Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Imitation-Projected Programmatic Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.05431 v4 pith:TKD6T6O5 submitted 2019-07-11 cs.LG cs.AIcs.PLstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.PLstat.ML
keywords learningprogrammaticpoliciespolicyspaceapproachespropelapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the problem of programmatic reinforcement learning, in which policies are represented as short programs in a symbolic language. Programmatic policies can be more interpretable, generalizable, and amenable to formal verification than neural policies; however, designing rigorous learning approaches for such policies remains a challenge. Our approach to this challenge -- a meta-algorithm called PROPEL -- is based on three insights. First, we view our learning task as optimization in policy space, modulo the constraint that the desired policy has a programmatic representation, and solve this optimization problem using a form of mirror descent that takes a gradient step into the unconstrained policy space and then projects back onto the constrained space. Second, we view the unconstrained policy space as mixing neural and programmatic representations, which enables employing state-of-the-art deep policy gradient approaches. Third, we cast the projection step as program synthesis via imitation learning, and exploit contemporary combinatorial methods for this task. We present theoretical convergence results for PROPEL and empirically evaluate the approach in three continuous control domains. The experiments show that PROPEL can significantly outperform state-of-the-art approaches for learning programmatic policies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SMOSE: Sparse Mixture of Shallow Experts for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Control Tasks

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sparse top-1 mixture of linear experts, trained with SAC and distilled into decision trees, matches or beats interpretable baselines and narrows the gap to opaque policies on MuJoCo tasks.

Pith tools