Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialogues
read the original abstract
Much of human dialogue occurs in semi-cooperative settings, where agents with different goals attempt to agree on common decisions. Negotiations require complex communication and reasoning skills, but success is easy to measure, making this an interesting task for AI. We gather a large dataset of human-human negotiations on a multi-issue bargaining task, where agents who cannot observe each other's reward functions must reach an agreement (or a deal) via natural language dialogue. For the first time, we show it is possible to train end-to-end models for negotiation, which must learn both linguistic and reasoning skills with no annotated dialogue states. We also introduce dialogue rollouts, in which the model plans ahead by simulating possible complete continuations of the conversation, and find that this technique dramatically improves performance. Our code and dataset are publicly available (https://github.com/facebookresearch/end-to-end-negotiator).
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
A Survey on LLM-based Conversational User Simulation
A survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM-based conversational user simulation, analyzes core techniques and evaluation methods, and identifies open challenges in the field.
-
Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models
The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job...
-
Interactive Evaluation Requires a Design Science
Interactive evaluation of AI must be reframed as a distinct paradigm that maps interaction trajectories to judgments on process, recoverability, coordination, robustness, and system performance, supported by a two-axi...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.