REVIEW 2 cited by
Emergence of Pragmatics from Referential Game between Theory of Mind Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Pragmatics studies how context can contribute to language meanings. In human communication, language is never interpreted out of context, and sentences can usually convey more information than their literal meanings. However, this mechanism is missing in most multi-agent systems, restricting the communication efficiency and the capability of human-agent interaction. In this paper, we propose an algorithm, using which agents can spontaneously learn the ability to "read between lines" without any explicit hand-designed rules. We integrate the theory of mind (ToM) in a cooperative multi-agent pedagogical situation and propose an adaptive reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm to develop a communication protocol. ToM is a profound cognitive science concept, claiming that people regularly reason about other's mental states, including beliefs, goals, and intentions, to obtain performance advantage in competition, cooperation or coalition. With this ability, agents consider language as not only messages but also rational acts reflecting others' hidden states. Our experiments demonstrate the advantage of pragmatic protocols over non-pragmatic protocols. We also show the teaching complexity following the pragmatic protocol empirically approximates to recursive teaching dimension (RTD).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Thinking vs. Doing: Agents that Reason by Scaling Test-Time Interaction
Scaling the number of interaction steps, trained via a curriculum over rollout horizon, improves web-agent task success and outperforms scaling per-step reasoning under fixed token budgets.
-
CoMet: Metaphor-Driven Covert Communication for Multi-Agent Language Games
CoMet couples a hypothesis-testing metaphor reasoner with a self-improving metaphor generator, and the resulting LLM agents win more often in metaphor-heavy language games.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.