Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Automatic Extraction of Causal Relations from Natural Language Texts: A Comprehensive Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1605.07895 v1 pith:K6AEOFJL submitted 2016-05-25 cs.AI cs.CLcs.IR

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.IR
keywords extractioncausaldataautomaticcomprehensivelanguagenaturalproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic extraction of cause-effect relationships from natural language texts is a challenging open problem in Artificial Intelligence. Most of the early attempts at its solution used manually constructed linguistic and syntactic rules on small and domain-specific data sets. However, with the advent of big data, the availability of affordable computing power and the recent popularization of machine learning, the paradigm to tackle this problem has slowly shifted. Machines are now expected to learn generic causal extraction rules from labelled data with minimal supervision, in a domain independent-manner. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey of causal relation extraction techniques from both paradigms, and analyse their relative strengths and weaknesses, with recommendations for future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Giveme5W1H: A Universal System for Extracting Main Events from News Articles

    cs.CL 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Giveme5W1H is a publicly available rule-based system that extracts the 5W1H phrases of a news article's main event, with reported precision of 0.73 overall and 0.82 for the first four W questions.

  2. A Survey of Event Causality Identification: Taxonomy, Challenges, Assessment, and Prospects

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A taxonomy and benchmark review of event causality identification, covering sentence-level, document-level, multilingual, and LLM-based methods.

Pith tools