pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.11666 · v1 · pith:2EEQJD3Fnew · submitted 2019-07-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

New Beta Cephei stars with KELT

Jonathan Labadie-Bartz , Gerald Handler , Joshua Pepper , Luis Balona , Peter De Cat , Daniel J. Stevens , Michael B. Lund , Keivan G. Stassun
show 4 more authors
Joseph E. Rodriguez Robert J. Siverd David J. James Rudolf B. Kuhn
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 15:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords Beta Cephei starsKELT surveystellar pulsationsasteroseismologymassive starsfrequency analysisO-type starsB-type stars
0
0 comments X

The pith

KELT light-curve analysis identifies 86 new Beta Cephei stars and raises the known total by 70 percent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts a frequency analysis on KELT survey light curves of known O- and B-type stars to search for Beta Cephei pulsators. It reports 113 confirmed Beta Cephei stars, 86 of them new, plus 96 additional candidates. These stars exhibit pressure and mixed modes that allow seismological probes of massive-star interiors. The enlarged sample will receive extensive TESS coverage, opening the way for detailed asteroseismic modeling of stellar structure and evolution. The work also notes five new eclipsing binaries and 22 stars showing equal frequency spacings consistent with rotational splitting.

Core claim

We present the results of a search for Galactic Beta Cephei stars by performing a frequency analysis on the optical light curves of known O- and B-type stars with data from the KELT exoplanet survey. We identify 113 Beta Cephei stars, of which 86 are new discoveries, which altogether represents a ~70% increase in the number presently known. An additional 96 candidates are identified. Among our targets, we find five new eclipsing binaries and 22 stars with equal frequency spacings suggestive of rotational splitting of nonradial pulsation modes.

What carries the argument

Frequency analysis of KELT light curves applied to O- and B-type stars to isolate the characteristic pulsation frequencies of Beta Cephei variables.

If this is right

  • The known population of Beta Cephei stars increases by approximately 70 percent.
  • Most of the new and known Beta Cephei stars will receive high-quality TESS light curves suitable for detailed asteroseismology.
  • Five new eclipsing binaries are added to the sample of O- and B-type systems.
  • Twenty-two stars exhibit frequency spacings consistent with rotational splitting of nonradial modes.
  • The larger sample supports improved statistical studies of massive-star interiors and evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same wide-field survey approach could be applied to other photometric archives to locate additional Beta Cephei stars beyond the KELT footprint.
  • TESS data on this expanded set may tighten constraints on the size of convective cores in massive stars.
  • Runaway-star candidates among the sample offer a route to test formation and ejection mechanisms for high-mass objects.
  • Statistical properties derived from the full 113-star list could be compared directly with stellar-evolution models that include pulsation physics.

Load-bearing premise

The detected periodic signals in the KELT data are Beta Cephei pulsations rather than other forms of stellar variability.

What would settle it

Higher-precision photometry or spectroscopy that reclassifies a large fraction of the 86 new objects as non-pulsators or different variable types would falsify the count.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.11666 by Daniel J. Stevens, David J. James, Gerald Handler, Jonathan Labadie-Bartz, Joseph E. Rodriguez, Joshua Pepper, Keivan G. Stassun, Luis Balona, Michael B. Lund, Peter De Cat, Robert J. Siverd, Rudolf B. Kuhn.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Boxplot showing the frequency (top row) and the ampli￾tude (bottom row) distributions for the β Cephei stars (left column) and the candidates (right column). These are split into bins accord￾ing to their spectral types, as reported in the literature. The numbers in the boxes in the top row indicate the number of objects in that bin. The corresponding bins in the lower row contain the same number of stars. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Histogram of the primary frequency (top left) and the corresponding amplitude (bottom left) recovered, the V-band mag￾nitude (top right), and the number of detected modes (bottom right) for the β Cephei and candidate stars [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Detection level of periodic variability in the β Cephei do￾main for stars classified as β Cephei pulsators (filled black circles) and candidates (open red circles). Note the logarithmic ordinate scale. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Power KELT 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Power TESS TIC 295435513 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Freq. [d 1 ] 0.00 0.02 Power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase-folded light curves of the eclipsing binaries dis￾covered in this work; the pulsational variability has been removed for clarity. Black points show the KELT data and red points show the binned data to illustrate the basic light curve shape. Inspecting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Phased light curves of the four β Cephei stars whose light curves show the “stillstand phenomenon,” when phased to their primary period. Black points show the KELT data, red points show the binned data, with 35 bins in phase, and the red curve shows a four-term sinusoidal fit to the binned data. Of these, HD 231124 is the only newly-reported β Cephei star. The other three are known β Cephei pulsators where… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Phased light curves for systems with non-sinusoidal sig￾nals. Symbols are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic β Cephei mode spectra for stars with equal frequency splittings. The signals suspected to form multiplets are indicated with thick red lines, other oscillation frequencies with thin black lines. Note that some of these possible multiplets are incomplete, that some stars have more than one splitting with the same spacing (that may sometimes even overlap in frequency), and that for two stars, HD 22… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Distribution of β Cephei (filled black circles) and candi￾date stars (open red circles) according to their Galactic latitude and distance from the Galactic plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Yearly values of the pulsation period of V652 Her (dots with error bars) compared to the fit to earlier data by Kilkenny et al. (2005). 5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Through a periodicity analysis of light curves from the KELT survey for O- and B-type stars, we identify 113 β Cephei pulsators, of which 89 are new discoveries. We iden￾tify a further 96 stars as β Cephei candidates, a group that likely cont… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the results of a search for Galactic Beta Cephei stars, which are massive pulsating stars with both pressure modes and mixed modes. Thus, these stars can serve as benchmarks for seismological studies of the interiors of massive stars. We conducted the search by performing a frequency analysis on the optical light curves of known O- and B-type stars with data from the KELT exoplanet survey. We identify 113 Beta Cephei stars, of which 86 are new discoveries, which altogether represents a ~70% increase in the number presently known. An additional 96 candidates are identified. Among our targets, we find five new eclipsing binaries and 22 stars with equal frequency spacings suggestive of rotational splitting of nonradial pulsation modes. Candidates for runaway stars among our targets and a number of interesting individual objects are discussed. Most of the known and newly discovered Beta Cephei stars will be observed by the TESS mission, providing by far the most comprehensive observational data set of massive main sequence pulsating stars of sufficient quality for detailed asteroseismic studies. Future analysis of these light curves has the potential to dramatically increase our understanding of the structure of stellar interiors and the physical processes taking place therein.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a search for Galactic Beta Cephei stars via frequency analysis of KELT light curves for known O- and B-type stars. It identifies 113 Beta Cephei stars (86 new discoveries, a ~70% increase in the known sample), plus 96 additional candidates, 5 new eclipsing binaries, and 22 stars showing equal frequency spacings suggestive of rotational splitting. Many targets are noted as suitable for TESS asteroseismology.

Significance. If the classifications hold, the expanded sample would provide a substantially larger set of massive pulsators for detailed seismic modeling of stellar interiors, especially once TESS light curves become available. The work is primarily observational and adds to the catalog of known Beta Cephei stars without introducing new theoretical derivations or parameter-free predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods (frequency analysis and classification)] The central claim of 113 secure Beta Cephei identifications (including the net ~70% increase) rests on the frequency-analysis pipeline in the methods section. The frequency window (typically 3–20 d⁻¹) and amplitude cuts used to isolate p-modes are not shown to have quantified overlap with SPB g-modes, daily aliases, or rotational signals; without explicit false-positive rates or cross-validation against known contaminants, the purity of the sample cannot be assessed.
  2. [Results (sample table)] Table or figure presenting the final sample (likely Table 1 or equivalent) lists the 113 stars but supplies no per-object validation metrics (e.g., number of independent modes, signal-to-noise thresholds, or comparison to literature classifications) that would allow readers to evaluate the reliability of the new discoveries versus the 96 candidates.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the discovery numbers but does not mention the total number of O/B stars initially searched or the selection function; adding this context would clarify the completeness of the search.
  2. [Methods] Notation for frequencies (e.g., d⁻¹ units) and amplitude thresholds should be defined consistently in the first methods subsection where they appear.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The two major comments identify areas where additional detail on validation and sample purity would strengthen the manuscript. We address each point below and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods (frequency analysis and classification)] The central claim of 113 secure Beta Cephei identifications (including the net ~70% increase) rests on the frequency-analysis pipeline in the methods section. The frequency window (typically 3–20 d⁻¹) and amplitude cuts used to isolate p-modes are not shown to have quantified overlap with SPB g-modes, daily aliases, or rotational signals; without explicit false-positive rates or cross-validation against known contaminants, the purity of the sample cannot be assessed.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the methods section does not include a quantitative false-positive analysis or explicit overlap estimates with SPB stars, aliases, or rotational modulation. The 3–20 d⁻¹ window and amplitude thresholds follow conventions from prior β Cephei surveys to target p-modes, and we performed literature cross-checks on the 27 previously known β Cephei stars recovered in our input list. However, we did not compute simulated false-positive rates or formal purity metrics. We will revise the methods section to add a dedicated paragraph discussing potential contaminants, the rationale for the frequency window, and an estimate of sample purity derived from the recovery rate of known objects plus a simple Monte Carlo assessment of aliasing and noise properties in the KELT data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (sample table)] Table or figure presenting the final sample (likely Table 1 or equivalent) lists the 113 stars but supplies no per-object validation metrics (e.g., number of independent modes, signal-to-noise thresholds, or comparison to literature classifications) that would allow readers to evaluate the reliability of the new discoveries versus the 96 candidates.

    Authors: We agree that the current Table 1 (or equivalent) lacks per-star metrics that would let readers judge classification reliability. The table reports only basic identifiers, coordinates, and a binary flag for new versus known. In the revised manuscript we will expand the table (or add a supplementary table) to include, for each star: the number of independent frequencies detected above the chosen S/N threshold, the highest S/N value, and a brief literature-comparison note. This will allow direct comparison between the 113 secure identifications and the 96 candidates. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Observational discovery report with no derivation chain or self-referential elements

full rationale

The paper performs a frequency analysis on KELT light curves of known O/B stars to identify Beta Cephei candidates using established frequency ranges (typically 3-20 d^{-1} for p-modes) and amplitude criteria. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations are load-bearing for the central count of 113 stars (86 new). Classification applies external definitions of Beta Cephei variability to new photometry; the result does not reduce to its inputs by construction and is self-contained against catalog benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that Beta Cephei stars are defined by the presence of both pressure and mixed modes detectable in optical photometry, plus the assumption that KELT sampling is sufficient to resolve those frequencies.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Beta Cephei stars are massive pulsating stars with both pressure modes and mixed modes.
    Stated directly in the first sentence of the abstract as the target class definition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5789 in / 1142 out tokens · 28463 ms · 2026-05-24T15:15:28.110764+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TESS Observations of Stochastic Low-frequency Variability in Extreme Helium Stars

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TESS data show stochastic low-frequency variability dominates in most extreme helium stars, with characteristic timescales of 0.5-10 days correlating to stellar parameters and matching subsurface convection predictions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2011, A&A, 534, A98, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117629

    Aerts, C., Briquet, M., Degroote, P., Thoul, A., & van Hoolst, T. 2011, A&A, 534, A98, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117629

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117629 2011

  2. [2]

    2003, Science, 300, 1926, doi: 10.1126/science.1084993

    Aerts, C., Thoul, A., Daszy´nska, J., et al. 2003, Science, 300, 1926, doi: 10.1126/science.1084993

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1084993 2003

  3. [3]

    2017, ApJL, 847, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8a62

    Aerts, C., Van Reeth, T., & Tkachenko, A. 2017, ApJL, 847, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8a62

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa8a62 2017

  4. [4]

    1994, A&A, 286, 136

    Aerts, C., Waelkens, C., & de Pauw, M. 1994, A&A, 286, 136

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    2004, A&A, 415, 241, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034142

    Aerts, C., Waelkens, C., Daszy´nska-Daszkiewicz, J., et al. 2004, A&A, 415, 241, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034142

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034142 2004

  6. [6]

    V ., Matthews, J

    Aerts, C., Marchenko, S. V ., Matthews, J. M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 470, doi: 10.1086/500800 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    work page doi:10.1086/500800 2006

  7. [7]

    M., & Steele, I

    Barnsley, R. M., & Steele, I. A. 2013, A&A, 556, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220419 Braganc ¸a, G. A., Daflon, S., Cunha, K., et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 130, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/130

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220419 2013

  8. [8]

    1993, A&A, 271, 482

    Breger, M., Stich, J., Garrido, R., et al. 1993, A&A, 271, 482

    work page 1993

  9. [9]

    and Shibahashi , H

    Briquet, M., Neiner, C., Aerts, C., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 483, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21933.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21933.x 2012

  10. [10]

    A., James, D

    Cargile, P. A., James, D. J., Pepper, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 782, 29, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/29

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/782/1/29 2014

  11. [11]

    L., Valette, B., & Carraro, G

    Chen, B., Vergely, J. L., Valette, B., & Carraro, G. 1998, A&A, 336, 137

    work page 1998

  12. [12]

    and Shibahashi , H

    Chini, R., Hoffmeister, V . H., Nasseri, A., Stahl, O., & Zinnecker, H. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1925, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21317.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21317.x 2012

  13. [13]

    S., & Steele, I

    Clark, J. S., & Steele, I. A. 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 141, 65, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000310

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:2000310 2000

  14. [14]

    Cousins, A. W. J. 1982, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 2158

    work page 1982

  15. [15]

    Crawford, D. L. 1978, AJ, 83, 48, doi: 10.1086/112176 Daflon, S., Cunha, K., de Ara ´ujo, F. X., Wolff, S., & Przybilla, N. 2007, AJ, 134, 1570, doi: 10.1086/521707 Daszy´nska-Daszkiewicz, J., Ostrowski, J., & Pamyatnykh, A. A. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 3153, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt670 De Cat, P. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference

    work page doi:10.1086/112176 1978

  16. [16]

    259, IAU Colloq

    Series, V ol. 259, IAU Colloq. 185: Radial and Nonradial Pulsationsn as Probes of Stellar Physics, ed. C. Aerts, T. R. Bedding, & J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, 196 De Cat, P., & Aerts, C. 2002, A&A, 393, 965, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021068 De Cat, P., Briquet, M., Aerts, C., et al. 2007, A&A, 463, 243, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066202

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021068 2002

  17. [17]

    2009, A&A, 506, 111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911782

    Degroote, P., Briquet, M., Catala, C., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911782

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911782 2009

  18. [18]

    G., & Beslin, W

    Deupree, R. G., & Beslin, W. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1900, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/1900

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/721/2/1900 2010

  19. [19]

    2004, A&A, 415, 251, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034143

    Dupret, M.-A., Thoul, A., Scuflaire, R., et al. 2004, A&A, 415, 251, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034143

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034143 2004

  20. [20]

    A., & Goode, P

    Dziembowski, W. A., & Goode, P. R. 1992, ApJ, 394, 670, doi: 10.1086/171621

    work page doi:10.1086/171621 1992

  21. [21]

    A., Moskalik, P., & Pamyatnykh, A

    Dziembowski, W. A., Moskalik, P., & Pamyatnykh, A. A. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 588, doi: 10.1093/mnras/265.3.588

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/265.3.588 1993

  22. [22]

    T., Ogilvie G

    Dziembowski, W. A., & Pamyatnykh, A. A. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 2061, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12964.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12964.x 2008

  23. [23]

    2004, A&A, 426, 687, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040418 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J

    Fokin, A., Mathias, P., Chapellier, E., Gillet, D., & Nardetto, N. 2004, A&A, 426, 687, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040418 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040418 2004

  24. [24]

    F., Hiltner, W

    Garrison, R. F., Hiltner, W. A., & Schild, R. E. 1977, ApJS, 35, 111, doi: 10.1086/190468

    work page doi:10.1086/190468 1977

  25. [25]

    P., & Lange, A

    Groote, D., Kaufmann, J. P., & Lange, A. 1982, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 50, 77

    work page 1982

  26. [26]

    Guetter, H. H. 1979, AJ, 84, 1846, doi: 10.1086/112616

    work page doi:10.1086/112616 1979

  27. [27]

    R., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15167.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.398..607V 398, 607

    Handler, G. 2005, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 5667 —. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 1339, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15005.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15005.x 2005

  28. [28]

    2011, A&A, 533, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116874

    Handler, G., & Meingast, S. 2011, A&A, 533, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116874

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116874 2011

  29. [29]

    Jiang, F

    Handler, G., Shobbrook, R. R., Vuthela, F. F., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1005, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06487.x New Beta Cephei stars with KELT 39

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06487.x 2003

  30. [30]

    and LeBlanc , F

    Handler, G., Balona, L. A., Shobbrook, R. R., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 262, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05295.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05295.x 2002

  31. [31]

    A., okas E

    Handler, G., Jerzykiewicz, M., Rodr´ıguez, E., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 327, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09728.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09728.x 2006

  32. [32]

    2019, ApJL, 873, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab095f

    Handler, G., Pigulski, A., Daszy´nska-Daszkiewicz, J., et al. 2019, ApJL, 873, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab095f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab095f 2019

  33. [33]

    I., & Mason, B

    Hartkopf, W. I., & Mason, B. D. 2009, AJ, 138, 813, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/3/813

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/3/813 2009

  34. [34]

    1956, Astronomische Nachrichten, 283, 109, doi: 10.1002/asna.19562830211

    Heckmann, O., Dieckvoss, W., & Kox, H. 1956, Astronomische Nachrichten, 283, 109, doi: 10.1002/asna.19562830211

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.19562830211 1956

  35. [35]

    1992, A&AS, 96, 207

    Heynderickx, D. 1992, A&AS, 96, 207

    work page 1992

  36. [36]

    1999, Michigan Spectral Survey, 5, 0

    Houk, N., & Swift, C. 1999, Michigan Spectral Survey, 5, 0

    work page 1999

  37. [37]

    R., & McSwain, M

    Huang, W., Gies, D. R., & McSwain, M. V . 2010, ApJ, 722, 605, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/605

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/722/1/605 2010

  38. [38]

    2009, A&A, 506, 95, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911928

    Huat, A.-L., Hubert, A.-M., Baudin, F., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 95, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911928

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911928 2009

  39. [39]

    1982, in IAU Symposium, V ol

    Jaschek, M., & Egret, D. 1982, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 98, Be Stars, ed. M. Jaschek & H.-G. Groth, 261 Jeffery, C. S. 2014, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 301, Precision Asteroseismology, ed. J. A. Guzik, W. J. Chaplin, G. Handler, & A. Pigulski, 297–304, doi: 10.1017/S1743921313014488 Jeffery, C. S., & Ramsay, G. 2018, MNRAS, 475, L122, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly015

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921313014488 1982

  40. [40]

    2009, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 5881 Kahraman Alic ¸avus ¸, F

    Jurcsik, J., Sodor, A., & Hajdu, G. 2009, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 5881 Kahraman Alic ¸avus ¸, F. 2016, personal communication

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    1972, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 7, 35

    Karlsson, B. 1972, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 7, 35

    work page 1972

  42. [42]

    J., Reeves J

    Kawka, A., Vennes, S., N´emeth, P., Kraus, M., & Kub´at, J. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 992, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17165.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17165.x 2010

  43. [43]

    V ., Samus, N

    Kazarovets, E. V ., Samus, N. N., Durlevich, O. V ., et al. 1999, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 4659, 1

    work page 1999

  44. [44]

    D., & Kilkenny, D

    Kelly, B. D., & Kilkenny, D. 1986, South African Astronomical Observatory Circular, 10, 27

    work page 1986

  45. [45]

    A., okas E

    Kilkenny, D., Crause, L. A., & van Wyk, F. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 559, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09188.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09188.x 2005

  46. [46]

    T., Done C., Smith D

    Kilkenny, D., Koen, C., Jeffery, C. S., Hill, N. C., & O’Donoghue, D. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 1119, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.03012.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.03012.x 1999

  47. [47]

    and LeBlanc , F

    Koen, C., & Eyer, L. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 45, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05150.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05150.x 2002

  48. [48]

    L., & Nicolet, B

    Kunzli, M., North, P., Kurucz, R. L., & Nicolet, B. 1997, A&AS, 122, 51, doi: 10.1051/aas:1997291

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1997291 1997

  49. [49]

    Bowman, D. M. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3015, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv868

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv868 2015

  50. [50]

    V ., et al

    Labadie-Bartz, J., Pepper, J., McSwain, M. V ., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 252, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6396

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa6396 2017

  51. [51]

    Communications in Asteroseismology , year = 2005, month = jun, volume =

    Lenz, P., & Breger, M. 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53, doi: 10.1553/cia146s53

    work page doi:10.1553/cia146s53 2005

  52. [52]

    1975, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 87, 173, doi: 10.1086/129741

    Levato, H., & Malaroda, S. 1975, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 87, 173, doi: 10.1086/129741

    work page doi:10.1086/129741 1975

  53. [53]

    Luri, X., Brown, A. G. A., Sarro, L. M., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832964

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832964 2018

  54. [54]

    1987, A&A, 178, 159

    Maeder, A. 1987, A&A, 178, 159

    work page 1987

  55. [55]

    Martin, J. C. 2006, AJ, 131, 3047, doi: 10.1086/504079

    work page doi:10.1086/504079 2006

  56. [56]

    2013, A&A, 560, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322480

    Martins, F., & Palacios, A. 2013, A&A, 560, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322480

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322480 2013

  57. [57]

    B., & Cambon, T

    Mathias, P., Gillet, D., Fokin, A. B., & Cambon, T. 1998, A&A, 339, 525

    work page 1998

  58. [58]

    2006, A&A, 459, 589, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064980

    Mazumdar, A., Briquet, M., Desmet, M., & Aerts, C. 2006, A&A, 459, 589, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064980

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20064980 2006

  59. [59]

    1997, A&AS, 124, 349, doi: 10.1051/aas:1997197

    Mermilliod, J.-C., Mermilliod, M., & Hauck, B. 1997, A&AS, 124, 349, doi: 10.1051/aas:1997197

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1997197 1997

  60. [60]

    2015, ApJ, 801, 113, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/113

    Moe, M., & Di Stefano, R. 2015, ApJ, 801, 113, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/113

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/2/113 2015

  61. [61]

    H., & O’Donoghue, D

    Montgomery, M. H., & O’Donoghue, D. 1999, Delta Scuti Star Newsletter, 13, 28

    work page 1999

  62. [62]

    Moskalik, P., & Dziembowski, W. A. 1992, A&A, 256, L5

    work page 1992

  63. [63]

    1994, A&A, 282, 843

    Mowlavi, N., & Forestini, M. 1994, A&A, 282, 843

    work page 1994

  64. [64]

    1993, A&A, 268, 653

    Napiwotzki, R., Schoenberner, D., & Wenske, V . 1993, A&A, 268, 653

    work page 1993

  65. [65]

    M., North, P., & Hubrig, S

    Netopil, M., Paunzen, E., Maitzen, H. M., North, P., & Hubrig, S. 2008, A&A, 491, 545, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810325

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810325 2008

  66. [66]

    M., Papadakis I

    Pamyatnykh, A. A., Handler, G., & Dziembowski, W. A. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 1022, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07721.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07721.x 2004

  67. [67]

    2015, A&A, 580, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526413

    Paunzen, E. 2015, A&A, 580, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526413

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526413 2015

  68. [68]

    J., Mamajek E

    Pecaut, M. J., & Mamajek, E. E. 2013, ApJS, 208, 9, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 2013

  69. [69]

    B., Siverd, R., James, D., & Stassun, K

    Pepper, J., Kuhn, R. B., Siverd, R., James, D., & Stassun, K. 2012, PASP, 124, 230, doi: 10.1086/665044

    work page doi:10.1086/665044 2012

  70. [70]

    W., DePoy, D

    Pepper, J., Pogge, R. W., DePoy, D. L., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 923, doi: 10.1086/521836

    work page doi:10.1086/521836 2007

  71. [71]

    2008, A&A, 477, 917, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078581

    Pigulski, A., & Pojma´nski, G. 2008, A&A, 477, 917, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078581

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078581 2008

  72. [72]

    2016, A&A, 588, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527872

    Pigulski, A., Cugier, H., Popowicz, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527872

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527872 2016

  73. [73]

    1967, Boletin de los Observatorios Tonantzintla y Tacubaya, 4, 86

    Poveda, A., Ruiz, J., & Allen, C. 1967, Boletin de los Observatorios Tonantzintla y Tacubaya, 4, 86

    work page 1967

  74. [74]

    Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS)

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2014, in Proc. SPIE, V ol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, 914320, doi: 10.1117/12.2063489

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2063489 2014

  75. [75]

    Rivinius, T., Baade, D., & Carciofi, A. C. 2016, A&A, 593, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628411

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628411 2016

  76. [76]

    C., Martayan C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    Rivinius, T., Carciofi, A. C., & Martayan, C. 2013, A&A Rv, 21, 69, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0 2013

  77. [77]

    2013, AJ, 146, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/102 40 L abadie-Bartz et al

    Saesen, S., Briquet, M., Aerts, C., Miglio, A., & Carrier, F. 2013, AJ, 146, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/102 40 L abadie-Bartz et al

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/102 2013

  78. [78]

    2014, A&A, 569, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323259 Skiff, B

    Eggenberger, P. 2014, A&A, 569, A18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323259 Skiff, B. A. 2014, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 1

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323259 2014

  79. [79]

    doi:10.1086/429408 , eprint =

    Stankov, A., & Handler, G. 2005, ApJS, 158, 193, doi: 10.1086/429408

    work page doi:10.1086/429408 2005

  80. [80]

    G., Oelkers, R

    Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Pepper, J., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad050

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aad050 2018

Showing first 80 references.