Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The weighted random graph model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0902.0897 v2 pith:INKWTDRK submitted 2009-02-05 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.dis-nnmath-phmath.COmath.MPphysics.soc-ph

classification cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.dis-nnmath-phmath.COmath.MPphysics.soc-ph
keywords weighteddistributiongraphmodelnetworksrandombinomialedge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce the weighted random graph (WRG) model, which represents the weighted counterpart of the Erdos-Renyi random graph and provides fundamental insights into more complicated weighted networks. We find analytically that the WRG is characterized by a geometric weight distribution, a binomial degree distribution and a negative binomial strength distribution. We also characterize exactly the percolation phase transitions associated with edge removal and with the appearance of weighted subgraphs of any order and intensity. We find that even this completely null model displays a percolation behavior similar to what observed in real weighted networks, implying that edge removal cannot be used to detect community structure empirically. By contrast, the analysis of clustering successfully reveals different patterns between the WRG and real networks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Forecasting UK Consumer Price Inflation with RaGNAR: Random Generalised Network Autoregressive Processes

    stat.AP 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Averaging GNAR forecasts across the top five random graphs selected by recent one-step-ahead errors beats AR benchmarks at all horizons and beats the Bank of England at 4-6 months, though the Bank comparison lacks sig...

Pith tools