REVIEW 3 cited by
Learning to Ask: Neural Question Generation for Reading Comprehension
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study automatic question generation for sentences from text passages in reading comprehension. We introduce an attention-based sequence learning model for the task and investigate the effect of encoding sentence- vs. paragraph-level information. In contrast to all previous work, our model does not rely on hand-crafted rules or a sophisticated NLP pipeline; it is instead trainable end-to-end via sequence-to-sequence learning. Automatic evaluation results show that our system significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art rule-based system. In human evaluations, questions generated by our system are also rated as being more natural (i.e., grammaticality, fluency) and as more difficult to answer (in terms of syntactic and lexical divergence from the original text and reasoning needed to answer).
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Learning Facts at Scale with Active Reading
Training LLMs on self-generated, diverse 'active reading' materials improves factual recall by 160-312% and scales to a 1T-token Wikipedia expert model.
-
The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMs
Finetuning open LMs on ChatGPT outputs creates models that mimic style and fool human raters but fail to close the performance gap to proprietary systems on tasks not well-represented in the imitation data.
-
Ask Good Questions for Large Language Models
The AGQ framework combines a concept-enhanced item response theory model with LLMs to generate guiding questions that adapt to a user's estimated knowledge gaps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.