pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11896 · v1 · pith:S4S2PORLnew · submitted 2019-06-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO

Unidentified Gamma-ray Sources as Targets for Indirect Dark Matter Detection with the Fermi-Large Area Telescope

Javier Coronado-Blazquez , Miguel A. Sanchez-Conde , Alberto Dominguez , Alejandra Aguirre-Santaella , Mattia Di Mauro , Nestor Mirabal , Daniel Nieto , Eric Charles This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO
keywords dark mattergamma-ray sourcesFermi LATsubhalosindirect detectionWIMPsannihilationunidentified sources
0
0 comments X

The pith

Unidentified Fermi LAT sources are filtered as dark matter subhalo candidates to derive upper limits on WIMP annihilation of 4×10^{-26} cm³ s^{-1} at 10 GeV in the tau channel.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors search the 3FGL, 2FHL, and 3FHL catalogs for unidentified gamma-ray sources whose properties match expectations for dark matter annihilation inside Milky Way subhalos. They apply cuts on flux, spectrum, and variability, then compare the surviving candidates against the number and brightness of subhalos predicted by the Via Lactea II simulation after adding a population of unresolved low-mass objects. This comparison produces conservative upper bounds on the velocity-averaged annihilation cross section for given dark matter masses and channels. A sympathetic reader cares because the same data set already collected by an operating telescope can be repurposed to test whether weakly interacting massive particles constitute dark matter.

Core claim

Filtering unidentified sources for dark-matter-like emission and comparing the sample size and fluxes to a repopulated Via Lactea II simulation yields an upper limit of 4×10^{-26} cm³ s^{-1} (5×10^{-25} cm³ s^{-1}) on the annihilation cross section for a 10 GeV (100 GeV) particle annihilating to tau leptons; the same procedure gives weaker but still useful bounds for the b b-bar channel.

What carries the argument

Repopulation of low-mass subhalos below the VL-II mass resolution, used to forecast how many gamma-ray-bright subhalos should be detectable and thereby normalize the observed candidate count into a cross-section limit.

If this is right

  • Tighter candidate filtering can strengthen the tau-channel limit by a factor of roughly three and the b b-bar limit by a factor of two.
  • The same unidentified-source sample can be re-analyzed for other annihilation final states once their spectra are folded through the instrument response.
  • The method provides an independent probe that does not rely on dwarf galaxies or the Galactic center and can be applied to future LAT data releases.
  • Limits scale directly with improvements in the instrument's minimum detectable flux or in the simulation's subhalo mass function.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the unidentified sources that survive the cuts are later shown to have non-dark-matter counterparts, the current limits become conservative upper bounds rather than tight constraints.
  • Extending the analysis to include spatial extension or time variability as additional filters could reduce the candidate list further without new observations.
  • The same repopulation technique could be applied to other N-body simulations to test how sensitive the limits are to the choice of host halo model.

Load-bearing premise

The added low-mass subhalos below the original simulation resolution have the correct abundance, spatial distribution, and gamma-ray luminosities to represent the real Milky Way population.

What would settle it

A measured number of unidentified sources passing the selection cuts that is either much larger or much smaller than the repopulated VL-II prediction at the same flux threshold would invalidate the derived cross-section limits.

read the original abstract

One of the predictions of the $\Lambda$CDM cosmological framework is the hierarchical formation of structure, giving rise to dark matter (DM) halos and subhalos. When the latter are massive enough they retain gas (i.e., baryons) and become visible. This is the case of the dwarf satellite galaxies in the Milky Way (MW). Below a certain mass, halos may not accumulate significant amounts of baryons and remain completely dark. However, if DM particles are Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), we expect them to annihilate in subhalos, producing gamma rays which can be detected with the Fermi satellite. Using the three most recent point-source Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) catalogs (3FGL, 2FHL and 3FHL), we search for DM subhalo candidates among the unidentified sources, i.e., sources with no firm association to a known astrophysical object. We apply several selection criteria based on the expected properties of the DM-induced emission from subhalos, which allow us to significantly reduce the list of potential candidates. Then, by characterizing the minimum detection flux of the instrument and comparing our sample to predictions from the Via Lactea II (VL-II) N-body cosmological simulation, we place conservative and robust constraints on the $\langle\sigma v\rangle-m_{DM}$ parameter space. For annihilation via the $\tau^+\tau^-$ channel, we put an upper limit of $4\times 10^{-26}~(5\times 10^{-25})~cm^3~s^{-1}$ for a mass of 10 (100) GeV. A critical improvement over previous treatments is the repopulation we made to include low-mass subhalos below the VL-II mass resolution. With more advanced subhalo candidate filtering the sensitivity reach of our method can potentially improve these constraints by a factor 3 (2) for $\tau^+\tau^-$ ($b \bar{b}$) channel.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper searches for dark matter subhalo candidates among unidentified sources in the 3FGL, 2FHL, and 3FHL Fermi-LAT catalogs by applying selection cuts motivated by expected DM annihilation properties. It then compares the number of surviving candidates to the predicted detectable subhalo population from the Via Lactea II N-body simulation (augmented by a repopulation procedure for objects below the simulation mass resolution) to derive upper limits on ⟨σv⟩ versus m_DM for the τ⁺τ⁻ and b b-bar channels, reporting e.g. 4×10^{-26} cm³ s^{-1} at 10 GeV for τ⁺τ⁻.

Significance. If the repopulation step is shown to be reliable, the work supplies conservative, simulation-calibrated constraints on WIMP annihilation that improve on earlier catalog-based limits by explicitly including the low-mass subhalo contribution; the multi-catalog approach and emphasis on robustness are strengths.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract, final paragraph] Abstract, final paragraph: The repopulation procedure for subhalos below VL-II mass resolution is stated to be a critical improvement, yet the manuscript provides no cross-check of the extrapolated mass function, radial distribution, concentration-mass relation, or luminosity assignment against any higher-resolution simulation in the mass and galactocentric-distance range that dominates the Fermi-detectable population. Because the predicted count of sources above threshold is dominated by these repopulated objects, any systematic bias directly scales the derived ⟨σv⟩ upper limits.
minor comments (1)
  1. The selection criteria and minimum detection flux characterization are described at a high level; explicit tabulation of the cuts and their effect on the candidate list (e.g., number of sources remaining after each cut) would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We respond point-by-point to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, final paragraph] Abstract, final paragraph: The repopulation procedure for subhalos below VL-II mass resolution is stated to be a critical improvement, yet the manuscript provides no cross-check of the extrapolated mass function, radial distribution, concentration-mass relation, or luminosity assignment against any higher-resolution simulation in the mass and galactocentric-distance range that dominates the Fermi-detectable population. Because the predicted count of sources above threshold is dominated by these repopulated objects, any systematic bias directly scales the derived ⟨σv⟩ upper limits.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not include explicit cross-checks of the repopulation procedure against higher-resolution simulations in the relevant mass and galactocentric distance ranges. The repopulation follows standard extrapolation techniques applied to the resolved VL-II population (power-law mass function, radial distribution, and concentration-mass relation drawn from the literature), as described in the methods. We did not perform new direct comparisons in this work. We maintain that the resulting upper limits are conservative: any systematic overestimation in the predicted number of detectable subhalos would only strengthen (i.e., lower) the derived ⟨σv⟩ bounds. To address the referee's concern we will revise the manuscript to add a dedicated paragraph on the assumptions underlying the repopulation, with additional references to supporting literature that has tested similar extrapolations. This constitutes a partial revision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: limits derived from external simulation comparison without self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper obtains <σv> upper limits by counting unidentified sources in Fermi catalogs after selection cuts and requiring that this count not exceed the number of subhalos predicted to be detectable in the VL-II simulation (plus repopulation of unresolved low-mass objects). The prediction is generated from the N-body output and an extrapolation procedure whose parameters are not fitted to the present catalog; the comparison is therefore an external benchmark test. No equation equates the derived limit to a fitted quantity by construction, and no load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation whose validity is internal to this work. The repopulation step is an assumption about simulation fidelity, not a definitional or fitted-input circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on the assumption that the repopulation algorithm correctly augments the VL-II subhalo catalog and that the chosen selection criteria isolate a DM-like population without significant contamination or loss of signal.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Unidentified sources that survive the DM-property cuts can be treated as a clean sample for setting limits.
    Abstract states that several selection criteria based on expected DM emission properties are applied to reduce the candidate list.
  • ad hoc to paper The repopulation procedure below VL-II resolution faithfully represents the true low-mass subhalo population.
    Abstract highlights this repopulation as the critical improvement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5937 in / 1326 out tokens · 24130 ms · 2026-05-25T14:10:47.087470+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages · 49 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Planck Collaboration,Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, A&A (2015) , [1502.01589v3]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Dark Matter: A Primer

    K. Garrett and G. Duda,Dark Matter: A Primer, Adv. Astron.(2010) , [1006.2483v2]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Physics Reports 405 (2005) 279–390

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Freese,Review of Observational Evidence for Dark Matter in the Universe and in upcoming searches for Dark Stars, vol

    K. Freese,Review of Observational Evidence for Dark Matter in the Universe and in upcoming searches for Dark Stars, vol. 36 ofEAS Publications Series. 2009, 10.1051/eas/0936016. – 31 – Figure 17. Same as Figure 12 but forcc annihilation channel. Figure 18. Same as Figure 12 but fortt annihilation channel

    work page doi:10.1051/eas/0936016 2009

  5. [5]

    Madau, J

    P. Madau, J. Diemand and M. Kuhlen,Dark Matter Subhalos and the Dwarf Satellites of the Milky Way, APJ 679 (2008) 1260–1271

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    The Aquarius Project: the subhalos of galactic halos

    V. Springel, J. Wang, M. Vogelsberger, A. Ludlow, A. Jenkins, A. Helmi et al.,The Aquarius Project: the subhalos of galactic halos, MNRAS (2008) , [0809.0898v1]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Clumps and streams in the local dark matter distribution

    J. Diemand, M. Kuhlen, P. Madau, M. Zemp, B. Moore, D. Potter et al.,Clumps and streams in the local dark matter distribution, Nature (2008) , [0805.1244v2]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Bertschinger,Effects of cold dark matter decoupling and pair annihilation on cosmological – 32 – Figure 19

    E. Bertschinger,Effects of cold dark matter decoupling and pair annihilation on cosmological – 32 – Figure 19. Same as Figure 12 but forW +W − annihilation channel. Figure 20. Same as Figure 12 but forZ 0Z 0 annihilation channel. perturbations, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006)

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    Profumo, K

    S. Profumo, K. Sigurdson and M. Kamionkowski,What Mass Are the Smallest Protohalos?, Phys. Rev. Lett.97 (2006)

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Particle Models and the Small-Scale Structure of Dark Matter

    T. Bringmann,Particle Models and the Small-Scale Structure of Dark Matter, New J. Phys. (2009) , [0903.0189v2]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  11. [11]

    M. G. Walker,Dark Matter in the Milky Way’s Dwarf Spheroidal Satellites. 2013, 10.1007/978-94-007-5612-0-20. – 33 – Figure 21. Same as Figure 12 but forhh annihilation channel. Figure 22. Same as Figure 12 but fore+e− annihilation channel

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5612-0-20 2013

  12. [12]

    L. Gao, S. D. M. White, A. Jenkins, F. Stoehr and V. Springel,The subhalo populations of ΛCDM dark haloes, MNRAS 355 (2004) 819–834, [astro-ph/0404589]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  13. [13]

    WIMP dark matter candidates and searches - current status and future prospects

    L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo and S. Trojanowski,WIMP dark matter candidates and searches - current issues and future prospects, ArXiv e-prints(2017) , [1707.06277v1]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    The moment of truth for WIMP Dark Matter

    G. Bertone,The moment of truth for WIMP Dark Matter, Nature 468(2010) , [1011.3532v1]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    The Fermi-LAT Collaboration and W. B. Atwood,The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission, APJ (2009) , [0902.1089v1]. – 34 – Figure 23. Same as Figure 12 but forµ+µ− annihilation channel

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    The Fermi-LAT Collaboration,Fermi Large Area Telescope Third Source Catalog, APJS (2015) , [1501.02003v3]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    2FHL: The Second Catalog of Hard Fermi-LAT Sources

    M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, W. B. Atwood, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini et al.,2FHL: The Second Catalog of Hard Fermi-LAT Sources, APJS 222 (2016) 5, [1508.04449]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    The Fermi-LAT Collaboration,3FHL: The Third Catalog of Hard Fermi-LAT Sources, APJS 232 (2017) 18, [1702.00664]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    The Origin of the Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background and Implications for Dark-Matter Annihilation

    M. Ajello, D. Gasparrini, M. Sanchez-Conde, G. Zaharijas, M. Gustafsson, J. Cohen-Tanugi et al.,The Origin of the Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background and Implications for Dark-Matter Annihilation, APJL 800 (2015) L27, [1501.05301]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    Search for extended gamma-ray emission from the Virgo galaxy cluster with Fermi-LAT

    M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, A. Albert, W. B. Atwood, L. Baldini, G. Barbiellini et al.,Search for extended gamma-ray emission from the Virgo galaxy cluster with Fermi-LAT, APJ (2015) , [1510.00004v1]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    A Tentative Gamma-Ray Line from Dark Matter Annihilation at the Fermi Large Area Telescope

    C. Weniger,A Tentative Gamma-Ray Line from Dark Matter Annihilation at the Fermi Large Area Telescope, JCAP (2012) , [1204.2797v2]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    The Fermi-LAT Collaboration,Search for Gamma-ray Spectral Lines with the Fermi Large Area Telescope and Dark Matter Implications, Phys. Rev. D(2013) , [1305.5597v3]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    The Fermi-LAT Collaboration,Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi-LAT Data, Phys. Rev. Lett(2015) , [1503.02641v2]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    The Fermi-LAT Collaboration,Fermi-LAT Observations of High-Energy Gamma-Ray Emission Toward the Galactic Center, APJ 819 (2016) 44, [1511.02938]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    The Fermi-LAT Collaboration,The Fermi Galactic Center GeV Excess and Implications for Dark Matter, APJ 840 (2017) 43, [1704.03910]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Ahnen, S

    M. Ahnen, S. Ansoldi, L. Antonelli, C. Arcaro, D. Baack, A. Babić et al.,Indirect dark matter searches in the dwarf satellite galaxy Ursa Major II with the MAGIC telescopes, JCAP 2018 (2018) 009–009. – 35 –

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Archambault, A

    S. Archambault, A. Archer, W. Benbow, R. Bird, E. Bourbeau, T. Brantseg et al.,Dark matter constraints from a joint analysis of dwarf Spheroidal galaxy observations with VERITAS, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 082001

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Abdallah, A

    H. Abdallah, A. Abramowski, F. Aharonian, F. A. Benkhali, A. Akhperjanian, E. Angüner et al.,Search for Dark Matter Annihilations towards the Inner Galactic Halo from 10 Years of Observations with H.E.S.S., Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Examining The Fermi-LAT Third Source Catalog In Search Of Dark Matter Subhalos

    B. Bertoni, D. Hooper and T. Linden,Examining The Fermi-LAT Third Source Catalog In Search Of Dark Matter Subhalos, JCAP 12 (2015) 035, [1504.02087]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Is The Gamma-Ray Source 3FGL J2212.5+0703 A Dark Matter Subhalo?

    B. Bertoni, D. Hooper and T. Linden,Is The Gamma-Ray Source 3FGL J2212.5+0703 A Dark Matter Subhalo?, JCAP 5 (2016) 049, [1602.07303]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Realistic estimation for the detectability of dark matter sub-halos with Fermi-LAT

    F. Calore, V. D. Romeri, M. D. Mauro, F. Donato and F. Marinacci,Realistic estimation for the detectability of dark matter sub-halos with Fermi-LAT, Phys. Rev. D(2016) , [1611.03503v1]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Dark matter subhalos and unidentified sources in the Fermi 3FGL source catalog

    D. Schoonenberg, J. Gaskins, G. Bertone and J. Diemand,Dark matter subhalos and unidentified sources in the Fermi 3FGL source catalog, JCAP 5 (2016) 028, [1601.06781]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Gamma Rays From Dark Matter Subhalos Revisited: Refining the Predictions and Constraints

    D. Hooper and S. J. Witte,Gamma Rays From Dark Matter Subhalos Revisited: Refining the Predictions and Constraints, JCAP 4 (2017) 018, [1610.07587]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Stringent Constraints On The Dark Matter Annihilation Cross Section From Subhalo Searches With The Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope

    A. Berlin and D. Hooper,Stringent Constraints On The Dark Matter Annihilation Cross Section From Subhalo Searches With The Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope, Phys. Rev. D (2013) , [1309.0525v1]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    H. S. Zechlin, M. V. Fernandes, D. Elsaesser and D. Horns,Dark matter subhaloes as gamma-ray sources and candidates in the first Fermi-LAT catalogue, A&A (2011) , [1111.3514v2]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  36. [36]

    H. S. Zechlin and D. Horns,Unidentified sources in the Fermi-LAT second source catalog: the case for DM subhalos, JCAP (2012) , [1210.3852v4]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  37. [37]

    A. V. Belikov, M. R. Buckley and D. Hooper,Searching for dark matter subhalos in the Fermi-LAT second source catalog, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    M. R. Buckley and D. Hooper,Dark Matter Subhalos In the Fermi First Source Catalog, Phys. Rev. D(2010) , [1004.1644v2]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [39]

    The Fermi LAT Collaboration,Search for Dark Matter Satellites using the FERMI-LAT, APJ (2012) , [1201.2691v1]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [40]

    Aguirre-Santaella, M

    A. Aguirre-Santaella, M. Sanchez-Conde and J. Coronado-Blazquez,Tbd, TBD (TBD)

    work page

  41. [41]

    Ángeles Moliné, M. A. Sánchez-Conde, S. Palomares-Ruiz and F. Prada,Characterization of subhalo structural properties and implications for dark matter annihilation signals, MNRAS 466 (2017) 4974–4990, [1603.04057]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Evans, F

    N. Evans, F. Ferrer and S. Sarkar,A travel guide to the dark matter annihilation signal, Phys. Rev. D 69 (jun, 2004)

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    Bergström, P

    L. Bergström, P. Ullio and J. H. Buckley,Observability of gamma rays from dark matter neutralino annihilations in the Milky Way halo, Astroparticle Physics 9 (aug, 1998) 137–162

    work page 1998

  44. [44]

    PPPC 4 DM ID: A Poor Particle Physicist Cookbook for Dark Matter Indirect Detection

    M. Cirelli, G. Corcella, A. Hektor, G. Hütsi, M. Kadastik, P. Panci et al.,PPPC 4 DM ID: A Poor Particle Physicist Cookbook for Dark Matter Indirect Detection, JCAP (2010) , [1012.4515v4]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten et al.,An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Computer Physics Communications191 (2015) 159–177, [1410.3012]. – 36 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Stadel, D

    J. Stadel, D. Potter, B. Moore, J. Diemand, P. Madau, M. Zemp et al.,Quantifying the heart of darkness with GHALO - a multibillion particle simulation of a galactic halo, MNRAS 398 (2009) L21–L25

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Garrison-Kimmel, M

    S. Garrison-Kimmel, M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock and K. Lee,ELVIS: Exploring the Local Volume in Simulations, MNRAS 438 (2014) 2578–2596

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Diemand, B

    J. Diemand, B. Moore and J. Stadel,Earth-mass dark-matter haloes as the first structures in the early Universe, Nature 433 (2005) 389–391

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    Anderhalden and J

    D. Anderhalden and J. Diemand,Density profiles of CDM microhalos and their implications for annihilation boost factors, JCAP 2013 (2013) 009–009

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    Ishiyama,Hierarchical Formation of Dark Matter Halos and the Free Streaming Scale, APJ 788 (2014) 27

    T. Ishiyama,Hierarchical Formation of Dark Matter Halos and the Free Streaming Scale, APJ 788 (2014) 27

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Diemand, M

    J. Diemand, M. Kuhlen and P. Madau,Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Dark Matter Halos and Their Substructure, APJ 667 (2007) 859–877

    work page 2007

  52. [52]

    Garrison-Kimmel, A

    S. Garrison-Kimmel, A. Wetzel, J. S. Bullock, P. F. Hopkins, M. Boylan-Kolchin, C.-A. Faucher-Giguère et al.,Not so lumpy after all: modelling the depletion of dark matter subhaloes by Milky Way-like galaxies, MNRAS 471 (2017) 1709–1727

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    W. H. Press and P. Schechter,Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation, APJ 187 (feb, 1974) 425

    work page 1974

  54. [54]

    Giocoli, L

    C. Giocoli, L. Pieri and G. Tormen,Analytical approach to subhalo population in dark matter haloes, MNRAS 387 (2008) 689–697

    work page 2008

  55. [55]

    Blanchet and J

    S. Blanchet and J. Lavalle,Diffuse gamma-ray constraints on dark matter revisited I: the impact of subhalos, JCAP 2012 (2012) 021–021

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    Pieri, J

    L. Pieri, J. Lavalle, G. Bertone and E. Branchini,Implications of high-resolution simulations on indirect dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011)

    work page 2011

  57. [57]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine,Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition (Princeton Series in Astrophysics). Princeton University Press, 2008

    work page 2008

  58. [58]

    F. C. van den Bosch, G. Ogiya, O. Hahn and A. Burkert,Disruption of dark matter substructure: fact or fiction?, MNRAS 474 (2017) 3043–3066

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Berezinsky, V

    V. Berezinsky, V. Dokuchaev and Y. Eroshenko,Destruction of small-scale dark matter clumps in the hierarchical structures and galaxies, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006)

    work page 2006

  60. [60]

    Goerdt, O

    T. Goerdt, O. Y. Gnedin, B. Moore, J. Diemand and J. Stadel,The survival and disruption of cold dark matter microhaloes: implications for direct and indirect detection experiments, MNRAS 375 (2007) 191–198

    work page 2007

  61. [61]

    H. Zhao, D. Hooper, G. W. Angus, J. E. Taylor and J. Silk,Tidal Disruption of the First Dark Microhalos, APJ 654 (2007) 697–701

    work page 2007

  62. [62]

    Q. Zhu, F. Marinacci, M. Maji, Y. Li, V. Springel and L. Hernquist,Baryonic impact on the dark matter distribution in Milky Way-sized galaxies and their satellites, MNRAS 458 (2016) 1559–1580

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Saz-Parkinson,Latest results on gamma-ray pulsars with Fermi, Il Nuovo Cimento C40 (Sep, 2017) 1–5

    P. Saz-Parkinson,Latest results on gamma-ray pulsars with Fermi, Il Nuovo Cimento C40 (Sep, 2017) 1–5

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    Laffon, D

    H. Laffon, D. A. Smith, L. Guillemot and for the Fermi-LAT Collaboration,New pulsars detected in gamma-rays with the Fermi-LAT, Proceedings of the 2014 Fermi Symposium (2015) , [1502.03251v2]

    work page arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    D. A. Smith, L. Guillemot, M. Kerr, C. Ng and E. Barr,Gamma-ray pulsars with Fermi, Proceeding of the 11th INTEGRAL Conference(2017) , [1706.03592v1]. – 37 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [66]

    N. Á. Crespo, F. Massaro, D. Milisavljevic, M. Landoni, V. Chavushyan, V. Patiño-Álvarez et al.,Optical Spectroscopic Observations of Gamma-Ray Blazar Candidates. VI. Further Observations from TNG, WHT, OAN, SOAR and MAGELLAN Telescopes, The Astronomical Journal 151 (2016) 95

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    H. A. Peña-Herazo, E. J. Marchesini, N. Á. Crespo, F. Ricci, F. Massaro, V. Chavushyan et al.,Optical spectroscopic observations of gamma-ray blazar candidates. VII. Follow-up campaign in the southern hemisphere, Astrophysics and Space Science362 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Paiano, R

    S. Paiano, R. Falomo, A. Franceschini, A. Treves and R. Scarpa,Optical Spectroscopic Survey of a Sample of Unidentified Fermi Objects, APJ 851 (2017) 135

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    Massaro, N

    F. Massaro, N. Á. Crespo, R. D’Abrusco, M. Landoni, N. Masetti, F. Ricci et al.,The gamma-ray blazar quest: new optical spectra, state of art and future perspectives, Astrophysics and Space Science361 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    C. J. Clark, J. Wu, H. J. Pletsch, L. Guillemot, B. Allen, C. Aulbert et al.,The Einstein@Home Gamma-Ray Pulsar Survey. I. Search Methods, Sensitivity and Discovery of New Young Gamma-Ray Pulsars, APJ 834 (2017) 106

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    C. J. Clark, H. J. Pletsch, J. Wu, L. Guillemot, M. Kerr, T. J. Johnson et al.,Einstein@Home discovers a radio-quiet gamma-ray millisecond pulsar, Science Advances 4 (2018) eaao7228

    work page 2018

  72. [72]

    Identification of the High-Energy Gamma-Ray Source 3FGL J1544.6-1125 as a Transitional Millisecond Pulsar Binary in an Accreting State

    S. Bogdanov and J. P. Halpern,Identification of the High-Energy Gamma-Ray Source 3FGL J1544.6-1125 as a Transitional Millisecond Pulsar Binary in an Accreting State, APJL 803 (2015) L27, [1503.01698]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Multi-wavelength observations of 3FGL J2039.6-5618: a candidate redback millisecond pulsar

    D. Salvetti, R. P. Mignani, A. D. Luca, C. Delvaux, C. Pallanca, A. Belfiore et al., Multi-wavelength observations of 3FGL J2039.6-5618: a candidate redback millisecond pulsar, APJ 814 (2015) 88, [1509.07474]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  74. [74]

    R. W. Romani,A binary counterpart for 2FGL J2039.6-5620, APJL 812 (2015) L24, [1509.07834]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  75. [75]

    Parkes radio searches of Fermi gamma-ray sources and millisecond pulsar discoveries

    F. Camilo, M. Kerr, P. S. Ray, S. M. Ransom, J. Sarkissian, H. T. Cromartie et al.,Parkes radio searches of Fermi gamma-ray sources and millisecond pulsar discoveries, APJ 810 (2015) 85, [1507.04451]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    The Fermi-LAT Collaboration,The 4FGL catalog, TBD (TBD)

    work page

  77. [77]

    The second catalog of flaring gamma-ray sources from the Fermi All-sky Variability Analysis

    S. Abdollahi, M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, A. Albert, L. Baldini, J. Ballet et al.,The second catalog of flaring gamma-ray sources from the Fermi All-sky Variability Analysis, ApJ (2016) , [1612.03165v3]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    The Fermi-LAT Collaboration,Fermi-LAT Observations of the Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission: Implications for Cosmic Rays and the Interstellar Medium, APJ (2012) , [1202.4039v2]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  79. [79]

    3FGLzoo. Classifying 3FGL Unassociated Fermi-LAT Gamma-ray Sources by Artificial Neural Networks

    D. Salvetti, G. Chiaro, G. La Mura and D. J. Thompson,3FGLzoo: classifying 3FGL unassociated Fermi-LATγ-ray sources by artificial neural networks, MNRAS 470 (2017) 1291–1297, [1705.09832]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    Research and characterisation of blazar candidates among the Fermi/LAT 3FGL catalogue using multivariate classifications

    J. Lefaucheur and S. Pita,Research and characterisation of blazar candidates among the Fermi-LAT 3FGL catalogue using multivariate classifications, A&A (2017) , [1703.01822v1]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.