REVIEW 2 cited by
Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Deep neural networks (DNN) have achieved unprecedented success in numerous machine learning tasks in various domains. However, the existence of adversarial examples has raised concerns about applying deep learning to safety-critical applications. As a result, we have witnessed increasing interests in studying attack and defense mechanisms for DNN models on different data types, such as images, graphs and text. Thus, it is necessary to provide a systematic and comprehensive overview of the main threats of attacks and the success of corresponding countermeasures. In this survey, we review the state of the art algorithms for generating adversarial examples and the countermeasures against adversarial examples, for the three popular data types, i.e., images, graphs and text.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Transferring Robustness for Graph Neural Network Against Poisoning Attacks
PA-GNN meta-learns to penalize adversarial edges on clean graphs and retains that penalization when fine-tuned on a poisoned graph, improving node classification accuracy under poisoning attacks.
-
Does Low Rank Adaptation Lead to Lower Robustness against Training-Time Attacks?
LoRA fine-tuning is more robust than full fine-tuning against backdoor attacks but more vulnerable to untargeted label-flipping poisoning, based on BERT/GLUE experiments and NTK-information-geometry analysis.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.