pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1903.06621 · v1 · submitted 2019-03-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.IM

Recognition: unknown

Towards open and reproducible multi-instrument analysis in gamma-ray astronomy

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM
keywords dataformatgamma-rayanalysischerenkovcrabinstrumentsnebula
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The analysis and combination of data from different gamma-ray instruments involves the use of collaboration proprietary software and case-by-case methods. The effort of defining a common data format for high-level data, namely event lists and instrument response functions (IRFs), has recently started for very-high-energy gamma-ray instruments, driven by the upcoming Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). In this work we implemented this prototypical data format for a small set of MAGIC, VERITAS, FACT, and H.E.S.S. Crab nebula observations, and we analyzed them with the open-source gammapy software package. By combining data from $Fermi$-LAT, and from four of the currently operating imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes, we produced a joint maximum likelihood fit of the Crab nebula spectrum. Aspects of the statistical errors and the evaluation of systematic uncertainty are also commented upon, along with the release format of spectral measurements. The results presented in this work are obtained using open-access on-line assets that allow for a long-term reproducibility of the results.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CTAO Simulations for Potential PeVatron Candidates

    astro-ph.HE 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    CTAO simulations exclude Cassiopeia A, RX J1713.7-3946, and HESS J1731-347 as PeVatrons via PTS metric while HAWC J2227+610 stays inconclusive, with 100 hours required to resolve proton cut-offs near 600 TeV.