pith. sign in

arxiv: 1808.10792 · v2 · pith:5LLLNXINnew · submitted 2018-08-31 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG

Bottom-Up Abstractive Summarization

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords contentselectorabstractivebottom-upfluentotherphrasesselection
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Neural network-based methods for abstractive summarization produce outputs that are more fluent than other techniques, but which can be poor at content selection. This work proposes a simple technique for addressing this issue: use a data-efficient content selector to over-determine phrases in a source document that should be part of the summary. We use this selector as a bottom-up attention step to constrain the model to likely phrases. We show that this approach improves the ability to compress text, while still generating fluent summaries. This two-step process is both simpler and higher performing than other end-to-end content selection models, leading to significant improvements on ROUGE for both the CNN-DM and NYT corpus. Furthermore, the content selector can be trained with as little as 1,000 sentences, making it easy to transfer a trained summarizer to a new domain.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Enriching and Controlling Global Semantics for Text Summarization

    cs.CL 2021-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A normalizing-flow neural topic model plus control mechanism are added to Transformer summarizers to supply and regulate global semantics, with reported gains over prior models on five benchmarks.

  2. Do Transformer Attention Heads Provide Transparency in Abstractive Summarization?

    cs.CL 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Analysis of transformer attention heads in abstractive summarization shows specialization in some heads and proposes a method to measure model reliance on learned attention distributions.