Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Few-Shot Learning for Opinion Summarization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.14884 v3 pith:K4CHZBZR submitted 2020-04-30 cs.LG cs.CLcs.NEstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CLcs.NEstat.ML
keywords summariespropertiesproductreviewssummarizationtextabstractiveautomatic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Opinion summarization is the automatic creation of text reflecting subjective information expressed in multiple documents, such as user reviews of a product. The task is practically important and has attracted a lot of attention. However, due to the high cost of summary production, datasets large enough for training supervised models are lacking. Instead, the task has been traditionally approached with extractive methods that learn to select text fragments in an unsupervised or weakly-supervised way. Recently, it has been shown that abstractive summaries, potentially more fluent and better at reflecting conflicting information, can also be produced in an unsupervised fashion. However, these models, not being exposed to actual summaries, fail to capture their essential properties. In this work, we show that even a handful of summaries is sufficient to bootstrap generation of the summary text with all expected properties, such as writing style, informativeness, fluency, and sentiment preservation. We start by training a conditional Transformer language model to generate a new product review given other available reviews of the product. The model is also conditioned on review properties that are directly related to summaries; the properties are derived from reviews with no manual effort. In the second stage, we fine-tune a plug-in module that learns to predict property values on a handful of summaries. This lets us switch the generator to the summarization mode. We show on Amazon and Yelp datasets that our approach substantially outperforms previous extractive and abstractive methods in automatic and human evaluation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLMs as Architects and Critics for Multi-Source Opinion Summarization

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new benchmark and prompt framework for generating and automatically evaluating product summaries that blend customer reviews with product metadata, with the best evaluator reaching 0.74 average Spearman correlation ...

Pith tools