pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1901.03423 · v3 · submitted 2019-01-10 · 📊 stat.AP · stat.ME

Recognition: unknown

Person as Population: A Longitudinal View of Single-Subject Causal Inference for Analyzing Self-Tracked Health Data

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 📊 stat.AP stat.ME
keywords datahealthapproachanalyzeavailablecausaleffectflexible
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Single-subject health data are becoming increasingly available thanks to advances in self-tracking technology (e.g., wearable devices, mobile apps, sensors, implants). Many users and health caregivers seek to use such observational time series data to recommend changing health practices in order to achieve desired health outcomes. However, there are few available causal inference approaches that are flexible enough to analyze such idiographic data. We develop a recently introduced causal-analysis framework based on n-of-1 randomized trials, and implement a flexible random-forests g-formula approach to estimating a recurring individualized effect called the "average period treatment effect". In the process, we argue that our approach essentially resembles that of a longitudinal study by partitioning a single time series into periods taking on binary treatment levels. We analyze six years of the author's own self-tracked physical activity and weight data to demonstrate our approach, and compare the results of our analysis to one that does not properly account for confounding.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PerCaM-Health: Personalized Dynamic Causal Graphs for Healthcare Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PerCaM-Health learns evolving personalized dynamic causal graphs from longitudinal health data to enable more reliable patient-level counterfactual queries than cohort or per-patient baselines.