

Load-bearing premise

The non-iterative fixed-stress split produces accurate enough coupled solutions for the selected benchmark problems and time scales without needing iteration or extra stabilization.

What would settle it

Observation of significant deviation between the computed pressure diffusion or displacement fields and the corresponding analytical solutions in any of the verification benchmarks.

read the original abstract

We present the verification of a thermo--hydrologic--mechanical capability implemented within the PFLOTRAN framework, with emphasis on benchmark-based assessment of the THM implementation. The thermal--hydrologic (TH) equations for mass and energy balance are solved on control-volume blocks or Voronoi cells, while the quasi-static momentum balance is solved on an element-based dual mesh. The coupling is achieved using a strictly sequential, non-iterative fixed-stress split strategy in which the TH system is solved implicitly for pressure and temperature, followed by a mechanics update for the displacement unknowns. Several verification problems are set up against poroelastic and thermo-poroelastic benchmarks, demonstrating agreement with analytical or semi-analytical benchmark responses for pressure diffusion, the temperature field, and mechanical deformation. In addition, we propose a treatment for discontinuities (e.g., fractures) based on mapping between mechanical and flow degrees of freedom, and validate the approach by comparison to an analytical solution. This work establishes the basis for thermo-poroelastic coupling in PFLOTRAN and provides a solid modeling foundation for a range of applications (e.g., enhanced geothermal systems and other subsurface energy storage) involving coupled thermal--hydrologic--mechanical (THM) processes in geologic porous media.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents the verification of a thermo-hydrologic-mechanical (THM) capability in PFLOTRAN. The TH equations are solved on control-volume or Voronoi cells and mechanics on a dual mesh, coupled via a strictly sequential non-iterative fixed-stress split (TH solved implicitly, followed by mechanics update). Verification is shown via agreement with analytical/semi-analytical benchmarks for pressure diffusion, temperature, deformation, and a discontinuity treatment.

Significance. If the non-iterative split accuracy holds beyond the tested cases, the work supplies a verified THM foundation in PFLOTRAN for applications such as enhanced geothermal systems. Credit is due for performing verification against external analytical benchmarks rather than self-referential fitting.

major comments (2)
  1. [Verification results / Abstract] Verification sections: claims of agreement with benchmarks are stated but no quantitative error metrics (L2 norms, relative errors, maximum deviations), mesh convergence studies, or time-step refinement data are reported. This leaves the central verification claim unquantified.
  2. [Coupling strategy / Verification problems] Coupling description and results: the strictly sequential non-iterative fixed-stress split is adopted without analysis of splitting error (O(Δt) truncation error known to depend on Biot coefficient, hydraulic diffusivity, and consolidation time). No comparison to an iterative or monolithic solver is provided, which is load-bearing for asserting that the formulation is verified for the stated applications.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: states 'several verification problems' without enumerating them or indicating which benchmark addresses which field (pressure, temperature, mechanics).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Verification results / Abstract] Verification sections: claims of agreement with benchmarks are stated but no quantitative error metrics (L2 norms, relative errors, maximum deviations), mesh convergence studies, or time-step refinement data are reported. This leaves the central verification claim unquantified.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative error metrics would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will report L2 norms, relative errors, and maximum deviations for pressure, temperature, and displacement where analytical solutions exist. We will also add a mesh-convergence study for one benchmark and time-step refinement results for the diffusion problems. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Coupling strategy / Verification problems] Coupling description and results: the strictly sequential non-iterative fixed-stress split is adopted without analysis of splitting error (O(Δt) truncation error known to depend on Biot coefficient, hydraulic diffusivity, and consolidation time). No comparison to an iterative or monolithic solver is provided, which is load-bearing for asserting that the formulation is verified for the stated applications.

    Authors: The verification is performed directly against analytical solutions of the coupled THM system; the observed agreement therefore already bounds the practical splitting error for the tested parameters and time scales. We will add a short discussion of the known O(Δt) truncation error and its dependence on the Biot coefficient. A comparison to monolithic or iterative solvers is not possible within the current PFLOTRAN implementation and lies outside the scope of this verification study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Verification against external analytical benchmarks shows no circularity

full rationale

The paper implements a sequential non-iterative fixed-stress THM solver in PFLOTRAN and verifies the implementation by direct comparison to independent analytical and semi-analytical benchmark solutions for pressure diffusion, temperature, and deformation (including a discontinuity treatment). No parameters are fitted to the verification data and then re-used as 'predictions'; the benchmarks are external references. Any self-citations are incidental and not load-bearing for the verification claims. The central result is numerical agreement with outside solutions, rendering the reported derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the formulation relies on standard continuum mechanics and poroelasticity assumptions not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5786 in / 1102 out tokens · 23624 ms · 2026-07-02T01:26:08.421928+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Energy Environ

    Heinemann, N., Alcalde, J., Miocic, J.M., Hangx, S.J.T., Kallmeyer, J., Ostertag-Henning, C., Hassanpouryouzband, A., Thaysen, E.M., Strobel, G.J., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., Edlmann, K., Wilkinson, M., Bentham, M., Stuart Haszeldine, R., Carbonell, R., Rudloff, A.: Enabling large- scale hydrogen storage in porous media – the scientific challenges. Energy ...

    work page doi:10.1039/d0ee03536j 2021

  2. [2]

    Geotechnical and Geological Engineering30, 525–551 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9491-0

    Rutqvist, J.: The geomechanics of co 2 storage in deep sedimentary formations. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering30, 525–551 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9491-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10706-011-9491-0 2012

  3. [3]

    International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences72, 242–260 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.07.011

    McClure, M.W., Horne, R.N.: An investigation of stimulation mechanisms in enhanced geothermal systems. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences72, 242–260 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.07.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.07.011 2014

  4. [4]

    General theory of three-dimensional consolidation

    Biot, M.A.: General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics12(2), 155–164 (1941) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712886

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1712886 1941

  5. [5]

    Journal of Applied Physics26(2), 182–185 (1955) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1721956

    Biot, M.A.: Theory of elasticity and consolidation for a porous anisotropic solid. Journal of Applied Physics26(2), 182–185 (1955) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1721956

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1721956 1955

  6. [6]

    Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2000).http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1jktrr4

    Wang, H.F.: Theory of Linear Poroelasticity with Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2000).http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1jktrr4

    2000

  7. [7]

    Coussy, O.: Thermoporoelasticity, pp. 71–112. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK (2003). Chap. 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470092718.ch4 . https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/0470092718.ch4

    work page doi:10.1002/0470092718.ch4 2003

  8. [8]

    Lewis, R.W., Schrefler, B.A.: The Finite Element Method in the Static and Dynamic Deformation 15 Table A1: RelativeL 2 errors for the numerical experiments. Experiment Evaluation Rel.L 2 error V ariable Terzaghi’s problem (4.1) t= 0.005 s 1.2×10 −3 pressure t= 0.05 s 3.7×10 −4 pressure t= 0.2 s 4.7×10 −4 pressure t= 0.5 s 1.4×10 −3 pressure t= 0.005 s 9.0...

    1998

  9. [9]

    Earth and Planetary Science Letters240(3), 539–558 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.09.017

    Steefel, C.I., DePaolo, D.J., Lichtner, P.C.: Reactive transport modeling: An essential tool and a new research approach for the earth sciences. Earth and Planetary Science Letters240(3), 539–558 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.09.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.09.017 2005

  10. [10]

    Hydrogeology Journal11(1), 7–40 (2003)

    Rutqvist, J., Stephansson, O.: The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrogeology Journal11(1), 7–40 (2003)

    2003

  11. [12]

    SPE Journal 3(3), 219–226 (1998) https://doi.org/10.2118/50939-PA

    Settari, A., Mourits, F.M.: A coupled reservoir and geomechanical simulation system. SPE Journal 3(3), 219–226 (1998) https://doi.org/10.2118/50939-PA

    work page doi:10.2118/50939-pa 1998

  12. [13]

    Convergence of iterative coupling for coupled flow and geome- chanics

    Mikeli´ c, A., Wheeler, M.F.: Convergence of iterative coupling for coupled flow and geomechanics. Computational Geosciences17(3), 479–496 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-012-9318-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10596-012-9318-y 2013

  13. [14]

    Journal of Open Source Software 9(102), 6973 (2024) https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06973

    Settgast, R.R., Aronson, R.M., Besset, J.R., Borio, A., Bui, Q.M., Byer, T.J., Castelletto, N., Cit- rain, A., Corbett, B.C., Corbett, J., Cordier, P., Cremon, M.A., Crook, C.M., Cusini, M., Fei, F., Frambati, S., Franc, J., Franceschini, A., Frigo, M., Fu, P., Gazzola, T., Gross, H., Hamon, F., Han, B.M., Hao, Y., Hasanzade, R., Homel, M., Huang, J., Jin...

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.06973 2024

  14. [15]

    14: Kirsch benchmark results for experiment 4.5

    Bilke, L., Naumov, D., Fischer, T., Wang, W., Mollaali, M., Buchwald, J., Max, J., Lehmann, C., 18 10−1 100 101 Radius (m) −1.6 −1.4 −1.2 −1.0 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.0 Stress (Pa) ×107 Hoop stress Radial stress Shear stress (a) 10−1 100 101 Radius (m) −2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 Stress (Pa) ×107 Hoop stress Radial stress Shear stress (b) 10−1 100 101 Radius (m...

    2025

  15. [16]

    SoftwareX31, 102264 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2025.102264

    Harbour, L., Giudicelli, G., Lindsay, A.D., Hansel, P.G., Icenhour, C., Li, M., Miller, J.M., Stogner, R.H., Behne, P., Yankura, D., Prince, Z.M., DeChant, C., Schwen, D., Spencer, B.W., Tano, M., Choi, N., Wang, Y., Nezdyur, M., Miao, Y., Hu, T., Kumar, S., Matthews, C., Langley, B., Nobre, N., Blair, A., MacMackin, C., Rocha, H.B., Palmer, E., Carter, J...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102264 2025

  16. [17]

    Water Resources Research50(1), 208–228 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1002/2012WR013483 https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2012WR013483 19

    Hammond, G.E., Lichtner, P.C., Mills, R.T.: Evaluating the performance of parallel subsurface simulators: An illustrative example with pflotran. Water Resources Research50(1), 208–228 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1002/2012WR013483 https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2012WR013483 19

    work page doi:10.1002/2012wr013483 2014

  17. [18]

    Technical report, Los Alamos National Lab

    Lichtner, P.C., Hammond, G.E., Lu, C., Karra, S., Bisht, G., Andre, B., Mills, R., Kumar, J.: Pflotran user manual: A massively parallel reactive flow and transport model for describing surface and subsurface processes. Technical report, Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States); Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United...

    work page doi:10.2172/1168703 2015

  18. [19]

    Los Alamos, NM, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2001)

    Lichtner, P.C., Hammond, G., Lu, C., Karra, S., Bisht, G., Andre, B., Mills, R., Kumar, J., Frederick, J.: Pflotran user manual. Los Alamos, NM, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2001)

    2001

  19. [20]

    John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2000)

    Okabe, A., Boots, B., Sugihara, K., Chiu, S.N.: Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/ 9780470317013

    2000

  20. [21]

    deuxi` eme m´ emoire: Recherches sur les parall´ elo` edres primitifs

    Voronoi, G.: Nouvelles applications des param` etres continus ` a la th´ eorie des formes quadratiques. deuxi` eme m´ emoire: Recherches sur les parall´ elo` edres primitifs. Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik134, 198–287 (1908)

    1908

  21. [22]

    Bulletin de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences de l’URSS, Classe des sciences math´ ematiques et naturelles (6), 793–800 (1934)

    Delaunay, B.: Sur la sph` ere vide. Bulletin de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences de l’URSS, Classe des sciences math´ ematiques et naturelles (6), 793–800 (1934)

    1934

  22. [23]

    Cambridge University Press, ??? (2019)

    Lie, K.-A.: An Introduction to Reservoir Simulation Using MATLAB/GNU Octave: User Guide for the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST). Cambridge University Press, ??? (2019)

    2019

  23. [24]

    Compu- tational Geosciences6(3-4), 405–432 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021291114475

    Aavatsmark, I.: An introduction to multipoint flux approximations for quadrilateral grids. Compu- tational Geosciences6(3-4), 405–432 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021291114475

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1021291114475 2002

  24. [25]

    SPE Advanced Technology Series2(02), 69–77 (1994) https://doi.org/10.2118/22889-PA https://onepetro.org/ATS/article- pdf/2/02/69/2606005/spe-22889-pa.pdf

    Palagi, C.L., Aziz, K.: Use of voronoi grid in reservoir simulation. SPE Advanced Technology Series2(02), 69–77 (1994) https://doi.org/10.2118/22889-PA https://onepetro.org/ATS/article- pdf/2/02/69/2606005/spe-22889-pa.pdf

    work page doi:10.2118/22889-pa 1994

  25. [26]

    Computational Geosciences2(4), 259–290 (1998) https://doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1011549407709

    Edwards, M.G., Rogers, C.F.: Finite volume discretization with imposed flux continuity for the general tensor pressure equation. Computational Geosciences2(4), 259–290 (1998) https://doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1011549407709

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1011549407709 1998

  26. [27]

    In: Ciarlet, P.G., Lions, J.-L

    Eymard, R., Gallou¨ et, T., Herbin, R.: Finite volume methods. In: Ciarlet, P.G., Lions, J.-L. (eds.) Handbook of Numerical Analysis vol. 7, pp. 713–1020. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2000)

    2000

  27. [28]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering200(13-16), 1591–1606 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.022

    Kim, J., Tchelepi, H.A., Juanes, R.: Stability and convergence of sequential methods for coupled flow and geomechanics: Fixed-stress and fixed-strain splits. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering200(13-16), 1591–1606 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.022 2011

  28. [29]

    http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc (2015)

    Balay, S., Abhyankar, S., Adams, M.F., Brown, J., Brune, P., Buschelman, K., Dalcin, L., Eijkhout, V., Gropp, W.D., Kaushik, D., Knepley, M.G., McInnes, L.C., Rupp, K., Smith, B.F., Zampini, S., Zhang, H.: PETSc Web page. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc (2015). http://www.mcs.anl.gov/ petsc

    2015

  29. [30]

    Technical Report ANL-95/11 - Revision 3.6, Argonne National Laboratory (2015)

    Balay, S., Abhyankar, S., Adams, M.F., Brown, J., Brune, P., Buschelman, K., Dalcin, L., Eijkhout, V., Gropp, W.D., Kaushik, D., Knepley, M.G., McInnes, L.C., Rupp, K., Smith, B.F., Zampini, S., Zhang, H.: PETSc users manual. Technical Report ANL-95/11 - Revision 3.6, Argonne National Laboratory (2015). http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc

    2015

  30. [31]

    (eds.) Efficient Management of Parallelism in Object-Oriented Numerical Software Libraries, pp

    Balay, S., Gropp, W.D., McInnes, L.C., Smith, B.F.: In: Arge, E., Bruaset, A.M., Langtangen, H.P. (eds.) Efficient Management of Parallelism in Object-Oriented Numerical Software Libraries, pp. 163–202. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1986-68

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1986-68 1997

  31. [32]

    John Wiley & Sons, New York (1943)

    Terzaghi, K.: Theoretical Soil Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1943)

    1943

  32. [33]

    20 Highway Research Board Proceedings37, 584–617 (1958)

    Schiffman, R.L.: Consolidation of soil under time-dependent loading and varying permeability. 20 Highway Research Board Proceedings37, 584–617 (1958)

    1958

  33. [34]

    G´ eotechnique3(7), 287–299 (1953)

    Mandel, J.: Consolidation des sols (´ etude math´ ematique). G´ eotechnique3(7), 287–299 (1953)

    1953

  34. [35]

    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics22, 186–191 (2005)

    Bai, B.: One-dimensional thermal consolidation characteristics of geotechnical media under non- isothermal condition. Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics22, 186–191 (2005)

    2005

  35. [36]

    Technical Report SAND2025-13033, Sandia National Laboratories (2025)

    Sandia National Laboratories: Cubit mesh generation toolkit user documentation. Technical Report SAND2025-13033, Sandia National Laboratories (2025). https://cubit.sandia.gov

    2025

  36. [37]

    https://doi.org/10.11578/dc.20221017.1

    Stimpson, C., Sjaardema, G., Dudley, C., Yorgason, R., Hanks, B., White, D., Kerr, R., Mitchell, S., Shepherd, J., Tautges, T., et al.: Cubit v.16.X (2022). https://doi.org/10.11578/dc.20221017.1 . https://www.osti.gov/biblio/code-95109

    work page doi:10.11578/dc.20221017.1 2022

  37. [38]

    https://lagrit.lanl.gov

    Los Alamos National Laboratory: LaGriT: Los Alamos Grid Toolbox. https://lagrit.lanl.gov. Mesh generation and optimization software (2024)

    2024

  38. [39]

    Karra, S.: satkarra/voronoi. GitHub. [Online; accessed 23-3-2026] (2024). https://github.com/ satkarra/voronoi

    2026

  39. [40]

    https://github.com/nschloe/meshio

    Schl¨ omer, N.: meshio: Python tools for I/O of mesh files. https://github.com/nschloe/meshio. Accessed: 2026-03-23 (2023)

    2026

  40. [41]

    Computational Geosciences29, 25 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-025-10364-8

    Huang, Y., Huang, X., Hyman, J.D.,et al.: Analytic solutions and field-scale application for verifi- cation of coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical processes in subsurface fractured media. Computational Geosciences29, 25 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-025-10364-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s10596-025-10364-8 2025

  41. [42]

    Castelletto, N., White, J.A., Tchelepi, H.A.: Accuracy and convergence properties of the fixed- stress iterative solution of two-way coupled poromechanics. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics39(14), 1593–1618 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2400 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nag.2400

    work page doi:10.1002/nag.2400 2015

  42. [43]

    G´ eotechnique46(2), 187–195 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.2.187

    Abousleiman, Y., Cheng, A.H.-D., Cui, L., Detournay, E., Roegiers, J.-C.: Mandel’s problem revisited. G´ eotechnique46(2), 187–195 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.2.187

    work page doi:10.1680/geot.1996.46.2.187 1996

  43. [44]

    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering53(4) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01989-0

    Gao, Q., Ghassemi, A.: Three-dimensional thermo-poroelastic modeling and analysis of flow, heat transport and deformation in fractured rock with applications to a lab-scale geothermal system. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering53(4) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01989-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00603-019-01989-0 2019

  44. [45]

    Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Sneddon, I.N.: The distribution of stress in the neighbourhood of a crack in an elastic solid. Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences187(1009), 229–260 (1946) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1946.0077

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1946.0077 1946

  45. [46]

    Quarterly of Applied Mathematics4, 262–267 (1946)

    Sneddon, I.N., Elliot, H.A.: The opening of a griffith crack under internal pressure. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics4, 262–267 (1946)

    1946

  46. [47]

    Inter- national Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences44(5), 739–757 (2007) https://doi.org/10

    Adachi, J., Siebrits, E., Peirce, A., Desroches, J.: Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures. Inter- national Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences44(5), 739–757 (2007) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijrmms.2006.11.006

    2007

  47. [48]

    CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2017)

    Anderson, T.L.: Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2017). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370293

    work page doi:10.1201/9781315370293 2017

  48. [49]

    Zeitshrift des Vereines deutscher Ingenieure42, 797–807 (1898)

    Kirsch, E.G.: Die theorie der elastizit¨ at und die bed¨ urfnisse der festigkeitslehre. Zeitshrift des Vereines deutscher Ingenieure42, 797–807 (1898)

  49. [50]

    Wiley- Blackwell, Maden, MA (2007)

    Jaeger, J.C., Cook, N.G.W., Zimmerman, R.: Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, 4th edn. Wiley- Blackwell, Maden, MA (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511735349

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511735349 2007

  50. [51]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Zoback, M.D.: Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007). https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586477 . Publication date: 10 December 2009 21

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511586477 2007