REVIEW 2 cited by
Convolutional neural networks that teach microscopes how to image
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning algorithms offer a powerful means to automatically analyze the content of medical images. However, many biological samples of interest are primarily transparent to visible light and contain features that are difficult to resolve with a standard optical microscope. Here, we use a convolutional neural network (CNN) not only to classify images, but also to optimize the physical layout of the imaging device itself. We increase the classification accuracy of a microscope's recorded images by merging an optical model of image formation into the pipeline of a CNN. The resulting network simultaneously determines an ideal illumination arrangement to highlight important sample features during image acquisition, along with a set of convolutional weights to classify the detected images post-capture. We demonstrate our joint optimization technique with an experimental microscope configuration that automatically identifies malaria-infected cells with 5-10% higher accuracy than standard and alternative microscope lighting designs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Aperture-aware Dispersion 5-D Light-field Imaging Spectrometer
ADLIS recovers full-spatial-resolution 5D spectral light fields from multiplexed 2D measurements using an end-to-end optimized birefringent quartz aperture encoder.
-
ADC-Aware End-to-End Optimization of a Dynamic Metasurface Antenna with Strong Mutual Coupling for Monostatic Scene Classification
ADC-aware end-to-end training of a 96-element DMA with experimentally calibrated mutual-coupling model maintains 87.2% scene-classification accuracy under 1-bit uniform ADCs, versus 56% when ADC effects are ignored.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.