REVIEW 3 cited by
Exploring Transformers for Large-Scale Speech Recognition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
While recurrent neural networks still largely define state-of-the-art speech recognition systems, the Transformer network has been proven to be a competitive alternative, especially in the offline condition. Most studies with Transformers have been constrained in a relatively small scale setting, and some forms of data argumentation approaches are usually applied to combat the data sparsity issue. In this paper, we aim at understanding the behaviors of Transformers in the large-scale speech recognition setting, where we have used around 65,000 hours of training data. We investigated various aspects on scaling up Transformers, including model initialization, warmup training as well as different Layer Normalization strategies. In the streaming condition, we compared the widely used attention mask based future context lookahead approach to the Transformer-XL network. From our experiments, we show that Transformers can achieve around 6% relative word error rate (WER) reduction compared to the BLSTM baseline in the offline fashion, while in the streaming fashion, Transformer-XL is comparable to LC-BLSTM with 800 millisecond latency constraint.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
A multilevel approach to accelerate the training of Transformers
A multilevel scheme that alternates fine transformer training with two half-depth coarse models reaches the single-level training loss with 44 percent fewer FLOPs on one small language-model setup.
-
Advancing Arabic Speech Recognition Through Large-Scale Weakly Supervised Learning
A Conformer-based Arabic ASR trained from scratch on 15,000 hours of weak labels outperforms several open and closed-source models on standard Arabic benchmarks.
-
Which one Performs Better? Wav2Vec or Whisper? Applying both in Badini Kurdish Speech to Text (BKSTT)
A new Badini Kurdish speech corpus and a comparison of Wav2Vec2 versus Whisper show Wav2Vec2 achieves 82.67% accuracy versus Whisper's 53.17%.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.