Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Pragmatic-Pedagogic Value Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1707.06354 v2 pith:KAMQGNIR submitted 2017-07-20 cs.AI cs.HCcs.LGcs.RO

classification cs.AIcs.HCcs.LGcs.RO
keywords humanalignmentvaluemodelssolutionactionscognitivecollaborative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As intelligent systems gain autonomy and capability, it becomes vital to ensure that their objectives match those of their human users; this is known as the value-alignment problem. In robotics, value alignment is key to the design of collaborative robots that can integrate into human workflows, successfully inferring and adapting to their users' objectives as they go. We argue that a meaningful solution to value alignment must combine multi-agent decision theory with rich mathematical models of human cognition, enabling robots to tap into people's natural collaborative capabilities. We present a solution to the cooperative inverse reinforcement learning (CIRL) dynamic game based on well-established cognitive models of decision making and theory of mind. The solution captures a key reciprocity relation: the human will not plan her actions in isolation, but rather reason pedagogically about how the robot might learn from them; the robot, in turn, can anticipate this and interpret the human's actions pragmatically. To our knowledge, this work constitutes the first formal analysis of value alignment grounded in empirically validated cognitive models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic annotation of 94 AI alignment papers shows the field largely equates human values with measurable preferences, rarely defines values, and is increasingly removing humans from alignment evaluation.

Pith tools