Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Novel Framework for Selection of GANs for an Application

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.08641 v2 pith:K73XCL5O submitted 2020-02-20 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CVstat.ML
keywords gansapplicationframeworknovelpointaddressingadversarialappropriate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) is a current focal point of research. The body of knowledge is fragmented, leading to a trial-error method while selecting an appropriate GAN for a given scenario. We provide a comprehensive summary of the evolution of GANs starting from its inception addressing issues like mode collapse, vanishing gradient, unstable training and non-convergence. We also provide a comparison of various GANs from the application point of view, its behaviour and implementation details. We propose a novel framework to identify candidate GANs for a specific use case based on architecture, loss, regularization and divergence. We also discuss application of the framework using an example, and we demonstrate a significant reduction in search space. This efficient way to determine potential GANs lowers unit economics of AI development for organizations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Diffusion-Based Approaches in Medical Image Generation and Analysis

    eess.IV 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    CNNs trained only on diffusion-generated synthetic medical images achieved 72-91% accuracy on real test images across three domains, but no comparison to models trained on real data was performed.

Pith tools