pith. sign in

arxiv: 1202.3748 · v1 · pith:WT6WT6R4new · submitted 2012-02-14 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Conditional Restricted Boltzmann Machines for Structured Output Prediction

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords outputconditionalproblemsstructuredbeenlearningmuchspace
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Conditional Restricted Boltzmann Machines (CRBMs) are rich probabilistic models that have recently been applied to a wide range of problems, including collaborative filtering, classification, and modeling motion capture data. While much progress has been made in training non-conditional RBMs, these algorithms are not applicable to conditional models and there has been almost no work on training and generating predictions from conditional RBMs for structured output problems. We first argue that standard Contrastive Divergence-based learning may not be suitable for training CRBMs. We then identify two distinct types of structured output prediction problems and propose an improved learning algorithm for each. The first problem type is one where the output space has arbitrary structure but the set of likely output configurations is relatively small, such as in multi-label classification. The second problem is one where the output space is arbitrarily structured but where the output space variability is much greater, such as in image denoising or pixel labeling. We show that the new learning algorithms can work much better than Contrastive Divergence on both types of problems.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Scientific Workflows through CFD based PIVAEs

    cs.DC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A CFD-PIVAE framework generates synthetic HPC workload data to enable scheduling strategies that achieve up to 10% energy savings at the cost of 15% CPU performance and 5-6% longer turnaround times.