Recognition: 1 theorem link
An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2
Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 23:09 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
PYTHIA 8.2 now provides a complete replacement for most high-energy collision simulations.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
PYTHIA 8.2 contains a coherent set of physics models for high-energy collisions, including a library of hard processes, initial- and final-state parton showers, matching and merging methods, multiparton interactions, beam remnants, string fragmentation, particle decays, utilities, and interfaces to external programs. This release has reached sufficient maturity to serve as a complete replacement for most applications, notably LHC physics studies, with the many new features allowing for an improved description of data.
What carries the argument
The PYTHIA event generator program, which assembles models for the evolution from a few-body hard process to a complex multiparticle final state.
If this is right
- Users can employ PYTHIA 8.2 for more accurate LHC event generation with updated matching and merging methods.
- The C++ structure supports better integration with modern computing tools and external programs.
- New features in parton showers and fragmentation should lead to closer matches with observed particle distributions.
- Researchers can rely on this version for comprehensive simulations without needing the old Fortran code.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Adoption of PYTHIA 8.2 could standardize simulation practices across LHC analyses and reduce discrepancies between different tools.
- Future extensions might incorporate new physics models more easily due to the modular C++ design.
- Improved data description could help in identifying subtle signals of beyond-standard-model physics.
- Performance gains from the rewrite may allow larger-scale simulation campaigns for theoretical studies.
Load-bearing premise
The implemented physics models for parton showers, multiparton interactions, and string fragmentation continue to describe real collision data accurately enough when parameters are tuned to existing measurements.
What would settle it
Persistent mismatches between PYTHIA 8.2 predictions and new experimental data from the LHC in untuned kinematic regions that cannot be fixed by adjusting model parameters.
read the original abstract
The PYTHIA program is a standard tool for the generation of events in high-energy collisions, comprising a coherent set of physics models for the evolution from a few-body hard process to a complex multiparticle final state. It contains a library of hard processes, models for initial- and final-state parton showers, matching and merging methods between hard processes and parton showers, multiparton interactions, beam remnants, string fragmentation and particle decays. It also has a set of utilities and several interfaces to external programs. PYTHIA 8.2 is the second main release after the complete rewrite from Fortran to C++, and now has reached such a maturity that it offers a complete replacement for most applications, notably for LHC physics studies. The many new features should allow an improved description of data.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript introduces PYTHIA 8.2, the second major release of the C++ rewrite of the PYTHIA Monte Carlo event generator. It describes the program's modular architecture and coherent set of physics models for high-energy collisions, covering hard processes, initial- and final-state parton showers, matching and merging methods, multiparton interactions, beam remnants, string fragmentation, particle decays, utilities, and external interfaces. The central claim is that the code has now reached sufficient maturity to serve as a complete replacement for most applications, particularly LHC physics studies, with the new features enabling an improved description of data.
Significance. If the implemented models continue to perform reliably when tuned, the paper is significant as a reference document for a standard tool in high-energy physics phenomenology. It documents the transition to a fully C++ implementation with enhanced modularity, which facilitates extensions and interfaces relevant to LHC analyses and beyond.
major comments (1)
- [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1: the claim that PYTHIA 8.2 'now has reached such a maturity that it offers a complete replacement for most applications, notably for LHC physics studies' is not supported by any new validation studies, quantitative benchmarks, or data comparisons within the manuscript itself; the text is purely descriptive and defers all performance assessment to separately cited works.
minor comments (2)
- The manuscript would benefit from a concise table in the introduction or a dedicated section that explicitly lists the major new features in 8.2 relative to 8.1, with pointers to the relevant subsections.
- Notation for tunable parameters (e.g., those controlling parton showers and MPI) is introduced inline but would be clearer if collected in a single summary table with default values and brief descriptions.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive recommendation to accept the manuscript. We address the major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1: the claim that PYTHIA 8.2 'now has reached such a maturity that it offers a complete replacement for most applications, notably for LHC physics studies' is not supported by any new validation studies, quantitative benchmarks, or data comparisons within the manuscript itself; the text is purely descriptive and defers all performance assessment to separately cited works.
Authors: We agree that the manuscript is descriptive and contains no new validation studies or data comparisons, as this is an 'Introduction' paper documenting the program architecture, features, and interfaces rather than a physics analysis. The maturity statement reflects the completion of the C++ rewrite (with all core models now implemented) and the program's readiness for LHC applications, as evidenced by the comprehensive feature set described in the text and by the many cited references to prior tuning, validation, and data comparisons. We do not view this as requiring a change to the manuscript. revision: no
Circularity Check
No significant circularity
full rationale
The document is a descriptive software manual and release note for PYTHIA 8.2. It enumerates implemented models (parton showers, MPI, string fragmentation, etc.) and features without presenting derivations, first-principles predictions, or new fitted quantities. The maturity claim rests on the completeness of the listed capabilities rather than any equation or result that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems appear; external model parameters are referenced to prior literature in the standard manner for documentation.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Forward citations
Cited by 42 Pith papers
-
Search for single vector-like quark production in opposite-sign dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV
No excess observed in search for vector-like top quark T to tH in opposite-sign dilepton final states; 95% CL upper limits on sigma times BR range from 2.0 pb at 600 GeV to 0.1 pb at 1000 GeV.
-
Probing Boosted Light Scalars in the Type-I 2HDM
Boosted light scalars decaying to b b-bar in Type-I 2HDM can be tagged as double-b fat-jets and used with SM gauge bosons to probe heavy scalars up to 540 GeV at the HL-LHC for masses 30-70 GeV.
-
Physics inspired quantum algorithm for QCD splitting functions
A modular two-qubit quantum circuit is constructed to encode the concurrence of helicity entanglement in pure-gluon splitting, with parameters calibrated to LHC jet data so that composed circuits reproduce experimenta...
-
Differential measurements of $\gamma\gamma\to\tau\tau$ and constraints on $\tau$-lepton electromagnetic moments in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with ATLAS
First differential cross-sections for γγ→ττ in Pb+Pb collisions yield 95% CL intervals -0.057 < a_τ < 0.035 and |d_τ| < 2.7×10^{-16} e cm.
-
Search for Long-Lived Dark Photons from Dark Radiation at the LHC
Dark radiation from dark matter produced in Z decays generates long-lived dark photons that dominate over meson decays and bremsstrahlung for small kinetic mixing and masses above the GeV scale, allowing FASER2, FACET...
-
Quantum-Inspired Tensor Network Autoencoders for Anomaly Detection: A MERA-Based Approach
A MERA-based autoencoder supplies a locality-aware hierarchical inductive bias that improves reconstruction-based anomaly detection for collider jets, with disentanglers providing benefit at strong compression bottlenecks.
-
Measure charge transport in high-energy nuclear collisions with an energy scan of isobaric collisions
An energy scan of isobaric collisions provides a double-ratio method to measure electric charge transport rapidity dependence, with simulations showing exponential decrease and model-dependent slopes distinct from bar...
-
Evidence of ZZ$\gamma$ production and observation of $4\ell\gamma$ in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV
First evidence for ZZ gamma production at 3.7 sigma and observation of 4 lepton gamma at 5.0 sigma in CMS data at 13 TeV, with measured fiducial cross sections consistent with predictions.
-
Many Wrongs Make a Right: Leveraging Biased Simulations Towards Unbiased Parameter Inference
Template-Adapted Mixture Model uses many biased simulations for data-driven estimates of signal and background distributions, yielding unbiased signal fraction estimates with well-calibrated uncertainties.
-
DNN predictions for pp reference $p_\mathrm{T}$ spectra at unmeasured $\sqrt{s}$
A deep neural network interpolates and extrapolates proton-proton reference transverse-momentum spectra to unmeasured center-of-mass energies using ALICE LHC data.
-
Composite top partners in exotic colour representations
Colour-sextet top partners in composite Higgs models are excluded up to 2-2.5 TeV by current LHC data via top-rich decays, with HL-LHC reach near 3 TeV.
-
How Invisible: Regressing The Key Model Parameter for Semi-visible Jet Searches
A regression model reconstructs the key parameter r_inv for semi-visible jets at higher precision than prior analytical methods and may unify s- and t-channel production searches.
-
Low-Multiplicity Jets as Probes of GeV-Scale Light-Quark-Coupled Particles
A proposed LHC search using low-multiplicity jets plus a photon can extend sensitivity to GeV-scale particles that couple to light quarks.
-
SemiCharmTag: a tool for Semileptonic Charm tagging
SemiCharmTag achieves a factor of ~4 signal-over-background improvement at 81% efficiency for Drell-Yan muons using secondary-vertex hadron tagging in LHCb proton-proton collision simulations.
-
Probing Higgs and Top Interactions through the Muon Lens at multi-TeV Muon Colliders
A 10 TeV muon collider could improve existing bounds on muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top interactions by up to an order of magnitude over current limits and FCC-ee projections.
-
Monte Carlo Event Generation with Continuous Normalizing Flows
Continuous normalizing flows improve unweighting efficiency in Monte Carlo event generation for high-jet-multiplicity collider processes by factors up to 184, with wall-time gains of about ten when combined with coupl...
-
Search for pair production of additional neutral scalars within the Inert Doublet Model in a final state with two electrons or two muons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV and 13.6 TeV
No significant excess found; new exclusion limits reach m_H = 108 GeV for m_H - m_A = 78 GeV in the Inert Doublet Model.
-
LHC Mono-$W/Z$ Signatures as a Probe for Dark Matter Explanations of Astrophysical Excesses
LHC mono-W/Z searches with a new channel-separation method can exclude large ranges of neutral and charged mass splittings in the 70-75 GeV IDM dark matter scenario that fits astrophysical excesses.
-
Can LLP detectors probe the reheating temperature? A case study of vector dark matter
In a vector dark matter extension of the Higgs portal, far detectors at colliders can probe otherwise inaccessible parameter space and set novel bounds on the reheating temperature.
-
Effective field theory interpretation of ATLAS measurements involving the Higgs boson, electroweak bosons and the top quark
A simultaneous fit to multiple ATLAS datasets constrains 48 SMEFT Wilson coefficients and matches subsets to 2HDM and heavy-vector models, finding consistency with the Standard Model.
-
Sequential Y(nS) suppression in high-multiplicity pp collisions: the experimental case for an early, globally correlated medium
Multi-differential tests on Υ(nS) and ψ(2S)/J/ψ suppression in high-multiplicity pp collisions rule out standard hadronic and string models in favor of an early globally correlated partonic medium.
-
Bayesian inference constraints on jet quenching across centrality, beam energy, and observable classes in LHC heavy-ion collisions
Bayesian posteriors from JETSCAPE jet-quenching model are largely compatible across centrality but exhibit shifts across beam energy and observable class, with varying ability to predict complementary datasets.
-
Search for charginos and neutralinos with $B-L$ $R$-parity violating decays in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV and $13.6$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector
No evidence for charginos and neutralinos in R-parity violating Higgs-decay channels; masses 150-1100 GeV excluded at 95% CL assuming equal lepton branching fractions.
-
Distinguishing Higgs portal and neutralino dark matter via vector boson fusion
Vector boson fusion processes at the LHC distinguish Higgs portal dark matter from neutralino dark matter at over 5 sigma using jet kinematics and a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with linear discriminant analysis.
-
Phenomenology of electroweak spin-1 resonances
Composite Higgs models with SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R predict spin-1 resonances mixing with electroweak bosons that remain viable at the LHC down to masses of about 1.5 TeV.
-
Medium Characterization with Hard Probes: From Cherenkov Light in QED to Jet Drift in QCD
Presents a dispersive fit for liquid argon refractive index sensitive to Cherenkov angles and uses jet drift in APE simulations to disentangle QGP tomography from energy loss.
-
Measurement of isolated-prompt photon$-$hadron correlations in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{\textit{s}_{\rm NN}} = 5.02}$ TeV
ALICE observes strong suppression of associated hadron yields per trigger photon in central Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, extending the kinematic reach of photon-hadron correlation measurements.
-
Study of $t\bar{t}$ threshold effects in $e\mu$ differential distributions measured in $\sqrt{s}=13$\,TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector
ATLAS data on eμ invariant mass and angle distributions in 13 TeV collisions are better described by ttbar models that include color-singlet quasi-bound states near threshold, with fits showing over 3 sigma evidence a...
-
Multi-Lepton Probes of the Drell-Yan Production of Triplet Higgses
The ΔSM real Higgs triplet model is consistent with LHC triboson excesses but predicts more events than observed and is not preferred over the Standard Model.
-
Same-Sign Tetralepton Signature at $\mu$TRISTAN
The paper identifies promising parameter regions for observing same-sign tetralepton events from charged Higgs pair and single production decaying to muons and heavy neutral leptons at μTRISTAN.
-
Mono-Z' Signatures in the B-L Supersymmetric Standard Model at the LHC
Mono-Z' events from Z' plus singlet Higgs production in the BLSSM-IS, with h' decaying to LSP dark matter pairs, yield a detectable leptonic signal independent of the specific DM candidate.
-
Search for quantum black holes in lepton+jet final states using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV with the ATLAS detector
No significant excess of high-mass lepton+jet events is observed in 164 fb^{-1} of 13.6 TeV pp collisions, setting 95% CL upper limits on quantum black hole production cross-section times branching ratio that reach a ...
-
Probing Flavor-Violating Higgs Decays in the Type-III Two-Higgs-Doublet Model at the LHC and HL-LHC
In the Type-III 2HDM, neutral and heavy charged flavor-violating Higgs decays can exceed 5 sigma significance at 300 fb^{-1} luminosity while the light charged mode is more background-limited.
-
Sensitivity to top-quark FCNC interactions at future muon colliders
A 10 TeV muon collider with 10 ab^{-1} could reach O(10^{-3}) sensitivity on top-quark FCNC couplings, improving current ATLAS/CMS bounds by more than an order of magnitude.
-
Exotic Higgs Decays at a Muon Collider
Muon colliders at 3 TeV and 10 TeV can probe branching ratios for h to SS decays in 4b and 2b2μ channels down to 10^{-3}–10^{-5}, improving on HL-LHC projections using machine learning.
-
Prospects for Measuring $H\to \rm{invisble}$ at the FCCee
FCC-ee at 240 GeV with 10.8 ab^{-1} could set a 95% CL upper limit of 0.15% on the branching ratio of Higgs to invisible particles.
-
Possibility of Probing an Extra Higgs Boson at the Compact Linear Collider
CLIC can probe an additional neutral Higgs boson H in the Two Higgs Doublet Model through the process e+e- to H nu nu-bar with H decaying to WW in the dilepton channel.
-
Machine Learning Study on Single Production of a Singlet Vector-like Lepton at the Large Hadron Collider
XGBoost machine learning improves discrimination in LHC searches for singlet vector-like leptons, yielding projected 2σ mass exclusion limits of 620 GeV (three-lepton) and 490 GeV (four-lepton) at 14 TeV with 3000 fb^{-1}.
-
Signals of Doomsday III: Cosmological signatures of the late time $U(1)_{EM}$ symmetry breaking
A model of late-time U(1)EM symmetry breaking via scalar-driven first-order phase transition predicts high-energy photon and neutrino bursts as long-range precursors detectable by multi-messenger facilities.
-
Track and Vertex Reconstruction with the ATLAS Inner Detector
ATLAS Inner Detector track and vertex reconstruction maintains high efficiency, good resolution, and low fake rates for up to 80 simultaneous proton-proton interactions in Run 2 and Run 3 data and simulations.
-
A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3
The paper provides a detailed physics and user manual for the PYTHIA 8.3 Monte Carlo event generator used in high-energy physics.
- Looking inside jets: an introduction to jet substructure and boosted-object phenomenology
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
-
[4]
T. Sj¨ ostrand and M. Bengtsson, Comput. Phys. Commun. 43 (1987) 367
work page 1987
-
[5]
H. U. Bengtsson, Comput. Phys. Commun. 31 (1984) 323
work page 1984
-
[6]
H. U. Bengtsson and G. Ingelman, Comput. Phys. Commun. 34 (1985) 251
work page 1985
-
[7]
H. U. Bengtsson and T. Sj¨ ostrand, Comput. Phys. Commun. 46 (1987) 43
work page 1987
- [8]
-
[9]
T. Sj¨ ostrand, P. Ed´ en, C. Friberg, L. L¨ onnblad, G. Miu, S. Mrenna and E. Norbin, Comput. Phys. Commun. 135 (2001) 238 [hep-ph/0010017]
-
[10]
T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna and P. Z. Skands, JHEP 0605 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175]
work page Pith review arXiv 2006
-
[11]
A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1
T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. C ommun. 178 (2008) 852 [arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2008
-
[12]
E. Boos, M. Dobbs, W. Giele, I. Hinchliffe, J. Huston, V. Ilyin, J. K anzaki and K. Kato et al. , hep-ph/0109068
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
- [13]
- [15]
-
[16]
Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune
P. Skands, S. Carrazza and J. Rojo, arXiv:1404.5630 [hep-ph]
- [17]
-
[18]
N. Desai and P. Z. Skands, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2238 [arXiv:1109.5852 [hep-ph]]
-
[19]
M. Fairbairn, A. C. Kraan, D. A. Milstead, T. Sj¨ ostrand, P. Z. Skands and T. Sloan, Phys. Rept. 438 (2007) 1 [hep-ph/0611040]
-
[20]
L. Carloni and T. Sj¨ ostrand, JHEP 1009 (2010) 105 [arXiv:1006.2911 [hep-ph]]
-
[21]
L. Carloni, J. Rathsman and T. Sj¨ ostrand, JHEP 1104 (2011) 091 [arXiv:1102.3795 [hep-ph]]. 40
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
-
[25]
J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, JH EP 1106 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522 [hep-ph]]
work page Pith review arXiv 2011
-
[26]
A. Donnachie and P. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. B296 (1992) 227 [hep-ph/9209205]
-
[27]
G. A. Schuler and T. Sj¨ ostrand, Nucl. Phys. B407 (1993) 539
work page 1993
- [28]
-
[29]
R. Ciesielski and K. Goulianos, PoS ICHEP2012 (2013) 301, [arXiv:1205.1446]
-
[30]
G. A. Schuler and T. Sj¨ ostrand, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 2257
work page 1994
-
[31]
TOTEM Collaboration, G. Antchev et al. , Europhys. Lett. 101 (2013) 21004
work page 2013
-
[32]
TOTEM Collaboration, G. Antchev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013), no. 1, 012001
work page 2013
- [33]
- [34]
-
[35]
A. Donnachie and P. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. B727 (2013) 500–505, [arXiv:1309.1292]
- [36]
- [37]
- [38]
-
[39]
T. Kasemets and T. Sj¨ ostrand, Eur. Phys. J. C 69 (2010) 19 [arXiv:1007.0897 [hep- ph]]
-
[40]
T. Sj¨ ostrand and P. Z. Skands, Eur. Phys. J. C 39 (2005) 129 [hep-ph/0408302]
- [41]
-
[42]
R. Corke and T. Sj¨ ostrand, JHEP 1103 (2011) 032 [arXiv:1011.1759 [hep-ph]]
-
[43]
V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15 (1972) 438 [Yad. Fiz. 15 (1972) 781]
work page 1972
- [44]
-
[45]
Y. L. Dokshitzer, Sov. Phys. JETP 46 (1977) 641 [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 73 (1977) 1216]
work page 1977
-
[46]
E. Norrbin and T. Sj¨ ostrand, Nucl. Phys. B 603 (2001) 297 [hep-ph/0010012]
- [47]
- [48]
-
[49]
J. Beringer et al. [Particle Data Group Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001
work page 2012
- [50]
-
[51]
L. Hartgring, E. Laenen and P. Skands, JHEP 1310 (2013) 127 [arXiv:1303.4974 [hep-ph]]
- [52]
-
[53]
R. Corke and T. Sj¨ ostrand, Eur. Phys. J. C 69 (2010) 1 [arXiv:1003.2384 [hep-ph]]
- [54]
-
[55]
T. Sj¨ ostrand and P. Z. Skands, JHEP 0403 (2004) 053 [hep-ph/0402078]
-
[56]
R. Corke and T. Sj¨ ostrand, JHEP 1001 (2010) 035 [arXiv:0911.1909 [hep-ph]]
-
[57]
R. Corke and T. Sj¨ ostrand, JHEP 1105 (2011) 009 [arXiv:1101.5953 [hep-ph]]
-
[58]
J. R. Christiansen and P. Z. Skands, in preparation
-
[59]
S. Argyropoulos and T. Sj¨ ostrand, arXiv:1407.6653 [hep-ph], accepted for publication in JHEP
- [60]
-
[61]
T. Sj¨ ostrand and V. A. Khoze, Z. Phys. C 62 (1994) 281 [hep-ph/9310242]
-
[62]
B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, G. Ingelman and T. Sj¨ ostrand , Phys. Rept. 97 (1983) 31
work page 1983
- [63]
-
[64]
B. Andersson, G. Gustafson and T. Sj¨ ostrand, Phys. Scrip ta 32 (1985) 574
work page 1985
-
[65]
T. Sj¨ ostrand and P. Z. Skands, Nucl. Phys. B 659 (2003) 243 [hep-ph/0212264]
- [66]
- [67]
- [68]
-
[69]
L. L¨ onnblad and T. Sj¨ ostrand, Eur. Phys. J. C 2 (1998) 165 [hep-ph/9711460]
-
[70]
Buckleyet al., General-purpose event genera- tors for LHC physics, Phys
A. Buckley, J. Butterworth, S. Gieseke, D. Grellscheid, S. Hoc he, H. Hoeth, F. Krauss and L. L¨ onnbladet al. , Phys. Rept. 504 (2011) 145 [arXiv:1101.2599 [hep-ph]]
-
[71]
A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms
P. Nason, JHEP 0411 (2004) 040 [hep-ph/0409146]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
-
[72]
Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method
S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, JHEP 0711 (2007) 070 [arXiv:0709.2092 [hep- ph]]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
-
[73]
Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations
S. Frixione and B. R. Webber, JHEP 0206 (2002) 029 [hep-ph/0204244]
work page Pith review arXiv 2002
-
[74]
S. Platzer and S. Gieseke, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2187 (2012) [arXiv:1109.6256 [hep-ph]]
-
[75]
A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods
S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, M. Schonherr and F. Siegert, JHEP 1209, 049 (2012) [arXiv:1111.1220 [hep-ph]]
work page Pith review arXiv 2012
-
[76]
J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Matte laer, H. -S. Shao and T. Stelzer et al. , JHEP 1407 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[77]
L. L¨ onnblad, JHEP 0205 (2002) 046 [hep-ph/0112284]
-
[78]
L. L¨ onnblad and S. Prestel, JHEP 1203 (2012) 019 [arXiv:1109.4829 [hep-ph]]
- [79]
-
[80]
L. L¨ onnblad and S. Prestel, JHEP 1302 (2013) 094 [arXiv:1211.4827 [hep-ph]]
-
[81]
L. L¨ onnblad and S. Prestel, JHEP 1303 (2013) 166 [arXiv:1211.7278 [hep-ph]]
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.