REVIEW 2 cited by
Interpretable Counting for Visual Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Questions that require counting a variety of objects in images remain a major challenge in visual question answering (VQA). The most common approaches to VQA involve either classifying answers based on fixed length representations of both the image and question or summing fractional counts estimated from each section of the image. In contrast, we treat counting as a sequential decision process and force our model to make discrete choices of what to count. Specifically, the model sequentially selects from detected objects and learns interactions between objects that influence subsequent selections. A distinction of our approach is its intuitive and interpretable output, as discrete counts are automatically grounded in the image. Furthermore, our method outperforms the state of the art architecture for VQA on multiple metrics that evaluate counting.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
RG-SAN: Rule-Guided Spatial Awareness Network for End-to-End 3D Referring Expression Segmentation
A rule-guided spatial-aware network that localizes all mentioned entities in a 3D scene and uses target-position weak supervision raises ScanRefer 3D-RES mIoU from 39.5 to 44.6.
-
A Comprehensive Survey on Visual Question Answering Datasets and Algorithms
A broad but dated survey of VQA datasets and algorithms that organizes the pre-2021 literature into four dataset categories and six model paradigms.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.