Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Stochastic gradient descent with random learning rate

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.06926 v4 pith:RNNBJPCC submitted 2020-03-15 cs.LG math.OCphysics.data-anstat.ML

classification cs.LGmath.OCphysics.data-anstat.ML
keywords learningraterandomstochasticalgorithmdescentgradientnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose to optimize neural networks with a uniformly-distributed random learning rate. The associated stochastic gradient descent algorithm can be approximated by continuous stochastic equations and analyzed within the Fokker-Planck formalism. In the small learning rate regime, the training process is characterized by an effective temperature which depends on the average learning rate, the mini-batch size and the momentum of the optimization algorithm. By comparing the random learning rate protocol with cyclic and constant protocols, we suggest that the random choice is generically the best strategy in the small learning rate regime, yielding better regularization without extra computational cost. We provide supporting evidence through experiments on both shallow, fully-connected and deep, convolutional neural networks for image classification on the MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Regime-Switching Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithms

    stat.CO 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Regime-switching LMC and KLMC variants inherit Gibbs invariance and get W2 convergence bounds; the headline FRS-KLMC O(1/sqrt(epsilon)) complexity is not supported by the given proof.

Pith tools